|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#2
August 1st 05, 10:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
"Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message ... Colorado professors: A cumulative poison that children are forced to DRINK may be causing cancer - just like AZT causes cancer. See the very end of this post. Copied to CDC/ATSDR's Annette Ashizawa, PhD )... MDs FORCING KIDS TO TAKE POISON "AZT...parents didn't want to give [it] to them." (See below.) AZT is a POISON - complete with a skull and cross bones label. http://www.rethinking.org/aids/AZTLabel.html Kids are being FORCED to take the poison AZT based solely on the shaky HIV/AIDS hypothesis. (More on the shaky HIV/AIDS hypothesis below.) The fact that HIV causes AIDS is well known in the scientific community. Obviously, it is not well known to all chiropractors, but science and facts were never considerations in chiropractic. garbage deleted Jeff 
|
|
#3
August 2nd 05, 12:32 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
HIV AND BABY STRANGULATION: MEDICAL "SCIENCE" vs. SCIENCE AND FACTS
ATTENTION Jeff P.Utz, MD: Even if you must believe the shaky HIV/AIDS hypothesis, you can still help stop your fellow MDs from engaging in mass baby strangling/baby blood robbery, etc. READERS: Retired obstetrician George Malcolm Morley MB ChB FACOG indicates that EVERY CESAREAN BABY is being strangled. Do I really mean that babies are being strangled? Yes. Babies are born breathing through their umbilical cords. MDs are engaging in IMMEDIATE cord clamping - asphyxiating babies before they are ready to breathe on their own and in doing so robbing babies of up to 50% of their blood volume. It's the damndest thing - obvious crime: Check out the verbiage of Dr. Morley's TEMPORARY strangulation recommendation below. PREGNANT WOMEN: It is EASY to make sure your baby gets the "extra" up to 50% of blood volume: Just tell your obstetrician not to clamp your baby's cord until it has stopped pulsating and your baby is pink and breathing and not in need of resuscitation... HIV... Jeff P.Utz, MD wrote: The fact that HIV causes AIDS is well known in the scientific community. Obviously, it is not well known to all chiropractors, but science and facts were never considerations in chiropractic. garbage deleted Todd D. Gastaldo, DC remarks: Jeff P.Utz, MD ignores science and facts - babies be damned. I only started to question the shaky HIV/AIDS hypothesis when I discovered medical "science" pretending that babies can't feel pain... Here is some of the "garbage" Jeff deleted.... California physicians embraced the shaky HIV/AIDS hypothesis to stay out of prison when I discovered in 1987 that they were ripping and slicing infant penises en masse - making babies scream and writhe and bleed - and telling parents that "babies can't feel pain" - and using obviously phony neurology [to do it]... In an Oct. 11, 1987 letter (copied to the New England Journal of Medicine) I noted that the American Academy of Pediatrics had just perpetuated in the journal Pediatrics the false notion that babies can't feel pain for lack of myelin. I pointed out that most of the nervous system never becomes myelinated that that unmyelinated nerves are thought to transmit the most excruciating qualities of pain. The Nov. 19, 1987 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine published an article that exposed the lack of myelin fraud; but an editorial in the same issue claimed that BABIES incur the pain of their circumcisions. MASS CHILD ABUSE Since the "babies can't feel pain" mass infant penis ripping and slicing was (is) obvious mass child abuse... I reported it - and called for a religious exemption... STRANGE THINGS HAPPENED... In late 1987 (BILLIONS of dollars' worth of infant screams ago) I called for a religious exemption from the child abuse laws for the ancient Jewish ritual that leaves most of the infant foreskin on the penis... In Jan/Feb 1988, California physicians immediately came out opposed to ALL religious exemptions and in favor of anonymity for PERPETRATORS of child abuse. (See the Jan and Feb 1988 issues of Pediatrics. In March 1988, California physicians ignored their own Scientific Board and by voice vote changed their "no medical indications" mass infant penis slicing operation into an ostensible HIV/AIDS-prevention "effective public health measure." (California Medical Association Res. 305-88 - still in force I believe.) Why did American physicians ignore their own Scientific Board and call for anonymity for PERPETRATORS of child abuse? The answer is simple: A religious exemption for the minimal ancient Jewish ritual (which leaves most of the foreskin on the penis) would have instantly identified total-foreskin-amputating American MDs as the mass child abusers they are. (Note: I am in favor of pardons in advance for MDs. As med students, MDs are TRAINED to perform obvious felonies - not just mass infant penis ripping and slicing. See below for discussion of other obvious felony surgeries "performed" by American MDs.) Again, the mass ripping and slicing of baby penises should have ended billions of dollars' worth of infant screams ago when I pointed out the phony "babies can't feel pain" neurology. GOOD NEWS Ending the infant screams NOW (finally) will instantly save America an estimated $400 million per year and PRESERVE the surgery as a CHOICE American males can make for themselves in adulthood. OTHER OBVIOUSLY ILLEGAL SURGERIES... ADULT VAGINAS By using semisitting and dorsal delivery positions, American physicians are closing birth canals up to 30%. It is EASY for women to offer their babies the "extra" up to 30% - just by rolling onto their sides - or kneeling - or squatting - or standing, etc. The simple biomechanics have been in the medical literature since early last century. I myself reported the simple biomechanics to the medical literature late last century. See Gastaldo TD. Letter. Birth. 1992;19(4):230-231. American physicians are closing birth canals up to 30% - then slicing vaginas - pretending to be doing everything possible to open birth canals even as they (I repeat) close birth canals the "extra" up to 30%. (Infant penis slicing and adult vagina slicing are American medicine's most frequent surgical behaviors toward males and females, respectively.) With birth canals KEPT closed the "extra" up to 30%, American physicians pull with hands, forceps and vacuums - sometimes pulling so hard they rip spinal nerves out of tiny spinal cords. ADULT ABDOMENS With birth canals kept closed the "extra" up to 30%, American physicians are also slicing abdomens en masse (c-section). The fact that MDs are LYING to cover-up is perhaps the most obvious clue that they know they are committing massive crime. For the Four OB Lies... See ACOG's 2005 edition: How NOT to birth http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3606 See also: RNs: 'Stitches, episiotomy, and postpartum complications' (Maternal care learning needs) http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3725 LAW ENFORCEMENT Note: I have reported these crimes to Oregon law enforcement - Oregon Atty Genl Hardy Myers - but MDs are a protected class under our medico-"legal" "just us" system. Only rarely does law enforcement criminally prosecute MDs. The most MDs have to lose is their medical license - and even that is fairly rare. BTW, doctors of chiropractic/DCs are also protected - as are others who hold state licenses. State licensing is ostensibly to protect consumers - but the real beneficiaries are the health professionals who are getting away with obvious crimes.) KEY POINT: Law enforcement compelling American physicians to allow birth canals to open the "extra" up to 30% is not going to prevent all episiotomies, c-sections and forceps deliveries - it's just that American physicians have no business closing birth canals the "extra" up to 30%. UMBILICAL CORD SURGERY American medicine's MOST frequent surgical behavior - umbilical cord clamping/cutting - is also obviously illegal - the way American MDs do it. American MDs are clamping/cutting umbilical cords IMMEDIATELY - thereby robbing babies of up to 50% of their blood volume. Retired obstetrician George Malcolm Morley, MB ChB FACOG indicates that the massive baby blood robbery is being inflicted on EVERY CESAREAN BABY. Keeping in mind that babies breathe through their umbilical cords... Dr. Morley is recommending a "lesser" child abuse (TEMPORARY baby strangulation) to help his obstetrician colleagues learn that they shouldn't be robbing babies of so much blood.... Here is what I wrote when I recently reported this massive crime to Oregon Atty Genl Hardy Myers (via )... NOTE: AMERICAN MEDICINE¹S **MOST** FREQUENT SURGICAL BEHAVIOR IS OBVIOUS CHILD ABUSE THE WAY OBSTETRICIANS PRACTICE IT... Retired obstetrician George Malcolm Morley, MB ChB FACOG is recommending that his fellow obstetricians temporarily strangle babies - to help obstetricians learn why they should not immediately clamp/cut umbilical cords thereby PERMANENTLY strangling babies/robbing them of up to 50% of their blood volume. Dr. Morley indicates that EVERY CESAREAN BABY is being robbed of up to 50% of his/her blood volume. HERE IS DR. MORLEY RECOMMENDING THE **TEMPORARY** BABY STRANGLING ON THE WEB... "[T]he umbilical cord [is] immediately closed between finger and thumb...The [fetal heart rate/FHR] will decelerate quickly to about 60 bpm...the color will change from purple-pink (normal at birth) to pallid blue (vaso-constriction and asphyxia.)...Few midwives or obstetricians will be able to observe, without interference, a deep, prolonged FHR deceleration on a non-breathing newborn for a period of 60 seconds.* Common sense will soon release the finger and thumb." http://www.cordclamping.com/acog-cp.htm Hardy [Oregon Atty Genl Hardy Myers], some OREGON obstetricians may be going to Dr. Morley's website and experimenting with his temporary baby strangling - as they engage in PERMANENT baby strangling - robbing babies of up to 50% of their blood volume. Dr. Morley MEANS well * but it is simply (obviously) illegal for him to encourage obstetricians to commit ³lesser² child abuse in order to encourage them to stop committing greater child abuse - robbing babies of up to 50% of babies¹ blood volume. See Michigan Baby Strangler George Malcolm Morley, MB ChB FACOG http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3739 ...Hardy, I know that you may be unable to investigate MDs because you part of the medico-"legal" "just us" system... But at least offer assistance to pregnant women in your circle of family and friends, OK? END EXCERPT OF DR. GASTALDO'S RECENT SUSPECTED CHILD ABUSE REPORT TO OREGON ATTY GENL HARDY MYERS... ATTENTION Jeff P.Utz, MD: Even if you believe the shaky HIV/AIDS hypothesis you can help stop your fellow MDs from engaging in mass baby strangling/baby blood robbery, etc. Again, I only started to question the shaky HIV/AIDS hypothesis when I discovered medical "science" pretending that babies can't feel pain... JUST HOW SHAKY IS THE HIV/AIDS HYPOTHESIS? VERY shaky... See James P. Hogan's Kicking the Sacred Cow: Questioning the Unquestionable and Thinking the Impermissible [July 2004]... http://www.duesberg.com/viewpoints/a...esy-hogan.html --EXCERPT Todd Dr. Gastaldo Copied to: Kicking the Sacred Cow author James P. Hogan via
|
|
#4
August 3rd 05, 05:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I am a personal trainer and have been for 8 years now. I work with a
lot of pregnant women and post pregnant women who want to keep in shape and the tummy area is what bothers them most. I get countless questions for suggestions on books or articles on what they can do. I decided to do some research myself and found there to be a real lack of information on help for post pregnant females and anything i did find was either weak, difficult to understand or in some circumstances the exercises could actually be harmful. So i am putting an e-book together on the subject and collecting marketing data in the form of a survey. Anyone who responds to this survey and completes all the questions i will be giving away the e-book FREE of charge as a thank you for participating. Please click on link below to access survey http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.asp?u=925421250861 If you can not click on this link then please copy the URL above and copy it into your web browser. To be eligible to get this e-book, you must respond to all questions. (I am not selling I am giving away!)
|
|
#5
August 6th 05, 11:01 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
***PLONK*** Todd Gastaldo wrote in : Colorado professors: A cumulative poison that children are forced to DRINK may be causing cancer - just like AZT causes cancer. See the very end of this post. Copied to CDC/ATSDR's Annette Ashizawa, PhD )... MDs FORCING KIDS TO TAKE POISON "AZT...parents didn't want to give [it] to them." (See below.) AZT is a POISON - complete with a skull and cross bones label. http://www.rethinking.org/aids/AZTLabel.html Kids are being FORCED to take the poison AZT based solely on the shaky HIV/AIDS hypothesis. (More on the shaky HIV/AIDS hypothesis below.) Liam Scheff reports: "[Child care worker] Mimi Pascual gave the children drugs every day and every night,on schedule, as the doctors ordered... "The drug Mimi remembers giving most often...is the nucleoside analog AZT... snip "More and more of the kids were there for compliance. They didn't want to take drugs, or their parents didn't want to give them, so they got put in ICC. "'None of us ever blamed the kids for refusing. We all saw them throw up like clockwork after taking the pills, and then the diarrhea that followed...' snip" [GASTALDO NOTES regarding "the diarrhea that followed": James P. Hogan says: "The 'side effects' [of AZT] look just like AIDS. Officially acknowledged effects of nucleoside analog drugs [like AZT] include diarrhea, dementia, lymphoma (cancer), muscle wasting, and T-cell depletion, which are also AIDS-defining" http://www.duesberg.com/viewpoints/a...sy-hogan.html] New York Press Volume 18, Issue 30 July 27 - August 2, 2005 INSIDE INCARNATION As the debate over AIDS-drug trials at Columbia's Incarnation Children Center grows louder, a former ICC employee reveals what she saw. By Liam Scheff http://www.nypress.com/18/30/news&co...liamscheff.cfm JUST HOW SHAKY IS THE HIV/AIDS HYPOTHESIS? VERY shaky... See James P. Hogan's Kicking the Sacred Cow: Questioning the Unquestionable and Thinking the Impermissible [July 2004]... http://www.duesberg.com/viewpoints/a...esy-hogan.html --EXCERPT Copied to Kicking the Sacred Cow author James P. Hogan via SO WHY DID AMERICAN PHYSICIANS EMBRACE THE SHAKY HIV/AIDS HYPOTHESIS? IN PART BECAUSE THEY WERE CAUGHT PERFORMING MASS CHILD ABUSE (OBVIOUSLY ILLEGAL SURGERIES)... California physicians embraced the shaky HIV/AIDS hypothesis to stay out of prison when I discovered in 1987 that they were ripping and slicing infant penises en masse - making babies scream and writhe and bleed - and telling parents that "babies can't feel pain" - and using obviously phony neurology... In an Oct. 11, 1987 letter (copied to the New England Journal of Medicine) I noted that the American Academy of Pediatrics had just perpetuated in the journal Pediatrics the false notion that babies can't feel pain for lack of myelin. I pointed out that most of the nervous system never becomes myelinated that that unmyelinated nerves are thought to transmit the most excruciating qualities of pain. The Nov. 19, 1987 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine published an article that exposed the lack of myelin fraud; but an editorial in the same issue claimed that BABIES incur the pain of their circumcisions. MASS CHILD ABUSE Since the "babies can't feel pain" mass infant penis ripping and slicing was (is) obvious mass child abuse... I reported it - and called for a religious exemption... STRANGE THINGS HAPPENED... In late 1987 (BILLIONS of dollars' worth of infant screams ago) I called for a religious exemption from the child abuse laws for the ancient Jewish ritual that leaves most of the infant foreskin on the penis... In Jan/Feb 1988, California physicians immediately came out opposed to ALL religious exemptions and in favor of anonymity for PERPETRATORS of child abuse. (See the Jan and Feb 1988 issues of Pediatrics. In March 1988, California physicians ignored their own Scientific Board and by voice vote changed their "no medical indications" mass infant penis slicing operation into an ostensible HIV/AIDS-prevention "effective public health measure." (California Medical Association Res. 305-88 - still in force I believe.) Why did American physicians ignore their own Scientific Board and call for anonymity for PERPETRATORS of child abuse? The answer is simple: A religious exemption for the minimal ancient Jewish ritual (which leaves most of the foreskin on the penis) would have instantly identified total-foreskin-amputating American MDs as the mass child abusers they are. (Note: I am in favor of pardons in advance for MDs. As med students, MDs are TRAINED to perform obvious felonies - not just mass infant penis ripping and slicing. See below for discussion of other obvious felony surgeries "performed" by American MDs.) Again, the mass ripping and slicing of baby penises should have ended billions of dollars' worth of infant screams ago when I pointed out the phony "babies can't feel pain" neurology. GOOD NEWS Ending the infant screams NOW (finally) will instantly save America an estimated $400 million per year and PRESERVE the surgery as a CHOICE American males can make for themselves in adulthood. OTHER OBVIOUSLY ILLEGAL SURGERIES... ADULT VAGINAS By using semisitting and dorsal delivery positions, American physicians are closing birth canals up to 30%. It is EASY for women to offer their babies the "extra" up to 30% - just by rolling onto their sides - or kneeling - or squatting - or standing, etc. The simple biomechanics have been in the medical literature since early last century. I myself reported the simple biomechanics to the medical literature late last century. See Gastaldo TD. Letter. Birth. 1992;19(4):230-231. American physicians are closing birth canals up to 30% - then slicing vaginas - pretending to be doing everything possible to open birth canals even as they (I repeat) close birth canals the "extra" up to 30%. (Infant penis slicing and adult vagina slicing are American medicine's most frequent surgical behaviors toward males and females, respectively.) With birth canals KEPT closed the "extra" up to 30%, American physicians pull with hands, forceps and vacuums - sometimes pulling so hard they rip spinal nerves out of tiny spinal cords. ADULT ABDOMENS With birth canals kept closed the "extra" up to 30%, American physicians are also slicing abdomens en masse (c-section). The fact that MDs are LYING to cover-up is perhaps the most obvious clue that they know they are committing massive crime. For the Four OB Lies... See ACOG's 2005 edition: How NOT to birth http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3606 See also: RNs: 'Stitches, episiotomy, and postpartum complications' (Maternal care learning needs) http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3725 LAW ENFORCEMENT Note: I have reported these crimes to Oregon law enforcement - Oregon Atty Genl Hardy Myers - but MDs are a protected class under our medico-"legal" "just us" system. Only rarely does law enforcement criminally prosecute MDs. The most MDs have to lose is their medical license - and even that is fairly rare. BTW, doctors of chiropractic/DCs are also protected - as are others who hold state licenses. State licensing is ostensibly to protect consumers - but the real beneficiaries are the health professionals who are getting away with obvious crimes.) KEY POINT: Law enforcement compelling American physicians to allow birth canals to open the "extra" up to 30% is not going to prevent all episiotomies, c-sections and forceps deliveries - it's just that American physicians have no business closing birth canals the "extra" up to 30%. UMBILICAL CORD SURGERY American medicine's MOST frequent surgical behavior - umbilical cord clamping/cutting - is also obviously illegal - the way American MDs do it. American MDs are clamping/cutting umbilical cords IMMEDIATELY - thereby robbing babies of up to 50% of their blood volume. Retired obstetrician George Malcolm Morley, MB ChB FACOG indicates that the massive baby blood robbery is being inflicted on EVERY CESAREAN BABY. Keeping in mind that babies breathe through their umbilical cords... Dr. Morley is recommending a "lesser" child abuse (TEMPORARY baby strangulation) to help his obstetrician colleagues learn that they shouldn't be robbing babies of so much blood.... Here is what I wrote when I recently reported this massive crime to Oregon Atty Genl Hardy Myers (via )... NOTE: AMERICAN MEDICINE¹S **MOST** FREQUENT SURGICAL BEHAVIOR IS OBVIOUS CHILD ABUSE THE WAY OBSTETRICIANS PRACTICE IT... Retired obstetrician George Malcolm Morley, MB ChB FACOG is recommending that his fellow obstetricians temporarily strangle babies - to help obstetricians learn why they should not immediately clamp/cut umbilical cords thereby PERMANENTLY strangling babies/robbing them of up to 50% of their blood volume. Dr. Morley indicates that EVERY CESAREAN BABY is being robbed of up to 50% of his/her blood volume. HERE IS DR. MORLEY RECOMMENDING THE **TEMPORARY** BABY STRANGLING ON THE WEB... "[T]he umbilical cord [is] immediately closed between finger and thumb...The [fetal heart rate/FHR] will decelerate quickly to about 60 bpm...the color will change from purple-pink (normal at birth) to pallid blue (vaso-constriction and asphyxia.)...Few midwives or obstetricians will be able to observe, without interference, a deep, prolonged FHR deceleration on a non-breathing newborn for a period of 60 seconds.* Common sense will soon release the finger and thumb." http://www.cordclamping.com/acog-cp.htm Hardy [Oregon Atty Genl Hardy Myers], some OREGON obstetricians may be going to Dr. Morley's website and experimenting with his temporary baby strangling - as they engage in PERMANENT baby strangling - robbing babies of up to 50% of their blood volume. Dr. Morley MEANS well * but it is simply (obviously) illegal for him to encourage obstetricians to commit ³lesser² child abuse in order to encourage them to stop committing greater child abuse - robbing babies of up to 50% of babies¹ blood volume. See Michigan Baby Strangler George Malcolm Morley, MB ChB FACOG http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3739 ...Hardy, I know that you may be unable to investigate MDs because you part of the medico-"legal" "just us" system... But at least offer assistance to pregnant women in your circle of family and friends, OK? END EXCERPT OF DR. GASTALDO'S RECENT SUSPECTED CHILD ABUSE REPORT TO OREGON ATTY GENL HARDY MYERS... Back to MDs forcing kids to take poison... Remember: Kids are being forced to take poison AZT in part because American MDs don't want to go to prison for their mass infant penis ripping and slicing behavior. Again, American MD mass ripping and slicing of baby penises should have ended billions of dollars' worth of infant screams ago back in 1987 when I pointed out the phony "babies can't feel pain" neurology. Again that GOOD NEWS: Ending the infant screams NOW (finally) will instantly save America an estimated $400 million per year and PRESERVE the surgery as a CHOICE American males can make for themselves in adulthood. Ending the other bizarre MD practices discussed above will save BILLIONS per year. Again: For the reason given above, I am in favor of pardons in advance for MDs. Sincerely, Todd Dr. Gastaldo Hillsboro, Oregon PS As alluded to at the beginning of this post, the cumulative poison fluoride ("fluoridation") may be causing cancer. There is epidemiologic evidence that boys drinking fluoridated water have a 700% greater risk of suffering osteosarcoma than boys who do not drink fluoridated water. CDC and dentists at the American Dental Association recently "celebrated" putting the cumulative poison fluoride into America's drinking water - even now that it is known that fluoride works TOPICALLY (if at all^^^) - i.e. - there was never any NEED for the cumulative poison to be in the water. ^^^Research indicates that fluoride saves less than 1 tooth surface in 128. See www.fluoridealert.com. People who still want their kids to have the cumulative poison fluoride on their teeth can use poisoned toothpaste. (Fluoride toothpaste is indeed poisoned. For the poison warning, check a tube of fluoridated toothpaste or go to www.aquasafe.us.) As with the poison AZT, the cumulative poison fluoride is being forced into children without parents' consent - but (and this is key) the cumulative poison fluoride is being administered with no life-threatening disease to treat... IT'S CRIMINAL The California Supreme Court wrote in THOR 93 C.D.O.S. 5658: "The common law has long recognized this principle: A physician who performs any medical procedure without the patient's consent commits a battery irrespective of the skill or care used." [Thor at 5659] I am told that all states have similar common law. 1. Under the common law doctrine of informed consent, even GOOD medicine administered without consent is a battery. 2. Battery against children is child abuse. MDs (and dentists) are getting away with mass child abuse. Oregon Atty Genl Hardy Myers and the rest of America's attorney generals are letting it happen. One citizen (me) reporting crimes is unlikely to change their medico-"legal" "just us" system behavior. I urge others to forward this post to their state's attorney general. As usual, as indicated above, this suspected child abuse report is being copied to Oregon Atty Genl Hardy Myers via . COLORADO PROFESSORS: Colorado State Prof. Thomas Sanders reportedly won't drink the cumulative poison fluoride^^^; but he may be in favor of drinking it is isn't derived from the fertilizer industry. Would you ask him if he is in favor of drinking the "good quality" poison? Sharlene K. Johnson wrote in Organic Style Magazine - July /August 2005: "Was it true that the chairman of the [Fort Collins, CO] water board‹Thomas Sanders, PhD, a Colorado State University professor of civil engineering and water-quality expert who had supported fluoridation for 30 years‹stopped drinking our city tap water as a result of the board's research? The answer...turned out to be yes..." Thomas Sanders, PhD was quoted: "When I started reading the literature, I came to the conclusion that in this country, we were supporting fluoridation without enough facts...I thought [our city was] using a very good quality sodium fluoride as the additive. When I found out it was from a fertilizer factory, that it was hazardous waste, and we were using it because its cheaper, I was absolutely shocked." ^^^See Organic Style and Fluoridation http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3760 I was just about to send this out when I received Paul Connett, PhD's FAN CAMPAIGN Bulletin #281 titled: "Will the real conspiracy please stand up." Paul is moaning about Harvard's Chester Douglass, PhD apparently covering-up epidemiologic evidence that fluoride may cause osteosarcoma. I am moaning here, as usual, about Paul himself covering-up/remaining silent about 1) the criminal aspect of fluoridation; and 2) the "good quality" poison scam. (It's being used in at least two legal actions wherein fluoride opponents are hoping municipalities won't be able to afford "pure" fluoride poison.) Unfortunately, real conspirators don't stand up. They remain silent - breathing together - potential cons - spiring - together. I just hope we can stop the poisoning of children - and the other obvious crimes - soon. I recently wrote to CDC's Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry/ATSDR (Annette Ashizawa, PhD): 1. CDC/ATSDR "works with states and other federal agencies to prevent exposure to hazardous substances from waste sites." http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/DRO/r1.html 2. EMERGENCY: A hazardous substance (hydrofluorosilicic acid w/ arsenic and lead) from phosphate fertilizer waste sites/scrubbers is being injected into America's water supply. (Some municipalities are using "pure" poison - sodium fluoride.) I said to Annette: CDC's ATSDR needs to simply DO ITS JOB and work with state attorney generals to stop/prevent this 60-year-old ongoing hazardous substance crime - NOW. I'll copy Annette (yet again) via . I say again to COLORADO PROFESSORS: Colorado State Prof. Thomas Sanders reportedly won't drink the cumulative poison fluoride; but he may be in favor of drinking it is isn't derived from the fertilizer industry. Would you ask him if he is in favor of drinking the "good quality" poison? I would be much reassured if the answer were no and Prof. Sanders was comfortable discussing at Fort Collins, CO water board meetings the rather obvious CRIMINAL aspect of the fluoride poisoning. See again THOR quoted above. (Again, I am told that all states have similar common law.) Perhaps Prof. Sanders could even talk Prof. Connett into finally ending his silence - instead of just moaning about Prof. Douglass' silence. One last note... Paul writes of the fluoride/osteosarcoma news... "Had not a member of the Fluoride Action Network (my son in fact) gone to the rare books section of the Harvard Library, and copied the relevant chapter of Bassin¹s thesis, the public-at-large would never have heard of this work (see WSJ, B1, July 22, 2005)." Bravo Michael Connett! Michael, please work with your dad on the "public-at-large" hearing about the common law indicating that fluoridation is a CRIME because it is administered without consent. Thanks. Copied to Michael Connett via . COLORADO PROFESSORS, please scroll up a little... This post will be archived for global access in the Google usenet archive. Search http://groups.google.com for "MDs forcing kids to take poison"
|
|
#6
August 6th 05, 11:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
John Schutkeker at am wrote:
***PLONK*** That'll teach me! : ) Todd Gastaldo wrote in : Colorado professors: A cumulative poison that children are forced to DRINK may be causing cancer - just like AZT causes cancer. See the very end of this post. Copied to CDC/ATSDR's Annette Ashizawa, PhD )... MDs FORCING KIDS TO TAKE POISON "AZT...parents didn't want to give [it] to them." (See below.) AZT is a POISON - complete with a skull and cross bones label. http://www.rethinking.org/aids/AZTLabel.html Kids are being FORCED to take the poison AZT based solely on the shaky HIV/AIDS hypothesis. (More on the shaky HIV/AIDS hypothesis below.) Liam Scheff reports: "[Child care worker] Mimi Pascual gave the children drugs every day and every night,on schedule, as the doctors ordered... "The drug Mimi remembers giving most often...is the nucleoside analog AZT... snip "More and more of the kids were there for compliance. They didn't want to take drugs, or their parents didn't want to give them, so they got put in ICC. "'None of us ever blamed the kids for refusing. We all saw them throw up like clockwork after taking the pills, and then the diarrhea that followed...' snip" [GASTALDO NOTES regarding "the diarrhea that followed": James P. Hogan says: "The 'side effects' [of AZT] look just like AIDS. Officially acknowledged effects of nucleoside analog drugs [like AZT] include diarrhea, dementia, lymphoma (cancer), muscle wasting, and T-cell depletion, which are also AIDS-defining" http://www.duesberg.com/viewpoints/a...sy-hogan.html] New York Press Volume 18, Issue 30 July 27 - August 2, 2005 INSIDE INCARNATION As the debate over AIDS-drug trials at Columbia's Incarnation Children Center grows louder, a former ICC employee reveals what she saw. By Liam Scheff http://www.nypress.com/18/30/news&co...liamscheff.cfm JUST HOW SHAKY IS THE HIV/AIDS HYPOTHESIS? VERY shaky... See James P. Hogan's Kicking the Sacred Cow: Questioning the Unquestionable and Thinking the Impermissible [July 2004]... http://www.duesberg.com/viewpoints/a...esy-hogan.html --EXCERPT Copied to Kicking the Sacred Cow author James P. Hogan via SO WHY DID AMERICAN PHYSICIANS EMBRACE THE SHAKY HIV/AIDS HYPOTHESIS? IN PART BECAUSE THEY WERE CAUGHT PERFORMING MASS CHILD ABUSE (OBVIOUSLY ILLEGAL SURGERIES)... California physicians embraced the shaky HIV/AIDS hypothesis to stay out of prison when I discovered in 1987 that they were ripping and slicing infant penises en masse - making babies scream and writhe and bleed - and telling parents that "babies can't feel pain" - and using obviously phony neurology... In an Oct. 11, 1987 letter (copied to the New England Journal of Medicine) I noted that the American Academy of Pediatrics had just perpetuated in the journal Pediatrics the false notion that babies can't feel pain for lack of myelin. I pointed out that most of the nervous system never becomes myelinated that that unmyelinated nerves are thought to transmit the most excruciating qualities of pain. The Nov. 19, 1987 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine published an article that exposed the lack of myelin fraud; but an editorial in the same issue claimed that BABIES incur the pain of their circumcisions. MASS CHILD ABUSE Since the "babies can't feel pain" mass infant penis ripping and slicing was (is) obvious mass child abuse... I reported it - and called for a religious exemption... STRANGE THINGS HAPPENED... In late 1987 (BILLIONS of dollars' worth of infant screams ago) I called for a religious exemption from the child abuse laws for the ancient Jewish ritual that leaves most of the infant foreskin on the penis... In Jan/Feb 1988, California physicians immediately came out opposed to ALL religious exemptions and in favor of anonymity for PERPETRATORS of child abuse. (See the Jan and Feb 1988 issues of Pediatrics. In March 1988, California physicians ignored their own Scientific Board and by voice vote changed their "no medical indications" mass infant penis slicing operation into an ostensible HIV/AIDS-prevention "effective public health measure." (California Medical Association Res. 305-88 - still in force I believe.) Why did American physicians ignore their own Scientific Board and call for anonymity for PERPETRATORS of child abuse? The answer is simple: A religious exemption for the minimal ancient Jewish ritual (which leaves most of the foreskin on the penis) would have instantly identified total-foreskin-amputating American MDs as the mass child abusers they are. (Note: I am in favor of pardons in advance for MDs. As med students, MDs are TRAINED to perform obvious felonies - not just mass infant penis ripping and slicing. See below for discussion of other obvious felony surgeries "performed" by American MDs.) Again, the mass ripping and slicing of baby penises should have ended billions of dollars' worth of infant screams ago when I pointed out the phony "babies can't feel pain" neurology. GOOD NEWS Ending the infant screams NOW (finally) will instantly save America an estimated $400 million per year and PRESERVE the surgery as a CHOICE American males can make for themselves in adulthood. OTHER OBVIOUSLY ILLEGAL SURGERIES... ADULT VAGINAS By using semisitting and dorsal delivery positions, American physicians are closing birth canals up to 30%. It is EASY for women to offer their babies the "extra" up to 30% - just by rolling onto their sides - or kneeling - or squatting - or standing, etc. The simple biomechanics have been in the medical literature since early last century. I myself reported the simple biomechanics to the medical literature late last century. See Gastaldo TD. Letter. Birth. 1992;19(4):230-231. American physicians are closing birth canals up to 30% - then slicing vaginas - pretending to be doing everything possible to open birth canals even as they (I repeat) close birth canals the "extra" up to 30%. (Infant penis slicing and adult vagina slicing are American medicine's most frequent surgical behaviors toward males and females, respectively.) With birth canals KEPT closed the "extra" up to 30%, American physicians pull with hands, forceps and vacuums - sometimes pulling so hard they rip spinal nerves out of tiny spinal cords. ADULT ABDOMENS With birth canals kept closed the "extra" up to 30%, American physicians are also slicing abdomens en masse (c-section). The fact that MDs are LYING to cover-up is perhaps the most obvious clue that they know they are committing massive crime. For the Four OB Lies... See ACOG's 2005 edition: How NOT to birth http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3606 See also: RNs: 'Stitches, episiotomy, and postpartum complications' (Maternal care learning needs) http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3725 LAW ENFORCEMENT Note: I have reported these crimes to Oregon law enforcement - Oregon Atty Genl Hardy Myers - but MDs are a protected class under our medico-"legal" "just us" system. Only rarely does law enforcement criminally prosecute MDs. The most MDs have to lose is their medical license - and even that is fairly rare. BTW, doctors of chiropractic/DCs are also protected - as are others who hold state licenses. State licensing is ostensibly to protect consumers - but the real beneficiaries are the health professionals who are getting away with obvious crimes.) KEY POINT: Law enforcement compelling American physicians to allow birth canals to open the "extra" up to 30% is not going to prevent all episiotomies, c-sections and forceps deliveries - it's just that American physicians have no business closing birth canals the "extra" up to 30%. UMBILICAL CORD SURGERY American medicine's MOST frequent surgical behavior - umbilical cord clamping/cutting - is also obviously illegal - the way American MDs do it. American MDs are clamping/cutting umbilical cords IMMEDIATELY - thereby robbing babies of up to 50% of their blood volume. Retired obstetrician George Malcolm Morley, MB ChB FACOG indicates that the massive baby blood robbery is being inflicted on EVERY CESAREAN BABY. Keeping in mind that babies breathe through their umbilical cords... Dr. Morley is recommending a "lesser" child abuse (TEMPORARY baby strangulation) to help his obstetrician colleagues learn that they shouldn't be robbing babies of so much blood.... Here is what I wrote when I recently reported this massive crime to Oregon Atty Genl Hardy Myers (via )... NOTE: AMERICAN MEDICINE¹S **MOST** FREQUENT SURGICAL BEHAVIOR IS OBVIOUS CHILD ABUSE THE WAY OBSTETRICIANS PRACTICE IT... Retired obstetrician George Malcolm Morley, MB ChB FACOG is recommending that his fellow obstetricians temporarily strangle babies - to help obstetricians learn why they should not immediately clamp/cut umbilical cords thereby PERMANENTLY strangling babies/robbing them of up to 50% of their blood volume. Dr. Morley indicates that EVERY CESAREAN BABY is being robbed of up to 50% of his/her blood volume. HERE IS DR. MORLEY RECOMMENDING THE **TEMPORARY** BABY STRANGLING ON THE WEB... "[T]he umbilical cord [is] immediately closed between finger and thumb...The [fetal heart rate/FHR] will decelerate quickly to about 60 bpm...the color will change from purple-pink (normal at birth) to pallid blue (vaso-constriction and asphyxia.)...Few midwives or obstetricians will be able to observe, without interference, a deep, prolonged FHR deceleration on a non-breathing newborn for a period of 60 seconds.* Common sense will soon release the finger and thumb." http://www.cordclamping.com/acog-cp.htm Hardy [Oregon Atty Genl Hardy Myers], some OREGON obstetricians may be going to Dr. Morley's website and experimenting with his temporary baby strangling - as they engage in PERMANENT baby strangling - robbing babies of up to 50% of their blood volume. Dr. Morley MEANS well * but it is simply (obviously) illegal for him to encourage obstetricians to commit ³lesser² child abuse in order to encourage them to stop committing greater child abuse - robbing babies of up to 50% of babies¹ blood volume. See Michigan Baby Strangler George Malcolm Morley, MB ChB FACOG http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3739 ...Hardy, I know that you may be unable to investigate MDs because you part of the medico-"legal" "just us" system... But at least offer assistance to pregnant women in your circle of family and friends, OK? END EXCERPT OF DR. GASTALDO'S RECENT SUSPECTED CHILD ABUSE REPORT TO OREGON ATTY GENL HARDY MYERS... Back to MDs forcing kids to take poison... Remember: Kids are being forced to take poison AZT in part because American MDs don't want to go to prison for their mass infant penis ripping and slicing behavior. Again, American MD mass ripping and slicing of baby penises should have ended billions of dollars' worth of infant screams ago back in 1987 when I pointed out the phony "babies can't feel pain" neurology. Again that GOOD NEWS: Ending the infant screams NOW (finally) will instantly save America an estimated $400 million per year and PRESERVE the surgery as a CHOICE American males can make for themselves in adulthood. Ending the other bizarre MD practices discussed above will save BILLIONS per year. Again: For the reason given above, I am in favor of pardons in advance for MDs. Sincerely, Todd Dr. Gastaldo Hillsboro, Oregon PS As alluded to at the beginning of this post, the cumulative poison fluoride ("fluoridation") may be causing cancer. There is epidemiologic evidence that boys drinking fluoridated water have a 700% greater risk of suffering osteosarcoma than boys who do not drink fluoridated water. CDC and dentists at the American Dental Association recently "celebrated" putting the cumulative poison fluoride into America's drinking water - even now that it is known that fluoride works TOPICALLY (if at all^^^) - i.e. - there was never any NEED for the cumulative poison to be in the water. ^^^Research indicates that fluoride saves less than 1 tooth surface in 128. See www.fluoridealert.com. People who still want their kids to have the cumulative poison fluoride on their teeth can use poisoned toothpaste. (Fluoride toothpaste is indeed poisoned. For the poison warning, check a tube of fluoridated toothpaste or go to www.aquasafe.us.) As with the poison AZT, the cumulative poison fluoride is being forced into children without parents' consent - but (and this is key) the cumulative poison fluoride is being administered with no life-threatening disease to treat... IT'S CRIMINAL The California Supreme Court wrote in THOR 93 C.D.O.S. 5658: "The common law has long recognized this principle: A physician who performs any medical procedure without the patient's consent commits a battery irrespective of the skill or care used." [Thor at 5659] I am told that all states have similar common law. 1. Under the common law doctrine of informed consent, even GOOD medicine administered without consent is a battery. 2. Battery against children is child abuse. MDs (and dentists) are getting away with mass child abuse. Oregon Atty Genl Hardy Myers and the rest of America's attorney generals are letting it happen. One citizen (me) reporting crimes is unlikely to change their medico-"legal" "just us" system behavior. I urge others to forward this post to their state's attorney general. As usual, as indicated above, this suspected child abuse report is being copied to Oregon Atty Genl Hardy Myers via . COLORADO PROFESSORS: Colorado State Prof. Thomas Sanders reportedly won't drink the cumulative poison fluoride^^^; but he may be in favor of drinking it is isn't derived from the fertilizer industry. Would you ask him if he is in favor of drinking the "good quality" poison? Sharlene K. Johnson wrote in Organic Style Magazine - July /August 2005: "Was it true that the chairman of the [Fort Collins, CO] water board‹Thomas Sanders, PhD, a Colorado State University professor of civil engineering and water-quality expert who had supported fluoridation for 30 years‹stopped drinking our city tap water as a result of the board's research? The answer...turned out to be yes..." Thomas Sanders, PhD was quoted: "When I started reading the literature, I came to the conclusion that in this country, we were supporting fluoridation without enough facts...I thought [our city was] using a very good quality sodium fluoride as the additive. When I found out it was from a fertilizer factory, that it was hazardous waste, and we were using it because its cheaper, I was absolutely shocked." ^^^See Organic Style and Fluoridation http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3760 I was just about to send this out when I received Paul Connett, PhD's FAN CAMPAIGN Bulletin #281 titled: "Will the real conspiracy please stand up." Paul is moaning about Harvard's Chester Douglass, PhD apparently covering-up epidemiologic evidence that fluoride may cause osteosarcoma. I am moaning here, as usual, about Paul himself covering-up/remaining silent about 1) the criminal aspect of fluoridation; and 2) the "good quality" poison scam. (It's being used in at least two legal actions wherein fluoride opponents are hoping municipalities won't be able to afford "pure" fluoride poison.) Unfortunately, real conspirators don't stand up. They remain silent - breathing together - potential cons - spiring - together. I just hope we can stop the poisoning of children - and the other obvious crimes - soon. I recently wrote to CDC's Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry/ATSDR (Annette Ashizawa, PhD): 1. CDC/ATSDR "works with states and other federal agencies to prevent exposure to hazardous substances from waste sites." http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/DRO/r1.html 2. EMERGENCY: A hazardous substance (hydrofluorosilicic acid w/ arsenic and lead) from phosphate fertilizer waste sites/scrubbers is being injected into America's water supply. (Some municipalities are using "pure" poison - sodium fluoride.) I said to Annette: CDC's ATSDR needs to simply DO ITS JOB and work with state attorney generals to stop/prevent this 60-year-old ongoing hazardous substance crime - NOW. I'll copy Annette (yet again) via . I say again to COLORADO PROFESSORS: Colorado State Prof. Thomas Sanders reportedly won't drink the cumulative poison fluoride; but he may be in favor of drinking it is isn't derived from the fertilizer industry. Would you ask him if he is in favor of drinking the "good quality" poison? I would be much reassured if the answer were no and Prof. Sanders was comfortable discussing at Fort Collins, CO water board meetings the rather obvious CRIMINAL aspect of the fluoride poisoning. See again THOR quoted above. (Again, I am told that all states have similar common law.) Perhaps Prof. Sanders could even talk Prof. Connett into finally ending his silence - instead of just moaning about Prof. Douglass' silence. One last note... Paul writes of the fluoride/osteosarcoma news... "Had not a member of the Fluoride Action Network (my son in fact) gone to the rare books section of the Harvard Library, and copied the relevant chapter of Bassin¹s thesis, the public-at-large would never have heard of this work (see WSJ, B1, July 22, 2005)." Bravo Michael Connett! Michael, please work with your dad on the "public-at-large" hearing about the common law indicating that fluoridation is a CRIME because it is administered without consent. Thanks. Copied to Michael Connett via . COLORADO PROFESSORS, please scroll up a little... This post will be archived for global access in the Google usenet archive. Search http://groups.google.com for "MDs forcing kids to take poison"
|
|
#7
August 7th 05, 04:03 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sat, 06 Aug 2005 22:17:18 GMT, Todd Gastaldo
wrote: John Schutkeker at am wrote: ***PLONK*** That'll teach me! : ) Oh yes, I'm sure that hurt Gastaldo's feelings that some random Usenetter thought himself important enough to quote an entire Gastaldo rant in order to tell us all that he's kill-filed him. In fact, further enhancing the stupidity of this move is the fact that now anyone who already had Gastaldo kill-filed still had to download his rant that you so nicely redistributed across the Usenet. By the way, thanks to near-universal HIV prenatal testing along with antepartum and postpartum AZT, congenital HIV is now almost unheard of. PF
|
|
#8
August 7th 05, 08:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
UW SURGICAL HIV/AIDS VACCINE HOAX - AND HIV/AIDS CLERGYMAN PF RILEY, MD
James P. Hogan, author of Kicking the Sacred Cow [2004] writes of those who blindly promote the very shaky HIV/AIDS hypothesis: "This is not the way of science, but of a fanatical religion putting down heresy." http://www.duesberg.com/viewpoints/a...esy-hogan.html Pseudonymous usenet pediatrician PF Riley, MD is a clergyman in the fanatical HIV/AIDS religion... UW SURGICAL HIV/AIDS VACCINE HOAX... The journal Science - longtime promoter of the fanatical HIV/AIDS religion - is now promoting infant penis ripping and slicing as an "anatomical vaccine for life"... King K. Holmes, MD, PhD of the University of Washington was so quoted in Cohen J. AIDS RESEARCH: Male Circumcision Thwarts HIV Infection. Science. 2005 Aug 5;309(5736):860. I'll copy King K. Holmes, MD, PhD the "anatomical vaccine for life" guy via . King, you indicate that you and 100 other UW faculty members are sucking from the HIV/AIDS federal tit to the tune of $83 million per year... http://depts.washington.edu/daid/faculty/holmes.htm And now you are rather explicitly using your fanatical HIV/AIDS religion to in effect promote infant screams... American MDs should have stopped ripping and slicing infant penises BILLIONS of dollars' worth of infant screams ago - back in 1987 when I exposed their phony "babies can't feel pain" neurology and called for a Jewish religious exemption from the child abuse laws (see Emerson on Circumcision at the very end of this post.) Ending the infant screams NOW (finally) will instantly save America an estimated $400 million per year and PRESERVE the surgery as a CHOICE American males can make for themselves in adulthood. King, if you must promote the infant screams (because of your federally-funded fanatical HIV/AIDS religion), why not at least stop your fellow MDs from closing birth canals up to 30% and robbing babies of up to 50% of their blood volume? Or does your overarching fanatical American medical religion prohibit that? Immediate cord clamping forces babies to breathe through their lungs before they are ready - and robs them of up to 50% of their blood volume. This is happening to EVERY CESAREAN BABY, according to retired obstetrician George Malcolm Morley, MB ChB FACOG, quoted below. King, I urge you to stop promoting infant screams and help stop the other obvious American medical crimes... John Schutkeker am expressed his displeasure with my post (quoted back below): ***PLONK*** I replied: That'll teach me! : ) Pseudonymous usenet pediatrician PF Riley, MD replied: Oh yes, I'm sure that hurt Gastaldo's feelings... My feelings are indeed hurt (somewhat) when people respond negatively - but I maintain focus on the fact that PF Riley, MD's colleagues are senselessly hurting and sometimes killing babies. See below. that some random Usenetter thought himself important enough to quote an entire Gastaldo rant in order to tell us all that he's kill-filed him. I too think myself important enough to quote back my entire "rant" - especially since it is relevant this to response to PF Riley, MD, who in snipping it pretended that his fellow MDs aren't senselessly hurting and sometimes killing babies. In fact, further enhancing the stupidity of this move is the fact that now anyone who already had Gastaldo kill-filed still had to download his rant that you so nicely redistributed across the Usenet. Delete buttons and killfiling are what make the usenet work. I agree with the sentiment of PF Riley, MD: When one is merely publicly expressing one's disdain ("PLONK") - there is no need to quote back. By the way, thanks to near-universal HIV prenatal testing along with antepartum and postpartum AZT, congenital HIV is now almost unheard of. PF HIV/AIDS Clergyman PF Riley, MD forgot to mention ABORTIONS as a means of preventing congenital HIV... (Maybe "near-universal HIV prenatal testing" was PF's euphemism for abortion?) In 1989, Rhame and Maki recommended that HIV be used to frighten women into abortions and contraception, i.e., into "preventing neonatal HIV infection" by killing fetuses. [See Rhame FS and Maki DG: The case for wider testing for HIV infection. N Eng J Med,(May11)1989;320(19):1248-1 254.] A year later, a Johns Hopkins working group recommended, in effect, that health professionals should PERSONALLY frighten Black and Hispanic women - after which the working group had the audacity to state, "the decision [to abort] should clearly be made...without interference by the state and without unsolicited advice or other undue influence from health professionals." * [Johns Hopkins Working Group on HIV Testing: JAMA, (Nov14)1990;264(18):2416-20] The Johns Hopkins Working Group, acknowledging genocidal incidents in U.S. history, wrote: *"It is not surprising that some read in a policy of targeting [HIV testing], not a desire to do good, but an agenda of genocide..." IF the shaky HIV/AIDS hypothesis is wrong (I believe it is VERY shaky - and wrong; see below)... ....then abortions based on the HIV/AIDS hypothesis are wrong - with distinct overtones of genocide. BTW, along with the Supremes, those unelected officials who somehow found the woman's right to abort in the US Constitution, I support a woman's right to choose - but SELECTIVE promotion of the right to choose looks a lot like genocide to me. I've quoted Haldeman on Nixon befo "[Nixon] emphasized that you have to face the fact that the whole problem is really the blacks...The key is to devise a system that recognizes this while not appearing to. *Problem with overall welfare plan is that it forces poor whites into the same position as blacks. "[Nixon] pointed out that there has never in history been an adequate black nation, and they are the only race of which this is true. *Says Africa is hopeless..." [Haldeman's diary entry regarding an April 28, 1969 meeting with Nixon. Haldeman HR. The Haldeman Diaries. NY: GP Putnam's Sons 1994:53] There are various reasons Africa is hopeless. It is noteworthy that Wall Street Journal staff reporter Schoofs' Pulitzer Prize-winning 'AIDs: The Agony of Africa' series was about the second African Holocaust (HIV/AIDS). Did anyone ever read about the first African Holocaust caused by the colonial powers? The World War Series started and everyone forgot about it. I think the the book was King Leopold's Ghost by Adam Hochschild. Maybe the War on Terror will cover-up the second African Holocaust as it continues? Why AREN'T other causes of immunodeficiency taken into account in the CDC surveillance definition of AIDS, i.e., why is it that, "Regardless of the presence of other causes of immunodeficiency, in the presence of laboratory evidence for HIV, any disease [we have] listed...indicates a diagnosis of AIDS."(?) [U.S. Centers for Disease Control: JAMA, 1987;258:1143-1154. UC Berkeley molecular biologist Peter Duesberg, PhD was reviled for pointing out such shaky aspects of the HIV/AIDS hypothesis... See James P. Hogan's Kicking the Sacred Cow: Questioning the Unquestionable and Thinking the Impermissible [July 2004]... http://www.duesberg.com/viewpo ints/aids-heresy-hogan.html --EXCERPT I believe the HIV/AIDS hypothesis to be as wrong as the American medical hypothesis that babies can't feel pain for "lack of myelin" was wrong. It was the exposure of this latter bizarre medical hypothesis that first prompted American MDs to embrace the very shaky HIV/AIDS hypothesis as a "medical reason" they were ripping and slicing infant penises en masse. American MDs stood (and still stand) to go to prison because American medicine's most frequent surgical behavior toward males is obvious child abuse. See Brigman WE. Circumcision as Child Abuse: The Legal and Constitutional Issues. University of Louisville School of Law, Journal of Family Law, Vol. 23, No. 3, 1984-85. Sometimes the child abuse escalates to murder. Some babies DIE from American medicine's grisly no-medical-indication surgery. Some lose their penises. Fortunately, these outcomes are rare - but most all babies scream and writhe and bleed - and all lose PART of their penis. NOTE: Brigman ("Circumcision as Child Abuse") did not include in his 1984-85 analysis the fact that American MDs were using phony "babies can't feel pain" neurology to "inform" parents. American MDs finally admitted that babies can feel pain in 2000. The very shaky HIV/AIDS hypothesis is STILL being used to cover-up the fact that American MDs stand to go to prison for their ONGOING mass child abuse for profit scheme... So it is quite understandable that HIV/AIDS Clergyman PF Riley, MD would promote poisoning children with AZT and not want people quoting back the following... Todd Gastaldo wrote in : Colorado professors: A cumulative poison that children are forced to DRINK may be causing cancer - just like AZT causes cancer. See the very end of this post. Copied to CDC/ATSDR's Annette Ashizawa, PhD )... MDs FORCING KIDS TO TAKE POISON "AZT...parents didn't want to give [it] to them." (See below.) AZT is a POISON - complete with a skull and cross bones label. http://www.rethinking.org/aids/AZTLabel.html Kids are being FORCED to take the poison AZT based solely on the shaky HIV/AIDS hypothesis. (More on the shaky HIV/AIDS hypothesis below.) Liam Scheff reports: "[Child care worker] Mimi Pascual gave the children drugs every day and every night,on schedule, as the doctors ordered... "The drug Mimi remembers giving most often...is the nucleoside analog AZT... snip "More and more of the kids were there for compliance. They didn't want to take drugs, or their parents didn't want to give them, so they got put in ICC. "'None of us ever blamed the kids for refusing. We all saw them throw up like clockwork after taking the pills, and then the diarrhea that followed...' snip" [GASTALDO NOTES regarding "the diarrhea that followed": James P. Hogan says: "The 'side effects' [of AZT] look just like AIDS. Officially acknowledged effects of nucleoside analog drugs [like AZT] include diarrhea, dementia, lymphoma (cancer), muscle wasting, and T-cell depletion, which are also AIDS-defining" http://www.duesberg.com/viewpoints/a...sy-hogan.html] New York Press Volume 18, Issue 30 July 27 - August 2, 2005 INSIDE INCARNATION As the debate over AIDS-drug trials at Columbia's Incarnation Children Center grows louder, a former ICC employee reveals what she saw. By Liam Scheff http://www.nypress.com/18/30/news&co...liamscheff.cfm JUST HOW SHAKY IS THE HIV/AIDS HYPOTHESIS? VERY shaky... See James P. Hogan's Kicking the Sacred Cow: Questioning the Unquestionable and Thinking the Impermissible [July 2004]... http://www.duesberg.com/viewpoints/a...esy-hogan.html --EXCERPT Copied to Kicking the Sacred Cow author James P. Hogan via SO WHY DID AMERICAN PHYSICIANS EMBRACE THE SHAKY HIV/AIDS HYPOTHESIS? IN PART BECAUSE THEY WERE CAUGHT PERFORMING MASS CHILD ABUSE (OBVIOUSLY ILLEGAL SURGERIES)... California physicians embraced the shaky HIV/AIDS hypothesis to stay out of prison when I discovered in 1987 that they were ripping and slicing infant penises en masse - making babies scream and writhe and bleed - and telling parents that "babies can't feel pain" - and using obviously phony neurology... In an Oct. 11, 1987 letter (copied to the New England Journal of Medicine) I noted that the American Academy of Pediatrics had just perpetuated in the journal Pediatrics the false notion that babies can't feel pain for lack of myelin. I pointed out that most of the nervous system never becomes myelinated that that unmyelinated nerves are thought to transmit the most excruciating qualities of pain. The Nov. 19, 1987 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine published an article that exposed the lack of myelin fraud; but an editorial in the same issue claimed that BABIES incur the pain of their circumcisions. MASS CHILD ABUSE Since the "babies can't feel pain" mass infant penis ripping and slicing was (is) obvious mass child abuse... I reported it - and called for a religious exemption... STRANGE THINGS HAPPENED... In late 1987 (BILLIONS of dollars' worth of infant screams ago) I called for a religious exemption from the child abuse laws for the ancient Jewish ritual that leaves most of the infant foreskin on the penis... In Jan/Feb 1988, California physicians immediately came out opposed to ALL religious exemptions and in favor of anonymity for PERPETRATORS of child abuse. (See the Jan and Feb 1988 issues of Pediatrics. In March 1988, California physicians ignored their own Scientific Board and by voice vote changed their "no medical indications" mass infant penis slicing operation into an ostensible HIV/AIDS-prevention "effective public health measure." (California Medical Association Res. 305-88 - still in force I believe.) Why did American physicians ignore their own Scientific Board and call for anonymity for PERPETRATORS of child abuse? The answer is simple: A religious exemption for the minimal ancient Jewish ritual (which leaves most of the foreskin on the penis) would have instantly identified total-foreskin-amputating American MDs as the mass child abusers they are. (Note: I am in favor of pardons in advance for MDs. As med students, MDs are TRAINED to perform obvious felonies - not just mass infant penis ripping and slicing. See below for discussion of other obvious felony surgeries "performed" by American MDs.) Again, the mass ripping and slicing of baby penises should have ended billions of dollars' worth of infant screams ago when I pointed out the phony "babies can't feel pain" neurology. GOOD NEWS Ending the infant screams NOW (finally) will instantly save America an estimated $400 million per year and PRESERVE the surgery as a CHOICE American males can make for themselves in adulthood. OTHER OBVIOUSLY ILLEGAL SURGERIES... ADULT VAGINAS By using semisitting and dorsal delivery positions, American physicians are closing birth canals up to 30%. It is EASY for women to offer their babies the "extra" up to 30% - just by rolling onto their sides - or kneeling - or squatting - or standing, etc. The simple biomechanics have been in the medical literature since early last century. I myself reported the simple biomechanics to the medical literature late last century. See Gastaldo TD. Letter. Birth. 1992;19(4):230-231. American physicians are closing birth canals up to 30% - then slicing vaginas - pretending to be doing everything possible to open birth canals even as they (I repeat) close birth canals the "extra" up to 30%. (Infant penis slicing and adult vagina slicing are American medicine's most frequent surgical behaviors toward males and females, respectively.) With birth canals KEPT closed the "extra" up to 30%, American physicians pull with hands, forceps and vacuums - sometimes pulling so hard they rip spinal nerves out of tiny spinal cords. ADULT ABDOMENS With birth canals kept closed the "extra" up to 30%, American physicians are also slicing abdomens en masse (c-section). The fact that MDs are LYING to cover-up is perhaps the most obvious clue that they know they are committing massive crime. For the Four OB Lies... See ACOG's 2005 edition: How NOT to birth http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3606 See also: RNs: 'Stitches, episiotomy, and postpartum complications' (Maternal care learning needs) http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3725 LAW ENFORCEMENT Note: I have reported these crimes to Oregon law enforcement - Oregon Atty Genl Hardy Myers - but MDs are a protected class under our medico-"legal" "just us" system. Only rarely does law enforcement criminally prosecute MDs. The most MDs have to lose is their medical license - and even that is fairly rare. BTW, doctors of chiropractic/DCs are also protected - as are others who hold state licenses. State licensing is ostensibly to protect consumers - but the real beneficiaries are the health professionals who are getting away with obvious crimes.) KEY POINT: Law enforcement compelling American physicians to allow birth canals to open the "extra" up to 30% is not going to prevent all episiotomies, c-sections and forceps deliveries - it's just that American physicians have no business closing birth canals the "extra" up to 30%. UMBILICAL CORD SURGERY American medicine's MOST frequent surgical behavior - umbilical cord clamping/cutting - is also obviously illegal - the way American MDs do it. American MDs are clamping/cutting umbilical cords IMMEDIATELY - thereby robbing babies of up to 50% of their blood volume. Retired obstetrician George Malcolm Morley, MB ChB FACOG indicates that the massive baby blood robbery is being inflicted on EVERY CESAREAN BABY. Keeping in mind that babies breathe through their umbilical cords... Dr. Morley is recommending a "lesser" child abuse (TEMPORARY baby strangulation) to help his obstetrician colleagues learn that they shouldn't be robbing babies of so much blood.... Here is what I wrote when I recently reported this massive crime to Oregon Atty Genl Hardy Myers (via )... NOTE: AMERICAN MEDICINE¹S **MOST** FREQUENT SURGICAL BEHAVIOR IS OBVIOUS CHILD ABUSE THE WAY OBSTETRICIANS PRACTICE IT... Retired obstetrician George Malcolm Morley, MB ChB FACOG is recommending that his fellow obstetricians temporarily strangle babies - to help obstetricians learn why they should not immediately clamp/cut umbilical cords thereby PERMANENTLY strangling babies/robbing them of up to 50% of their blood volume. Dr. Morley indicates that EVERY CESAREAN BABY is being robbed of up to 50% of his/her blood volume. HERE IS DR. MORLEY RECOMMENDING THE **TEMPORARY** BABY STRANGLING ON THE WEB... "[T]he umbilical cord [is] immediately closed between finger and thumb...The [fetal heart rate/FHR] will decelerate quickly to about 60 bpm...the color will change from purple-pink (normal at birth) to pallid blue (vaso-constriction and asphyxia.)...Few midwives or obstetricians will be able to observe, without interference, a deep, prolonged FHR deceleration on a non-breathing newborn for a period of 60 seconds.* Common sense will soon release the finger and thumb." http://www.cordclamping.com/acog-cp.htm Hardy [Oregon Atty Genl Hardy Myers], some OREGON obstetricians may be going to Dr. Morley's website and experimenting with his temporary baby strangling - as they engage in PERMANENT baby strangling - robbing babies of up to 50% of their blood volume. Dr. Morley MEANS well * but it is simply (obviously) illegal for him to encourage obstetricians to commit ³lesser² child abuse in order to encourage them to stop committing greater child abuse - robbing babies of up to 50% of babies¹ blood volume. See Michigan Baby Strangler George Malcolm Morley, MB ChB FACOG http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3739 ...Hardy, I know that you may be unable to investigate MDs because you part of the medico-"legal" "just us" system... But at least offer assistance to pregnant women in your circle of family and friends, OK? END EXCERPT OF DR. GASTALDO'S RECENT SUSPECTED CHILD ABUSE REPORT TO OREGON ATTY GENL HARDY MYERS... Back to MDs forcing kids to take poison... Remember: Kids are being forced to take poison AZT in part because American MDs don't want to go to prison for their mass infant penis ripping and slicing behavior. Again, American MD mass ripping and slicing of baby penises should have ended billions of dollars' worth of infant screams ago back in 1987 when I pointed out the phony "babies can't feel pain" neurology. Again that GOOD NEWS: Ending the infant screams NOW (finally) will instantly save America an estimated $400 million per year and PRESERVE the surgery as a CHOICE American males can make for themselves in adulthood. Ending the other bizarre MD practices discussed above will save BILLIONS per year. Again: For the reason given above, I am in favor of pardons in advance for MDs. Sincerely, Todd Dr. Gastaldo Hillsboro, Oregon PS As alluded to at the beginning of this post, the cumulative poison fluoride ("fluoridation") may be causing cancer. There is epidemiologic evidence that boys drinking fluoridated water have a 700% greater risk of suffering osteosarcoma than boys who do not drink fluoridated water. CDC and dentists at the American Dental Association recently "celebrated" putting the cumulative poison fluoride into America's drinking water - even now that it is known that fluoride works TOPICALLY (if at all^^^) - i.e. - there was never any NEED for the cumulative poison to be in the water. ^^^Research indicates that fluoride saves less than 1 tooth surface in 128. See www.fluoridealert.com. People who still want their kids to have the cumulative poison fluoride on their teeth can use poisoned toothpaste. (Fluoride toothpaste is indeed poisoned. For the poison warning, check a tube of fluoridated toothpaste or go to www.aquasafe.us.) As with the poison AZT, the cumulative poison fluoride is being forced into children without parents' consent - but (and this is key) the cumulative poison fluoride is being administered with no life-threatening disease to treat... IT'S CRIMINAL The California Supreme Court wrote in THOR 93 C.D.O.S. 5658: "The common law has long recognized this principle: A physician who performs any medical procedure without the patient's consent commits a battery irrespective of the skill or care used." [Thor at 5659] I am told that all states have similar common law. 1. Under the common law doctrine of informed consent, even GOOD medicine administered without consent is a battery. 2. Battery against children is child abuse. MDs (and dentists) are getting away with mass child abuse. Oregon Atty Genl Hardy Myers and the rest of America's attorney generals are letting it happen. One citizen (me) reporting crimes is unlikely to change their medico-"legal" "just us" system behavior. I urge others to forward this post to their state's attorney general. As usual, as indicated above, this suspected child abuse report is being copied to Oregon Atty Genl Hardy Myers via . COLORADO PROFESSORS: Colorado State Prof. Thomas Sanders reportedly won't drink the cumulative poison fluoride^^^; but he may be in favor of drinking it is isn't derived from the fertilizer industry. Would you ask him if he is in favor of drinking the "good quality" poison? Sharlene K. Johnson wrote in Organic Style Magazine - July /August 2005: "Was it true that the chairman of the [Fort Collins, CO] water board‹Thomas Sanders, PhD, a Colorado State University professor of civil engineering and water-quality expert who had supported fluoridation for 30 years‹stopped drinking our city tap water as a result of the board's research? The answer...turned out to be yes..." Thomas Sanders, PhD was quoted: "When I started reading the literature, I came to the conclusion that in this country, we were supporting fluoridation without enough facts...I thought [our city was] using a very good quality sodium fluoride as the additive. When I found out it was from a fertilizer factory, that it was hazardous waste, and we were using it because its cheaper, I was absolutely shocked." ^^^See Organic Style and Fluoridation http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3760 I was just about to send this out when I received Paul Connett, PhD's FAN CAMPAIGN Bulletin #281 titled: "Will the real conspiracy please stand up." Paul is moaning about Harvard's Chester Douglass, PhD apparently covering-up epidemiologic evidence that fluoride may cause osteosarcoma. I am moaning here, as usual, about Paul himself covering-up/remaining silent about 1) the criminal aspect of fluoridation; and 2) the "good quality" poison scam. (It's being used in at least two legal actions wherein fluoride opponents are hoping municipalities won't be able to afford "pure" fluoride poison.) Unfortunately, real conspirators don't stand up. They remain silent - breathing together - potential cons - spiring - together. I just hope we can stop the poisoning of children - and the other obvious crimes - soon. I recently wrote to CDC's Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry/ATSDR (Annette Ashizawa, PhD): 1. CDC/ATSDR "works with states and other federal agencies to prevent exposure to hazardous substances from waste sites." http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/DRO/r1.html 2. EMERGENCY: A hazardous substance (hydrofluorosilicic acid w/ arsenic and lead) from phosphate fertilizer waste sites/scrubbers is being injected into America's water supply. (Some municipalities are using "pure" poison - sodium fluoride.) I said to Annette: CDC's ATSDR needs to simply DO ITS JOB and work with state attorney generals to stop/prevent this 60-year-old ongoing hazardous substance crime - NOW. I'll copy Annette (yet again) via . I say again to COLORADO PROFESSORS: Colorado State Prof. Thomas Sanders reportedly won't drink the cumulative poison fluoride; but he may be in favor of drinking it is isn't derived from the fertilizer industry. Would you ask him if he is in favor of drinking the "good quality" poison? I would be much reassured if the answer were no and Prof. Sanders was comfortable discussing at Fort Collins, CO water board meetings the rather obvious CRIMINAL aspect of the fluoride poisoning. See again THOR quoted above. (Again, I am told that all states have similar common law.) Perhaps Prof. Sanders could even talk Prof. Connett into finally ending his silence - instead of just moaning about Prof. Douglass' silence. One last note... Paul writes of the fluoride/osteosarcoma news... "Had not a member of the Fluoride Action Network (my son in fact) gone to the rare books section of the Harvard Library, and copied the relevant chapter of Bassin¹s thesis, the public-at-large would never have heard of this work (see WSJ, B1, July 22, 2005)." Bravo Michael Connett! Michael, please work with your dad on the "public-at-large" hearing about the common law indicating that fluoridation is a CRIME because it is administered without consent. Thanks. Copied to Michael Connett via . COLORADO PROFESSORS, please scroll up a little... This post will be archived for global access in the Google usenet archive. Search http://groups.google.com for "MDs forcing kids to take poison" Emerson expressed tolerance for the ancient Jewish ritual. See Emerson on Circumcision; also: Africa and [Fore]skin Freaks (American MDs) http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3774 I too am tolerant. I am in favor of pardons in advance for the MDs and ritual circumcisers who have been illegally performing TOTAL infant foreskin amputation - and an exemption from the child abuse laws for the ancient Jewish ritual that leaves most of the foreskin on the penis. I hope people will help expose the UW surgical HIV/AIDS vaccine hoax and other religious fanaticism in medicine. This post too will be archived for global access in the Google usenet archive. Search http://groups.google.com for "UW surgical HIV/AIDS vaccine hoax - and HIV/AIDS Clergyman PF Riley, MD"
|
|
#9
August 7th 05, 09:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
PF Riley wrote: By the way, thanks to near-universal HIV prenatal testing along with antepartum and postpartum AZT, congenital HIV is now almost unheard of. COMMENT: In the US. In other countries, notably Africa, it's not true. Partly due to stupidity (they have some wacko Germans telling them that HIV is harmless, and some in the government are listening) and partly due to poverty, and partly due to more than a decade of REALLY dumb delays in how the vertical transmission drug prevention trials were run (since transmission occurs at birth, it really only makes sense to knock viral levels down JUST before birth, and cheaply give drug no longer than it takes to do that, but--- duh-- nobody thought of doing that for YEARS). That said, this is not the best argument for circumcision. If a kid wants it at puberty as an adjunct HIV preventive, let him opt for the surgery then, the same way he would for a nose job or orthodontics. Why make irreversible and major decisions for people when you don't have to, and can wait till they are capable of participating? This isn't like giving childhood vaccines. BTW, the universal hep B vac program seems to be working. I'll be glad to see that disease as a thing of the past. Now where's the dang hep C vaccine? And if the cat FIV vaccine really works at all, why are they taking so long for people? Inquiring minds want to know. SBH
|
|
#10
August 7th 05, 11:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
AZT AND WACKO AMERICAN MDs...
They are still promoting the DNA-chain-terminator AZT... In 1995, Duesberg and Bialy asked of HIV/AIDS scientists: "Are they aware that the manufacturer of AZT says in the Physician's Desk Reference that 'it was often difficult to distinguish adverse events possibly associated with zidovudine [AZT] administration from underlying signs of HIV diseases...'?... Are they aware that the DNA chain terminators were developed 30 years ago to kill growing human cells for chemotherapy, not as anti-HIV drugs?..." http://www.sumeria.net/aids/howei.html I recently quoted from a woman child care worker who observed what happened when children were forced to take AZT: "[Child care worker] Mimi Pascual gave the children drugs every day and every night,on schedule, as the doctors ordered... "The drug Mimi remembers giving most often...is the nucleoside analog AZT... snip "More and more of the kids were there for compliance. They didn't want to take drugs, or their parents didn't want to give them, so they got put in ICC. "'None of us ever blamed the kids for refusing. We all saw them throw up like clockwork after taking the pills, and then the diarrhea that followed...' snip" [GASTALDO NOTES regarding "the diarrhea that followed": James P. Hogan says: "The 'side effects' [of AZT] look just like AIDS. Officially acknowledged effects of nucleoside analog drugs [like AZT] include diarrhea, dementia, lymphoma (cancer), muscle wasting, and T-cell depletion, which are also AIDS-defining" http://www.duesberg.com/viewpoints/a...sy-hogan.html] New York Press Volume 18, Issue 30 July 27 - August 2, 2005 INSIDE INCARNATION As the debate over AIDS-drug trials at Columbia's Incarnation Children Center grows louder, a former ICC employee reveals what she saw. By Liam Scheff http://www.nypress.com/18/30/news&co...liamscheff.cfm JUST HOW SHAKY IS THE HIV/AIDS HYPOTHESIS? VERY shaky... See James P. Hogan's Kicking the Sacred Cow: Questioning the Unquestionable and Thinking the Impermissible [July 2004]... http://www.duesberg.com/viewpoints/a...esy-hogan.html --EXCERPT Copied to Kicking the Sacred Cow author James P. Hogan via Pseudonymous usenet pediatrician PF Riley, MD "responded" by further promoting use of AZT: By the way, thanks to near-universal HIV prenatal testing along with antepartum and postpartum AZT, congenital HIV is now almost unheard of. Steve Harris, MD replied: In other countries, notably Africa, it's not true. Partly due to stupidity (they have some wacko Germans telling them that HIV is harmless, and some in the government are listening) LOL! Steve, what about those wacko AMERICAN MDs telling parents that babies can't feel pain as they ripped and sliced infant penises en masse?! When I pointed out the phony "lack of myelin" neurology - and the fact that there were no medical indications - and demanded that they stop their mass child abuse... Wacko American MDs in the California Medical Association House of Delegates instantly (by voice vote!) ignored their own Scientific Board and converted their "no medical indications" mass infant penis ripping and slicing into a "we've been preventing HIV/AIDS transmission all along" "effective public health measure." (LOL!) That was 1988. The next year, the American Academy of Pediatrics committee looking into routine infant circumcision failed to mention the California Medical Association's brand new "effective public health measure" in reporting there were still no medical indications - amid a "potential medical indications" media scam... The media scam was so successful that MDs had to be informed: MEDICAL TRIBUNE 30:16 (8 June 1989) * * * * *FORGET THOSE HEADLINES ABOUT CIRCUMCISION * * * * * * AAP IS AGAINST ROUTINE CIRCUMCISION http://www.cirp.org/CIRP/news/ 1989.06.08%3aMedicalTribune Talk about wacko - the ONLY reason American MDs didn't (and don't) go to prison (for this and other obvious MD crimes) is that they are a protected class under our medico-"legal" "just us" system. Steve B. Harris, MD correctly noted that, in effect: "Without enforcement, there is no law. Without law, there is no crime...These are elementary principles. Get an adult to explain them to you." I replied to Steve: "You make a good point...I am learning only late in life that MDs can blithely commit crime because law enforcement doesn't prosecute it...I just don't think it fair (for example) that babies have to pay with their lives and limbs for such MD arrogance...I am particularly concerned that MD-obstetricians are closing birth canals up to 30% and lying to cover-up... For the Four OB Lies (they are whoppers)... See ACOG's 2005 edition: How NOT to birth http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3606 " NOTE: I am also concerned that Steve's fellow MDs are immediately clamping umbilical cords - temporarily asphyxiating babies/forcing them to breathe with their lungs before they are ready - and in the process robbing babies of up to 50% of their blood volume. This is happening to EVERY CESAREAN BABY, according retired obstetrician George Malcolm Morley, MB ChB FACOG. See again: ACOG's 2005 edition: How NOT to birth http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3606 Steve B. Harris, MD continued... [More congenital HIV in Africa] is partly due to poverty, and LOL! Ain't that the tooth (as a fine chap I know sometimes says)... Speaking of poverty - and malnutrition - why aren't other causes of immunodeficiency taken into account in the CDC surveillance definition of AIDS, i.e., why is it that, "Regardless of the presence of other causes of immunodeficiency, in the presence of laboratory evidence for HIV, any disease [we have] listed...indicates a diagnosis of AIDS."(?) [U.S. Centers for Disease Control: JAMA, 1987;258:1143-1154. UC Berkeley molecular biologist Peter Duesberg, PhD was reviled for pointing out such shaky aspects of the HIV/AIDS hypothesis... See James P. Hogan's Kicking the Sacred Cow: Questioning the Unquestionable and Thinking the Impermissible [July 2004]... http://www.duesberg.com/viewpo ints/aids-heresy-hogan.html --EXCERPT partly due to more than a decade of REALLY dumb delays in how the vertical transmission drug prevention trials were run (since transmission occurs at birth, it really only makes sense to knock viral levels down JUST before birth, and cheaply give drug no longer than it takes to do that, but--- duh-- nobody thought of doing that for YEARS). Vertical transmission/mother to child? I remember years ago, an obstetrician ARGUED with me when I pointed out that cesarean section was now recommended to prevent putative vertical transmission of HIV/AIDS from mother to child - LOL! C-sections to prevent HIV/AIDS transmission is just one more "fact" of the fanatical religion called HIV/AIDS "science" - like the spectacle of UW's King Holmes, MD, PhD (and 100 others) sucking at the federal HIV/AIDS tit ($83 million per year!) as King promotes routine infant circumcision as an "anatomical vaccine for life." And in the journal "Science" no less! LOL! See UW surgical HIV/AIDS vaccine hoax - and HIV/AIDS Clergyman PF Riley, MD http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3776 That said, this is not the best argument for circumcision. Bravo Steve-O! If a kid wants it at puberty as an adjunct HIV preventive, let him opt for the surgery then, the same way he would for a nose job or orthodontics. Didn't most Muslims (and some African tribes) wait till puberty? Regardless, HIV/AIDS is a RELIGIOUS "HIV preventive" "reason" to circumcise - to keep American MDs out of prison for their past ("babies can't feel pain") and ongoing mass infant penis ripping and slicing behavior. Why make irreversible and major decisions for people when you don't have to, and can wait till they are capable of participating? This isn't like giving childhood vaccines. Well Steve-O, it's like you told me: "Without enforcement, there is no law. Without law, there is no crime...These are elementary principles. Get an adult to explain them to you." BTW, the universal hep B vac program seems to be working. I'll be glad to see that disease as a thing of the past. Now where's the dang hep C vaccine? Hep B only "seems" to be working? The original aim of the hep B vac trial was measuring vaccine efficacy against liver cancer. Hopefully by now they at least have FAKED such efficacy "scientifically." In 1987, while they were still trying to figure out hep B vaccine efficacy against liver cancer, James E. Maynard, MD wrote: "...[O]ver the next 5 to 10 years...[Third World countries] will need 350 million doses a year...By the year 2000 we will have accomplished our task if we see hepatitis B incorporated as the seventh universal immunogen for infant immunization in the Expanded Program on Immunization that is sponsored by the World Health Organization." [James E. Maynard, M.D., executive director of a nine physician international task force run by the Seattle-based Program for Appropriate Technology and Health (PATH), discussing the hepatitis B vaccine produced by Alfred M. Prince, M.D. of the New York Blood Center. *In Marwick C: JAMA, Sept.18, 1987;258(1):1439] As hundreds of millions of Third World children were being injected with hepatitis B vaccine, most of the world¹s physicians were refusing hepatitis B vaccine injections - for fear of catching AIDS.... Dr. AM Prince, developer of the hepatitis B vaccine, wrote in 1991: "[M]any high-risk individuals...do not wish to be vaccinated. *This applies surprisingly to about 50% of physicians and nurses in many countries, who despite all assurances remain unconvinced that HBV vaccine will not transmit unknown agents of disease." [Prince AM: Hepatitis B virus: active and passive immunization. In Cryz SJ (ed.): Vaccines and immunotherapy, 1991, New York: Pergamon Press.] In one study MDs refused hepatitis B vaccination - even when it was offered free of charge: "...the majority of physicians...failed to be vaccinated even when offered the hepatitis B vaccine free of charge." [Clancy CM, Cebul RD, Williams SV. Guiding individual decisions: a randomized controlled trial of decision analysis. Am J Med, 1988;84(2):283-8] Even stranger than doctors not taking their own hepatitis B vaccine is the fact that Hepatitis B vaccine researchers discovered early on that nearly all the African children on whom they were experimenting, were testing positive for hepatitis B virus [The Lancet, May12, 1989, p. 1057-60] - but were almost never expressing symptoms of the disease called hepatitis. [Cancer Res, 1987;47:5782-87] In 1999, I wrote to CDC's Walter Orenstein, MD: And now a 1998 press release reports, in effect, that these same Hepatitis B vaccine researchers are indicating that unvaccinated infants WERE suffering from acute hepatitis - from infancy up to the age of ten years: "The Gambia Hepatitis Intervention Study has clearly demonstrated that protection against persistent hepatitis B infection by infant vaccination continues up to the age of ten years. The study of this protection against...against acute hepatitis...should be continued into the adolescent years when new modes of exposure to the virus will occur." http://www.iarc.fr/preleases/1 21e.htm Whatever the case with acute hepatitis, the 1998 press release to which I am referring was titled, "Recommendations for the control of hepatitis B-related CANCER" [emphasis added] - but upon reading the press release, one finds that the Gambian study is being conducted because researchers DON'T KNOW whether Hep B vaccine prevents cancer... According to the press release: "GHIS should ensure that cancer registration in The Gambia and linkage of individuals with liver cancer to vaccine records is made as effective as possible, in order for the study to fulfill its *ORIGINAL AIM* of measuring vaccine efficacy against liver cancer." [emphasis added] http://www.iarc.fr/preleases/1 21e.htm I wrote further... Dr. Orenstein, most of the world public is unaware that millions (billions?) are being spent to innoculate children to MAYBE prevent the adult cancer called hepatocellular carcinoma - as 50% of African children in some areas starve to death. [50% mortality rate is from Sachs MY and Martin AS (Eds.): Worldmark Encyclopedia of the Nations, Volume 2: Africa, 7th ed., 1988, New York: Worldmark Press, Ltd., John Wiley & Sons, Inc.] Interesting side note: *I am truly surprised that the 1998 press release about The Gambian experiment (see above) did not explicitly mention the woodchuck studies and the epidemiologic studies being used to claim that Hep B vaccine prevents cancer. *Also interesting is Duesberg and Schwartz's 1992 claim that "there is no convincing evidence that hepatitis B viral DNA is functionally relevant for the initiation and maintenance of hepatomas." [Duesberg PH and Schwartz JR: Latent viruses and mutated oncogenes: no evidence for pathogenicity. Progress in Nucleic Acid Research and Molecular Biology, 1992;43:135-204] Dr. Orenstein, I believe, was recently exposed trying to cover-up thimerosal danger. Someone correct me if I am wrong about that. And if the cat FIV vaccine really works at all, why are they taking so long for people? Inquiring minds want to know. Steve, it is good for MDs to have inquiring minds. Your fellow MDs are immediately clamping umbilical cords - temporarily asphyxiating babies/forcing them to breathe with their lungs before they are ready - and in the process robbing babies of up to 50% of their blood volume. This is happening to EVERY CESAREAN BABY, according retired obstetrician George Malcolm Morley, MB ChB FACOG. See again: ACOG's 2005 edition: How NOT to birth http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3606 Steve, are you doing anything to stop your fellow MDs from asphyxiating babies and robbing up 50% of their blood? Or are you just going to stand on your valid observation (see above) that if you MDs can get away with crime, in effect, you aren't committing crime? Just curious. Sincerely, Your friend, Todd Dr. Gastaldo Hillsboro, Oregon This post will be archived for global access in the Google usenet archive. Search http://groups.google.com for "Wacko American MDs"
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| misc.kids FAQ on Good things about having kids | [email protected] | Info and FAQ's | 0 | May 30th 05 05:28 AM |
| misc.kids FAQ on Good things about having kids | [email protected] | Info and FAQ's | 0 | March 30th 05 06:34 AM |
| misc.kids FAQ on Good things about having kids | [email protected] | Info and FAQ's | 0 | July 29th 04 05:16 AM |
| misc.kids FAQ on Good things about having kids | [email protected] | Info and FAQ's | 0 | June 28th 04 07:42 PM |
| Do Plant and Droaner claim insufficient spanking for Klebold and Harris caused Columbine? | Kane | Spanking | 13 | May 21st 04 03:29 AM |
Linear Mode
