If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
children
i have seen the rsults of non spanking ( no disapline).i have also
seen the result of child abuse. children need disaplin .NOThammering i was a solo dad. my kids have never got into trouble. they new di .sapline. however i know other mums dads who had to use other methods,they were nto child abusers and shoulnot be considerd as such. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
children
The ultraliberal or socialist KOOKS who try to push
laws against all parental spanking commonly refer to even the most reasonable spanking as BEATING or otherwise blur the distinction you made. The antispanking agenda is a socialist agenda. The socialist kooks would like to extend the situation where government is parent, and as part of that they like to neutralize effective parents and try to conceal the DISMAL performance of the state as parent. For the state to second guess parents about such things as spanking is absurd since the state is such a grossly inferior parent. High courts have actually decided that Child Protection agencies are NOT the spanking police. Much of what CPS agencies judge parents for is NOT anything legislated anyway, often they enforce caseworkers attitudes and political agenda rather than actual laws. Are you actually in New Zealand or are you just using a remailer based there? Jan 6, 1:40*am, wrote: i have seen the rsults of non spanking ( no disapline).i have also seen the result of child abuse. children need disaplin .NOThammering i was a solo dad. my kids have never got into trouble. they new di *.sapline. however i know other mums dads who had to use other methods,they were nto child abusers and shoulnot be considerd as such. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|