Dan Sullivan NAILED for various LIES

Dan Sullivan started this thread with:

"Private messages on FightCPS.com aren't private at all???"

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.s...e304c52e9c1fd8

It's one of several threads on this subject Dan Sullivan
created on this subject. Gratuitously Dan Top Posted
another thread called:

"Does good dad, forum administrator, deny he reads
the PRIVATE messages on the FightCPS forums?"

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.s...fce0235127099b

The first three messages there shed light on the subject.

It would appear than now Dan Sullivan has his answer.

Apparently Dan manufactured a big LIE and thought that by
applying a lot of BLUSTER he could avoid the need for any
proof.

Dan has been kicked out of at least four Family Rights groups.

He tried denying that he was kicked out of FightCPS.
This lie was exposed and in an attempt to "explain away"
how he was kicked out erroneously, he posted e-mails
that proved he was WELL AWARE that he had been kicked out.
( Proving that he lied when he denied being kicked out! )

Dan has tried (half heartedly) to deny that he was
the Oliver Sutton sock. This hasn't gone well for him.

In another thread Dan told gooddad to go pound some nails.

It looks like Dan got NAILED.


http://groups.google.com/group/alt.s...fce0235127099b

Does good dad, forum administrator, deny he reads the PRIVATE messages
on the FightCPS forums?

1 From: Dan Sullivan - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 6:00 am
Groups: alt.support.child-protective-services

Just when you thought you found people you could trust.


2 From: - Date: Sun, Jan 14 2007 12:37 am
Groups: alt.support.child-protective-services

Dan Sullivan wrote:
Just when you thought you found people you could trust.

Wow, Dan I see you've takin time out of your busy life helping families

to circle up the manure wagons.
One would think that someone with your wisdom would surely know how a
phpBB message board operates or at least research it before making
themself out to be so stupid..

Unless the only reason is to relate my name and "Private messages on
FightCPS.com aren't private at all" to anyone who google searches
FightCPS... Nice smear campaign... Ever do PR work for Senators?

Do you think EVERY administrator on EVERY phpBB message board can
actually go in and read people's private messages? Do you really
believe the developers of such boards leave loopholes like this open?

No one has the ability to read others pm's.. They would have to know
the individuals password... To read everyones pm's they would have to
know EVERY persons password used on the site...

Anyone who doubts this can ask ANY administrator at any site using the
phpBB Group, probably using any type of message board for that matter..


Go ask the developers themselves, http://www.phpbb.com/features.php
Click on support and ask or
Look under security, *Strong encryption to keep passwords safe in the
database*

BTW....How many "sock" names did you have at our site Dan?
I quit looking after I found 2.... "Drose" and "Oliver Sutton" ...
Most of Oliver's posts ip address matched Drose's and 3/4 of "hers"
matched Dan Sullivan... Some within a half hour of each other and in
the same thread......

I'd stay and chat but I'm in the middle of doing some research for a
couple of families needing help with a CPS case


3 From: Linda Martin - Date: Sun, Jan 14 2007 12:52 am

Private messages at FightCPS can't be read by system administrators
because
the software doesn't allow it. If you don't believe me, set up phpBB
and try
it from the administration panel.

Linda

Fight CPS
http://www.fightcps.com
Message Board:
http://forum.fightcps.com

This one
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.s...e304c52e9c1fd8

One where Linda weighed in
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.s...fce0235127099b

Here is a THIRD gratuitous thread on this Dan Sullivan started.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.s...05a48f236c6ecc

And the whole accusation was a LIE!

Dan Sullivan started a thread called :

" If Private Messages on FightCPS are being read by good dad, shouldn't
they have a different name? Like "You may think they're PRIVATE
MESSAGES, but good dad, forum administator, will be reading them behind
your back?" ""

1 From: Dan Sullivan - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 7:02 pm

Comments?

2 From: 0:- - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 7:05 pm

Dan Sullivan wrote:
Comments?

I'll wait for Tim's.

Subject changed: Don's lunatic kookout
3 From: inkspot - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 7:15 pm
Email: inkspot

Run out of kiddies to sell on usenet Don?

Subject changed: Dans sniveling snitching whine
4 From: inkspot - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 7:14 pm

Dan
Get a clue.

It's the administrators DUTY to read those messages.

5 From: 0:- - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 7:23 pm

inkspot wrote:
Dan
Get a clue.

It's the administrators DUTY to read those messages.

If that is so, why don't the posters of those messages know about this
'duty?'

6 From: inkspot - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 7:57 pm

0:- wrote:
inkspot wrote:
Dan
Get a clue.

It's the administrators DUTY to read those messages.

If that is so, why don't the posters of those messages know about this
'duty?'

[F] off Don, you pathetic piece of [s]. But if you must know, it's dem
damn terr'ists - forever vigil - homeward bound - hail to the decider
and stuff like that.

Dubya said there would be sacrifices - so luv it or leave it - Oh you
were kicked out - sorry.

Subject changed: If Private Messages on FightCPS are being read by
good dad, shouldn't they have a different name? Like "You may think
they're PRIVATE MESSAGES, but good dad, forum administator, will be
reading them behind your back?"
7 From: Dan Sullivan - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 7:20 pm

inkspot wrote,

Dan Get a clue.

It's the administrators DUTY to read those messages.

Why would reading the PRIVATE MESSAGES on FightCPS be good dad's DUTY?

8 From: Dan Sullivan - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 7:34 pm

Dan Sullivan wrote:
inkspot wrote,

Dan Get a clue.

It's the administrators DUTY to read those messages.

Why would reading the PRIVATE MESSAGES on FightCPS be good dad's DUTY?

Please explain.

9 From: inkspot - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 7:53 pm

Dan Sullivan wrote:
inkspot wrote,

Dan Get a clue.

It's the administrators DUTY to read those messages.

Why would reading the PRIVATE MESSAGES on FightCPS be good dad's DUTY?

I didn't say GD - I said the administrator.

10 From: Dan Sullivan - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 7:56 pm

inkspot wrote:
Dan Sullivan wrote:
inkspot wrote,

Dan Get a clue.

It's the administrators DUTY to read those messages.

Why would reading the PRIVATE MESSAGES on FightCPS be good dad's DUTY?

I didn't say GD - I said the administrator.

Ok, the administrator.

Why is it the administrator's DUTY to read the private messages?

11 From: inkspot - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 8:03 pm

- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

Dan Sullivan wrote:
inkspot wrote:
Dan Sullivan wrote:
inkspot wrote,

Dan Get a clue.

It's the administrators DUTY to read those messages.
Why would reading the PRIVATE MESSAGES on FightCPS be good dad's DUTY?

I didn't say GD - I said the administrator.

Ok, the administrator.

Why is it the administrator's DUTY to read the private messages?

Because he's the administrator. Who's responsibility do you think it
should be?

12 From: Dan Sullivan - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 8:09 pm

- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

inkspot wrote:
Dan Sullivan wrote:
inkspot wrote:
Dan Sullivan wrote:
inkspot wrote,

Dan Get a clue.

It's the administrators DUTY to read those messages.
Why would reading the PRIVATE MESSAGES on FightCPS be good dad's DUTY?

I didn't say GD - I said the administrator.

Ok, the administrator.

Why is it the administrator's DUTY to read the private messages?

Because he's the administrator. Who's responsibility do you think it
should be?

Nobody's responsibility.

That's why the PRIVATE MESSAGES are supposed to be PRIVATE!!!!

Why would an administrator have a duty to read privates messages on
FightCPS?

Is it his responsibility to monitor what members say privately to one
another?

13 From: inkspot - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 8:15 pm

- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

Dan Sullivan wrote:
inkspot wrote:
Dan Sullivan wrote:
inkspot wrote:
Dan Sullivan wrote:
inkspot wrote,

Dan Get a clue.

It's the administrators DUTY to read those messages.
Why would reading the PRIVATE MESSAGES on FightCPS be good dad's DUTY?

I didn't say GD - I said the administrator.
Ok, the administrator.

Why is it the administrator's DUTY to read the private messages?

Because he's the administrator. Who's responsibility do you think it
should be?

Nobody's responsibility.

That's why the PRIVATE MESSAGES are supposed to be PRIVATE!!!!

Oh please - that was before the Patriot Act.

Why would an administrator have a duty to read privates messages on
FightCPS?

Terr'ists might plan an attack - CPS scumsuckers might infiltrate the
private list - pedophiles - cubans.

Is it his responsibility to monitor what members say privately to one
another?

Yes.

Subject changed: If Private Messages on FightCPS are being read by
good dad, shouldn't they have a different name? Like "You may think
they're PRIVATE MESSAGES, but good dad, forum administator, will be
reading them behind your back?"
14 From: Greegor - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 7:57 pm

Has there yet been any proof it takes place?
Wouldn't that be the order of business before
analyzing why?

15 From: Dan Sullivan - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 8:14 pm

Greegor wrote:
Has there yet been any proof it takes place?

Inkspot claims reading the private messages on FightCPS is the DUTY of
the administrator.

Wouldn't that be the order of business before
analyzing why?

Now that we know reading PRIVATE MESSAGES is the DUTY of the FightCPS
administrator, we just have to ascertain why.

Subject changed: Dans paranoid kookout"
16 From: inkspot - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 8:19 pm

Dan Sullivan wrote:
Greegor wrote:
Has there yet been any proof it takes place?

Inkspot claims reading the private messages on FightCPS is the DUTY of
the administrator.

Wouldn't that be the order of business before
analyzing why?

Now that we know reading PRIVATE MESSAGES is the DUTY of the FightCPS
administrator, we just have to ascertain why.

Hmmmmmmmmmm - homos?

Subject changed: If Private Messages on FightCPS are being read by
good dad, shouldn't they have a different name? Like "You may think
they're PRIVATE MESSAGES, but good dad, forum administator, will be
reading them behind your back?"
17 From: Dan Sullivan - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 8:19 pm

Dan Sullivan wrote:
Greegor wrote:
Has there yet been any proof it takes place?

Inkspot claims reading the private messages on FightCPS is the DUTY of
the administrator.

Wouldn't that be the order of business before
analyzing why?

Now that we know reading PRIVATE MESSAGES is the DUTY of the FightCPS
administrator, we just have to ascertain why.

What a shame, inkspot went blotto; he choked on his own massive
stupidity.

Subject changed: Dan's loser whine
18 From: inkspot - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 8:28 pm

Dan Sullivan wrote:
Dan Sullivan wrote:
Greegor wrote:
Has there yet been any proof it takes place?
Inkspot claims reading the private messages on FightCPS is the DUTY of
the administrator.

Wouldn't that be the order of business before
analyzing why?
Now that we know reading PRIVATE MESSAGES is the DUTY of the FightCPS
administrator, we just have to ascertain why.

What a shame, inkspot went blotto; he choked on his own massive
stupidity.

Hey - sorry to leave you here alone, but I got a date.

If you weren't such a big, stupid, ugly SOB you could score without
paying too. nite

Subject changed: If Private Messages on FightCPS are being read by
good dad, shouldn't they have a different name? Like "You may think
they're PRIVATE MESSAGES, but good dad, forum administator, will be
reading them behind your back?"
19 From: Dan Sullivan - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 8:46 pm

- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

inkspot wrote:
Dan Sullivan wrote:
Dan Sullivan wrote:
Greegor wrote:
Has there yet been any proof it takes place?
Inkspot claims reading the private messages on FightCPS is the DUTY of
the administrator.

Wouldn't that be the order of business before
analyzing why?
Now that we know reading PRIVATE MESSAGES is the DUTY of the FightCPS
administrator, we just have to ascertain why.

What a shame, inkspot went blotto; he choked on his own massive
stupidity.

Hey - sorry to leave you here alone, but I got a date.

Mary Palmer, again?

Thought so.

Subject changed: Dan's loser whine
20 From: 0:- - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 9:39 pm

- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

inkspot wrote:
Dan Sullivan wrote:
Dan Sullivan wrote:
Greegor wrote:
Has there yet been any proof it takes place?
Inkspot claims reading the private messages on FightCPS is the DUTY of
the administrator.

Wouldn't that be the order of business before
analyzing why?
Now that we know reading PRIVATE MESSAGES is the DUTY of the FightCPS
administrator, we just have to ascertain why.

What a shame, inkspot went blotto; he choked on his own massive
stupidity.

Hey - sorry to leave you here alone, but I got a date.

Translation: "soooooeeeee, pig pig pig, soooooooeeeee, pig pig pig."

If you weren't such a big, stupid, ugly SOB you could score without
paying too. nite

It's so sad to see someone with such high regard for himself choke like

this.

You have my condolences. Tell your girl friend "Oink, Oink, grunt,
grunt, grunt."

R RR RR RR RR R

21 From: - Date: Sun, Jan 14 2007 12:35 am

- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

Dan Sullivan wrote:
Dan Sullivan wrote:
Greegor wrote:
Has there yet been any proof it takes place?

Inkspot claims reading the private messages on FightCPS is the DUTY of
the administrator.

Wouldn't that be the order of business before
analyzing why?

Now that we know reading PRIVATE MESSAGES is the DUTY of the FightCPS
administrator, we just have to ascertain why.

What a shame, inkspot went blotto; he choked on his own massive
stupidity.

Wow, Dan I see you've takin time out of your busy life helping families

to circle up the manure wagons.
One would think that someone with your wisdom would surely know how a
phpBB message board operates or at least research it before making
themself out to be so stupid..

Unless the only reason is to relate my name and "Private messages on
FightCPS.com aren't private at all" to anyone who google searches
FightCPS... Nice smear campaign... Ever do PR work for Senators?

Do you think EVERY administrator on EVERY phpBB message board can
actually go in and read people's private messages? Do you really
believe the developers of such boards leave loopholes like this open?

No one has the ability to read others pm's.. They would have to know
the individuals password... To read everyones pm's they would have to
know EVERY persons password used on the site...

Anyone who doubts this can ask ANY administrator at any site using the
phpBB Group, probably using any type of message board for that matter..


Go ask the developers themselves, http://www.phpbb.com/features.php
Click on support and ask or
Look under security, *Strong encryption to keep passwords safe in the
database*

BTW....How many "sock" names did you have at our site Dan?
I quit looking after I found 2.... "Drose" and "Oliver Sutton" ...
Most of Oliver's posts ip address matched Drose's and 3/4 of "hers"
matched Dan Sullivan... Some within a half hour of each other and in
the same thread......

I'd stay and chat but I'm in the middle of doing some research for a
couple of families needing help with a CPS case

22 From: 0:- - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 9:30 pm

Greegor wrote:
Has there yet been any proof it takes place?
Wouldn't that be the order of business before
analyzing why?

Have you asked Gooddad?

23 From: - Date: Sun, Jan 14 2007 12:41 am

0:- wrote:
Greegor wrote:
Has there yet been any proof it takes place?
Wouldn't that be the order of business before
analyzing why?

Have you asked Gooddad?

Wow, Dan I see you've takin time out of your busy life helping families

to circle up the manure wagons.
One would think that someone with your wisdom would surely know how a
phpBB message board operates or at least research it before making
themself out to be so stupid..

Unless the only reason is to relate my name and "Private messages on
FightCPS.com aren't private at all" to anyone who google searches
FightCPS... Nice smear campaign... Ever do PR work for Senators?

Do you think EVERY administrator on EVERY phpBB message board can
actually go in and read people's private messages? Do you really
believe the developers of such boards leave loopholes like this open?

No one has the ability to read others pm's.. They would have to know
the individuals password... To read everyones pm's they would have to
know EVERY persons password used on the site...

Anyone who doubts this can ask ANY administrator at any site using the
phpBB Group, probably using any type of message board for that matter..


Go ask the developers themselves, http://www.phpbb.com/features.php
Click on support and ask or
Look under security, *Strong encryption to keep passwords safe in the
database*

BTW....How many "sock" names did you have at our site Dan?
I quit looking after I found 2.... "Drose" and "Oliver Sutton" ...
Most of Oliver's posts ip address matched Drose's and 3/4 of "hers"
matched Dan Sullivan... Some within a half hour of each other and in
the same thread......

I'd stay and chat but I'm in the middle of doing some research for a
couple of families needing help with a CPS case

Greegor wrote:
This one
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.s...e304c52e9c1fd8

One where Linda weighed in
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.s...fce0235127099b

Here is a THIRD gratuitous thread on this Dan Sullivan started.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.s...05a48f236c6ecc

And the whole accusation was a LIE!

Accusation?




Dan Sullivan started a thread called :

" If Private Messages on FightCPS are being read by good dad, shouldn't
they have a different name? Like "You may think they're PRIVATE
MESSAGES, but good dad, forum administator, will be reading them behind
your back?" ""

1 From: Dan Sullivan - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 7:02 pm

Comments?

2 From: 0:- - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 7:05 pm

Dan Sullivan wrote:
Comments?

I'll wait for Tim's.

Subject changed: Don's lunatic kookout
3 From: inkspot - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 7:15 pm
Email: inkspot

Run out of kiddies to sell on usenet Don?

Subject changed: Dans sniveling snitching whine
4 From: inkspot - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 7:14 pm

Dan
Get a clue.

It's the administrators DUTY to read those messages.

5 From: 0:- - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 7:23 pm

inkspot wrote:
Dan
Get a clue.

It's the administrators DUTY to read those messages.

If that is so, why don't the posters of those messages know about this
'duty?'

6 From: inkspot - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 7:57 pm

0:- wrote:
inkspot wrote:
Dan
Get a clue.

It's the administrators DUTY to read those messages.

If that is so, why don't the posters of those messages know about this
'duty?'

[F] off Don, you pathetic piece of [s]. But if you must know, it's dem
damn terr'ists - forever vigil - homeward bound - hail to the decider
and stuff like that.

Dubya said there would be sacrifices - so luv it or leave it - Oh you
were kicked out - sorry.

Subject changed: If Private Messages on FightCPS are being read by
good dad, shouldn't they have a different name? Like "You may think
they're PRIVATE MESSAGES, but good dad, forum administator, will be
reading them behind your back?"
7 From: Dan Sullivan - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 7:20 pm

inkspot wrote,

Dan Get a clue.

It's the administrators DUTY to read those messages.

Why would reading the PRIVATE MESSAGES on FightCPS be good dad's DUTY?

8 From: Dan Sullivan - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 7:34 pm

Dan Sullivan wrote:
inkspot wrote,

Dan Get a clue.

It's the administrators DUTY to read those messages.

Why would reading the PRIVATE MESSAGES on FightCPS be good dad's DUTY?

Please explain.

9 From: inkspot - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 7:53 pm

Dan Sullivan wrote:
inkspot wrote,

Dan Get a clue.

It's the administrators DUTY to read those messages.

Why would reading the PRIVATE MESSAGES on FightCPS be good dad's DUTY?

I didn't say GD - I said the administrator.

10 From: Dan Sullivan - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 7:56 pm

inkspot wrote:
Dan Sullivan wrote:
inkspot wrote,

Dan Get a clue.

It's the administrators DUTY to read those messages.

Why would reading the PRIVATE MESSAGES on FightCPS be good dad's DUTY?

I didn't say GD - I said the administrator.

Ok, the administrator.

Why is it the administrator's DUTY to read the private messages?

11 From: inkspot - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 8:03 pm

- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

Dan Sullivan wrote:
inkspot wrote:
Dan Sullivan wrote:
inkspot wrote,

Dan Get a clue.

It's the administrators DUTY to read those messages.
Why would reading the PRIVATE MESSAGES on FightCPS be good dad's DUTY?

I didn't say GD - I said the administrator.

Ok, the administrator.

Why is it the administrator's DUTY to read the private messages?

Because he's the administrator. Who's responsibility do you think it
should be?

12 From: Dan Sullivan - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 8:09 pm

- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

inkspot wrote:
Dan Sullivan wrote:
inkspot wrote:
Dan Sullivan wrote:
inkspot wrote,

Dan Get a clue.

It's the administrators DUTY to read those messages.
Why would reading the PRIVATE MESSAGES on FightCPS be good dad's DUTY?

I didn't say GD - I said the administrator.

Ok, the administrator.

Why is it the administrator's DUTY to read the private messages?

Because he's the administrator. Who's responsibility do you think it
should be?

Nobody's responsibility.

That's why the PRIVATE MESSAGES are supposed to be PRIVATE!!!!

Why would an administrator have a duty to read privates messages on
FightCPS?

Is it his responsibility to monitor what members say privately to one
another?

13 From: inkspot - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 8:15 pm

- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

Dan Sullivan wrote:
inkspot wrote:
Dan Sullivan wrote:
inkspot wrote:
Dan Sullivan wrote:
inkspot wrote,

Dan Get a clue.

It's the administrators DUTY to read those messages.
Why would reading the PRIVATE MESSAGES on FightCPS be good dad's DUTY?

I didn't say GD - I said the administrator.
Ok, the administrator.

Why is it the administrator's DUTY to read the private messages?

Because he's the administrator. Who's responsibility do you think it
should be?

Nobody's responsibility.

That's why the PRIVATE MESSAGES are supposed to be PRIVATE!!!!

Oh please - that was before the Patriot Act.

Why would an administrator have a duty to read privates messages on
FightCPS?

Terr'ists might plan an attack - CPS scumsuckers might infiltrate the
private list - pedophiles - cubans.

Is it his responsibility to monitor what members say privately to one
another?

Yes.

Subject changed: If Private Messages on FightCPS are being read by
good dad, shouldn't they have a different name? Like "You may think
they're PRIVATE MESSAGES, but good dad, forum administator, will be
reading them behind your back?"
14 From: Greegor - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 7:57 pm

Has there yet been any proof it takes place?
Wouldn't that be the order of business before
analyzing why?

15 From: Dan Sullivan - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 8:14 pm

Greegor wrote:
Has there yet been any proof it takes place?

Inkspot claims reading the private messages on FightCPS is the DUTY of
the administrator.

Wouldn't that be the order of business before
analyzing why?

Now that we know reading PRIVATE MESSAGES is the DUTY of the FightCPS
administrator, we just have to ascertain why.

Subject changed: Dans paranoid kookout"
16 From: inkspot - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 8:19 pm

Dan Sullivan wrote:
Greegor wrote:
Has there yet been any proof it takes place?

Inkspot claims reading the private messages on FightCPS is the DUTY of
the administrator.

Wouldn't that be the order of business before
analyzing why?

Now that we know reading PRIVATE MESSAGES is the DUTY of the FightCPS
administrator, we just have to ascertain why.

Hmmmmmmmmmm - homos?

Subject changed: If Private Messages on FightCPS are being read by
good dad, shouldn't they have a different name? Like "You may think
they're PRIVATE MESSAGES, but good dad, forum administator, will be
reading them behind your back?"
17 From: Dan Sullivan - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 8:19 pm

Dan Sullivan wrote:
Greegor wrote:
Has there yet been any proof it takes place?

Inkspot claims reading the private messages on FightCPS is the DUTY of
the administrator.

Wouldn't that be the order of business before
analyzing why?

Now that we know reading PRIVATE MESSAGES is the DUTY of the FightCPS
administrator, we just have to ascertain why.

What a shame, inkspot went blotto; he choked on his own massive
stupidity.

Subject changed: Dan's loser whine
18 From: inkspot - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 8:28 pm

Dan Sullivan wrote:
Dan Sullivan wrote:
Greegor wrote:
Has there yet been any proof it takes place?
Inkspot claims reading the private messages on FightCPS is the DUTY of
the administrator.

Wouldn't that be the order of business before
analyzing why?
Now that we know reading PRIVATE MESSAGES is the DUTY of the FightCPS
administrator, we just have to ascertain why.

What a shame, inkspot went blotto; he choked on his own massive
stupidity.

Hey - sorry to leave you here alone, but I got a date.

If you weren't such a big, stupid, ugly SOB you could score without
paying too. nite

Subject changed: If Private Messages on FightCPS are being read by
good dad, shouldn't they have a different name? Like "You may think
they're PRIVATE MESSAGES, but good dad, forum administator, will be
reading them behind your back?"
19 From: Dan Sullivan - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 8:46 pm

- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

inkspot wrote:
Dan Sullivan wrote:
Dan Sullivan wrote:
Greegor wrote:
Has there yet been any proof it takes place?
Inkspot claims reading the private messages on FightCPS is the DUTY of
the administrator.

Wouldn't that be the order of business before
analyzing why?
Now that we know reading PRIVATE MESSAGES is the DUTY of the FightCPS
administrator, we just have to ascertain why.

What a shame, inkspot went blotto; he choked on his own massive
stupidity.

Hey - sorry to leave you here alone, but I got a date.

Mary Palmer, again?

Thought so.

Subject changed: Dan's loser whine
20 From: 0:- - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 9:39 pm

- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

inkspot wrote:
Dan Sullivan wrote:
Dan Sullivan wrote:
Greegor wrote:
Has there yet been any proof it takes place?
Inkspot claims reading the private messages on FightCPS is the DUTY of
the administrator.

Wouldn't that be the order of business before
analyzing why?
Now that we know reading PRIVATE MESSAGES is the DUTY of the FightCPS
administrator, we just have to ascertain why.

What a shame, inkspot went blotto; he choked on his own massive
stupidity.

Hey - sorry to leave you here alone, but I got a date.

Translation: "soooooeeeee, pig pig pig, soooooooeeeee, pig pig pig."

If you weren't such a big, stupid, ugly SOB you could score without
paying too. nite

It's so sad to see someone with such high regard for himself choke like

this.

You have my condolences. Tell your girl friend "Oink, Oink, grunt,
grunt, grunt."

R RR RR RR RR R

21 From: - Date: Sun, Jan 14 2007 12:35 am

- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

Dan Sullivan wrote:
Dan Sullivan wrote:
Greegor wrote:
Has there yet been any proof it takes place?

Inkspot claims reading the private messages on FightCPS is the DUTY of
the administrator.

Wouldn't that be the order of business before
analyzing why?

Now that we know reading PRIVATE MESSAGES is the DUTY of the FightCPS
administrator, we just have to ascertain why.

What a shame, inkspot went blotto; he choked on his own massive
stupidity.

Wow, Dan I see you've takin time out of your busy life helping families

to circle up the manure wagons.
One would think that someone with your wisdom would surely know how a
phpBB message board operates or at least research it before making
themself out to be so stupid..

Unless the only reason is to relate my name and "Private messages on
FightCPS.com aren't private at all" to anyone who google searches
FightCPS... Nice smear campaign... Ever do PR work for Senators?

Do you think EVERY administrator on EVERY phpBB message board can
actually go in and read people's private messages? Do you really
believe the developers of such boards leave loopholes like this open?

No one has the ability to read others pm's.. They would have to know
the individuals password... To read everyones pm's they would have to
know EVERY persons password used on the site...

Anyone who doubts this can ask ANY administrator at any site using the
phpBB Group, probably using any type of message board for that matter..


Go ask the developers themselves, http://www.phpbb.com/features.php
Click on support and ask or
Look under security, *Strong encryption to keep passwords safe in the
database*

BTW....How many "sock" names did you have at our site Dan?
I quit looking after I found 2.... "Drose" and "Oliver Sutton" ...
Most of Oliver's posts ip address matched Drose's and 3/4 of "hers"
matched Dan Sullivan... Some within a half hour of each other and in
the same thread......

I'd stay and chat but I'm in the middle of doing some research for a
couple of families needing help with a CPS case

22 From: 0:- - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 9:30 pm

Greegor wrote:
Has there yet been any proof it takes place?
Wouldn't that be the order of business before
analyzing why?

Have you asked Gooddad?

23 From: - Date: Sun, Jan 14 2007 12:41 am

0:- wrote:
Greegor wrote:
Has there yet been any proof it takes place?
Wouldn't that be the order of business before
analyzing why?

Have you asked Gooddad?

Wow, Dan I see you've takin time out of your busy life helping families

to circle up the manure wagons.
One would think that someone with your wisdom would surely know how a
phpBB message board operates or at least research it before making
themself out to be so stupid..

Unless the only reason is to relate my name and "Private messages on
FightCPS.com aren't private at all" to anyone who google searches
FightCPS... Nice smear campaign... Ever do PR work for Senators?

Do you think EVERY administrator on EVERY phpBB message board can
actually go in and read people's private messages? Do you really
believe the developers of such boards leave loopholes like this open?

No one has the ability to read others pm's.. They would have to know
the individuals password... To read everyones pm's they would have to
know EVERY persons password used on the site...

Anyone who doubts this can ask ANY administrator at any site using the
phpBB Group, probably using any type of message board for that matter..


Go ask the developers themselves, http://www.phpbb.com/features.php
Click on support and ask or
Look under security, *Strong encryption to keep passwords safe in the
database*

BTW....How many "sock" names did you have at our site Dan?
I quit looking after I found 2.... "Drose" and "Oliver Sutton" ...
Most of Oliver's posts ip address matched Drose's and 3/4 of "hers"
matched Dan Sullivan... Some within a half hour of each other and in
the same thread......

I'd stay and chat but I'm in the middle of doing some research for a
couple of families needing help with a CPS case

0:- wrote:
Greegor wrote:
This one
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.s...e304c52e9c1fd8

One where Linda weighed in
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.s...fce0235127099b

Here is a THIRD gratuitous thread on this Dan Sullivan started.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.s...05a48f236c6ecc

And the whole accusation was a LIE!

Accusation?

Yeah dinkhead - as in Dan falsely accusing GD of reading PM's on the forum.




Dan Sullivan started a thread called :

" If Private Messages on FightCPS are being read by good dad, shouldn't
they have a different name? Like "You may think they're PRIVATE
MESSAGES, but good dad, forum administator, will be reading them behind
your back?" ""

1 From: Dan Sullivan - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 7:02 pm

Comments?

2 From: 0:- - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 7:05 pm

Dan Sullivan wrote:
Comments?
I'll wait for Tim's.

Subject changed: Don's lunatic kookout
3 From: inkspot - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 7:15 pm
Email: inkspot

Run out of kiddies to sell on usenet Don?

Subject changed: Dans sniveling snitching whine
4 From: inkspot - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 7:14 pm

Dan
Get a clue.

It's the administrators DUTY to read those messages.

5 From: 0:- - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 7:23 pm

inkspot wrote:
Dan
Get a clue.
It's the administrators DUTY to read those messages.
If that is so, why don't the posters of those messages know about this
'duty?'

6 From: inkspot - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 7:57 pm

0:- wrote:
inkspot wrote:
Dan
Get a clue.
It's the administrators DUTY to read those messages.
If that is so, why don't the posters of those messages know about this
'duty?'
[F] off Don, you pathetic piece of [s]. But if you must know, it's dem
damn terr'ists - forever vigil - homeward bound - hail to the decider
and stuff like that.

Dubya said there would be sacrifices - so luv it or leave it - Oh you
were kicked out - sorry.

Subject changed: If Private Messages on FightCPS are being read by
good dad, shouldn't they have a different name? Like "You may think
they're PRIVATE MESSAGES, but good dad, forum administator, will be
reading them behind your back?"
7 From: Dan Sullivan - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 7:20 pm

inkspot wrote,

Dan Get a clue.
It's the administrators DUTY to read those messages.
Why would reading the PRIVATE MESSAGES on FightCPS be good dad's DUTY?

8 From: Dan Sullivan - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 7:34 pm

Dan Sullivan wrote:
inkspot wrote,
Dan Get a clue.
It's the administrators DUTY to read those messages.
Why would reading the PRIVATE MESSAGES on FightCPS be good dad's DUTY?
Please explain.

9 From: inkspot - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 7:53 pm

Dan Sullivan wrote:
inkspot wrote,
Dan Get a clue.
It's the administrators DUTY to read those messages.
Why would reading the PRIVATE MESSAGES on FightCPS be good dad's DUTY?
I didn't say GD - I said the administrator.

10 From: Dan Sullivan - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 7:56 pm

inkspot wrote:
Dan Sullivan wrote:
inkspot wrote,
Dan Get a clue.
It's the administrators DUTY to read those messages.
Why would reading the PRIVATE MESSAGES on FightCPS be good dad's DUTY?
I didn't say GD - I said the administrator.
Ok, the administrator.

Why is it the administrator's DUTY to read the private messages?

11 From: inkspot - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 8:03 pm

- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

Dan Sullivan wrote:
inkspot wrote:
Dan Sullivan wrote:
inkspot wrote,
Dan Get a clue.
It's the administrators DUTY to read those messages.
Why would reading the PRIVATE MESSAGES on FightCPS be good dad's DUTY?
I didn't say GD - I said the administrator.
Ok, the administrator.
Why is it the administrator's DUTY to read the private messages?
Because he's the administrator. Who's responsibility do you think it
should be?

12 From: Dan Sullivan - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 8:09 pm

- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

inkspot wrote:
Dan Sullivan wrote:
inkspot wrote:
Dan Sullivan wrote:
inkspot wrote,
Dan Get a clue.
It's the administrators DUTY to read those messages.
Why would reading the PRIVATE MESSAGES on FightCPS be good dad's DUTY?
I didn't say GD - I said the administrator.
Ok, the administrator.
Why is it the administrator's DUTY to read the private messages?
Because he's the administrator. Who's responsibility do you think it
should be?
Nobody's responsibility.

That's why the PRIVATE MESSAGES are supposed to be PRIVATE!!!!

Why would an administrator have a duty to read privates messages on
FightCPS?

Is it his responsibility to monitor what members say privately to one
another?

13 From: inkspot - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 8:15 pm

- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

Dan Sullivan wrote:
inkspot wrote:
Dan Sullivan wrote:
inkspot wrote:
Dan Sullivan wrote:
inkspot wrote,
Dan Get a clue.
It's the administrators DUTY to read those messages.
Why would reading the PRIVATE MESSAGES on FightCPS be good dad's DUTY?
I didn't say GD - I said the administrator.
Ok, the administrator.
Why is it the administrator's DUTY to read the private messages?
Because he's the administrator. Who's responsibility do you think it
should be?
Nobody's responsibility.
That's why the PRIVATE MESSAGES are supposed to be PRIVATE!!!!
Oh please - that was before the Patriot Act.

Why would an administrator have a duty to read privates messages on
FightCPS?
Terr'ists might plan an attack - CPS scumsuckers might infiltrate the
private list - pedophiles - cubans.

Is it his responsibility to monitor what members say privately to one
another?
Yes.

Subject changed: If Private Messages on FightCPS are being read by
good dad, shouldn't they have a different name? Like "You may think
they're PRIVATE MESSAGES, but good dad, forum administator, will be
reading them behind your back?"
14 From: Greegor - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 7:57 pm

Has there yet been any proof it takes place?
Wouldn't that be the order of business before
analyzing why?

15 From: Dan Sullivan - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 8:14 pm

Greegor wrote:
Has there yet been any proof it takes place?
Inkspot claims reading the private messages on FightCPS is the DUTY of
the administrator.

Wouldn't that be the order of business before
analyzing why?
Now that we know reading PRIVATE MESSAGES is the DUTY of the FightCPS
administrator, we just have to ascertain why.

Subject changed: Dans paranoid kookout"
16 From: inkspot - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 8:19 pm

Dan Sullivan wrote:
Greegor wrote:
Has there yet been any proof it takes place?
Inkspot claims reading the private messages on FightCPS is the DUTY of
the administrator.
Wouldn't that be the order of business before
analyzing why?
Now that we know reading PRIVATE MESSAGES is the DUTY of the FightCPS
administrator, we just have to ascertain why.
Hmmmmmmmmmm - homos?

Subject changed: If Private Messages on FightCPS are being read by
good dad, shouldn't they have a different name? Like "You may think
they're PRIVATE MESSAGES, but good dad, forum administator, will be
reading them behind your back?"
17 From: Dan Sullivan - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 8:19 pm

Dan Sullivan wrote:
Greegor wrote:
Has there yet been any proof it takes place?
Inkspot claims reading the private messages on FightCPS is the DUTY of
the administrator.
Wouldn't that be the order of business before
analyzing why?
Now that we know reading PRIVATE MESSAGES is the DUTY of the FightCPS
administrator, we just have to ascertain why.
What a shame, inkspot went blotto; he choked on his own massive
stupidity.

Subject changed: Dan's loser whine
18 From: inkspot - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 8:28 pm

Dan Sullivan wrote:
Dan Sullivan wrote:
Greegor wrote:
Has there yet been any proof it takes place?
Inkspot claims reading the private messages on FightCPS is the DUTY of
the administrator.
Wouldn't that be the order of business before
analyzing why?
Now that we know reading PRIVATE MESSAGES is the DUTY of the FightCPS
administrator, we just have to ascertain why.
What a shame, inkspot went blotto; he choked on his own massive
stupidity.
Hey - sorry to leave you here alone, but I got a date.

If you weren't such a big, stupid, ugly SOB you could score without
paying too. nite

Subject changed: If Private Messages on FightCPS are being read by
good dad, shouldn't they have a different name? Like "You may think
they're PRIVATE MESSAGES, but good dad, forum administator, will be
reading them behind your back?"
19 From: Dan Sullivan - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 8:46 pm

- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

inkspot wrote:
Dan Sullivan wrote:
Dan Sullivan wrote:
Greegor wrote:
Has there yet been any proof it takes place?
Inkspot claims reading the private messages on FightCPS is the DUTY of
the administrator.
Wouldn't that be the order of business before
analyzing why?
Now that we know reading PRIVATE MESSAGES is the DUTY of the FightCPS
administrator, we just have to ascertain why.
What a shame, inkspot went blotto; he choked on his own massive
stupidity.
Hey - sorry to leave you here alone, but I got a date.
Mary Palmer, again?

Thought so.

Subject changed: Dan's loser whine
20 From: 0:- - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 9:39 pm

- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

inkspot wrote:
Dan Sullivan wrote:
Dan Sullivan wrote:
Greegor wrote:
Has there yet been any proof it takes place?
Inkspot claims reading the private messages on FightCPS is the DUTY of
the administrator.
Wouldn't that be the order of business before
analyzing why?
Now that we know reading PRIVATE MESSAGES is the DUTY of the FightCPS
administrator, we just have to ascertain why.
What a shame, inkspot went blotto; he choked on his own massive
stupidity.
Hey - sorry to leave you here alone, but I got a date.
Translation: "soooooeeeee, pig pig pig, soooooooeeeee, pig pig pig."

If you weren't such a big, stupid, ugly SOB you could score without
paying too. nite
It's so sad to see someone with such high regard for himself choke like

this.

You have my condolences. Tell your girl friend "Oink, Oink, grunt,
grunt, grunt."

R RR RR RR RR R

21 From: - Date: Sun, Jan 14 2007 12:35 am

- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

Dan Sullivan wrote:
Dan Sullivan wrote:
Greegor wrote:
Has there yet been any proof it takes place?
Inkspot claims reading the private messages on FightCPS is the DUTY of
the administrator.
Wouldn't that be the order of business before
analyzing why?
Now that we know reading PRIVATE MESSAGES is the DUTY of the FightCPS
administrator, we just have to ascertain why.
What a shame, inkspot went blotto; he choked on his own massive
stupidity.
Wow, Dan I see you've takin time out of your busy life helping families

to circle up the manure wagons.
One would think that someone with your wisdom would surely know how a
phpBB message board operates or at least research it before making
themself out to be so stupid..

Unless the only reason is to relate my name and "Private messages on
FightCPS.com aren't private at all" to anyone who google searches
FightCPS... Nice smear campaign... Ever do PR work for Senators?

Do you think EVERY administrator on EVERY phpBB message board can
actually go in and read people's private messages? Do you really
believe the developers of such boards leave loopholes like this open?

No one has the ability to read others pm's.. They would have to know
the individuals password... To read everyones pm's they would have to
know EVERY persons password used on the site...

Anyone who doubts this can ask ANY administrator at any site using the
phpBB Group, probably using any type of message board for that matter..


Go ask the developers themselves, http://www.phpbb.com/features.php
Click on support and ask or
Look under security, *Strong encryption to keep passwords safe in the
database*

BTW....How many "sock" names did you have at our site Dan?
I quit looking after I found 2.... "Drose" and "Oliver Sutton" ...
Most of Oliver's posts ip address matched Drose's and 3/4 of "hers"
matched Dan Sullivan... Some within a half hour of each other and in
the same thread......

I'd stay and chat but I'm in the middle of doing some research for a
couple of families needing help with a CPS case

22 From: 0:- - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 9:30 pm

Greegor wrote:
Has there yet been any proof it takes place?
Wouldn't that be the order of business before
analyzing why?
Have you asked Gooddad?

23 From: - Date: Sun, Jan 14 2007 12:41 am

0:- wrote:
Greegor wrote:
Has there yet been any proof it takes place?
Wouldn't that be the order of business before
analyzing why?
Have you asked Gooddad?
Wow, Dan I see you've takin time out of your busy life helping families

to circle up the manure wagons.
One would think that someone with your wisdom would surely know how a
phpBB message board operates or at least research it before making
themself out to be so stupid..

Unless the only reason is to relate my name and "Private messages on
FightCPS.com aren't private at all" to anyone who google searches
FightCPS... Nice smear campaign... Ever do PR work for Senators?

Do you think EVERY administrator on EVERY phpBB message board can
actually go in and read people's private messages? Do you really
believe the developers of such boards leave loopholes like this open?

No one has the ability to read others pm's.. They would have to know
the individuals password... To read everyones pm's they would have to
know EVERY persons password used on the site...

Anyone who doubts this can ask ANY administrator at any site using the
phpBB Group, probably using any type of message board for that matter..


Go ask the developers themselves, http://www.phpbb.com/features.php
Click on support and ask or
Look under security, *Strong encryption to keep passwords safe in the
database*

BTW....How many "sock" names did you have at our site Dan?
I quit looking after I found 2.... "Drose" and "Oliver Sutton" ...
Most of Oliver's posts ip address matched Drose's and 3/4 of "hers"
matched Dan Sullivan... Some within a half hour of each other and in
the same thread......

I'd stay and chat but I'm in the middle of doing some research for a
couple of families needing help with a CPS case


--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Greegor wrote:
This one
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.s...e304c52e9c1fd8

One where Linda weighed in
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.s...fce0235127099b

Here is a THIRD gratuitous thread on this Dan Sullivan started.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.s...05a48f236c6ecc

And the whole accusation was a LIE!

I wonder why Dan would publically attack GD when he knew his nonsense
would be exposed? GD says Dan is stupid. I wonder.


Dan Sullivan started a thread called :

" If Private Messages on FightCPS are being read by good dad, shouldn't
they have a different name? Like "You may think they're PRIVATE
MESSAGES, but good dad, forum administator, will be reading them behind
your back?" ""

1 From: Dan Sullivan - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 7:02 pm

Comments?

2 From: 0:- - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 7:05 pm

Dan Sullivan wrote:
Comments?

I'll wait for Tim's.

Subject changed: Don's lunatic kookout
3 From: inkspot - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 7:15 pm
Email: inkspot

Run out of kiddies to sell on usenet Don?

Subject changed: Dans sniveling snitching whine
4 From: inkspot - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 7:14 pm

Dan
Get a clue.

It's the administrators DUTY to read those messages.

5 From: 0:- - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 7:23 pm

inkspot wrote:
Dan
Get a clue.

It's the administrators DUTY to read those messages.

If that is so, why don't the posters of those messages know about this
'duty?'

6 From: inkspot - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 7:57 pm

0:- wrote:
inkspot wrote:
Dan
Get a clue.

It's the administrators DUTY to read those messages.

If that is so, why don't the posters of those messages know about this
'duty?'

[F] off Don, you pathetic piece of [s]. But if you must know, it's dem
damn terr'ists - forever vigil - homeward bound - hail to the decider
and stuff like that.

Dubya said there would be sacrifices - so luv it or leave it - Oh you
were kicked out - sorry.

Subject changed: If Private Messages on FightCPS are being read by
good dad, shouldn't they have a different name? Like "You may think
they're PRIVATE MESSAGES, but good dad, forum administator, will be
reading them behind your back?"
7 From: Dan Sullivan - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 7:20 pm

inkspot wrote,

Dan Get a clue.

It's the administrators DUTY to read those messages.

Why would reading the PRIVATE MESSAGES on FightCPS be good dad's DUTY?

8 From: Dan Sullivan - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 7:34 pm

Dan Sullivan wrote:
inkspot wrote,

Dan Get a clue.

It's the administrators DUTY to read those messages.

Why would reading the PRIVATE MESSAGES on FightCPS be good dad's DUTY?

Please explain.

9 From: inkspot - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 7:53 pm

Dan Sullivan wrote:
inkspot wrote,

Dan Get a clue.

It's the administrators DUTY to read those messages.

Why would reading the PRIVATE MESSAGES on FightCPS be good dad's DUTY?

I didn't say GD - I said the administrator.

10 From: Dan Sullivan - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 7:56 pm

inkspot wrote:
Dan Sullivan wrote:
inkspot wrote,

Dan Get a clue.

It's the administrators DUTY to read those messages.

Why would reading the PRIVATE MESSAGES on FightCPS be good dad's DUTY?

I didn't say GD - I said the administrator.

Ok, the administrator.

Why is it the administrator's DUTY to read the private messages?

11 From: inkspot - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 8:03 pm

- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

Dan Sullivan wrote:
inkspot wrote:
Dan Sullivan wrote:
inkspot wrote,

Dan Get a clue.

It's the administrators DUTY to read those messages.
Why would reading the PRIVATE MESSAGES on FightCPS be good dad's DUTY?

I didn't say GD - I said the administrator.

Ok, the administrator.

Why is it the administrator's DUTY to read the private messages?

Because he's the administrator. Who's responsibility do you think it
should be?

12 From: Dan Sullivan - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 8:09 pm

- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

inkspot wrote:
Dan Sullivan wrote:
inkspot wrote:
Dan Sullivan wrote:
inkspot wrote,

Dan Get a clue.

It's the administrators DUTY to read those messages.
Why would reading the PRIVATE MESSAGES on FightCPS be good dad's DUTY?

I didn't say GD - I said the administrator.

Ok, the administrator.

Why is it the administrator's DUTY to read the private messages?

Because he's the administrator. Who's responsibility do you think it
should be?

Nobody's responsibility.

That's why the PRIVATE MESSAGES are supposed to be PRIVATE!!!!

Why would an administrator have a duty to read privates messages on
FightCPS?

Is it his responsibility to monitor what members say privately to one
another?

13 From: inkspot - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 8:15 pm

- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

Dan Sullivan wrote:
inkspot wrote:
Dan Sullivan wrote:
inkspot wrote:
Dan Sullivan wrote:
inkspot wrote,

Dan Get a clue.

It's the administrators DUTY to read those messages.
Why would reading the PRIVATE MESSAGES on FightCPS be good dad's DUTY?

I didn't say GD - I said the administrator.
Ok, the administrator.

Why is it the administrator's DUTY to read the private messages?

Because he's the administrator. Who's responsibility do you think it
should be?

Nobody's responsibility.

That's why the PRIVATE MESSAGES are supposed to be PRIVATE!!!!

Oh please - that was before the Patriot Act.

Why would an administrator have a duty to read privates messages on
FightCPS?

Terr'ists might plan an attack - CPS scumsuckers might infiltrate the
private list - pedophiles - cubans.

Is it his responsibility to monitor what members say privately to one
another?

Yes.

Subject changed: If Private Messages on FightCPS are being read by
good dad, shouldn't they have a different name? Like "You may think
they're PRIVATE MESSAGES, but good dad, forum administator, will be
reading them behind your back?"
14 From: Greegor - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 7:57 pm

Has there yet been any proof it takes place?
Wouldn't that be the order of business before
analyzing why?

15 From: Dan Sullivan - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 8:14 pm

Greegor wrote:
Has there yet been any proof it takes place?

Inkspot claims reading the private messages on FightCPS is the DUTY of
the administrator.

Wouldn't that be the order of business before
analyzing why?

Now that we know reading PRIVATE MESSAGES is the DUTY of the FightCPS
administrator, we just have to ascertain why.

Subject changed: Dans paranoid kookout"
16 From: inkspot - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 8:19 pm

Dan Sullivan wrote:
Greegor wrote:
Has there yet been any proof it takes place?

Inkspot claims reading the private messages on FightCPS is the DUTY of
the administrator.

Wouldn't that be the order of business before
analyzing why?

Now that we know reading PRIVATE MESSAGES is the DUTY of the FightCPS
administrator, we just have to ascertain why.

Hmmmmmmmmmm - homos?

Subject changed: If Private Messages on FightCPS are being read by
good dad, shouldn't they have a different name? Like "You may think
they're PRIVATE MESSAGES, but good dad, forum administator, will be
reading them behind your back?"
17 From: Dan Sullivan - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 8:19 pm

Dan Sullivan wrote:
Greegor wrote:
Has there yet been any proof it takes place?

Inkspot claims reading the private messages on FightCPS is the DUTY of
the administrator.

Wouldn't that be the order of business before
analyzing why?

Now that we know reading PRIVATE MESSAGES is the DUTY of the FightCPS
administrator, we just have to ascertain why.

What a shame, inkspot went blotto; he choked on his own massive
stupidity.

Subject changed: Dan's loser whine
18 From: inkspot - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 8:28 pm

Dan Sullivan wrote:
Dan Sullivan wrote:
Greegor wrote:
Has there yet been any proof it takes place?
Inkspot claims reading the private messages on FightCPS is the DUTY of
the administrator.

Wouldn't that be the order of business before
analyzing why?
Now that we know reading PRIVATE MESSAGES is the DUTY of the FightCPS
administrator, we just have to ascertain why.

What a shame, inkspot went blotto; he choked on his own massive
stupidity.

Hey - sorry to leave you here alone, but I got a date.

If you weren't such a big, stupid, ugly SOB you could score without
paying too. nite

Subject changed: If Private Messages on FightCPS are being read by
good dad, shouldn't they have a different name? Like "You may think
they're PRIVATE MESSAGES, but good dad, forum administator, will be
reading them behind your back?"
19 From: Dan Sullivan - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 8:46 pm

- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

inkspot wrote:
Dan Sullivan wrote:
Dan Sullivan wrote:
Greegor wrote:
Has there yet been any proof it takes place?
Inkspot claims reading the private messages on FightCPS is the DUTY of
the administrator.

Wouldn't that be the order of business before
analyzing why?
Now that we know reading PRIVATE MESSAGES is the DUTY of the FightCPS
administrator, we just have to ascertain why.

What a shame, inkspot went blotto; he choked on his own massive
stupidity.

Hey - sorry to leave you here alone, but I got a date.

Mary Palmer, again?

Thought so.

Subject changed: Dan's loser whine
20 From: 0:- - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 9:39 pm

- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

inkspot wrote:
Dan Sullivan wrote:
Dan Sullivan wrote:
Greegor wrote:
Has there yet been any proof it takes place?
Inkspot claims reading the private messages on FightCPS is the DUTY of
the administrator.

Wouldn't that be the order of business before
analyzing why?
Now that we know reading PRIVATE MESSAGES is the DUTY of the FightCPS
administrator, we just have to ascertain why.

What a shame, inkspot went blotto; he choked on his own massive
stupidity.

Hey - sorry to leave you here alone, but I got a date.

Translation: "soooooeeeee, pig pig pig, soooooooeeeee, pig pig pig."

If you weren't such a big, stupid, ugly SOB you could score without
paying too. nite

It's so sad to see someone with such high regard for himself choke like

this.

You have my condolences. Tell your girl friend "Oink, Oink, grunt,
grunt, grunt."

R RR RR RR RR R

21 From: - Date: Sun, Jan 14 2007 12:35 am

- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

Dan Sullivan wrote:
Dan Sullivan wrote:
Greegor wrote:
Has there yet been any proof it takes place?

Inkspot claims reading the private messages on FightCPS is the DUTY of
the administrator.

Wouldn't that be the order of business before
analyzing why?

Now that we know reading PRIVATE MESSAGES is the DUTY of the FightCPS
administrator, we just have to ascertain why.

What a shame, inkspot went blotto; he choked on his own massive
stupidity.

Wow, Dan I see you've takin time out of your busy life helping families

to circle up the manure wagons.
One would think that someone with your wisdom would surely know how a
phpBB message board operates or at least research it before making
themself out to be so stupid..

Unless the only reason is to relate my name and "Private messages on
FightCPS.com aren't private at all" to anyone who google searches
FightCPS... Nice smear campaign... Ever do PR work for Senators?

Do you think EVERY administrator on EVERY phpBB message board can
actually go in and read people's private messages? Do you really
believe the developers of such boards leave loopholes like this open?

No one has the ability to read others pm's.. They would have to know
the individuals password... To read everyones pm's they would have to
know EVERY persons password used on the site...

Anyone who doubts this can ask ANY administrator at any site using the
phpBB Group, probably using any type of message board for that matter..


Go ask the developers themselves, http://www.phpbb.com/features.php
Click on support and ask or
Look under security, *Strong encryption to keep passwords safe in the
database*

BTW....How many "sock" names did you have at our site Dan?
I quit looking after I found 2.... "Drose" and "Oliver Sutton" ...
Most of Oliver's posts ip address matched Drose's and 3/4 of "hers"
matched Dan Sullivan... Some within a half hour of each other and in
the same thread......

I'd stay and chat but I'm in the middle of doing some research for a
couple of families needing help with a CPS case

22 From: 0:- - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 9:30 pm

Greegor wrote:
Has there yet been any proof it takes place?
Wouldn't that be the order of business before
analyzing why?

Have you asked Gooddad?

23 From: - Date: Sun, Jan 14 2007 12:41 am

0:- wrote:
Greegor wrote:
Has there yet been any proof it takes place?
Wouldn't that be the order of business before
analyzing why?

Have you asked Gooddad?

Wow, Dan I see you've takin time out of your busy life helping families

to circle up the manure wagons.
One would think that someone with your wisdom would surely know how a
phpBB message board operates or at least research it before making
themself out to be so stupid..

Unless the only reason is to relate my name and "Private messages on
FightCPS.com aren't private at all" to anyone who google searches
FightCPS... Nice smear campaign... Ever do PR work for Senators?

Do you think EVERY administrator on EVERY phpBB message board can
actually go in and read people's private messages? Do you really
believe the developers of such boards leave loopholes like this open?

No one has the ability to read others pm's.. They would have to know
the individuals password... To read everyones pm's they would have to
know EVERY persons password used on the site...

Anyone who doubts this can ask ANY administrator at any site using the
phpBB Group, probably using any type of message board for that matter..


Go ask the developers themselves, http://www.phpbb.com/features.php
Click on support and ask or
Look under security, *Strong encryption to keep passwords safe in the
database*

BTW....How many "sock" names did you have at our site Dan?
I quit looking after I found 2.... "Drose" and "Oliver Sutton" ...
Most of Oliver's posts ip address matched Drose's and 3/4 of "hers"
matched Dan Sullivan... Some within a half hour of each other and in
the same thread......

I'd stay and chat but I'm in the middle of doing some research for a
couple of families needing help with a CPS case


--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

inkspot wrote:
Greegor wrote:
This one
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.s...e304c52e9c1fd8

One where Linda weighed in
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.s...fce0235127099b

Here is a THIRD gratuitous thread on this Dan Sullivan started.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.s...05a48f236c6ecc

And the whole accusation was a LIE!

I wonder why Dan would publically attack GD when he knew his nonsense
would be exposed? GD says Dan is stupid. I wonder.

All I did was ask a few questions.

Dan Sullivan wrote:
inkspot wrote:
Greegor wrote:
This one
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.s...e304c52e9c1fd8

One where Linda weighed in
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.s...fce0235127099b

Here is a THIRD gratuitous thread on this Dan Sullivan started.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.s...05a48f236c6ecc

And the whole accusation was a LIE!
I wonder why Dan would publically attack GD when he knew his nonsense
would be exposed? GD says Dan is stupid. I wonder.

All I did was ask a few questions.


Yup - and all Dahmer did was take a few young men out to dinner.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

inkspot wrote:
0:- wrote:
Greegor wrote:
This one
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.s...e304c52e9c1fd8


One where Linda weighed in
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.s...fce0235127099b


Here is a THIRD gratuitous thread on this Dan Sullivan started.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.s...05a48f236c6ecc


And the whole accusation was a LIE!

Accusation?

Yeah dinkhead - as in Dan falsely accusing GD of reading PM's on the forum.

Falsely accusing?

Whatever would make Dan think that gd read private messages?








Dan Sullivan started a thread called :

" If Private Messages on FightCPS are being read by good dad, shouldn't
they have a different name? Like "You may think they're PRIVATE
MESSAGES, but good dad, forum administator, will be reading them behind
your back?" ""

1 From: Dan Sullivan - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 7:02 pm

Comments?

2 From: 0:- - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 7:05 pm

Dan Sullivan wrote:
Comments?
I'll wait for Tim's.

Subject changed: Don's lunatic kookout
3 From: inkspot - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 7:15 pm
Email: inkspot

Run out of kiddies to sell on usenet Don?

Subject changed: Dans sniveling snitching whine
4 From: inkspot - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 7:14 pm

Dan
Get a clue.

It's the administrators DUTY to read those messages.

5 From: 0:- - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 7:23 pm

inkspot wrote:
Dan
Get a clue.
It's the administrators DUTY to read those messages.
If that is so, why don't the posters of those messages know about this
'duty?'

6 From: inkspot - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 7:57 pm

0:- wrote:
inkspot wrote:
Dan
Get a clue.
It's the administrators DUTY to read those messages.
If that is so, why don't the posters of those messages know about this
'duty?'
[F] off Don, you pathetic piece of [s]. But if you must know, it's dem
damn terr'ists - forever vigil - homeward bound - hail to the decider
and stuff like that.

Dubya said there would be sacrifices - so luv it or leave it - Oh you
were kicked out - sorry.

Subject changed: If Private Messages on FightCPS are being read by
good dad, shouldn't they have a different name? Like "You may think
they're PRIVATE MESSAGES, but good dad, forum administator, will be
reading them behind your back?"
7 From: Dan Sullivan - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 7:20 pm

inkspot wrote,

Dan Get a clue.
It's the administrators DUTY to read those messages.
Why would reading the PRIVATE MESSAGES on FightCPS be good dad's DUTY?

8 From: Dan Sullivan - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 7:34 pm

Dan Sullivan wrote:
inkspot wrote,
Dan Get a clue.
It's the administrators DUTY to read those messages.
Why would reading the PRIVATE MESSAGES on FightCPS be good dad's DUTY?
Please explain.

9 From: inkspot - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 7:53 pm

Dan Sullivan wrote:
inkspot wrote,
Dan Get a clue.
It's the administrators DUTY to read those messages.
Why would reading the PRIVATE MESSAGES on FightCPS be good dad's DUTY?
I didn't say GD - I said the administrator.

10 From: Dan Sullivan - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 7:56 pm

inkspot wrote:
Dan Sullivan wrote:
inkspot wrote,
Dan Get a clue.
It's the administrators DUTY to read those messages.
Why would reading the PRIVATE MESSAGES on FightCPS be good dad's DUTY?
I didn't say GD - I said the administrator.
Ok, the administrator.

Why is it the administrator's DUTY to read the private messages?

11 From: inkspot - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 8:03 pm

- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

Dan Sullivan wrote:
inkspot wrote:
Dan Sullivan wrote:
inkspot wrote,
Dan Get a clue.
It's the administrators DUTY to read those messages.
Why would reading the PRIVATE MESSAGES on FightCPS be good dad's
DUTY?
I didn't say GD - I said the administrator.
Ok, the administrator.
Why is it the administrator's DUTY to read the private messages?
Because he's the administrator. Who's responsibility do you think it
should be?

12 From: Dan Sullivan - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 8:09 pm

- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

inkspot wrote:
Dan Sullivan wrote:
inkspot wrote:
Dan Sullivan wrote:
inkspot wrote,
Dan Get a clue.
It's the administrators DUTY to read those messages.
Why would reading the PRIVATE MESSAGES on FightCPS be good dad's
DUTY?
I didn't say GD - I said the administrator.
Ok, the administrator.
Why is it the administrator's DUTY to read the private messages?
Because he's the administrator. Who's responsibility do you think it
should be?
Nobody's responsibility.

That's why the PRIVATE MESSAGES are supposed to be PRIVATE!!!!

Why would an administrator have a duty to read privates messages on
FightCPS?

Is it his responsibility to monitor what members say privately to one
another?

13 From: inkspot - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 8:15 pm

- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

Dan Sullivan wrote:
inkspot wrote:
Dan Sullivan wrote:
inkspot wrote:
Dan Sullivan wrote:
inkspot wrote,
Dan Get a clue.
It's the administrators DUTY to read those messages.
Why would reading the PRIVATE MESSAGES on FightCPS be good dad's
DUTY?
I didn't say GD - I said the administrator.
Ok, the administrator.
Why is it the administrator's DUTY to read the private messages?
Because he's the administrator. Who's responsibility do you think it
should be?
Nobody's responsibility.
That's why the PRIVATE MESSAGES are supposed to be PRIVATE!!!!
Oh please - that was before the Patriot Act.

Why would an administrator have a duty to read privates messages on
FightCPS?
Terr'ists might plan an attack - CPS scumsuckers might infiltrate the
private list - pedophiles - cubans.

Is it his responsibility to monitor what members say privately to one
another?
Yes.

Subject changed: If Private Messages on FightCPS are being read by
good dad, shouldn't they have a different name? Like "You may think
they're PRIVATE MESSAGES, but good dad, forum administator, will be
reading them behind your back?"
14 From: Greegor - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 7:57 pm

Has there yet been any proof it takes place?
Wouldn't that be the order of business before
analyzing why?

15 From: Dan Sullivan - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 8:14 pm

Greegor wrote:
Has there yet been any proof it takes place?
Inkspot claims reading the private messages on FightCPS is the DUTY of
the administrator.

Wouldn't that be the order of business before
analyzing why?
Now that we know reading PRIVATE MESSAGES is the DUTY of the FightCPS
administrator, we just have to ascertain why.

Subject changed: Dans paranoid kookout"
16 From: inkspot - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 8:19 pm

Dan Sullivan wrote:
Greegor wrote:
Has there yet been any proof it takes place?
Inkspot claims reading the private messages on FightCPS is the DUTY of
the administrator.
Wouldn't that be the order of business before
analyzing why?
Now that we know reading PRIVATE MESSAGES is the DUTY of the FightCPS
administrator, we just have to ascertain why.
Hmmmmmmmmmm - homos?

Subject changed: If Private Messages on FightCPS are being read by
good dad, shouldn't they have a different name? Like "You may think
they're PRIVATE MESSAGES, but good dad, forum administator, will be
reading them behind your back?"
17 From: Dan Sullivan - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 8:19 pm

Dan Sullivan wrote:
Greegor wrote:
Has there yet been any proof it takes place?
Inkspot claims reading the private messages on FightCPS is the DUTY of
the administrator.
Wouldn't that be the order of business before
analyzing why?
Now that we know reading PRIVATE MESSAGES is the DUTY of the FightCPS
administrator, we just have to ascertain why.
What a shame, inkspot went blotto; he choked on his own massive
stupidity.

Subject changed: Dan's loser whine
18 From: inkspot - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 8:28 pm

Dan Sullivan wrote:
Dan Sullivan wrote:
Greegor wrote:
Has there yet been any proof it takes place?
Inkspot claims reading the private messages on FightCPS is the DUTY of
the administrator.
Wouldn't that be the order of business before
analyzing why?
Now that we know reading PRIVATE MESSAGES is the DUTY of the FightCPS
administrator, we just have to ascertain why.
What a shame, inkspot went blotto; he choked on his own massive
stupidity.
Hey - sorry to leave you here alone, but I got a date.

If you weren't such a big, stupid, ugly SOB you could score without
paying too. nite

Subject changed: If Private Messages on FightCPS are being read by
good dad, shouldn't they have a different name? Like "You may think
they're PRIVATE MESSAGES, but good dad, forum administator, will be
reading them behind your back?"
19 From: Dan Sullivan - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 8:46 pm

- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

inkspot wrote:
Dan Sullivan wrote:
Dan Sullivan wrote:
Greegor wrote:
Has there yet been any proof it takes place?
Inkspot claims reading the private messages on FightCPS is the
DUTY of
the administrator.
Wouldn't that be the order of business before
analyzing why?
Now that we know reading PRIVATE MESSAGES is the DUTY of the FightCPS
administrator, we just have to ascertain why.
What a shame, inkspot went blotto; he choked on his own massive
stupidity.
Hey - sorry to leave you here alone, but I got a date.
Mary Palmer, again?

Thought so.

Subject changed: Dan's loser whine
20 From: 0:- - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 9:39 pm

- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

inkspot wrote:
Dan Sullivan wrote:
Dan Sullivan wrote:
Greegor wrote:
Has there yet been any proof it takes place?
Inkspot claims reading the private messages on FightCPS is the
DUTY of
the administrator.
Wouldn't that be the order of business before
analyzing why?
Now that we know reading PRIVATE MESSAGES is the DUTY of the FightCPS
administrator, we just have to ascertain why.
What a shame, inkspot went blotto; he choked on his own massive
stupidity.
Hey - sorry to leave you here alone, but I got a date.
Translation: "soooooeeeee, pig pig pig, soooooooeeeee, pig pig pig."

If you weren't such a big, stupid, ugly SOB you could score without
paying too. nite
It's so sad to see someone with such high regard for himself choke like

this.

You have my condolences. Tell your girl friend "Oink, Oink, grunt,
grunt, grunt."

R RR RR RR RR R

21 From: - Date: Sun, Jan 14 2007 12:35 am

- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

Dan Sullivan wrote:
Dan Sullivan wrote:
Greegor wrote:
Has there yet been any proof it takes place?
Inkspot claims reading the private messages on FightCPS is the DUTY of
the administrator.
Wouldn't that be the order of business before
analyzing why?
Now that we know reading PRIVATE MESSAGES is the DUTY of the FightCPS
administrator, we just have to ascertain why.
What a shame, inkspot went blotto; he choked on his own massive
stupidity.
Wow, Dan I see you've takin time out of your busy life helping families

to circle up the manure wagons.
One would think that someone with your wisdom would surely know how a
phpBB message board operates or at least research it before making
themself out to be so stupid..

Unless the only reason is to relate my name and "Private messages on
FightCPS.com aren't private at all" to anyone who google searches
FightCPS... Nice smear campaign... Ever do PR work for Senators?

Do you think EVERY administrator on EVERY phpBB message board can
actually go in and read people's private messages? Do you really
believe the developers of such boards leave loopholes like this open?

No one has the ability to read others pm's.. They would have to know
the individuals password... To read everyones pm's they would have to
know EVERY persons password used on the site...

Anyone who doubts this can ask ANY administrator at any site using the
phpBB Group, probably using any type of message board for that matter..


Go ask the developers themselves, http://www.phpbb.com/features.php
Click on support and ask or
Look under security, *Strong encryption to keep passwords safe in the
database*

BTW....How many "sock" names did you have at our site Dan?
I quit looking after I found 2.... "Drose" and "Oliver Sutton" ...
Most of Oliver's posts ip address matched Drose's and 3/4 of "hers"
matched Dan Sullivan... Some within a half hour of each other and in
the same thread......

I'd stay and chat but I'm in the middle of doing some research for a
couple of families needing help with a CPS case

22 From: 0:- - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 9:30 pm

Greegor wrote:
Has there yet been any proof it takes place?
Wouldn't that be the order of business before
analyzing why?
Have you asked Gooddad?

23 From: - Date: Sun, Jan 14 2007 12:41 am

0:- wrote:
Greegor wrote:
Has there yet been any proof it takes place?
Wouldn't that be the order of business before
analyzing why?
Have you asked Gooddad?
Wow, Dan I see you've takin time out of your busy life helping families

to circle up the manure wagons.
One would think that someone with your wisdom would surely know how a
phpBB message board operates or at least research it before making
themself out to be so stupid..

Unless the only reason is to relate my name and "Private messages on
FightCPS.com aren't private at all" to anyone who google searches
FightCPS... Nice smear campaign... Ever do PR work for Senators?

Do you think EVERY administrator on EVERY phpBB message board can
actually go in and read people's private messages? Do you really
believe the developers of such boards leave loopholes like this open?

No one has the ability to read others pm's.. They would have to know
the individuals password... To read everyones pm's they would have to
know EVERY persons password used on the site...

Anyone who doubts this can ask ANY administrator at any site using the
phpBB Group, probably using any type of message board for that matter..


Go ask the developers themselves, http://www.phpbb.com/features.php
Click on support and ask or
Look under security, *Strong encryption to keep passwords safe in the
database*

BTW....How many "sock" names did you have at our site Dan?
I quit looking after I found 2.... "Drose" and "Oliver Sutton" ...
Most of Oliver's posts ip address matched Drose's and 3/4 of "hers"
matched Dan Sullivan... Some within a half hour of each other and in
the same thread......

I'd stay and chat but I'm in the middle of doing some research for a
couple of families needing help with a CPS case

inkspot wrote:
Greegor wrote:
This one
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.s...e304c52e9c1fd8


One where Linda weighed in
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.s...fce0235127099b


Here is a THIRD gratuitous thread on this Dan Sullivan started.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.s...05a48f236c6ecc


And the whole accusation was a LIE!

I wonder why Dan would publically attack GD when he knew his nonsense
would be exposed?

Well, your hyperbole about Dan's actions notwithstanding, I too wonder.
snort

GD says Dan is stupid. I wonder.

You do?

Gosh, me too.

Kane RRR R R R RR RR ....oh dear, this is getting rich.





Dan Sullivan started a thread called :

" If Private Messages on FightCPS are being read by good dad, shouldn't
they have a different name? Like "You may think they're PRIVATE
MESSAGES, but good dad, forum administator, will be reading them behind
your back?" ""

1 From: Dan Sullivan - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 7:02 pm

Comments?

2 From: 0:- - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 7:05 pm

Dan Sullivan wrote:
Comments?

I'll wait for Tim's.

Subject changed: Don's lunatic kookout
3 From: inkspot - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 7:15 pm
Email: inkspot

Run out of kiddies to sell on usenet Don?

Subject changed: Dans sniveling snitching whine
4 From: inkspot - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 7:14 pm

Dan
Get a clue.

It's the administrators DUTY to read those messages.

5 From: 0:- - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 7:23 pm

inkspot wrote:
Dan
Get a clue.

It's the administrators DUTY to read those messages.

If that is so, why don't the posters of those messages know about this
'duty?'

6 From: inkspot - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 7:57 pm

0:- wrote:
inkspot wrote:
Dan
Get a clue.

It's the administrators DUTY to read those messages.

If that is so, why don't the posters of those messages know about this
'duty?'

[F] off Don, you pathetic piece of [s]. But if you must know, it's dem
damn terr'ists - forever vigil - homeward bound - hail to the decider
and stuff like that.

Dubya said there would be sacrifices - so luv it or leave it - Oh you
were kicked out - sorry.

Subject changed: If Private Messages on FightCPS are being read by
good dad, shouldn't they have a different name? Like "You may think
they're PRIVATE MESSAGES, but good dad, forum administator, will be
reading them behind your back?"
7 From: Dan Sullivan - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 7:20 pm

inkspot wrote,

Dan Get a clue.

It's the administrators DUTY to read those messages.

Why would reading the PRIVATE MESSAGES on FightCPS be good dad's DUTY?

8 From: Dan Sullivan - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 7:34 pm

Dan Sullivan wrote:
inkspot wrote,

Dan Get a clue.

It's the administrators DUTY to read those messages.

Why would reading the PRIVATE MESSAGES on FightCPS be good dad's DUTY?

Please explain.

9 From: inkspot - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 7:53 pm

Dan Sullivan wrote:
inkspot wrote,

Dan Get a clue.

It's the administrators DUTY to read those messages.

Why would reading the PRIVATE MESSAGES on FightCPS be good dad's DUTY?

I didn't say GD - I said the administrator.

10 From: Dan Sullivan - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 7:56 pm

inkspot wrote:
Dan Sullivan wrote:
inkspot wrote,

Dan Get a clue.

It's the administrators DUTY to read those messages.

Why would reading the PRIVATE MESSAGES on FightCPS be good dad's DUTY?

I didn't say GD - I said the administrator.

Ok, the administrator.

Why is it the administrator's DUTY to read the private messages?

11 From: inkspot - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 8:03 pm

- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

Dan Sullivan wrote:
inkspot wrote:
Dan Sullivan wrote:
inkspot wrote,

Dan Get a clue.

It's the administrators DUTY to read those messages.
Why would reading the PRIVATE MESSAGES on FightCPS be good dad's DUTY?

I didn't say GD - I said the administrator.

Ok, the administrator.

Why is it the administrator's DUTY to read the private messages?

Because he's the administrator. Who's responsibility do you think it
should be?

12 From: Dan Sullivan - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 8:09 pm

- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

inkspot wrote:
Dan Sullivan wrote:
inkspot wrote:
Dan Sullivan wrote:
inkspot wrote,

Dan Get a clue.

It's the administrators DUTY to read those messages.
Why would reading the PRIVATE MESSAGES on FightCPS be good dad's
DUTY?

I didn't say GD - I said the administrator.

Ok, the administrator.

Why is it the administrator's DUTY to read the private messages?

Because he's the administrator. Who's responsibility do you think it
should be?

Nobody's responsibility.

That's why the PRIVATE MESSAGES are supposed to be PRIVATE!!!!

Why would an administrator have a duty to read privates messages on
FightCPS?

Is it his responsibility to monitor what members say privately to one
another?

13 From: inkspot - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 8:15 pm

- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

Dan Sullivan wrote:
inkspot wrote:
Dan Sullivan wrote:
inkspot wrote:
Dan Sullivan wrote:
inkspot wrote,

Dan Get a clue.

It's the administrators DUTY to read those messages.
Why would reading the PRIVATE MESSAGES on FightCPS be good dad's
DUTY?

I didn't say GD - I said the administrator.
Ok, the administrator.

Why is it the administrator's DUTY to read the private messages?

Because he's the administrator. Who's responsibility do you think it
should be?

Nobody's responsibility.

That's why the PRIVATE MESSAGES are supposed to be PRIVATE!!!!

Oh please - that was before the Patriot Act.

Why would an administrator have a duty to read privates messages on
FightCPS?

Terr'ists might plan an attack - CPS scumsuckers might infiltrate the
private list - pedophiles - cubans.

Is it his responsibility to monitor what members say privately to one
another?

Yes.

Subject changed: If Private Messages on FightCPS are being read by
good dad, shouldn't they have a different name? Like "You may think
they're PRIVATE MESSAGES, but good dad, forum administator, will be
reading them behind your back?"
14 From: Greegor - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 7:57 pm

Has there yet been any proof it takes place?
Wouldn't that be the order of business before
analyzing why?

15 From: Dan Sullivan - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 8:14 pm

Greegor wrote:
Has there yet been any proof it takes place?

Inkspot claims reading the private messages on FightCPS is the DUTY of
the administrator.

Wouldn't that be the order of business before
analyzing why?

Now that we know reading PRIVATE MESSAGES is the DUTY of the FightCPS
administrator, we just have to ascertain why.

Subject changed: Dans paranoid kookout"
16 From: inkspot - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 8:19 pm

Dan Sullivan wrote:
Greegor wrote:
Has there yet been any proof it takes place?

Inkspot claims reading the private messages on FightCPS is the DUTY of
the administrator.

Wouldn't that be the order of business before
analyzing why?

Now that we know reading PRIVATE MESSAGES is the DUTY of the FightCPS
administrator, we just have to ascertain why.

Hmmmmmmmmmm - homos?

Subject changed: If Private Messages on FightCPS are being read by
good dad, shouldn't they have a different name? Like "You may think
they're PRIVATE MESSAGES, but good dad, forum administator, will be
reading them behind your back?"
17 From: Dan Sullivan - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 8:19 pm

Dan Sullivan wrote:
Greegor wrote:
Has there yet been any proof it takes place?

Inkspot claims reading the private messages on FightCPS is the DUTY of
the administrator.

Wouldn't that be the order of business before
analyzing why?

Now that we know reading PRIVATE MESSAGES is the DUTY of the FightCPS
administrator, we just have to ascertain why.

What a shame, inkspot went blotto; he choked on his own massive
stupidity.

Subject changed: Dan's loser whine
18 From: inkspot - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 8:28 pm

Dan Sullivan wrote:
Dan Sullivan wrote:
Greegor wrote:
Has there yet been any proof it takes place?
Inkspot claims reading the private messages on FightCPS is the DUTY of
the administrator.

Wouldn't that be the order of business before
analyzing why?
Now that we know reading PRIVATE MESSAGES is the DUTY of the FightCPS
administrator, we just have to ascertain why.

What a shame, inkspot went blotto; he choked on his own massive
stupidity.

Hey - sorry to leave you here alone, but I got a date.

If you weren't such a big, stupid, ugly SOB you could score without
paying too. nite

Subject changed: If Private Messages on FightCPS are being read by
good dad, shouldn't they have a different name? Like "You may think
they're PRIVATE MESSAGES, but good dad, forum administator, will be
reading them behind your back?"
19 From: Dan Sullivan - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 8:46 pm

- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

inkspot wrote:
Dan Sullivan wrote:
Dan Sullivan wrote:
Greegor wrote:
Has there yet been any proof it takes place?
Inkspot claims reading the private messages on FightCPS is the DUTY of
the administrator.

Wouldn't that be the order of business before
analyzing why?
Now that we know reading PRIVATE MESSAGES is the DUTY of the FightCPS
administrator, we just have to ascertain why.

What a shame, inkspot went blotto; he choked on his own massive
stupidity.

Hey - sorry to leave you here alone, but I got a date.

Mary Palmer, again?

Thought so.

Subject changed: Dan's loser whine
20 From: 0:- - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 9:39 pm

- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

inkspot wrote:
Dan Sullivan wrote:
Dan Sullivan wrote:
Greegor wrote:
Has there yet been any proof it takes place?
Inkspot claims reading the private messages on FightCPS is the DUTY of
the administrator.

Wouldn't that be the order of business before
analyzing why?
Now that we know reading PRIVATE MESSAGES is the DUTY of the FightCPS
administrator, we just have to ascertain why.

What a shame, inkspot went blotto; he choked on his own massive
stupidity.

Hey - sorry to leave you here alone, but I got a date.

Translation: "soooooeeeee, pig pig pig, soooooooeeeee, pig pig pig."

If you weren't such a big, stupid, ugly SOB you could score without
paying too. nite

It's so sad to see someone with such high regard for himself choke like

this.

You have my condolences. Tell your girl friend "Oink, Oink, grunt,
grunt, grunt."

R RR RR RR RR R

21 From: - Date: Sun, Jan 14 2007 12:35 am

- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

Dan Sullivan wrote:
Dan Sullivan wrote:
Greegor wrote:
Has there yet been any proof it takes place?

Inkspot claims reading the private messages on FightCPS is the DUTY of
the administrator.

Wouldn't that be the order of business before
analyzing why?

Now that we know reading PRIVATE MESSAGES is the DUTY of the FightCPS
administrator, we just have to ascertain why.

What a shame, inkspot went blotto; he choked on his own massive
stupidity.

Wow, Dan I see you've takin time out of your busy life helping families

to circle up the manure wagons.
One would think that someone with your wisdom would surely know how a
phpBB message board operates or at least research it before making
themself out to be so stupid..

Unless the only reason is to relate my name and "Private messages on
FightCPS.com aren't private at all" to anyone who google searches
FightCPS... Nice smear campaign... Ever do PR work for Senators?

Do you think EVERY administrator on EVERY phpBB message board can
actually go in and read people's private messages? Do you really
believe the developers of such boards leave loopholes like this open?

No one has the ability to read others pm's.. They would have to know
the individuals password... To read everyones pm's they would have to
know EVERY persons password used on the site...

Anyone who doubts this can ask ANY administrator at any site using the
phpBB Group, probably using any type of message board for that matter..


Go ask the developers themselves, http://www.phpbb.com/features.php
Click on support and ask or
Look under security, *Strong encryption to keep passwords safe in the
database*

BTW....How many "sock" names did you have at our site Dan?
I quit looking after I found 2.... "Drose" and "Oliver Sutton" ...
Most of Oliver's posts ip address matched Drose's and 3/4 of "hers"
matched Dan Sullivan... Some within a half hour of each other and in
the same thread......

I'd stay and chat but I'm in the middle of doing some research for a
couple of families needing help with a CPS case

22 From: 0:- - Date: Sat, Jan 13 2007 9:30 pm

Greegor wrote:
Has there yet been any proof it takes place?
Wouldn't that be the order of business before
analyzing why?

Have you asked Gooddad?

23 From: - Date: Sun, Jan 14 2007 12:41 am

0:- wrote:
Greegor wrote:
Has there yet been any proof it takes place?
Wouldn't that be the order of business before
analyzing why?

Have you asked Gooddad?

Wow, Dan I see you've takin time out of your busy life helping families

to circle up the manure wagons.
One would think that someone with your wisdom would surely know how a
phpBB message board operates or at least research it before making
themself out to be so stupid..

Unless the only reason is to relate my name and "Private messages on
FightCPS.com aren't private at all" to anyone who google searches
FightCPS... Nice smear campaign... Ever do PR work for Senators?

Do you think EVERY administrator on EVERY phpBB message board can
actually go in and read people's private messages? Do you really
believe the developers of such boards leave loopholes like this open?

No one has the ability to read others pm's.. They would have to know
the individuals password... To read everyones pm's they would have to
know EVERY persons password used on the site...

Anyone who doubts this can ask ANY administrator at any site using the
phpBB Group, probably using any type of message board for that matter..


Go ask the developers themselves, http://www.phpbb.com/features.php
Click on support and ask or
Look under security, *Strong encryption to keep passwords safe in the
database*

BTW....How many "sock" names did you have at our site Dan?
I quit looking after I found 2.... "Drose" and "Oliver Sutton" ...
Most of Oliver's posts ip address matched Drose's and 3/4 of "hers"
matched Dan Sullivan... Some within a half hour of each other and in
the same thread......

I'd stay and chat but I'm in the middle of doing some research for a
couple of families needing help with a CPS case

Yet another thread on this same subject, started by inkspot

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.s...f9d30ddfbc0469

Groups: alt.support.child-protective-services

Thread title: Dan's False Accusations Exposed Again

1 From: inkspot - Date: Sun, Jan 14 2007 4:56 am

Sheesh.
Just when you thought it was safe to trust CPS scum.

2 From: Dan Sullivan - Date: Sun, Jan 14 2007 8:27 am

Subject changed: Dan's False Accusations Exposed Again - that's not
true. It's no wonder you people can't beat CPS. Not once did I make an
accusation about good dad reading private messages on FightCPS. All I
did was ask a few questions.

Isn't that accurate and true?

And good dad didn't specifically say he didn't read the private
messages in his long and tedious response.

And Linda Martin said a system administrator couldn't read the private
messages, but good dad is the forum administrator.

So... I'm waiting for the specific and direct denials.

Until then the questions remain... unanswered.

3 From: - Date: Sun, Jan 14 2007 1:17 pm
Subject changed:
Dan Sullivan stars in "Playing Stupid" A low budget comedy Co-starring
and Directed by Kane

I see an Oscar in your future Dan

4 From: Dan Sullivan - Date: Sun, Jan 14 2007 1:41 pm
Subject changed:
Good dad fails to specifically say whether or not he reads the private
messages on FightCPS

wrote:
I see an Oscar in your future Dan

I see you standing in the corner with a dunce hat on your head, good
dad.

Did Linda Martin say it was OK for me to post all the back and forth
emails between her and I that show you banned me without her knowledge?


5 From: Linda Martin - Date: Mon, Jan 15 2007 12:59 am

Dan Sullivan wrote
Did Linda Martin say it was OK for me to post all the back and forth
emails between her and I that show you banned me without her knowledge?

Dan,
No, don't post my emails. I knew Good Dad was going to ban you. I
banned
Bob, and Good Dad banned you. Neither of us were happy with the
situation
(you two being argumentative) and we didn't come to any conclusion that
only
one or the other of you should be banned. Actually, it became apparent
over
time that both should be banned because the arguing never stopped. Just

like, here... you're doing the same thing.

Linda
Fight CPS

6 From: Dan Sullivan - Date: Mon, Jan 15 2007 2:39 am

Linda Martin wrote:
Dan Sullivan wrote
Did Linda Martin say it was OK for me to post all the back and forth
emails between her and I that show you banned me without her knowledge?

Dan,
No, don't post my emails.

Why not, Linda?

I knew Good Dad was going to ban you.

Not according to what you said to me in your emails.

If you're admitting you lied to me in your emails why shouldn't I post
them here for everyone to see?

I banned Bob, and Good Dad banned you.

That's exactly what I have been saying.

Neither of us were happy with the situation
(you two being argumentative) and we didn't come to any conclusion that only
one or the other of you should be banned.

Bob wasn't arguing.

Bob had been violating the FightCPS Registration Agreement by posting
messages that were offensive and abusive... and he refused to stop
after you posted two or three messages warning him to stop.

Actually, it became apparent over
time that both should be banned because the arguing never stopped. Just
like, here... you're doing the same thing.

The question, Linda Martin, is did you lie to me in your emails or are
you lying now?

From what you said in your emails, I believe you're lying now.

I'd ask you if good dad was able to read the FightCPS private messages
as forum administrator, but who could believe anything you'd answer?