Unpeeling the stinky little spring onion

After taking free shots at parents for years, no-spanks are finally
getting tarred and feathered with their own shortcomings.

:-( There is the "educational flatline" that began about the time the
no-spank worm began to eat away at feminist-dominated schools.

:-( There is the creeping mold of youth street gang activity that
began after the feminist-dominated child welfare Schutzstaffel and a
"war on men" began to make no-spank the de facto law of the land in
low-income lone-parent homes.

:-( There is the link to no-spank laissez-faire parenting and its wild
bunch kids who have helped turn schools into zoos.

:-( There is questionable self-serving no-spank research that ALWAYS
found spanking to be bad. (It's a little like the bank teller who
ALWAYS comes out exactly even at the end of each business day!)

:-( There is the fact that never spanked kids really don't turn out
any better.

Layer after layer, as the stinky little spring onion of no-spank gets
peeled away to reveal the naked empress of feminism. She is a
self-serving and despicable little narcissist to rival any evil queen
to stride across the pages of fairytale or myth. She takes more than
she gives and is so cowardly at to hide behind women and children.
No-spank was all about her. Children were merely the excuse.

Opinions wrote:
After taking free shots at parents for years, no-spanks are finally
getting tarred and feathered with their own shortcomings.

:-( There is the "educational flatline" that began about the time the
no-spank worm began to eat away at feminist-dominated schools.

No there isn't. In fact those schools that have banned paddling are in
the vanguard if recognized high achievement outcomes.

:-( There is the creeping mold of youth street gang activity that
began after the feminist-dominated child welfare Schutzstaffel and a
"war on men" began to make no-spank the de facto law of the land in
low-income lone-parent homes.

You actually believe that other conditions in d'hood are not responsible?

They do spank their children there. In fact, rather a lot. And in
schools there the paddling is at it's highest rate over suburbs, and
rural. Who'd a thought.

:-( There is the link to no-spank laissez-faire parenting and its wild
bunch kids who have helped turn schools into zoos.

You are just a bundle of unfounded unproven and in fact oft disproven
announcements, aren't you, lil 'o'?

:-( There is questionable self-serving no-spank research that ALWAYS
found spanking to be bad. (It's a little like the bank teller who
ALWAYS comes out exactly even at the end of each business day!)

Gosh, who could argue with the profundity of that?

:-( There is the fact that never spanked kids really don't turn out
any better.

Where are you getting this "fact" from?

Layer after layer, as the stinky little spring onion

Inappropriate metaphor. You must have been often spanked. Spring onions
have a lovely delicate aroma that just cries out to make a leek and
onion soup.

of no-spank gets
peeled away to reveal the naked empress of feminism.

You sure got it in for women. I hope your wife managed to escape you
somehow.

She is a
self-serving and despicable little narcissist to rival any evil queen
to stride across the pages of fairytale or myth.

Well, it takes all kinds. I've met some really great feminists in my
time. Got exhausted gettin' laid to. You?

She takes more than
she gives and is so cowardly at to hide behind women and children.
No-spank was all about her. Children were merely the excuse.

lil 'o' your agenda is obviously one based on events that have left you
extremely bitter.

Did one of those kids you went back to spanking after failing at using
PET turn out to be queer?

And ****ed at you?

R R R R R

Just what you deserve.

You are so hate filled at women it oozes from your posts.

0:-



--
"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what
to have for lunch. Liberty is a well armed lamb
contesting the vote." - Benjamin Franklin

Opinions wrote:

After taking free shots at parents for years, no-spanks are finally
getting tarred and feathered with their own shortcomings.

:-( There is the "educational flatline" that began about the time the
no-spank worm began to eat away at feminist-dominated schools.

Of course, research has demonstrated just the opposite.

:-( There is the creeping mold of youth street gang activity that
began after the feminist-dominated child welfare Schutzstaffel and a
"war on men" began to make no-spank the de facto law of the land in
low-income lone-parent homes.

Street gang youth activity has been around for decades, even centuries.
Would you like references.

:-( There is the link to no-spank laissez-faire parenting and its wild
bunch kids who have helped turn schools into zoos.

This is a giggle. I suggest you post the link and I certainly hope the
link provides a full-text research article published in a peer-reviewed
journal. I'll wait.

:-( There is questionable self-serving no-spank research that ALWAYS
found spanking to be bad. (It's a little like the bank teller who
ALWAYS comes out exactly even at the end of each business day!)

There is no research that has found spanking to be more effective than
othet alternative and positive discipline strategies. If you have a
reference, please post the reference.

:-( There is the fact that never spanked kids really don't turn out
any better.

Layer after layer, as the stinky little spring onion of no-spank gets
peeled away to reveal the naked empress of feminism. She is a
self-serving and despicable little narcissist to rival any evil queen
to stride across the pages of fairytale or myth. She takes more than
she gives and is so cowardly at to hide behind women and children.
No-spank was all about her. Children were merely the excuse.

This must have been written by an adult child that was hit and hurt in
the name of discipline. His parents were not trustworthy. These
parents hurt their little child. It's natural to take out that hurt and
frustration on others, who as an adult, disagree.

I wish you well, Opinions. You must have been so terribly hurt as a
little child.

LaVonne

It hurts to be an abused child, a neglected child, an unwanted child,
and a neglected child, doesn't it? I feel the pain in your posts.

LaVonne

Opinions wrote:

After taking free shots at parents for years, no-spanks are finally
getting tarred and feathered with their own shortcomings.

:-( There is the "educational flatline" that began about the time the
no-spank worm began to eat away at feminist-dominated schools.

:-( There is the creeping mold of youth street gang activity that
began after the feminist-dominated child welfare Schutzstaffel and a
"war on men" began to make no-spank the de facto law of the land in
low-income lone-parent homes.

:-( There is the link to no-spank laissez-faire parenting and its wild
bunch kids who have helped turn schools into zoos.

:-( There is questionable self-serving no-spank research that ALWAYS
found spanking to be bad. (It's a little like the bank teller who
ALWAYS comes out exactly even at the end of each business day!)

:-( There is the fact that never spanked kids really don't turn out
any better.

Layer after layer, as the stinky little spring onion of no-spank gets
peeled away to reveal the naked empress of feminism. She is a
self-serving and despicable little narcissist to rival any evil queen
to stride across the pages of fairytale or myth. She takes more than
she gives and is so cowardly at to hide behind women and children.
No-spank was all about her. Children were merely the excuse.

Are you speaking from your own experience, LaVonne? ;-)

AFfromDreamLand

On Mon, 3 Apr 2006, Carlson LaVonne wrote:

It hurts to be an abused child, a neglected child, an unwanted child,
and a neglected child, doesn't it? I feel the pain in your posts.

LaVonne

Opinions wrote:

After taking free shots at parents for years, no-spanks are finally
getting tarred and feathered with their own shortcomings.

:-( There is the "educational flatline" that began about the time the
no-spank worm began to eat away at feminist-dominated schools.

:-( There is the creeping mold of youth street gang activity that
began after the feminist-dominated child welfare Schutzstaffel and a
"war on men" began to make no-spank the de facto law of the land in
low-income lone-parent homes.

:-( There is the link to no-spank laissez-faire parenting and its wild
bunch kids who have helped turn schools into zoos.

:-( There is questionable self-serving no-spank research that ALWAYS
found spanking to be bad. (It's a little like the bank teller who
ALWAYS comes out exactly even at the end of each business day!)

:-( There is the fact that never spanked kids really don't turn out
any better.

Layer after layer, as the stinky little spring onion of no-spank gets
peeled away to reveal the naked empress of feminism. She is a
self-serving and despicable little narcissist to rival any evil queen
to stride across the pages of fairytale or myth. She takes more than
she gives and is so cowardly at to hide behind women and children.
No-spank was all about her. Children were merely the excuse.

And all this that you have said has absolutly nothing to do with the disinegration of the Family right?

With over 50% of marriages ending in Divorce, and Many Many More unwed mothers having children, that has absolutly nothing to do with what you have written right?

The lack of discipline in the lives of our children has nothing to do with the fact that Parents are now spending 50+ hours a week outside of the home and when they do come home are plopping down in front of the television and NOT parenting.

Right...it's all because a handful of People decided that it was Damaging to spank children...Right...keep deluding yourself.

Originally Posted by Opinions

After taking free shots at parents for years, no-spanks are finally
getting tarred and feathered with their own shortcomings.

:-( There is the "educational flatline" that began about the time the
no-spank worm began to eat away at feminist-dominated schools.

:-( There is the creeping mold of youth street gang activity that
began after the feminist-dominated child welfare Schutzstaffel and a
"war on men" began to make no-spank the de facto law of the land in
low-income lone-parent homes.

:-( There is the link to no-spank laissez-faire parenting and its wild
bunch kids who have helped turn schools into zoos.

:-( There is questionable self-serving no-spank research that ALWAYS
found spanking to be bad. (It's a little like the bank teller who
ALWAYS comes out exactly even at the end of each business day!)

:-( There is the fact that never spanked kids really don't turn out
any better.

Layer after layer, as the stinky little spring onion of no-spank gets
peeled away to reveal the naked empress of feminism. She is a
self-serving and despicable little narcissist to rival any evil queen
to stride across the pages of fairytale or myth. She takes more than
she gives and is so cowardly at to hide behind women and children.
No-spank was all about her. Children were merely the excuse.

While no-spanks seem to have often had miserable childhoods, the closer
one gets to the feminist origins of no-spank, the more defensive
no-spanks become. Actually, "frenetic" is probably a more accurate
description.

It's like pulling back the curtain and revealing the Wizard pulling the
levers in Oz. As in Frank Baum's story, once parents see the cowardly
little creature behind the feminist-dominated child welfare
Schutzstaffel curtain, the power and terror or the bumbling
bureaucratic apparatus disappears.

Feminist-inspired no-spank is just another self-serving agenda
pretending to care about children.

Doan wrote:
Are you speaking from your own experience, LaVonne? ;-)

AFfromDreamLand

On Mon, 3 Apr 2006, Carlson LaVonne wrote:

It hurts to be an abused child, a neglected child, an unwanted child,
and a neglected child, doesn't it? I feel the pain in your posts.

LaVonne

Opinions wrote:

After taking free shots at parents for years, no-spanks are finally
getting tarred and feathered with their own shortcomings.

:-( There is the "educational flatline" that began about the time the
no-spank worm began to eat away at feminist-dominated schools.

:-( There is the creeping mold of youth street gang activity that
began after the feminist-dominated child welfare Schutzstaffel and a
"war on men" began to make no-spank the de facto law of the land in
low-income lone-parent homes.

:-( There is the link to no-spank laissez-faire parenting and its wild
bunch kids who have helped turn schools into zoos.

:-( There is questionable self-serving no-spank research that ALWAYS
found spanking to be bad. (It's a little like the bank teller who
ALWAYS comes out exactly even at the end of each business day!)

:-( There is the fact that never spanked kids really don't turn out
any better.

Layer after layer, as the stinky little spring onion of no-spank gets
peeled away to reveal the naked empress of feminism. She is a
self-serving and despicable little narcissist to rival any evil queen
to stride across the pages of fairytale or myth. She takes more than
she gives and is so cowardly at to hide behind women and children.
No-spank was all about her. Children were merely the excuse.

Opinions wrote:
While no-spanks seem

Your use of the verb "seems," reveals you lack conviction.

http://tinyurl.com/mco6c

You lack conviction because you lack facts.

You lack facts because when or IF you bother to find them they disagree
with your pet theories, thus you don't actually know if what you state
is true or false.

Making it innuendo.

Making you a coward that does not wish to have others challenge his
pontifications.

to have often had miserable childhoods, the closer
one gets to the feminist origins of no-spank, the more defensive
no-spanks become.

Proof for the "childhoods" allegation would be..?

Proof that no-spank is a feminist origin concept and effort, and that
there are not other origins and efforts...?

Actually, "frenetic" is probably a more accurate
description.

"Probably?" Don't you KNOW?

Actually, "frenetic" is most assuredly the best description of your pro
spanking women hating diatribes.

It's like pulling back the curtain and revealing the Wizard pulling the
levers in Oz.

A perfect metaphor for the claims that spanking works.

As in Frank Baum's story, once parents see the cowardly
little creature behind the feminist-dominated child welfare
Schutzstaffel curtain, the power and terror or the bumbling
bureaucratic apparatus disappears.

Exactly what has happened to the spanking advocates. Their cowardice is
revealed (as though THAT was hard to see...R R R R) and the failure as
well as danger of spanking.

Feminist-inspired no-spank is just another self-serving agenda
pretending to care about children.

And assaulting children is proof of love?

0:-




Doan wrote:
Are you speaking from your own experience, LaVonne? ;-)

AFfromDreamLand

On Mon, 3 Apr 2006, Carlson LaVonne wrote:

It hurts to be an abused child, a neglected child, an unwanted child,
and a neglected child, doesn't it? I feel the pain in your posts.

LaVonne

Opinions wrote:

After taking free shots at parents for years, no-spanks are finally
getting tarred and feathered with their own shortcomings.

:-( There is the "educational flatline" that began about the time the
no-spank worm began to eat away at feminist-dominated schools.

:-( There is the creeping mold of youth street gang activity that
began after the feminist-dominated child welfare Schutzstaffel and a
"war on men" began to make no-spank the de facto law of the land in
low-income lone-parent homes.

:-( There is the link to no-spank laissez-faire parenting and its wild
bunch kids who have helped turn schools into zoos.

:-( There is questionable self-serving no-spank research that ALWAYS
found spanking to be bad. (It's a little like the bank teller who
ALWAYS comes out exactly even at the end of each business day!)

:-( There is the fact that never spanked kids really don't turn out
any better.

Layer after layer, as the stinky little spring onion of no-spank gets
peeled away to reveal the naked empress of feminism. She is a
self-serving and despicable little narcissist to rival any evil queen
to stride across the pages of fairytale or myth. She takes more than
she gives and is so cowardly at to hide behind women and children.
No-spank was all about her. Children were merely the excuse.





--
"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what
to have for lunch. Liberty is a well armed lamb
contesting the vote." - Benjamin Franklin

But what does that say about outlawing spanking? Maybe a better solution
is to outlaw divorce and unwed mothers having children instead. Oh man!
It feels good to be an emperor. ;-)

AFfromDreamLand

On Tue, 4 Apr 2006, beccafromlalaland wrote:


And all this that you have said has absolutly nothing to do with the
disinegration of the Family right?

With over 50% of marriages ending in Divorce, and Many Many More unwed
mothers having children, that has absolutly nothing to do with what you
have written right?

The lack of discipline in the lives of our children has nothing to do
with the fact that Parents are now spending 50+ hours a week outside of
the home and when they do come home are plopping down in front of the
television and NOT parenting.

Right...it's all because a handful of People decided that it was
Damaging to spank children...Right...keep deluding yourself.




Opinions Wrote:
After taking free shots at parents for years, no-spanks are finally
getting tarred and feathered with their own shortcomings.

:-( There is the "educational flatline" that began about the time the
no-spank worm began to eat away at feminist-dominated schools.

:-( There is the creeping mold of youth street gang activity that
began after the feminist-dominated child welfare Schutzstaffel and a
"war on men" began to make no-spank the de facto law of the land in
low-income lone-parent homes.

:-( There is the link to no-spank laissez-faire parenting and its
wild
bunch kids who have helped turn schools into zoos.

:-( There is questionable self-serving no-spank research that ALWAYS
found spanking to be bad. (It's a little like the bank teller who
ALWAYS comes out exactly even at the end of each business day!)

:-( There is the fact that never spanked kids really don't turn out
any better.

Layer after layer, as the stinky little spring onion of no-spank gets
peeled away to reveal the naked empress of feminism. She is a
self-serving and despicable little narcissist to rival any evil queen
to stride across the pages of fairytale or myth. She takes more than
she gives and is so cowardly at to hide behind women and children.
No-spank was all about her. Children were merely the excuse.


--
beccafromlalaland

The problems with the American family seem to stem from a variety of
sources. One is the nature of women likely to arrive at American ports
of entry in the 19th and early 20th centuries. Another was the
instability of nuclear families without a broader context of extended
family and village support. A bad situation was made worse by feminists
trying to create the home front of World War II and a
feminist-dominated child welfare Schutzstaffel intent on getting men at
the first sign of domestic difficulties.

What most women fail to realize is that feminists sold them to
corporations as cheap labor. That is why family income hasn't seen any
real growth in decades and lone parents are more likely to live in
poverty. They are among the new slaves.

beccafromlalaland wrote:
And all this that you have said has absolutly nothing to do with the
disinegration of the Family right?

With over 50% of marriages ending in Divorce, and Many Many More unwed
mothers having children, that has absolutly nothing to do with what you
have written right?

The lack of discipline in the lives of our children has nothing to do
with the fact that Parents are now spending 50+ hours a week outside of
the home and when they do come home are plopping down in front of the
television and NOT parenting.

Right...it's all because a handful of People decided that it was
Damaging to spank children...Right...keep deluding yourself.




Opinions Wrote:
After taking free shots at parents for years, no-spanks are finally
getting tarred and feathered with their own shortcomings.

:-( There is the "educational flatline" that began about the time the
no-spank worm began to eat away at feminist-dominated schools.

:-( There is the creeping mold of youth street gang activity that
began after the feminist-dominated child welfare Schutzstaffel and a
"war on men" began to make no-spank the de facto law of the land in
low-income lone-parent homes.

:-( There is the link to no-spank laissez-faire parenting and its
wild
bunch kids who have helped turn schools into zoos.

:-( There is questionable self-serving no-spank research that ALWAYS
found spanking to be bad. (It's a little like the bank teller who
ALWAYS comes out exactly even at the end of each business day!)

:-( There is the fact that never spanked kids really don't turn out
any better.

Layer after layer, as the stinky little spring onion of no-spank gets
peeled away to reveal the naked empress of feminism. She is a
self-serving and despicable little narcissist to rival any evil queen
to stride across the pages of fairytale or myth. She takes more than
she gives and is so cowardly at to hide behind women and children.
No-spank was all about her. Children were merely the excuse.


--
beccafromlalaland