If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Gazette opinion: Federal rules foster state care challenge
Gazette opinion: Federal rules foster state care challenge
Montana's foster care program has run short of money to cover care of children removed from their parents' homes because of abuse or neglect. As a result, $1.7 million in state funds has been shifted into the foster care program this year and the program will try to close a $300,000 funding gap by eliminating allowances for respite care and reducing children's clothing allowances. With the cuts, the basic payment of $15 to $18 a day isn't being touched, according to Gail Gray, director of the Montana Department of Public Health and Human Services. "We protected what foster care parents told us to protect," Gray said. Committed families "Foster families will be tightening their belts," said Melody Blendu, a foster parent for nine years and president of the Yellowstone Valley Foster Parent Adoptive Association. "They will ride this out and wait to see better times. Our foster families are very committed. They really pull together, they rally. I don't think we'll lose families over this." Because of changes in federal regulations and the federal government's stricter application of its rules, fewer Montana foster care children qualify for federal funding. The Montana Department of Public Health and Human Services started the biennium with a budget that assumed that the federal government would cover 60 percent of the children in Montana foster care. Last month, only 40 percent of the children in Montana foster care were deemed eligible for this federal program for impoverished children. The rules that have made some Montana foster care cases ineligible for federal reimbursement include those in homes that haven't yet been fully licensed. Gray says all the foster homes used by the state are safe, but some are in the process of completing licensure. For example, if the state places foster children with a relative who isn't already a licensed foster parent, it will take 60 to 90 days to complete the training and other licensure requirements. In the meantime, the state keeps the children in the relative's home because the placement is in the childrens' best interest. Court requirements Another stumbling block is a federal requirement that each foster care child have a permanency hearing in court within 12 months and that the court's finding must include language recently specified by federal regulators. The timing is a challenge in busy courts that must protect children as well as the rights of parents. The verbiage problem seems to be a matter of getting the word out to all courts all over the state. Other states are in similar situations with their latest federal foster care audits, Gray said. In Montana, the cuts in respite care and clothing allowance take the foster families back a couple of years when similar cuts were made during the state budget crisis. The allowances were then restored and now are being taken away again. Next year, the federal auditors will be back. And then they won't just be pulling funds from the cases they find out of compliance. The feds will extrapolate the audit findings to cut funds from a percentage of all Montana foster care children. Instead of hundreds of thousands of dollars, millions will be at risk. DPHHS must work hard within the agency and with the court system to make sure it gets all the federal foster care reimbursement possible. It appears that the Legislature and Gov.-elect Brian Schweitzer will have to consider increasing state support for foster care. We join Blendu in urging concerned citizens to talk to their legislators and congressional delegation about foster care. Over time, Blendu worries, the cutbacks may mean that children "will have to reach higher levels of crisis" before the state can step in because there won't be money to take care of all the children. Society doesn't benefit from taking money away from the necessary care of abused and neglected children. http://www.billingsgazette.com/index.../30-gaz-op.inc Defend your civil liberties! Get information at http://www.aclu.org, become a member at http://www.aclu.org/join and get active at http://www.aclu.org/action. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| ACS NY "Child welfare agencies get bad press" | Kane | Foster Parents | 17 | June 7th 04 03:47 PM |
'Horrible' Home | Kane | General | 1 | July 16th 03 02:29 AM |
| Database should audit high $$ in Foster Care system | Kane | General | 3 | July 15th 03 06:43 AM |