Apology for rudeness... Ukrainian adoption -a real possibility to reach your dream

Kane wrote
Do you think I don't know who it actually is? Do you think I don't
know that you know who it actually is?

You claim I know nothing but when it's CONVENIENT for you
suddenly you presume I know what suits you.

On Mar 18, 8:10 am, "Greegor" wrote:
Kane wrote

Do you think I don't know who it actually is? Do you think I don't
know that you know who it actually is?

You claim I know nothing but when it's CONVENIENT for you
suddenly you presume I know what suits you.

What is relevant to the issue under dicussion is always "CONVENIENT,"
Greg, to me or anyone else with a brain and honor.

What you know nothing about is the world. What you do know about are
the various vicious criminal socks that post here to try and protect
you from YOU revealing your own stupidity.

You question about "fake" fatality data for instance.

Instead of do the minimum of exploring of your buddies bull****
claims, using his OWN references, you simply presumed he told the
truth....someone you puckering KNOW is a congenital compulsive liar.

Anyone looking at the Texas Comptroller's actual statement knows it's
not 44 kids killed by foster parents in that year, but TWO, you stupid
****ant. 2, stupid. TWO. as in one, two, buckle your yellow shoe, you
pucking idiot.

And this is a theme in your postings, and I have to presume, your life
as well. Living on misinformation that supports your various violent
fantasies about overthrowing the government. Yer too stupid to ****
downwind, Yellowshoes.

Yer a loser, kid. A loser.

And stupid.

And full of yourself.

GFYS

Kane: Are you positive that fx lied about the death numbers in
Texas?
For both years referred to?

On Mar 19, 11:02 am, "Kane" wrote:
On Mar 18, 8:10 am, "Greegor" wrote:

Kane wrote

Do you think I don't know who it actually is? Do you think I don't
know that you know who it actually is?

You claim I know nothing but when it's CONVENIENT for you
suddenly you presume I know what suits you.

What is relevant to the issue under dicussion is always "CONVENIENT,"

Pretzel logic Kane?

Greg, to me or anyone else with a brain and honor.

That leaves YOU out.

What you know nothing about is the world. What you do know about are
the various vicious criminal socks

What do you mean about "criminal socks"? Joking?

that post here to try and protect
you from YOU revealing your own stupidity.

I don't think anybody can protect me from that by posting.

You question about "fake" fatality data for instance.

I think the agencies are EXPERTS at telling lies about
the fatality and abuse information for their benefit.

Remember I once posted a story where a CITIZEN
in one state kept a tally WITH NAMES from the
media and found the numbers passed to the Feds
were doctored down as fx's piece alleged.
(In other words, agencies have already been caught doing this!)

Instead of do the minimum of exploring of your buddies bull****
claims, using his OWN references, you simply presumed he told the
truth....someone you puckering KNOW is a congenital compulsive liar.

You didn't post it.

Anyone looking at the Texas Comptroller's actual statement knows it's
not 44 kids killed by foster parents in that year, but TWO, you stupid
****ant. 2, stupid. TWO. as in one, two, buckle your yellow shoe, you
pucking idiot.

Only two kids killed by Fosters in Texas one year?
Where do you think the 44 kids figure came from?

And this is a theme in your postings, and I have to presume, your life
as well. Living on misinformation that supports your various violent
fantasies about overthrowing the government.

WHAT? Please link to quotes where I said that.

Yer too stupid to ****
downwind, Yellowshoes.

Yer a loser, kid. A loser.

And stupid.

And full of yourself.

You're the former government agent, and megalomaniac.


GFYS

I don't need to resort to that, but I'm glad I cheer you up so!

On Mar 19, 2:07 pm, "0:-]" wrote:
On 19 Mar 2007 12:25:30 -0700, "Greegor" wrote:

Kane: Are you positive that fx lied about the death numbers in
Texas?
For both years referred to?

Greg, it doesn't matter about "both" years. It matters that no one was
faking anything.

And it was not proven by the post.

And I proved fx was full of **** using the Tx Comptroller's report for
"evidence," when it shows that the states report of "2" was absolutely
on the money according to the comptroller.

If you have a point to make, why not make it, Greg?

Go for it, or run as usual.

I don't run, I am a fast walker, when I'm not carrying a heavy pack.

Where do you think fx got the 44 figure?


0;]





On Mar 19, 11:02 am, "Kane" wrote:
On Mar 18, 8:10 am, "Greegor" wrote:

Kane wrote

Do you think I don't know who it actually is? Do you think I don't
know that you know who it actually is?

You claim I know nothing but when it's CONVENIENT for you
suddenly you presume I know what suits you.

What is relevant to the issue under dicussion is always "CONVENIENT,"

Pretzel logic Kane?

Greg, to me or anyone else with a brain and honor.

That leaves YOU out.

What you know nothing about is the world. What you do know about are
the various vicious criminal socks

What do you mean about "criminal socks"? Joking?

that post here to try and protect
you from YOU revealing your own stupidity.

I don't think anybody can protect me from that by posting.

You question about "fake" fatality data for instance.

I think the agencies are EXPERTS at telling lies about
the fatality and abuse information for their benefit.

Remember I once posted a story where a CITIZEN
in one state kept a tally WITH NAMES from the
media and found the numbers passed to the Feds
were doctored down as fx's piece alleged.
(In other words, agencies have already been caught doing this!)

Instead of do the minimum of exploring of your buddies bull****
claims, using his OWN references, you simply presumed he told the
truth....someone you puckering KNOW is a congenital compulsive liar.

You didn't post it.

Anyone looking at the Texas Comptroller's actual statement knows it's
not 44 kids killed by foster parents in that year, but TWO, you stupid
****ant. 2, stupid. TWO. as in one, two, buckle your yellow shoe, you
pucking idiot.

Only two kids killed by Fosters in Texas one year?
Where do you think the 44 kids figure came from?

And this is a theme in your postings, and I have to presume, your life
as well. Living on misinformation that supports your various violent
fantasies about overthrowing the government.

WHAT? Please link to quotes where I said that.

Yer too stupid to ****
downwind, Yellowshoes.

Yer a loser, kid. A loser.

And stupid.

And full of yourself.

You're the former government agent, and megalomaniac.

GFYS

I don't need to resort to that, but I'm glad I cheer you up so!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

On Mar 19, 1:22 pm, "Greegor" wrote:
On Mar 19, 2:07 pm, "0:-]" wrote:



On 19 Mar 2007 12:25:30 -0700, "Greegor" wrote:

Kane: Are you positive that fx lied about the death numbers in
Texas?
For both years referred to?

Greg, it doesn't matter about "both" years. It matters that no one was
faking anything.

And it was not proven by the post.

And I proved fx was full of **** using the Tx Comptroller's report for
"evidence," when it shows that the states report of "2" was absolutely
on the money according to the comptroller.

If you have a point to make, why not make it, Greg?

Go for it, or run as usual.

I don't run, I am a fast walker, when I'm not carrying a heavy pack.

Where do you think fx got the 44 figure?

I don't think, I know. All YOU have to do is go and read the refernce
HE posted.

And I quoted more fully from.

Read it yet:?

Probably not, but you just had to babble.

He's mixing and matching labels to things to get the outcome.

There were no 44 children killed by foster parents, stupid.

Go read it.



0;]

On Mar 19, 11:02 am, "Kane" wrote:
On Mar 18, 8:10 am, "Greegor" wrote:

Kane wrote

Do you think I don't know who it actually is? Do you think I don't
know that you know who it actually is?

You claim I know nothing but when it's CONVENIENT for you
suddenly you presume I know what suits you.

What is relevant to the issue under dicussion is always "CONVENIENT,"

Pretzel logic Kane?

Greg, to me or anyone else with a brain and honor.

That leaves YOU out.

What you know nothing about is the world. What you do know about are
the various vicious criminal socks

What do you mean about "criminal socks"? Joking?

that post here to try and protect
you from YOU revealing your own stupidity.

I don't think anybody can protect me from that by posting.

You question about "fake" fatality data for instance.

I think the agencies are EXPERTS at telling lies about
the fatality and abuse information for their benefit.

Remember I once posted a story where a CITIZEN
in one state kept a tally WITH NAMES from the
media and found the numbers passed to the Feds
were doctored down as fx's piece alleged.
(In other words, agencies have already been caught doing this!)

Instead of do the minimum of exploring of your buddies bull****
claims, using his OWN references, you simply presumed he told the
truth....someone you puckering KNOW is a congenital compulsive liar.

You didn't post it.

Anyone looking at the Texas Comptroller's actual statement knows it's
not 44 kids killed by foster parents in that year, but TWO, you stupid
****ant. 2, stupid. TWO. as in one, two, buckle your yellow shoe, you
pucking idiot.

Only two kids killed by Fosters in Texas one year?
Where do you think the 44 kids figure came from?

And this is a theme in your postings, and I have to presume, your life
as well. Living on misinformation that supports your various violent
fantasies about overthrowing the government.

WHAT? Please link to quotes where I said that.

Yer too stupid to ****
downwind, Yellowshoes.

Yer a loser, kid. A loser.

And stupid.

And full of yourself.

You're the former government agent, and megalomaniac.

GFYS

I don't need to resort to that, but I'm glad I cheer you up so!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I'm in a big hurry to check it out. Have you noticed?

On Mar 19, 6:11 pm, "0:-" wrote:
On Mar 19, 1:22 pm, "Greegor" wrote:





On Mar 19, 2:07 pm, "0:-]" wrote:

On 19 Mar 2007 12:25:30 -0700, "Greegor" wrote:

Kane: Are you positive that fx lied about the death numbers in
Texas?
For both years referred to?

Greg, it doesn't matter about "both" years. It matters that no one was
faking anything.

And it was not proven by the post.

And I proved fx was full of **** using the Tx Comptroller's report for
"evidence," when it shows that the states report of "2" was absolutely
on the money according to the comptroller.

If you have a point to make, why not make it, Greg?

Go for it, or run as usual.

I don't run, I am a fast walker, when I'm not carrying a heavy pack.

Where do you think fx got the 44 figure?

I don't think, I know. All YOU have to do is go and read the refernce
HE posted.

And I quoted more fully from.

Read it yet:?

Probably not, but you just had to babble.

He's mixing and matching labels to things to get the outcome.

There were no 44 children killed by foster parents, stupid.

Go read it.





0;]

On Mar 19, 11:02 am, "Kane" wrote:
On Mar 18, 8:10 am, "Greegor" wrote:

Kane wrote

Do you think I don't know who it actually is? Do you think I don't
know that you know who it actually is?

You claim I know nothing but when it's CONVENIENT for you
suddenly you presume I know what suits you.

What is relevant to the issue under dicussion is always "CONVENIENT,"

Pretzel logic Kane?

Greg, to me or anyone else with a brain and honor.

That leaves YOU out.

What you know nothing about is the world. What you do know about are
the various vicious criminal socks

What do you mean about "criminal socks"? Joking?

that post here to try and protect
you from YOU revealing your own stupidity.

I don't think anybody can protect me from that by posting.

You question about "fake" fatality data for instance.

I think the agencies are EXPERTS at telling lies about
the fatality and abuse information for their benefit.

Remember I once posted a story where a CITIZEN
in one state kept a tally WITH NAMES from the
media and found the numbers passed to the Feds
were doctored down as fx's piece alleged.
(In other words, agencies have already been caught doing this!)

Instead of do the minimum of exploring of your buddies bull****
claims, using his OWN references, you simply presumed he told the
truth....someone you puckering KNOW is a congenital compulsive liar.

You didn't post it.

Anyone looking at the Texas Comptroller's actual statement knows it's
not 44 kids killed by foster parents in that year, but TWO, you stupid
****ant. 2, stupid. TWO. as in one, two, buckle your yellow shoe, you
pucking idiot.

Only two kids killed by Fosters in Texas one year?
Where do you think the 44 kids figure came from?

And this is a theme in your postings, and I have to presume, your life
as well. Living on misinformation that supports your various violent
fantasies about overthrowing the government.

WHAT? Please link to quotes where I said that.

Yer too stupid to ****
downwind, Yellowshoes.

Yer a loser, kid. A loser.

And stupid.

And full of yourself.

You're the former government agent, and megalomaniac.

GFYS

I don't need to resort to that, but I'm glad I cheer you up so!

Greegor wrote:
I'm in a big hurry to check it out. Have you noticed?

In other words you aren't interested in facts, and support a liar.

Why is that no surprise?




On Mar 19, 6:11 pm, "0:-" wrote:
On Mar 19, 1:22 pm, "Greegor" wrote:





On Mar 19, 2:07 pm, "0:-]" wrote:
On 19 Mar 2007 12:25:30 -0700, "Greegor" wrote:
Kane: Are you positive that fx lied about the death numbers in
Texas?
For both years referred to?
Greg, it doesn't matter about "both" years. It matters that no one was
faking anything.
And it was not proven by the post.
And I proved fx was full of **** using the Tx Comptroller's report for
"evidence," when it shows that the states report of "2" was absolutely
on the money according to the comptroller.
If you have a point to make, why not make it, Greg?
Go for it, or run as usual.
I don't run, I am a fast walker, when I'm not carrying a heavy pack.
Where do you think fx got the 44 figure?
I don't think, I know. All YOU have to do is go and read the refernce
HE posted.

And I quoted more fully from.

Read it yet:?

Probably not, but you just had to babble.

He's mixing and matching labels to things to get the outcome.

There were no 44 children killed by foster parents, stupid.

Go read it.





0;]
On Mar 19, 11:02 am, "Kane" wrote:
On Mar 18, 8:10 am, "Greegor" wrote:
Kane wrote
Do you think I don't know who it actually is? Do you think I don't
know that you know who it actually is?
You claim I know nothing but when it's CONVENIENT for you
suddenly you presume I know what suits you.
What is relevant to the issue under dicussion is always "CONVENIENT,"
Pretzel logic Kane?
Greg, to me or anyone else with a brain and honor.
That leaves YOU out.
What you know nothing about is the world. What you do know about are
the various vicious criminal socks
What do you mean about "criminal socks"? Joking?
that post here to try and protect
you from YOU revealing your own stupidity.
I don't think anybody can protect me from that by posting.
You question about "fake" fatality data for instance.
I think the agencies are EXPERTS at telling lies about
the fatality and abuse information for their benefit.
Remember I once posted a story where a CITIZEN
in one state kept a tally WITH NAMES from the
media and found the numbers passed to the Feds
were doctored down as fx's piece alleged.
(In other words, agencies have already been caught doing this!)
Instead of do the minimum of exploring of your buddies bull****
claims, using his OWN references, you simply presumed he told the
truth....someone you puckering KNOW is a congenital compulsive liar.
You didn't post it.
Anyone looking at the Texas Comptroller's actual statement knows it's
not 44 kids killed by foster parents in that year, but TWO, you stupid
****ant. 2, stupid. TWO. as in one, two, buckle your yellow shoe, you
pucking idiot.
Only two kids killed by Fosters in Texas one year?
Where do you think the 44 kids figure came from?
And this is a theme in your postings, and I have to presume, your life
as well. Living on misinformation that supports your various violent
fantasies about overthrowing the government.
WHAT? Please link to quotes where I said that.
Yer too stupid to ****
downwind, Yellowshoes.
Yer a loser, kid. A loser.
And stupid.
And full of yourself.
You're the former government agent, and megalomaniac.
GFYS
I don't need to resort to that, but I'm glad I cheer you up so!