If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
DCs: OBs are anti-psychic (anti-education - like BJ-'straight' chiros)
OBSTETRICIANS ARE ANTI-PSYCHIC (ANTI-EDUCATION - LIKE BJ-"STRAIGHT" CHIROS!)
See the Dorland's definition of PSYCHIC below... PORT ORANGE PCC Prof. David R. Seaman, DC (and other PCC faculty listed below) - please see NERVE INTERFERENCE discussion below. BJ-"straights": Dr. DD Palmer, Founder of straight chiropractic wrote: "'Interference' is not known in physiology." [1910:978] PREGNANT WOMEN: OBs are RESTRICTING the mental act of accumulating knowledge - knowingly^^^ closing birth canals - up to 30% - by using semisitting and dorsal (woman-on-her-back) delivery. ^^^See the simple PROOF that OBs are knowingly closing birth canals in PS1 below. CHIROPRACTORS: The chiropractic profession is missing a GOLDEN opportunity to save tiny lives and tiny limbs and PREVENT more vertebral subluxations than DCs will ever be able to adjust by hand. WHY ARE CHIROPRACTIC TRADE UNIONS SILENT? NOTE: Chiropractic was *defined* (in part) as "the mental act of accumulating knowledge" (see below)... LADIES: To chiropractically adjust yourselves - to accumulate the knowledge of how EASY it is to allow your birth canal to OPEN the "extra" up to 30%... See the very end of this post... AECC = Anglo-European Chiropractic College/AECC OPEN LETTER to AECC (archived for global access at: http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2396) AECC ERROR (small one)... AECC SAYS: "[Dr. DD Palmer] performed the initial chiropractic adjustment...and later in The Chiropractor's Adjustment he wrote..." http://www.aecc.ac.uk/career/history/index.asp Dear Anglo-European Chiropractic College/AECC, Correcting the above quoted error on your history page will segue nicely into my understanding of Dr. DD Palmer's chiropractic (DD-straight chiropractic). The title "The Chiropractor's Adjustment" which you attribute to Dr. DD Palmer is neither the title (nor the subtitle) of DD's 1910 text The Science, Art, and Philosophy of Chiropractic. DD subtitled his 1910 text, The Chiropractor's ADJUSTER (emphasis added)... I'm *pretty* sure DD subtitled his 1910 text The Chiropractors ADJUSTER - because his son BJ Palmer's magazine was The Chiropractor. (See "tracing The Chiropractor," below.) DD's The Chiropractor's ADJUSTER was DD's literary adjusting device to describe his non-spinal adjustment of non-spinal subluxations in BJ's thinking. For example, DD delivered CRUCIAL non-spinal adjustments to BJ when this ostensible "Developer" of chiropractic - threw out the sympathetic nervous system and installed "Direct Mental Impulse." (!) The sympathetic nervous system was troublesome to BJ because it meant "pinching" of spinal nerves could not possibly be the cause of all disease. The part of DD's book where he describes BJ finally putting back the sympathetic nervous system has to be the funniest part of DD's 1910 text. I personally believe BJ's hilarious sympathetic nervous system tossing stupidity was what later led BJ to attempt to drive the entire chiropractic profession into adjusting mostly the top two vertebrae (to relieve CORD pressure) and leasing from BJ (of course) BJ's upper cervical subluxation detection equipment! NOTE: BJ-"straight"-like behavior in medicine: British obstetrician Jason Gardosi, MD threw out the fundamental human rest and delivery posture called squatting in his 1989 Lancet "randomised controlled trial of squatting" - where nobody squatted. (!) More on Gardosi below... DD discussed his diagnosis of his son BJ's "Developer" LUXATION: On p. 752, DD wrote (this is FUNNY!): "I have analyzed the symptoms, and am now tracing The Chiropractor [BJ's journal, originally founded by DD - TDG] in order to locate the luxation causing aberration and kleptomania. I find on page 15 of the July number, 'Everything is tried but the right thing-adjusting the cause-which remained for D. D. Palmer to discover.' In this same number is advertised, 'The Science of Chiropractic, by Dr. D. D. Palmer, Discoverer and Developer.' Up to this date every vertebra examined showed proper alignment; due respect was paid by the son to his father for his untiring research from the time B. J., the son, was seven years of age up to three years ago. If the symptoms of aberration and kleptomania continue to increase, some number of the Chiropractor in the near future will give the date of the father's graduation as later than that of his son...I have found the luxation on page 59 of the August and September number, 1907. It shows symptoms of aberration, hallucination, mental wandering, divergence from the truth and a well-defined case of kleptomania. The reader may notice the mental derangement, the incoherent, disjointed expressions, that have little relation to the subject; the delusions of the patient [BJ], imagining himself to be the discoverer, developer and Founder of Chiropractic...It is to be hoped that this adjustment may bring [BJ] to his senses, relieve him from kleptomania and wandering from the paths of truth and moral rectitude." Whereas BJ called himself the "Developer" of chiropractic, DD called BJ "the enveloper" [1910:701] PSYCHIC (CHIROPRACTIC) ADJUSTING: Adjusting "the organ of thought and judgement" I have previously called non-spinal (educational) adjusting - PSYCHIC (chiropractic) adjusting... (The word psychic was used by the late WD Harper, DC in Anything Can Cause Anything: A Correlation of Dr. DD Palmer's Principles of Chiropractic [3rd ed., 1974]; and it appeared in my definition of chiropractic in Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary [1988, 1994, 2000]) According to Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary: PSYCHIC: pertaining to the psyche or to the mind; mental [psyche - a Greek word meaning "the organ of thought and judgement"] --Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary, 29th ed. Given that the brain is thought to be the seat of the psyche ("the organ of thought and judgement")...OBs are not just ANTI-PSYCHIC (anti-education) but actually also ANTI-PSYCHE. OBs are senselessly closing birth canals up to 30% as an estimated 4.6% of "healthy" term neonates suffer unexplained brain bleeds! The organ of thought and judgement is getting hammered in babies! See Pregnant? PSYCHIC (chiropractic) adjusting can make birth easier... http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2327 BACK TO DD... DD did LOTS of non-spinal (psychic) chiropractic adjusting. "Chiropractic came as an educator," he said in the same book in which he NAMED chiropractic (in part) "the mental act of accumulating knowledge." [1910:465,19] In DD's day, MDs were RESTRICTING the mental act of accumulating knowledge... MDs are STILL restricting the mental act of accumulating knowledge - as political DCs remain silent and thereby HELP MDs restrict the mental act of accumulating knowledge... For details... See Dorland's: Preventing VS by educating OBs (also: New defn of chiro in Dorland's) http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2318 See also: Babies at the doctor-subject interface... http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2394 I hope Anglo-European Chiropractic College/AECC will help stop MDs (and MBs) from closing birth canals up to 30% and gruesomely manipulating most babies' spines. Particular AECC chiropractic adjustive attention should be focused upon BJ-"straight"-like British OB Jason Gardosi... See Edgbaston (UK) birth fraud (and 'the birth cushion') http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2387 More on Gardosi in PS1 below... Dr. Gastaldo PS1 Here is simple PROOF (from The Merck Manual) that MDs and MBs are knowingly closing birth canals (up to 30% according to radiographic studies)... "When shoulder dystocia occurs...the mother's thighs are hyperflexed to increase the diameter of the pelvic outlet..." http://www.merck.com/mrkshared/mmanu...er253/253g.jsp WHY are OBs and CNMwives (nurse midwives) waiting until the head is out and shoulders get stuck before giving the baby maximum pelvic outlet diameter? WHY are we letting OBs and CNMwives force babies' heads through birth canals senselessly closed up to 30%? (An estimated 4.6% of "healthy" term babies suffer unexplained brain bleeds! And babies actually suffer DENTS in their skulls - "pingpong" skull fractures - though most of these dents/"pingpong" fractures pop out.) THE KICKER OBs and CNMwives are KEEPING birth canals closed when babies' shoulders get stuck! The Merck Manual method for increasing the diameter of the pelvic outlet - merely hyperflexing the mother's thighs - is BAD McRoberts maneuver - and BAD McRoberts maneuver does not roll the woman off her sacrum and therefore does NOT increase the diameter of the pelvic outlet! See ACOG birth crime video evidence http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2300 WMPI/JASON GARDOSI, MD Here are the simple grisly biomechanics of semisitting (and dorsal) delivery clearly stated by Jason Gardosi, MD, director of the British National Health Service/NHS West Midlands Perinatal Institute/WMPI... "...the weight of the mother is in part taken on the sacrum which is therefore pushed upwards, thus decreasing the antero-posterior diameter of the pelvic outlet..." http://www.wmpi.net/reviews/oe/oe_shoulder_dystocia.htm Incredibly, the just quoted WMPI site states the grisly biomechanics of semisitting but then RECOMMENDS semisitting delivery (closing the birth canal), as in, "The second stage...You might want to remain in bed with your back propped up with pillows...As you push, try to let yourself 'open up' below..." http://www.preg.info/book/chapter11.htm WMPI/Jason Gardosi, MD is advising women to close their birth canals, then saying: "As you push, try to let yourself 'open up' below..." (!) ON A POSITIVE NOTE: The WMPI site does recommend a version of GOOD McRoberts if the shoulders get stuck... http://www.wmpi.net/reviews/oe/oe_shoulder_dystocia.htm LAUGHABLE: Gardosi says of himself: "Developed new obstetric aid, the 'Birth Cushion', for studying squatting during the second stage of labour." http://www.obgyn.net/board/gardosi.htm In fact, no one squatted in Gardosi's "randomised controlled trial of squatting." (!) See again: Edgbaston (UK) birth fraud (and 'the birth cushion') http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2387 NOTE: At one time, WMPI/Jason Gardosi, MD and his British OB pal Malcolm Griffiths got me censored from an international obstetric listserv for protesting this bizarre obstetric behavior - but fortunately not before two of my articles got posted... See http://forums.obgyn.net/forums/ob-gy...9707/0128.html See also: http://forums.obgyn.net/ob-gyn-l/OBGYNL.9707/0153.html MY BEST GUESS (as to why MDs haven't yet stopped the massive obstetric crime)? Stopping it would be tantamount to admitting it. PARDONS IN ADVANCE FOR MDs... As usual, I am in favor of pardons in advance for MDs. MDs are just academic prime cuts forced through this culture's most powerful mental meatgrinder - medical school. Pardons in advance will allow MDs to keep doing their valid medical work, making money to pay the inevitable civil damages. PREGNANT WOMEN: MDs and MBs are KNOWINGLY closing birth canals up to 30% by using dorsal and semisitting delivery. It is EASY for you to allow your birth canal to OPEN the "extra" up to 30%. Just roll onto your side as you push your baby out - or deliver on hands-and-knees, kneeling, standing, squatting, etc. BEWARE though: Some MDs and MBs will let you "try" "alternative" delivery positions but will move you back to dorsal or semisitting (close your birth canal!) as you push your baby out! Talk to your MD or MB about this TODAY. MDs/MBs: If you must push or pull - and sometimes you must - first get the woman off her sacrum - off her back/butt. Thanks for reading, everyone. Sincerely, Todd Dr. Gastaldo PS2 NERVE INTERFERENCE DD said, "'Interference' is not known in physiology." [1910:978] BJ-"straight" chiros are still promoting "nerve interference"... So Palmer College of Chiropractic Florida's Prof. David R. Seaman, DC asks: "Where is the nerve interference...[where is the interference with BJ's - TDG] immeasurable mental impulse? Clearly, we need to rethink our use of the term 'nerve interference.'" http://www.chiroweb.com/columnist/seaman/index.html KEY POINT: When DD said, "'Interference' is not known in physiology" [1910:978] - he was trying to steer the profession away from son BJ's anti-chiropractic notion that the nervous system controls the body. According to DD, the body is NOT controlled by the nervous system but rather by WHAT IRRITATES the nervous system. DD posited a spiritual diagnostic trick... Innate - a spiritual force - always irritates the nervous system to cause health. "Spirit, as generally understood, is what I designate as Innate...Did I say anything about nerves being innate? Nerves are not Innate...Did anyone else get the idea that nerves were Innate?" [Palmer DD 1910:382] The cause of health, then, is SPIRITUAL - Innate... The cause of disease is non-spiritual - environmental irritants (mech/chem/psychic) - internal and external... According to physiologist Arthur Guyton [1976]: "Most activites of the nervous system are originated by sensory experience emanating from sensory receptors" [Guyton AH. 5th ed., 1976:608] And according to anatomist Hollinshead [197_]: "The basic function of the nervous system is to connect a receptor to an effector organ." [W.H. Hollinshead. Textbook of Anatomy 3rd ed. Harper and Row, p. 68] D.D. stated the same concept: "Nerves have but two functions - conveying impulses outward and sensations inward." [Palmer DD. The Science, Art and Philosophy of Chiropractic. Portland, OR: Portland Printing House Co. 1910:510] D.D. openly indicated that all healing arts of his day employed a diagnostic/treatment concept that was identical to his Innate diagnostic trick... "...[T]hat which knows much better how to mend a fractured bone the first day of its life than the surgeon will ever know; that intellect which is known as Hahneman's Vital Force; New Thought's Divine Spark; Hudson's Subconscious Mind; the Allopath's Vis Medicatrix Naturae; the healing power of nature...[is the same as - TDG]...D.D. Palmer's Innate Intelligence..." [1910:864] "INNATE - born with...I would not change it except to replace it with...the Christian's God...the Hebrew's Helohim, the Mahometan's Allah..." [1910:493] (This last quote seems to me DD's subtle attempt to adjust what might be called "The God Subluxation" - to wit - everyone thinking THEIR God is THE God and as a consequence they will prevail in war - or - my favorite right here in the good ol' USA - that a given God will help one set of believers win a football game against another set of believers!) Oddly (at least to me)... "[T]he physical...includes the psychic, the soul...the bond of union between spirit and body..." [DD Palmer 1910:497] Which reminds me... Dorland's 29th edition defines spirit as "liquid": 1. any volatile or distilled liquid. 2. a solution of volatile material in alcohol... This aspiritual "liquid" Dorland's definition of spirit reminds me.. DD said: "To be sure, Chiropractic may be practiced without a knowledge of...[Innate-Soul-Body]...but, why not know what your business if founded upon?" [DD Palmer 1910:691] DD's INNATE (SPIRITUAL) DIAGNOSTIC TRICK... DD advised (note: I'm LOOSELY paraphrasing DD via WD Harper's Anything Can Cause Anything): ASSUME Innate is irritating the nervous system trying to cause health... If the patient is sick - something ELSE - something identifiable/diagnosable - is irritating the nervous system to cause disease... FIRST identify and adjust mech/chem/psychic subluxations in the external environment. SECOND identify and adjust subluxations in the internal environment; keeping in mind the possibility that external environmental irritation has altered the internal environment to cause it to noxiously irritate ITSELF via: a) secondary MECHANICAL irritants ("vertebral subluxations"); b) secondary CHEMICAL irritants (unsuitable ingesta or inappropriate medications); c) secondary PSYCHIC irritants ("mental impingements"/outside minds that perpetuate a and b). RB Livingston, MD alludes to these "secondaries" in the 1985 edition of Best and Taylor's Physiologic Basis of Medical Practice: "Aware of sensory physiology, you will readily retain the following practical principles: First, many processes intervene between stimulation of peripheral receptors and higher perceptual centers...There needs to be a leavening of self-doubt in the physician's mind as to the possibility of as yet unrecognized and as yet undiscovered sensory intrusions that may also be contributing influentially to the patient's perceptual experiences." Again - if a person is diseased - something ELSE (besides Innate) - some DIAGNOSABLE noxious mechanical, chemical and/or psychic irritant - in the internal OR external environment - is irritating the nervous system and may be identified/diagnosed using a knowledge of the nervous system (hence the current Dorland's definition of chiropractic: "a science of applied neurophysiologic diagnosis..."). See again: Dorland's: Preventing VS by educating OBs (also: New defn of chiro in Dorland's) http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2318 I have diagnosed OB/GYNs as human subluxations - noxious external environmental irritants who GROSSLY pinch and stretch nerves - sometimes fatally. MD-obstetricians are GRUESOMELY irritating tiny nervous systems - GRUESOMELY manipulating most babies' spines at birth. NON-SPINAL chiropractic adjustment is in order... AECC readers see: Babies at the doctor-subject interface... http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2394 Thanks for reading everyone. Sincerely, Todd Dr. Gastaldo Blind Copied to the following PORT ORANGE CHIROS/EDUCATORS: ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; Why is PCC's Prof. Maxine McMullen, DC silent? Maybe she just didn't get my emails... PORT ORANGE CHIRO/EDUCATOR Prof. Seaman... You wrote: "In the past, when I have applied these arguments against so-called 'straight' colleagues, they have immediately resorted to personal attacks..." http://www.chiroweb.com/columnist/seaman/index.html Prof. Seaman, I have been having difficulty getting straight answers from BJ-"straight" Terry Rondberg, DC: See Chiropractic's twin sister? (Prof. Hamonet on osteopathy) http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/1913 CHIROS: Why the chiro silence? Why is the chiropractic profession ignoring this GOLDEN opportunity to save tiny lives and tiny limbs and PREVENT more vertebral subluxations than DCs will ever be able to adjust by hand? Why (for example) is JC Smith, DC ignoring this totally inappropriate, sometimes fatal mass spinal manipulation by MDs as he hammers the BJ-"straight" DC who was recently sent to prison? At a minimum, why does not JC Smith, DC ALSO aim chiro criticism at the MOST PROLIFIC spinal manipulators - MD-obstetricians? Why does not JC join me in publicly demanding that MD-obstetricians stop closing birth canals? I'll cc JC at: HEY! Maybe JC could help protect babies from GRUESOME spinal manipulation while he waits for his public debate with WCA's head BJ-"straight" Terry Rondberg, DC - who is also silent about this matter (as is WCA's Maxine McMullen, DC who is on the Port Orange PCC faculty with Prof. Seaman.)... Of course, BJ-"straights" are not anti-education if education fits their belief and practice system - just like OBs are not opposed to educating women - unless it involves telling them that OBs are knowingly closing birth canals! BACK TO BIRTH The force that CLOSES the birth canal up to 30% is the psychic force (MD or CNMwife or Western culture/television) telling the woman to deliver on her back/buttocks - on her sacrum. The force that OPENS the birth canal up to 30% is the uterus pushing the fetal presenting part - usually the fetal head - through the pelvic outlet. ("[T]he fetal head serves as an internal pelvimeter..." [Williams Obstetrics 2001:58]) Thus a woman who is on hands-and-knees, kneeling, squatting, standing, etc. is ONLY opening her birth canal up to 30% if her uterus is pushing her baby's head through the outlet; but a woman who is delivering semisitting or dorsal is ALWAYS closing her birth canal up to 30%. PREGNANT WOMEN: MDs and MBs are KNOWINGLY closing birth canals up to 30% by using dorsal and semisitting delivery. See PROOF above. It is EASY for you to allow your birth canal to OPEN the "extra" up to 30%. Just roll onto your side as you push your baby out - or deliver on hands-and-knees, kneeling, standing, squatting, etc. BEWARE though: Some MDs and MBs will let you "try" "alternative" delivery positions but will move you back to dorsal or semisitting (close your birth canal!) as you push your baby out! Talk to your MD or MB about this TODAY. MDs/MBs: If you must push or pull - and sometimes you must - first get the woman off her sacrum - off her back/butt. This Open Letter to AECC will be instantly archived for global access at: http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2396. Within 24 hours it will be in the Google usenet groups archive. Search http://groups.google.com for "OBs are anti-psychic (anti-education - like BJ-'straight' chiros)" |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
OBs are anti-psychic (anti-education - like BJ-'straight' chiros)
a lot of
Todd Gastaldo wrote in message ink.net... OBSTETRICIANS ARE ANTI-PSYCHIC (ANTI-EDUCATION - LIKE BJ-"STRAIGHT" CHIROS!) See the Dorland's definition of PSYCHIC below... PORT ORANGE PCC Prof. David R. Seaman, DC (and other PCC faculty listed below) - please see NERVE INTERFERENCE discussion below. BJ-"straights": Dr. DD Palmer, Founder of straight chiropractic wrote: "'Interference' is not known in physiology." [1910:978] PREGNANT WOMEN: OBs are RESTRICTING the mental act of accumulating knowledge - knowingly^^^ closing birth canals - up to 30% - by using semisitting and dorsal (woman-on-her-back) delivery. ^^^See the simple PROOF that OBs are knowingly closing birth canals in PS1 below. CHIROPRACTORS: The chiropractic profession is missing a GOLDEN opportunity to save tiny lives and tiny limbs and PREVENT more vertebral subluxations than DCs will ever be able to adjust by hand. WHY ARE CHIROPRACTIC TRADE UNIONS SILENT? NOTE: Chiropractic was *defined* (in part) as "the mental act of accumulating knowledge" (see below)... LADIES: To chiropractically adjust yourselves - to accumulate the knowledge of how EASY it is to allow your birth canal to OPEN the "extra" up to 30%... See the very end of this post... AECC = Anglo-European Chiropractic College/AECC OPEN LETTER to AECC (archived for global access at: http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2396) AECC ERROR (small one)... AECC SAYS: "[Dr. DD Palmer] performed the initial chiropractic adjustment...and later in The Chiropractor's Adjustment he wrote..." http://www.aecc.ac.uk/career/history/index.asp Dear Anglo-European Chiropractic College/AECC, Correcting the above quoted error on your history page will segue nicely into my understanding of Dr. DD Palmer's chiropractic (DD-straight chiropractic). The title "The Chiropractor's Adjustment" which you attribute to Dr. DD Palmer is neither the title (nor the subtitle) of DD's 1910 text The Science, Art, and Philosophy of Chiropractic. DD subtitled his 1910 text, The Chiropractor's ADJUSTER (emphasis added)... I'm *pretty* sure DD subtitled his 1910 text The Chiropractors ADJUSTER - because his son BJ Palmer's magazine was The Chiropractor. (See "tracing The Chiropractor," below.) DD's The Chiropractor's ADJUSTER was DD's literary adjusting device to describe his non-spinal adjustment of non-spinal subluxations in BJ's thinking. For example, DD delivered CRUCIAL non-spinal adjustments to BJ when this ostensible "Developer" of chiropractic - threw out the sympathetic nervous system and installed "Direct Mental Impulse." (!) The sympathetic nervous system was troublesome to BJ because it meant "pinching" of spinal nerves could not possibly be the cause of all disease. The part of DD's book where he describes BJ finally putting back the sympathetic nervous system has to be the funniest part of DD's 1910 text. I personally believe BJ's hilarious sympathetic nervous system tossing stupidity was what later led BJ to attempt to drive the entire chiropractic profession into adjusting mostly the top two vertebrae (to relieve CORD pressure) and leasing from BJ (of course) BJ's upper cervical subluxation detection equipment! NOTE: BJ-"straight"-like behavior in medicine: British obstetrician Jason Gardosi, MD threw out the fundamental human rest and delivery posture called squatting in his 1989 Lancet "randomised controlled trial of squatting" - where nobody squatted. (!) More on Gardosi below... DD discussed his diagnosis of his son BJ's "Developer" LUXATION: On p. 752, DD wrote (this is FUNNY!): "I have analyzed the symptoms, and am now tracing The Chiropractor [BJ's journal, originally founded by DD - TDG] in order to locate the luxation causing aberration and kleptomania. I find on page 15 of the July number, 'Everything is tried but the right thing-adjusting the cause-which remained for D. D. Palmer to discover.' In this same number is advertised, 'The Science of Chiropractic, by Dr. D. D. Palmer, Discoverer and Developer.' Up to this date every vertebra examined showed proper alignment; due respect was paid by the son to his father for his untiring research from the time B. J., the son, was seven years of age up to three years ago. If the symptoms of aberration and kleptomania continue to increase, some number of the Chiropractor in the near future will give the date of the father's graduation as later than that of his son...I have found the luxation on page 59 of the August and September number, 1907. It shows symptoms of aberration, hallucination, mental wandering, divergence from the truth and a well-defined case of kleptomania. The reader may notice the mental derangement, the incoherent, disjointed expressions, that have little relation to the subject; the delusions of the patient [BJ], imagining himself to be the discoverer, developer and Founder of Chiropractic...It is to be hoped that this adjustment may bring [BJ] to his senses, relieve him from kleptomania and wandering from the paths of truth and moral rectitude." Whereas BJ called himself the "Developer" of chiropractic, DD called BJ "the enveloper" [1910:701] PSYCHIC (CHIROPRACTIC) ADJUSTING: Adjusting "the organ of thought and judgement" I have previously called non-spinal (educational) adjusting - PSYCHIC (chiropractic) adjusting... (The word psychic was used by the late WD Harper, DC in Anything Can Cause Anything: A Correlation of Dr. DD Palmer's Principles of Chiropractic [3rd ed., 1974]; and it appeared in my definition of chiropractic in Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary [1988, 1994, 2000]) According to Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary: PSYCHIC: pertaining to the psyche or to the mind; mental [psyche - a Greek word meaning "the organ of thought and judgement"] --Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary, 29th ed. Given that the brain is thought to be the seat of the psyche ("the organ of thought and judgement")...OBs are not just ANTI-PSYCHIC (anti-education) but actually also ANTI-PSYCHE. OBs are senselessly closing birth canals up to 30% as an estimated 4.6% of "healthy" term neonates suffer unexplained brain bleeds! The organ of thought and judgement is getting hammered in babies! See Pregnant? PSYCHIC (chiropractic) adjusting can make birth easier... http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2327 BACK TO DD... DD did LOTS of non-spinal (psychic) chiropractic adjusting. "Chiropractic came as an educator," he said in the same book in which he NAMED chiropractic (in part) "the mental act of accumulating knowledge." [1910:465,19] In DD's day, MDs were RESTRICTING the mental act of accumulating knowledge... MDs are STILL restricting the mental act of accumulating knowledge - as political DCs remain silent and thereby HELP MDs restrict the mental act of accumulating knowledge... For details... See Dorland's: Preventing VS by educating OBs (also: New defn of chiro in Dorland's) http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2318 See also: Babies at the doctor-subject interface... http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2394 I hope Anglo-European Chiropractic College/AECC will help stop MDs (and MBs) from closing birth canals up to 30% and gruesomely manipulating most babies' spines. Particular AECC chiropractic adjustive attention should be focused upon BJ-"straight"-like British OB Jason Gardosi... See Edgbaston (UK) birth fraud (and 'the birth cushion') http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2387 More on Gardosi in PS1 below... Dr. Gastaldo PS1 Here is simple PROOF (from The Merck Manual) that MDs and MBs are knowingly closing birth canals (up to 30% according to radiographic studies)... "When shoulder dystocia occurs...the mother's thighs are hyperflexed to increase the diameter of the pelvic outlet..." http://www.merck.com/mrkshared/mmanu...er253/253g.jsp WHY are OBs and CNMwives (nurse midwives) waiting until the head is out and shoulders get stuck before giving the baby maximum pelvic outlet diameter? WHY are we letting OBs and CNMwives force babies' heads through birth canals senselessly closed up to 30%? (An estimated 4.6% of "healthy" term babies suffer unexplained brain bleeds! And babies actually suffer DENTS in their skulls - "pingpong" skull fractures - though most of these dents/"pingpong" fractures pop out.) THE KICKER OBs and CNMwives are KEEPING birth canals closed when babies' shoulders get stuck! The Merck Manual method for increasing the diameter of the pelvic outlet - merely hyperflexing the mother's thighs - is BAD McRoberts maneuver - and BAD McRoberts maneuver does not roll the woman off her sacrum and therefore does NOT increase the diameter of the pelvic outlet! See ACOG birth crime video evidence http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2300 WMPI/JASON GARDOSI, MD Here are the simple grisly biomechanics of semisitting (and dorsal) delivery clearly stated by Jason Gardosi, MD, director of the British National Health Service/NHS West Midlands Perinatal Institute/WMPI... "...the weight of the mother is in part taken on the sacrum which is therefore pushed upwards, thus decreasing the antero-posterior diameter of the pelvic outlet..." http://www.wmpi.net/reviews/oe/oe_shoulder_dystocia.htm Incredibly, the just quoted WMPI site states the grisly biomechanics of semisitting but then RECOMMENDS semisitting delivery (closing the birth canal), as in, "The second stage...You might want to remain in bed with your back propped up with pillows...As you push, try to let yourself 'open up' below..." http://www.preg.info/book/chapter11.htm WMPI/Jason Gardosi, MD is advising women to close their birth canals, then saying: "As you push, try to let yourself 'open up' below..." (!) ON A POSITIVE NOTE: The WMPI site does recommend a version of GOOD McRoberts if the shoulders get stuck... http://www.wmpi.net/reviews/oe/oe_shoulder_dystocia.htm LAUGHABLE: Gardosi says of himself: "Developed new obstetric aid, the 'Birth Cushion', for studying squatting during the second stage of labour." http://www.obgyn.net/board/gardosi.htm In fact, no one squatted in Gardosi's "randomised controlled trial of squatting." (!) See again: Edgbaston (UK) birth fraud (and 'the birth cushion') http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2387 NOTE: At one time, WMPI/Jason Gardosi, MD and his British OB pal Malcolm Griffiths got me censored from an international obstetric listserv for protesting this bizarre obstetric behavior - but fortunately not before two of my articles got posted... See http://forums.obgyn.net/forums/ob-gy...9707/0128.html See also: http://forums.obgyn.net/ob-gyn-l/OBGYNL.9707/0153.html MY BEST GUESS (as to why MDs haven't yet stopped the massive obstetric crime)? Stopping it would be tantamount to admitting it. PARDONS IN ADVANCE FOR MDs... As usual, I am in favor of pardons in advance for MDs. MDs are just academic prime cuts forced through this culture's most powerful mental meatgrinder - medical school. Pardons in advance will allow MDs to keep doing their valid medical work, making money to pay the inevitable civil damages. PREGNANT WOMEN: MDs and MBs are KNOWINGLY closing birth canals up to 30% by using dorsal and semisitting delivery. It is EASY for you to allow your birth canal to OPEN the "extra" up to 30%. Just roll onto your side as you push your baby out - or deliver on hands-and-knees, kneeling, standing, squatting, etc. BEWARE though: Some MDs and MBs will let you "try" "alternative" delivery positions but will move you back to dorsal or semisitting (close your birth canal!) as you push your baby out! Talk to your MD or MB about this TODAY. MDs/MBs: If you must push or pull - and sometimes you must - first get the woman off her sacrum - off her back/butt. Thanks for reading, everyone. Sincerely, Todd Dr. Gastaldo PS2 NERVE INTERFERENCE DD said, "'Interference' is not known in physiology." [1910:978] BJ-"straight" chiros are still promoting "nerve interference"... So Palmer College of Chiropractic Florida's Prof. David R. Seaman, DC asks: "Where is the nerve interference...[where is the interference with BJ's - TDG] immeasurable mental impulse? Clearly, we need to rethink our use of the term 'nerve interference.'" http://www.chiroweb.com/columnist/seaman/index.html KEY POINT: When DD said, "'Interference' is not known in physiology" [1910:978] - he was trying to steer the profession away from son BJ's anti-chiropractic notion that the nervous system controls the body. According to DD, the body is NOT controlled by the nervous system but rather by WHAT IRRITATES the nervous system. DD posited a spiritual diagnostic trick... Innate - a spiritual force - always irritates the nervous system to cause health. "Spirit, as generally understood, is what I designate as Innate...Did I say anything about nerves being innate? Nerves are not Innate...Did anyone else get the idea that nerves were Innate?" [Palmer DD 1910:382] The cause of health, then, is SPIRITUAL - Innate... The cause of disease is non-spiritual - environmental irritants (mech/chem/psychic) - internal and external... According to physiologist Arthur Guyton [1976]: "Most activites of the nervous system are originated by sensory experience emanating from sensory receptors" [Guyton AH. 5th ed., 1976:608] And according to anatomist Hollinshead [197_]: "The basic function of the nervous system is to connect a receptor to an effector organ." [W.H. Hollinshead. Textbook of Anatomy 3rd ed. Harper and Row, p. 68] D.D. stated the same concept: "Nerves have but two functions - conveying impulses outward and sensations inward." [Palmer DD. The Science, Art and Philosophy of Chiropractic. Portland, OR: Portland Printing House Co. 1910:510] D.D. openly indicated that all healing arts of his day employed a diagnostic/treatment concept that was identical to his Innate diagnostic trick... "...[T]hat which knows much better how to mend a fractured bone the first day of its life than the surgeon will ever know; that intellect which is known as Hahneman's Vital Force; New Thought's Divine Spark; Hudson's Subconscious Mind; the Allopath's Vis Medicatrix Naturae; the healing power of nature...[is the same as - TDG]...D.D. Palmer's Innate Intelligence..." [1910:864] "INNATE - born with...I would not change it except to replace it with...the Christian's God...the Hebrew's Helohim, the Mahometan's Allah..." [1910:493] (This last quote seems to me DD's subtle attempt to adjust what might be called "The God Subluxation" - to wit - everyone thinking THEIR God is THE God and as a consequence they will prevail in war - or - my favorite right here in the good ol' USA - that a given God will help one set of believers win a football game against another set of believers!) Oddly (at least to me)... "[T]he physical...includes the psychic, the soul...the bond of union between spirit and body..." [DD Palmer 1910:497] Which reminds me... Dorland's 29th edition defines spirit as "liquid": 1. any volatile or distilled liquid. 2. a solution of volatile material in alcohol... This aspiritual "liquid" Dorland's definition of spirit reminds me.. DD said: "To be sure, Chiropractic may be practiced without a knowledge of...[Innate-Soul-Body]...but, why not know what your business if founded upon?" [DD Palmer 1910:691] DD's INNATE (SPIRITUAL) DIAGNOSTIC TRICK... DD advised (note: I'm LOOSELY paraphrasing DD via WD Harper's Anything Can Cause Anything): ASSUME Innate is irritating the nervous system trying to cause health... If the patient is sick - something ELSE - something identifiable/diagnosable - is irritating the nervous system to cause disease... FIRST identify and adjust mech/chem/psychic subluxations in the external environment. SECOND identify and adjust subluxations in the internal environment; keeping in mind the possibility that external environmental irritation has altered the internal environment to cause it to noxiously irritate ITSELF via: a) secondary MECHANICAL irritants ("vertebral subluxations"); b) secondary CHEMICAL irritants (unsuitable ingesta or inappropriate medications); c) secondary PSYCHIC irritants ("mental impingements"/outside minds that perpetuate a and b). RB Livingston, MD alludes to these "secondaries" in the 1985 edition of Best and Taylor's Physiologic Basis of Medical Practice: "Aware of sensory physiology, you will readily retain the following practical principles: First, many processes intervene between stimulation of peripheral receptors and higher perceptual centers...There needs to be a leavening of self-doubt in the physician's mind as to the possibility of as yet unrecognized and as yet undiscovered sensory intrusions that may also be contributing influentially to the patient's perceptual experiences." Again - if a person is diseased - something ELSE (besides Innate) - some DIAGNOSABLE noxious mechanical, chemical and/or psychic irritant - in the internal OR external environment - is irritating the nervous system and may be identified/diagnosed using a knowledge of the nervous system (hence the current Dorland's definition of chiropractic: "a science of applied neurophysiologic diagnosis..."). See again: Dorland's: Preventing VS by educating OBs (also: New defn of chiro in Dorland's) http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2318 I have diagnosed OB/GYNs as human subluxations - noxious external environmental irritants who GROSSLY pinch and stretch nerves - sometimes fatally. MD-obstetricians are GRUESOMELY irritating tiny nervous systems - GRUESOMELY manipulating most babies' spines at birth. NON-SPINAL chiropractic adjustment is in order... AECC readers see: Babies at the doctor-subject interface... http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2394 Thanks for reading everyone. Sincerely, Todd Dr. Gastaldo Blind Copied to the following PORT ORANGE CHIROS/EDUCATORS: ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; Why is PCC's Prof. Maxine McMullen, DC silent? Maybe she just didn't get my emails... PORT ORANGE CHIRO/EDUCATOR Prof. Seaman... You wrote: "In the past, when I have applied these arguments against so-called 'straight' colleagues, they have immediately resorted to personal attacks..." http://www.chiroweb.com/columnist/seaman/index.html Prof. Seaman, I have been having difficulty getting straight answers from BJ-"straight" Terry Rondberg, DC: See Chiropractic's twin sister? (Prof. Hamonet on osteopathy) http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/1913 CHIROS: Why the chiro silence? Why is the chiropractic profession ignoring this GOLDEN opportunity to save tiny lives and tiny limbs and PREVENT more vertebral subluxations than DCs will ever be able to adjust by hand? Why (for example) is JC Smith, DC ignoring this totally inappropriate, sometimes fatal mass spinal manipulation by MDs as he hammers the BJ-"straight" DC who was recently sent to prison? At a minimum, why does not JC Smith, DC ALSO aim chiro criticism at the MOST PROLIFIC spinal manipulators - MD-obstetricians? Why does not JC join me in publicly demanding that MD-obstetricians stop closing birth canals? I'll cc JC at: HEY! Maybe JC could help protect babies from GRUESOME spinal manipulation while he waits for his public debate with WCA's head BJ-"straight" Terry Rondberg, DC - who is also silent about this matter (as is WCA's Maxine McMullen, DC who is on the Port Orange PCC faculty with Prof. Seaman.)... Of course, BJ-"straights" are not anti-education if education fits their belief and practice system - just like OBs are not opposed to educating women - unless it involves telling them that OBs are knowingly closing birth canals! BACK TO BIRTH The force that CLOSES the birth canal up to 30% is the psychic force (MD or CNMwife or Western culture/television) telling the woman to deliver on her back/buttocks - on her sacrum. The force that OPENS the birth canal up to 30% is the uterus pushing the fetal presenting part - usually the fetal head - through the pelvic outlet. ("[T]he fetal head serves as an internal pelvimeter..." [Williams Obstetrics 2001:58]) Thus a woman who is on hands-and-knees, kneeling, squatting, standing, etc. is ONLY opening her birth canal up to 30% if her uterus is pushing her baby's head through the outlet; but a woman who is delivering semisitting or dorsal is ALWAYS closing her birth canal up to 30%. PREGNANT WOMEN: MDs and MBs are KNOWINGLY closing birth canals up to 30% by using dorsal and semisitting delivery. See PROOF above. It is EASY for you to allow your birth canal to OPEN the "extra" up to 30%. Just roll onto your side as you push your baby out - or deliver on hands-and-knees, kneeling, standing, squatting, etc. BEWARE though: Some MDs and MBs will let you "try" "alternative" delivery positions but will move you back to dorsal or semisitting (close your birth canal!) as you push your baby out! Talk to your MD or MB about this TODAY. MDs/MBs: If you must push or pull - and sometimes you must - first get the woman off her sacrum - off her back/butt. This Open Letter to AECC will be instantly archived for global access at: http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2396. Within 24 hours it will be in the Google usenet groups archive. Search http://groups.google.com for "OBs are anti-psychic (anti-education - like BJ-'straight' chiros)" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How Children REALLY React To Control | Chris | General | 444 | July 20th 04 07:14 PM |
Pregnant? PSYCHIC (chiropractic) adjusting can make birth easier... | al gu | Pregnancy | 1 | February 23rd 04 01:15 AM |
Dorland's: Preventing VS by educating OBs (also: New defn of chiro in Dorland's) | Todd Gastaldo | Pregnancy | 0 | February 20th 04 03:48 AM |