If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
CANCER INC
On 12/6/10 3:57 PM, carole wrote:
"Bob Officer"-*-*.@.*-*- wrote in message ... . OH that is much too slow a process to work effectively. The These is why other people continually tell carole, she needs to get a good foundation in body chemistry, physiology, and biology to fully participate in these forums. Arrogant attitude. As if nobody can possibly know anything about health without such knowledge. This is very ugly of you bob, especially in an alternative health group. The Philosophical and Historical Roots of Holistic Approaches to Health 22/12/2005 The fact that you post this shows that you don't have any idea about how the body works, what causes disease, or much knowledge in human biology or science. That's what you need to understand medicine. And just philosophical crap. Jeff http://www.naturalmatters.net/articl...icle=879&cat=4 "The Empirical school of thought held different assumptions about the ways of acquiring knowledge on health, disease, and the treatment of disease. It did not look for nor seek to understand the causes of disease. It sought and developed ways that worked whether or not the practitioner understood at first why the methods worked. Although Empirical practitioners usually had theories on how and why their methods worked, they recognized that their theories were always secondary to the fact that the method worked. Over long periods of time and through close observations, empirical practitioners developed their own time tested and systematic health practices that were not based on an analytical understanding of cause and effect. The Rationalist school, of which modern medicine is the latest development, has claimed the title of being the "scientific" medicine. At the same time, it asserted that other approaches to understanding health and to the treatment of disease were unscientific and were often to be considered as "quackery." The meaning and significance of scientific methodology are discussed in detail in volumes II and III of Divided Legacy. Coulter points out that although the Rationalists explained why their methods worked or didn't work, their explanations were soon disproven and were replaced by a new set of "facts." It should be clarified that the definition and the historical use of the word "empirical" refers to the dependence upon observation and experience alone without the use of theory or reductionistic methodology. Although modern medicine is considered a highly empirical science, it is much more rationally based than empirically based. " |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
This is very informative post about Cancer and i visit your given link there is more useful information. I really impress with your work and i hope you continue it.
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Breast Cancer Statistics - How Breast Cancer Survival Rates Increased 50$B!s(B | [email protected] | General | 0 | January 11th 08 05:41 AM |
What Is Cancer? | [email protected] | Kids Health | 0 | January 1st 08 06:15 PM |
Vaginal Cancer after Breast cancer | Novi | Breastfeeding | 0 | July 8th 07 04:13 PM |
The Abraham Cherrix cancer story the media won't print: Harry Hoxsey's cancer cures and the US government campaign to destroy them | Ilena Rose | Kids Health | 45 | August 8th 06 07:08 PM |
Yo tuve Cancer-I have Cancer | elisa ramiez conde | General | 0 | December 14th 04 01:59 PM |