Unpeeling the stinky little spring onion

Greegor wrote:
Where is your conservatism?
Let me see it, Kane!

I answered.

Now, let me see yours.

0:-




--
"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what
to have for lunch. Liberty is a well armed lamb
contesting the vote." - Benjamin Franklin

Greegor wrote:
Where is your conservatism?
Let me see it, Kane!

Is it a conservative value to move in with a single mother, not marry
her, do "child care" while she works, and when the child is gone to
still stay home not working?

Is it conservatism to participate routinely in anti-government
squawkfests of lies and half-truths, and spinning facts into ravings?

Is it conservatism to support posters that advocate for beating children
naked in church by church members?

So, what is YOUR conservatism, Greg?

And have you finally gotten a job, or did you have one and got fired
recently, so that you have all this time to post?

Are YOU a conservative, Greg?

0:-



--
"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what
to have for lunch. Liberty is a well armed lamb
contesting the vote." - Benjamin Franklin

So you're not an economic conservative,
not a religious conservative and your
definition of conservative comes from
a dictionary?

Hitler defined himself as a National Socialist.
Did the dictionary definition fit?

Kane, I can't see you agreeing with
anybody else or anybody else agreeing
with you unless they have a common
financial interest. You used obscenity
publicly and worldwide for over a year
and she never saw it? Hahaha..

LaVonne is as kooky liberal as they come.

You say you are conservative but there
is no way you would get along with
any political group of any stripe.

You aren't a card carrying Republican are you?

Greegor wrote:
So you're not an economic conservative,
not a religious conservative and your
definition of conservative comes from
a dictionary?

Mmm...and the dictionary is not a good source for word definitions how?

Hitler defined himself as a National Socialist.
Did the dictionary definition fit?

I have no idea. Why don't you look it up and get back to us?

Kane, I can't see you agreeing with
anybody else or anybody else agreeing
with you unless they have a common
financial interest.

You seem rather limited in your views. That's a nonsensical statement,
Greg.

You used obscenity
publicly and worldwide for over a year
and she never saw it? Hahaha..

Who never saw it?

LaVonne is as kooky liberal as they come.

You can't debate her so it's ad hom time, right?

You say you are conservative but there
is no way you would get along with
any political group of any stripe.

Odd, I not only can, but do. I serve on two local political 'groups'
currently in my region. They sought ME out. I speak publicly to issues,
responding to visiting candidates and for incumbents when I wish...which
if fairly often.

In fact I challenged a Republican candidate in an open forum when came
up with the stupid, but popular, comment recently popularized by hard
right Christian conservatives that if you allowed homosexuals to marry
first thing you know people would be lobbying to marry their pets.


You aren't a card carrying Republican are you?


Sure am. But I don't think either party has a lock on goodness and
purity. Do you?

And what party are you registered to vote with, Greg?

Or are you going to continue to harass me with questions?

After all, if I'm answering YOURS and you are NOT answering mine, it's
obvious you have a need for a one sided conversation...hence YOU are
harassing me.

You are NOT fully participating in debate with me.

Got that?

Think it over, you little ****ant.

0:-



--
"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what
to have for lunch. Liberty is a well armed lamb
contesting the vote." - Benjamin Franklin

Greegor wrote:
Um, Kane, You already mentioned the two
social services panels, but now you are
trying to portray them as Republican activism?

Please provide enough attributions for others reading to not have to go
back and try to figure out what you are discussing.

If you actually wish to debate, rather than harass, you would do that
without being asked.

You seem very out of touch with how others perceive and react, Greegor.

I can see why you are a spanking advocate.

You are liberal in your view of government agencies,

You don't know whether I am or not. We have not discussed more than one
or two. There are many others.

liberal with your socialist anti spanking zealotry,

Socialists are anti-spankers? Never heard of that connection before.
Care to provide some examples.

liberal with your homophilia,

I have no such agenda. I am even handed with people based on their
actions and biases. I can find no reason to treat homosexuals different
than Italians.

liberal when it comes to spending taxes,

No I'm not. It's you folks that do that. You push for the design of
social programs that create not only more pain, loss, disruptions, but
in the end, will cost much more.

Spanking, for instance, as practiced in this country, with various
violent outcomes all to often (I just posted estimates of injury and
death from parents escalating from "spanking" to abuse) cost billions of
dollars.

Where's the conservatism?

Where's yours?

Your choice of toilet paper?

If your posts came on paper..yes.

0:-




--
"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what
to have for lunch. Liberty is a well armed lamb
contesting the vote." - Benjamin Franklin

It is not unheard of for a feminist to post as a man and imply all
sorts of conservative philosophical agreement with just 1 or 2
exceptions. Those exceptions usually are in keeping with the core of
the feminist agenda.

Here are some examples.

Schools are bad, but that's the fault of the robber barons 100 years
ago and has nothing to do with feminists running the schools today.

Christianity is fine so long as no one quote too much from the Old
Testament or Paul, and sticks to the warm fuzzy sayings of Jesus.

Fiscal conservatism is the way to go so long as funding isn't cut for
schools and child welfare agencies.

Spanking is okay, if you must, just make sure it's only one little
smack that is ineffective.

Greegor wrote:
Um, Kane, You already mentioned the two
social services panels, but now you are
trying to portray them as Republican activism?

You are liberal in your view of government agencies,
liberal with your socialist anti spanking zealotry,
liberal with your homophilia,
liberal when it comes to spending taxes,

Where's the conservatism?

Your choice of toilet paper?

Opinions wrote:
It is not unheard of for a feminist to post as a man and imply all
sorts of conservative philosophical agreement with just 1 or 2
exceptions.

Please post some examples with proof. You are lying, of course, again,
in your desperation. Sad.

Those exceptions usually are in keeping with the core of
the feminist agenda.

You fantasize that. You don't know what it is.

Here are some examples.

Schools are bad, but that's the fault of the robber barons 100 years
ago and has nothing to do with feminists running the schools today.

Actually you yourself have pointed out things that schools do to
children that in fact DO come from the Horace Mann model. And financed
and controlled all this time through teachings schools funding by Trusts
of those same old robber barons, long dead now. But still having the
same influence. Read John Gato.

Feminists don't run the schools.

Christianity is fine so long as no one quote too much from the Old
Testament or Paul, and sticks to the warm fuzzy sayings of Jesus.

Is this the same Jesus that scourged the money lenders in the temple?
Do you recall what it is claimed He said at the time?

Fiscal conservatism is the way to go so long as funding isn't cut for
schools and child welfare agencies.

Nice claim. No proof.

Spanking is okay, if you must, just make sure it's only one little
smack that is ineffective.

Yes, I once slipped in just that way. My kid was under heavy quilts and
I didn't even leave a dent in the covering let alone contact his bare
flesh.

Yet I knew in an instant that I had done something wrong. And I
corrected it. From that time on my son knew that he had my word and was
safe. I suspect that he wondered, since I am a very large strong man and
he had seen me physically fight off a mentally ill person that came to
our door and attacked my wife.

And he knew that other children got spanked. He had witnessed it.

You poor thing. You really are suffering with all the changes in the
world aren't you?

You just stay there and cling to your dreams, until the end.

0:-


Greegor wrote:
Um, Kane, You already mentioned the two
social services panels, but now you are
trying to portray them as Republican activism?

You are liberal in your view of government agencies,
liberal with your socialist anti spanking zealotry,
liberal with your homophilia,
liberal when it comes to spending taxes,

Where's the conservatism?

Your choice of toilet paper?



--
"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what
to have for lunch. Liberty is a well armed lamb
contesting the vote." - Benjamin Franklin