If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
Tobacco companies to fight tobacco tax increase measure
In article ,
Sin Nombre wrote: If you are concerned about offending people in alt.smokers, perhaps you should just refrain from posting? One can only go so far in trying to accommodate people. As we all saw, this group was nearly empty when I stopped posting here for a few weeks. This group's topic is smoking and that's what I will discuss here. I won't discuss topics not related to smoking. You are certainly free to engage me in discussion, or not. Its your choice. |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Tobacco companies to fight tobacco tax increase measure
On Aug 27, 6:40 pm, Shawn Hirn wrote:
In article , Sin Nombre wrote: If you are concerned about offending people in alt.smokers, perhaps you should just refrain from posting? One can only go so far in trying to accommodate people. As we all saw, this group was nearly empty when I stopped posting here for a few weeks. This group's topic is smoking and that's what I will discuss here. I won't discuss topics not related to smoking. You are certainly free to engage me in discussion, or not. Its your choice. Then you honestly BELIEVE that YOU are the keeper of the newsgroup? Salmon diligently protest mocking Albequerque, indeed! |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Tobacco companies to fight tobacco tax increase measure
In article om,
Picachu is a recovering sex slave wrote: On Aug 27, 6:40 pm, Shawn Hirn wrote: In article , Sin Nombre wrote: If you are concerned about offending people in alt.smokers, perhaps you should just refrain from posting? One can only go so far in trying to accommodate people. As we all saw, this group was nearly empty when I stopped posting here for a few weeks. This group's topic is smoking and that's what I will discuss here. I won't discuss topics not related to smoking. You are certainly free to engage me in discussion, or not. Its your choice. Then you honestly BELIEVE that YOU are the keeper of the newsgroup? No, but I do have a knack for encouraging discussion here. |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
Tobacco companies to fight tobacco tax increase measure
On Aug 27, 6:46 pm, Shawn Hirn wrote:
In article om, Picachu is a recovering sex slave wrote: On Aug 27, 6:40 pm, Shawn Hirn wrote: In article , Sin Nombre wrote: If you are concerned about offending people in alt.smokers, perhaps you should just refrain from posting? One can only go so far in trying to accommodate people. As we all saw, this group was nearly empty when I stopped posting here for a few weeks. This group's topic is smoking and that's what I will discuss here. I won't discuss topics not related to smoking. You are certainly free to engage me in discussion, or not. Its your choice. Then you honestly BELIEVE that YOU are the keeper of the newsgroup? No, but I do have a knack for encouraging discussion here. If others are examples that may be a mixed blessing! Be the first on your block to demolish your block! |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Tobacco companies to fight tobacco tax increase measure
On Aug 27, 8:32 pm, "Bjorn Berg f/Fergie Berg and All the Ships at S"
wrote: On Aug 27, 6:29 pm, Sin Nombre wrote: Shawn Hirn wrote: In article , Sin Nombre wrote: Shawn Hirn wrote: In article , Bill Shatzer wrote: lein wrote: -snip- And big tobacco/smokers are subsidizing your social security by dying earlier and not collecting as much, if any, social security. You could pay for a ****load of years on social security for the costs of treating one lung cancer case. Or one case of chronic emphysema. Smokers may go earlier but they tend to go much more expensively. Any savings on the social security side tend to get more than offset on the Medicare side. Not to mention, that if the leave a child behind, the kid gets to collected on his or her addicted parents' social security benefits. You are right. I would have been better for that smoker to have had control of his own money. Then he could have saved the money himself, at a much higher rate of return. He would have had much more to leave his children. And on the flip side, he could have NOT paid into medicare or medicade. He would have been responsible for his own health related bills. Thus not effecting anyone else. Your points are worthy of consideration, but since I wouldn't want to offend anyone on alt.smokers by discussing a topic unrelated to smoking, I won't bother. If you are concerned about offending people in alt.smokers, perhaps you should just refrain from posting?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - If they wanna bitch and jam out newsgroup with syphilis and vomit about smokey smelling bike helmets while leaving a topless bar, LET THEM!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
Tobacco companies to fight tobacco tax increase measure
On Aug 27, 8:32 pm, "Bjorn Berg f/Fergie Berg and All the Ships at S"
wrote: On Aug 27, 6:29 pm, Sin Nombre wrote: Shawn Hirn wrote: In article , Sin Nombre wrote: Shawn Hirn wrote: In article , Bill Shatzer wrote: lein wrote: -snip- And big tobacco/smokers are subsidizing your social security by dying earlier and not collecting as much, if any, social security. You could pay for a ****load of years on social security for the costs of treating one lung cancer case. Or one case of chronic emphysema. Smokers may go earlier but they tend to go much more expensively. Any savings on the social security side tend to get more than offset on the Medicare side. Not to mention, that if the leave a child behind, the kid gets to collected on his or her addicted parents' social security benefits. You are right. I would have been better for that smoker to have had control of his own money. Then he could have saved the money himself, at a much higher rate of return. He would have had much more to leave his children. And on the flip side, he could have NOT paid into medicare or medicade. He would have been responsible for his own health related bills. Thus not effecting anyone else. Your points are worthy of consideration, but since I wouldn't want to offend anyone on alt.smokers by discussing a topic unrelated to smoking, I won't bother. If you are concerned about offending people in alt.smokers, perhaps you should just refrain from posting?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - If they wanna bitch and jam out newsgroup with syphilis and vomit about smokey smelling bike helmets while leaving a topless bar, LET THEM!- Hide quoted text - ______________________________________________ Good Decisions from the troll. "Bjorn Berg f/Fergie Berg You wanna let em **** in your beer too? wrote Bjorn back. Would ya think that there are plenty of groups for them to do just that.? Or is that the Boise thing to do? It just seem like Shame Him wants to red flag the bull. Smokers kinda extract their pound of flesh ya know... Read the group back if ya know how... How many years has he been doing this? tell us... Tell us why we need to tolerate it any further. "Bjorn Berg f/Fergie Berg and All the Ships at Sea" Writes in dissappearing ink on aioe.org so we'll Keep you from being disolved... |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
Tobacco companies to fight tobacco tax increase measure
On Aug 28, 5:23 pm, wrote:
On Aug 27, 8:32 pm, "Bjorn Berg f/Fergie Berg and All the Ships at S" wrote: On Aug 27, 6:29 pm, Sin Nombre wrote: Shawn Hirn wrote: In article , Sin Nombre wrote: Shawn Hirn wrote: In article , Bill Shatzer wrote: lein wrote: -snip- And big tobacco/smokers are subsidizing your social security by dying earlier and not collecting as much, if any, social security. You could pay for a ****load of years on social security for the costs of treating one lung cancer case. Or one case of chronic emphysema. Smokers may go earlier but they tend to go much more expensively. Any savings on the social security side tend to get more than offset on the Medicare side. Not to mention, that if the leave a child behind, the kid gets to collected on his or her addicted parents' social security benefits. You are right. I would have been better for that smoker to have had control of his own money. Then he could have saved the money himself, at a much higher rate of return. He would have had much more to leave his children. And on the flip side, he could have NOT paid into medicare or medicade. He would have been responsible for his own health related bills. Thus not effecting anyone else. Your points are worthy of consideration, but since I wouldn't want to offend anyone on alt.smokers by discussing a topic unrelated to smoking, I won't bother. If you are concerned about offending people in alt.smokers, perhaps you should just refrain from posting?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - If they wanna bitch and jam out newsgroup with syphilis and vomit about smokey smelling bike helmets while leaving a topless bar, LET THEM!- Hide quoted text - ______________________________________________ Good Decisions from the troll. "Bjorn Berg f/Fergie Berg You wanna let em **** in your beer too? wrote Bjorn back. Would ya think that there are plenty of groups for them to do just that.? Or is that the Boise thing to do? It just seem like Shame Him wants to red flag the bull. Smokers kinda extract their pound of flesh ya know... Read the group back if ya know how... How many years has he been doing this? tell us... Tell us why we need to tolerate it any further. "Bjorn Berg f/Fergie Berg and All the Ships at Sea" Writes in dissappearing ink on aioe.org so we'll Keep you from being disolved... - Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I have been here seven years on this ****ant network and I will die on it and be buried in the middle of your phone line. No other explanations will be offered and MY WORD IS FINAL ON IT. Do they teach ANYTHING in school? BTW I sing Karaoke in BARS? Shut the **** up. |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
Tobacco companies to fight tobacco tax increase measure
On Aug 28, 8:56 pm, Picachu is a recovering sex slave
wrote: On Aug 28, 5:23 pm, wrote: On Aug 27, 8:32 pm, "Bjorn Berg f/Fergie Berg and All the Ships at S" wrote: On Aug 27, 6:29 pm, Sin Nombre wrote: Shawn Hirn wrote: In article , Sin Nombre wrote: Shawn Hirn wrote: In article , Bill Shatzer wrote: lein wrote: -snip- And big tobacco/smokers are subsidizing your social security by dying earlier and not collecting as much, if any, social security. You could pay for a ****load of years on social security for the costs of treating one lung cancer case. Or one case of chronic emphysema. Smokers may go earlier but they tend to go much more expensively. Any savings on the social security side tend to get more than offset on the Medicare side. Not to mention, that if the leave a child behind, the kid gets to collected on his or her addicted parents' social security benefits. You are right. I would have been better for that smoker to have had control of his own money. Then he could have saved the money himself, at a much higher rate of return. He would have had much more to leave his children. And on the flip side, he could have NOT paid into medicare or medicade. He would have been responsible for his own health related bills. Thus not effecting anyone else. Your points are worthy of consideration, but since I wouldn't want to offend anyone on alt.smokers by discussing a topic unrelated to smoking, I won't bother. If you are concerned about offending people in alt.smokers, perhaps you should just refrain from posting?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - If they wanna bitch and jam out newsgroup with syphilis and vomit about smokey smelling bike helmets while leaving a topless bar, LET THEM!- Hide quoted text - ______________________________________________ Good Decisions from the troll. "Bjorn Berg f/Fergie Berg You wanna let em **** in your beer too? wrote Bjorn back. Would ya think that there are plenty of groups for them to do just that.? Or is that the Boise thing to do? It just seem like Shame Him wants to red flag the bull. Smokers kinda extract their pound of flesh ya know... Read the group back if ya know how... How many years has he been doing this? tell us... Tell us why we need to tolerate it any further. "Bjorn Berg f/Fergie Berg and All the Ships at Sea" Writes in dissappearing ink on aioe.org so we'll Keep you from being disolved... - Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I have been here seven years on this ****ant network and I will die on it and be buried in the middle of your phone line. No other explanations will be offered and MY WORD IS FINAL ON IT. Do they teach ANYTHING in school? BTW I sing Karaoke in BARS? Shut the **** up.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Hey That's great, fish. Sounds good to me. We'll welcome the moment. Don't forget about the part where I shove up your ass real good. You wrap the line around your neck, and I' ll pull for you. till the drink hearty. Chuggmy_Juggawhizz 71.221.178.244 WHOIS - 71.221.167.129 Email link to resultsGenerated by www.DNSstuff.com Location: United States [City: Boise, Idaho] OrgName: Qwest Communications Corporation OrgID: QCC-22 Address: 1801 California Street City: Denver StateProv: CO PostalCode: 80202 Country: US NetRange: 71.208.0.0 - 71.223.255.255 CIDR: 71.208.0.0/12 NetName: QWEST-INET-118 NetHandle: NET-71-208-0-0-1 Parent: NET-71-0-0-0-0 NetType: Direct Allocation NameServer: AUTHNS1.MPLS.QWEST.NET NameServer: AUTHNS2.DNVR.QWEST.NET NameServer: AUTHNS3.STTL.QWEST.NET Comment: RegDate: 2005-05-06 Updated: 2006-05-11 RAbuseHandle: QIA2-ARIN RAbuseName: Qwest Abuse RAbusePhone: +1-877-886-6515 RAbuseEmail: RNOCHandle: QIN-ARIN RNOCName: Qwest IP NOC RNOCPhone: +1-877-886-6515 RNOCEmail: RTechHandle: QIA-ARIN RTechName: Qwest IP Admin RTechPhone: +1-877-886-6515 RTechEmail: OrgAbuseHandle: QIA2-ARIN OrgAbuseName: Qwest Abuse OrgAbusePhone: +1-877-886-6515 OrgAbuseEmail: OrgNOCHandle: QIN-ARIN OrgNOCName: Qwest IP NOC OrgNOCPhone: +1-877-886-6515 OrgNOCEmail: OrgTechHandle: QIA-ARIN OrgTechName: Qwest IP Admin OrgTechPhone: +1-877-886-6515 OrgTechEmail: # ARIN WHOIS database, last updated 2007-08-28 19:10 # Enter ? for additional hints on searching ARIN's WHOIS database GoMsendbots |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
THE TOBACCO INDUSTRY'S SECONDHAND SCIENCE | Ilena Rose | Kids Health | 0 | February 15th 06 05:44 PM |
THE TOBACCO INDUSTRY'S SECONDHAND SCIENCE | Ilena Rose | Kids Health | 1 | February 15th 06 05:12 PM |
How tobacco is worse than a mean teacher | AA0II | General | 0 | December 5th 05 04:01 AM |
Pregnant smokers: Big Tobacco to help babies? | Todd Gastaldo | Pregnancy | 0 | March 26th 04 09:12 PM |
petition against tobacco | Polaris2002 | Kids Health | 0 | September 27th 03 09:43 PM |