Retroactive Child Support Modification

Has anyone heard of this? My court date is this week and we are
asking for modifed payments retroactive to Jan. 06.

My income went down dramatically and Jan, 06 is when I filed for
original modification. Well, first court date she did not show up.
Second, her lawyer withdrew. Third, she had no lawyer and judge told
her to get one. Fourth, she had her addy impounded and changed jobs,
so sheriff never served papers.

Now this week is the Fifth. She has been served. I am just wondering
if the judge will order modification on the state guidelines, or, have
the actual balls to make it retroactive.
Do Woman Rule?

http://mylesbian.blogspot.com/

Save 50% On Your Student Loans

http://clc-micro.blogspot.com/

"stern" wrote
Has anyone heard of this? My court date is this week and we are
asking for modifed payments retroactive to Jan. 06.
....................
==
Support is generally modified retroactively to the date of filing.

"stern" wrote in message
oups.com...
Has anyone heard of this? My court date is this week and we are
asking for modifed payments retroactive to Jan. 06.

My income went down dramatically and Jan, 06 is when I filed for
original modification. Well, first court date she did not show up.
Second, her lawyer withdrew. Third, she had no lawyer and judge told
her to get one. Fourth, she had her addy impounded and changed jobs,
so sheriff never served papers.

Now this week is the Fifth. She has been served. I am just wondering
if the judge will order modification on the state guidelines, or, have
the actual balls to make it retroactive.
Do Woman Rule?


Good luck. I really do hope it is retroactive to when you filed. Sounds
like she has been leading you quite the dance.

On Jul 15, 7:11?am, stern wrote:
Has anyone heard of this? My court date is this week and we are
asking for modifed payments retroactive to Jan. 06.

My income went down dramatically and Jan, 06 is when I filed for
original modification. Well, first court date she did not show up.
Second, her lawyer withdrew. Third, she had no lawyer and judge told
her to get one. Fourth, she had her addy impounded and changed jobs,
so sheriff never served papers.

Now this week is the Fifth. She has been served. I am just wondering
if the judge will order modification on the state guidelines, or, have
the actual balls to make it retroactive.
Do Woman Rule?

http://mylesbian.blogspot.com/

Save 50% On Your Student Loans

http://clc-micro.blogspot.com/

It is supposed to be retro to when you filed. I would say your ex's
girlfriend has more "balls" than the judge.

On Jul 15, 12:19 pm, Relayer wrote:
On Jul 15, 7:11?am, stern wrote:





Has anyone heard of this? My court date is this week and we are
asking for modifed payments retroactive to Jan. 06.

My income went down dramatically and Jan, 06 is when I filed for
original modification. Well, first court date she did not show up.
Second, her lawyer withdrew. Third, she had no lawyer and judge told
her to get one. Fourth, she had her addy impounded and changed jobs,
so sheriff never served papers.

Now this week is the Fifth. She has been served. I am just wondering
if the judge will order modification on the state guidelines, or, have
the actual balls to make it retroactive.
Do Woman Rule?

http://mylesbian.blogspot.com/

Save 50% On Your Student Loans

http://clc-micro.blogspot.com/

It is supposed to be retro to when you filed. I would say your ex's
girlfriend has more "balls" than the judge.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Thanks. We are also asking for her to pay 50% of my legal fees for
all the runarounds. That is a stretch.

Do Woman Rule?

http://mylesbian.blogspot.com/

Save 50% On Your Student Loans

http://clc-micro.blogspot.com/

"stern" wrote
Relayer wrote:
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

It is supposed to be retro to when you filed. I would say your ex's
girlfriend has more "balls" than the judge.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Thanks. We are also asking for her to pay 50% of my legal fees for
all the runarounds. That is a stretch.
==
You should have requested 100%

Gini wrote:
"stern" wrote
Has anyone heard of this? My court date is this week and we are
asking for modifed payments retroactive to Jan. 06.
...................
==
Support is generally modified retroactively to the date of filing.


What?

Gini wrote:
"stern" wrote
Relayer wrote:
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
It is supposed to be retro to when you filed. I would say your ex's
girlfriend has more "balls" than the judge.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
Thanks. We are also asking for her to pay 50% of my legal fees for
all the runarounds. That is a stretch.
==
You should have requested 100%


Legal fees for child support?

"Soprano" wrote in message
...
Gini wrote:
"stern" wrote
Has anyone heard of this? My court date is this week and we are
asking for modifed payments retroactive to Jan. 06.
...................
==
Support is generally modified retroactively to the date of filing.


What?

If mom files a petition in court saying "Dad got a new job amd is making
$500 more per month than he was, so my child deserves a slice of that," a
court date is scheduled--sometimes several months later. The judge looks at
the proof and says "Oh, my. You're right--dad must pay another $100 per
month in child support." And the order begins the day mom filed in
court--not the date of the hearing. So, if the hearing was put off for 6
months, dad will already be $600 behind in child support. Itwould be nice
if dad's could get retroactive downward modifications of child support to
the date they file, but that doesn't necessarily always happen.

"Soprano" wrote in message
...
Gini wrote:
"stern" wrote
Relayer wrote:
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
It is supposed to be retro to when you filed. I would say your ex's
girlfriend has more "balls" than the judge.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
Thanks. We are also asking for her to pay 50% of my legal fees for
all the runarounds. That is a stretch.
==
You should have requested 100%


Legal fees for child support?

Oh, Atlanta, you really are unfamiliar with this wonderful system, aren't
you? Lawyers get rich off of family law cases. It is sad and sick--but it
is the way things are done.