How many have actually read the Straus study?

Have you read the Embry study, LaVonne? ;-)

Doan

On Wed, 31 Dec 2003, Carlson LaVonne wrote:

Read the study, Greg. Didn't do that yet, did you?



Greg Hanson wrote:

But aren't you going to provide the full Embry study first?
Instead of doing the ADHD kinda thing by jumping to
a new thread, why don't you address the LACK of
the full Embry study - in the original thread you started?

You complain about others, but you and Chris
yapped forever about Embry, but what you ""cited""
was only a short blurb.

Deal with that first.

Straus screwed up so bad you are really wasting time
to even bring up this biased nitwit who got caught at it.

Doan wrote:

I have, LaVonne. Dare to debate me? ;-)

Doan
-------------
You're a LIAR!
Steve

On Sun, 4 Jan 2004, R. Steve Walz wrote:

Doan wrote:

I have, LaVonne. Dare to debate me? ;-)

Doan
-------------
You're a LIAR!
Steve

Another typical response from a "never-spanked" boy. Thanks, Steve. With
you and Kane, I can just sit back and LAUGH! ;-)

Doan

Doan wrote:

On Sun, 4 Jan 2004, R. Steve Walz wrote:

Doan wrote:

I have, LaVonne. Dare to debate me? ;-)

Doan
-------------
You're a LIAR!
Steve

Another typical response from a "never-spanked" boy. Thanks, Steve. With
you and Kane, I can just sit back and LAUGH! ;-)

Doan
-------------------
You giggle nervously because you were damaged, and we weren't.
Steve

On Mon, 5 Jan 2004, R. Steve Walz wrote:

Doan wrote:

On Sun, 4 Jan 2004, R. Steve Walz wrote:

Doan wrote:

I have, LaVonne. Dare to debate me? ;-)

Doan
-------------
You're a LIAR!
Steve

Another typical response from a "never-spanked" boy. Thanks, Steve. With
you and Kane, I can just sit back and LAUGH! ;-)

Doan
-------------------
You giggle nervously because you were damaged, and we weren't.
Steve

Right! Because both of you were "never-spanked"! ;-)

Doan

Doan wrote:

On Mon, 5 Jan 2004, R. Steve Walz wrote:

Another typical response from a "never-spanked" boy. Thanks, Steve. With
you and Kane, I can just sit back and LAUGH! ;-)

Doan
-------------------
You giggle nervously because you were damaged, and we weren't.
Steve

Right! Because both of you were "never-spanked"! ;-)

Doan
-----------------------
You seem to imagine the damage you sustained to be something good,
but, you see, that distorted twisted notion *IS* the damage!!!
Steve

On Mon, 5 Jan 2004, R. Steve Walz wrote:

Doan wrote:

On Mon, 5 Jan 2004, R. Steve Walz wrote:

Another typical response from a "never-spanked" boy. Thanks, Steve. With
you and Kane, I can just sit back and LAUGH! ;-)

Doan
-------------------
You giggle nervously because you were damaged, and we weren't.
Steve

Right! Because both of you were "never-spanked"! ;-)

Doan
-----------------------
You seem to imagine the damage you sustained to be something good,
but, you see, that distorted twisted notion *IS* the damage!!!
Steve

LOL! With all the "****" spewing out of your mouth, I am glad to
hear that you are another "never-spanked" boy!

Doan

Simple solution that the "cohort" often ignores is to repost the study
without edits or interpretations to the ng. But they don't like open
or honest dialogue...-Chris

Non-spanker by choice,
Chris C.
TX

Carlson LaVonne wrote in message ...
Didn't read the study, Greg? Thank you.

Greg Hanson wrote:

Are you Riak?

On 10 Jan 2004 22:51:45 -0800, (Chris C.) wrote:

Before you get too carried away, simpleton, check out the character
named in the subject line...not just for whether or not he has read
the study, but for
matters of child abuse.

This is what YOU support, encourage, and apologize for. And I'm
delighted to see you back.. It gives me a chance to expose you for the
cohort of the dodging weasel that you are.

Simple solution that the "cohort"

You're the "cohort" asshole. You need each other to support your
vicious treatment of children and excuse each other.

often ignores

We "ignore" nothign, but YOU do, and so does your "cohort,"
continuously. And what you can't igore you dodge and change the
subject of. Just like you did here. It Doan that claims to have the
study and won't post it. I have criteria before I'll debate him and he
is dodging....the common practice of you dishonest self deluded twits.

is to repost the study
without edits or interpretations to the ng.

It's never been posted. It never was suggested by non-spankers that
they had it. It's just a Doan dodge to avoid The Question.

But they don't like open
or honest dialogue...-Chris

Open or honest dialogue? R R R R, from you Twits? Puleeeezzze.

The only reference ever to "the study" by the anti spank side was to a
quote of a magazine article with a quotation of Dr. Embry. That's been
reproduced on deman a number of times.

Those who wanted the study itself have jumped up and down like weasels
pretending to have it but unwilling to post it in full.

And would NOT go to the source to argue but just kept babbling "you
don't have the study" when "the study" wasn't offered in the first
place. Burden of proof on YOUR side of the next as per the study.

Because of the inability and unwillingness to debate openly and
honesty, your ilk, I will not debate until the bull**** brought up by
one of you, the Doananiser, is cleared up.

He has refused to do so. He hasn't even proven he has the study to
debate about. He's refused also to post the study he claims he has.

And he has not honestly answered The Question (google in aps to find
The Question as posted by me).

No Chief Blow Hard..........

If you want in, goody. Come on, the water's fine.

But I'm not willing to debate any of you on the Embry study until YOU
answer The Question honestly. It's time your nonsense was exposed for
the vicious child and family hating crap that it's always been.

And Doananator has Three tasks before he qualifies for debate. You
have one, otherwise go **** up a rope.

Non-spanker by choice,

.....and apologist for, hence supporter of, those that do.

Chris C.
TX

Kane


Carlson LaVonne wrote in message ...
Didn't read the study, Greg? Thank you.

Greg Hanson wrote:

Are you Riak?

(Kane) wrote in message . com...

simpleton, dodging weasel, asshole, dishonest self deluded twits,
you Twits, weasels, ilk, bull**** ,Doananiser, No Chief Blow Hard,
vicious child and family hating crap,otherwise go **** up a
rope---Kane


Greg--I thought it would be interesting to do a frequency of derisive
comments (12) in this last post. His intellect is obviously limited so
he feels the need to add such verbiage to legitimize his lack of
scholarship. -Keep posting.-Chris

Non-spanker by choice,
Chris C.
TX