Video - Why Vaccines Aren't Safe - Mary Tocco, Michigan

In article ,
wrote:
On Feb 17, 2:07*pm, Kevysmom wrote:
The flu vaccine that babies receive still has 12.5 mcg of mercury in
it, Babies get two of these.

On Feb 17, 1:37*pm, "JOHN" wrote:



"D. C. Sessions" wrote in
...

In message , JOHN wrote:

And the page is inaccurate. For example, it states that vaccines are
immune suppressing. That is false.

http://whale.to/vaccines/autoimmune1.htm

Mercury is hardly an immune booster:

Which has -- what? -- to do with vaccines, since they don't have
any mercury in them?

--

"D. C. Sessions" wrote in message
...

Mercury is hardly an immune booster:

Which has -- what? -- to do with vaccines, since they don't have any
mercury in them?

They did for the last 50 years or so, still do for the third world, and
still in flu vaccines, some tetanus
etchttp://www.vaccinesafety.edu/thi-table.htm

and there may still eb trace amounts which they don't have to declare

And then we have all the other poisons Jeff calls *'immune boosters' like
aluminium etc

try and get the facts first- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

If you look at the recent video on vaccines, you will find this data:
1950 mercury exposure was 50 mcg.
1970 mercury exposure was 75 mcg.
1992 mercury exposure was 187.5 mcg
2003 mercury exposure was 212.5 mcg.

And what, pray, are the 2008 numbers? I'm not too worried about 2003
unless someone is planning on sending us all back in time.

-- David Wright :: alphabeta at copper.net
These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
"Without Bush, what will America's schoolchildren have to look down on?"
-- Bill Maher

"David Wright"

On Feb 17

"David Wright" wrote:

On Feb 17, 2:07 pm

Old news, Davey. Are you bored?