Thimerosal in vaccines reduces incidence of autism

by Mark Probert Jun 25, 2006 at 01:52 PM


Regardless of the reasons, I think that it's great that thimerosal
is no longer used in most vaccines. I hope that (regardless of the
reasons)
that dentists should stop making use of mercury in dental fillings.
Do you think that mercury in vaccines is NOT harmful?

Absolutely. I know that based on my extensive reading, there are no
adverse effects.

**************


Mark some people use to think the world was flat! and some scientist swore
that ciggarettes didnt cause cancer!

If you read the material on thimerosal and the studies you would/could not
make such a statement! There has NEVER been a study saying thimerosal is
safe! The scientist who work for pharma may twist studies and say it
doesnt cause this or its not as toxic as methylmercury, But NOT ONE study
has come out and proved it is safe to inject thimerosal into pregnant
women or infants!

When I first started my quest on thimerosal, I went to the EXPERTS, This
would include Toxicologist.

A little back ground on what it takes to be a toxicologist.

Many toxicologists enter the field after taking graduate work in anatomy,
biochemistry, chemistry, or physiology, and complete their doctoral
program in these fields, or get their M.D. or Doctor of Veterinary
Medicine. Typically, they then acquire experience or work toward a Ph.D.
in toxicology.

The Toxicologist who I spoke with in detail is a professor of toxicology
and has been for over 30 years. Here is a little of what he said regarding
thimerosal(ethylmercury) and methylmercury.


Remember: methyl mercury and ethyl mercury have the same toxicological
properties.


So unless the drug pushers on here can prove to me that thimerosal is NOT
toxic or shows me a study proving thimerosal has been proven to be safe on
a fetal brain and does not cause brain damage, I will continue calling
them what they are "PHARMA PUPPETS"!!

Kevysmom wrote:
by Mark Probert Jun 25, 2006 at 01:52 PM


Regardless of the reasons, I think that it's great that thimerosal
is no longer used in most vaccines. I hope that (regardless of the
reasons)
that dentists should stop making use of mercury in dental fillings.
Do you think that mercury in vaccines is NOT harmful?

Absolutely. I know that based on my extensive reading, there are no
adverse effects.

**************


Mark some people use to think the world was flat! and some scientist swore
that ciggarettes didnt cause cancer!

There are still people who think the world is flat. They are properly
called loonies.

As for those scientist, they were lying.

If you read the material on thimerosal and the studies you would/could not
make such a statement!

The fact is, I have read the studies on thimerosal and the
epidemiological studies. All show NO LINK.

There has NEVER been a study saying thimerosal is
safe!

There has never been a study showing that it actually causes problems in
humans.

The scientist who work for pharma may twist studies and say it
doesnt cause this or its not as toxic as methylmercury, But NOT ONE study
has come out and proved it is safe to inject thimerosal into pregnant
women or infants!

Horse****.

Kevysmom wrote:
When I first started my quest on thimerosal, I went to the EXPERTS, This
would include Toxicologist.

A little back ground on what it takes to be a toxicologist.

Many toxicologists enter the field after taking graduate work in anatomy,
biochemistry, chemistry, or physiology, and complete their doctoral
program in these fields, or get their M.D. or Doctor of Veterinary
Medicine. Typically, they then acquire experience or work toward a Ph.D.
in toxicology.

The Toxicologist who I spoke with in detail is a professor of toxicology
and has been for over 30 years. Here is a little of what he said regarding
thimerosal(ethylmercury) and methylmercury.


Remember: methyl mercury and ethyl mercury have the same toxicological
properties.

That is absolutely incorrect. Your saying it makes you look stupid.

So unless the drug pushers on here can prove to me that thimerosal is NOT
toxic or shows me a study proving thimerosal has been proven to be safe on
a fetal brain and does not cause brain damage, I will continue calling
them what they are "PHARMA PUPPETS"!!

by Mark Probert Jun 25, 2006 at 05:14 PM

The Toxicologist who I spoke with in detail is a professor of
toxicology
and has been for over 30 years. Here is a little of what he said
regarding
thimerosal(ethylmercury) and methylmercury.


Remember: methyl mercury and ethyl mercury have the same toxicological
properties.

That is absolutely incorrect. Your saying it makes you look stupid.


***********

This is why I explained to you the back ground of a toxicologist. But
since your a Failed Attorney Im sure you would know more about the
toxicology of mercury then a professor of toxicology! lol, You do know
how to make me smile even on a bad day!

"Kevysmom" wrote:

by Mark Probert Jun 25, 2006 at 05:14 PM

The Toxicologist who I spoke with in detail is a professor of
toxicology
and has been for over 30 years. Here is a little of what he said
regarding
thimerosal(ethylmercury) and methylmercury.


Remember: methyl mercury and ethyl mercury have the same toxicological
properties.

That is absolutely incorrect. Your saying it makes you look stupid.


***********

This is why I explained to you the back ground of a toxicologist. But
since your a Failed Attorney Im sure you would know more about the
toxicology of mercury then a professor of toxicology! lol, You do know
how to make me smile even on a bad day!

I'm not a failed attorney, but in response to the statement "Remember:
methyl mercury and ethyl mercury have the same toxicological
properties" I can only say:

That is absolutely incorrect. Your saying it makes you look stupid.
--
Peter Bowditch aa #2243
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au
Australian Skeptics http://www.skeptics.com.au
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com

Kevysmom wrote:
by Mark Probert Jun 25, 2006 at 05:14 PM

The Toxicologist who I spoke with in detail is a professor of
toxicology
and has been for over 30 years. Here is a little of what he said
regarding
thimerosal(ethylmercury) and methylmercury.


Remember: methyl mercury and ethyl mercury have the same toxicological
properties.

That is absolutely incorrect. Your saying it makes you look stupid.


***********

This is why I explained to you the back ground of a toxicologist. But
since your a Failed Attorney Im sure you would know more about the
toxicology of mercury then a professor of toxicology! lol, You do know
how to make me smile even on a bad day!

I have never attacked you personally. I do feel sorry for you, since you
are consumed by your anger over the death of the child you expected and
were handed one who is not that child.

There is absolutely no proof that the two chemicals are the same
toxicologically. Here is some food for your thought:

The comparative toxicology of ethyl- and methylmercury
L. Magos1 , A. W. Brown1, S. Sparrow1, E. Bailey1, R. T. Snowden1 and
W. R. Skipp1

(1) Toxicology Unit, Medical Research Council Laboratories,
Woodmansterne Road, SM5 4EF Carshalton, Surrey, England

Received: 17 April 1985 Accepted: 21 May 1985

....an equimolar dose of ethylmercury was less neurotoxic than
methylmercury...

http://www.springerlink.com/(21v1iafzdb41yw55lxytyhnl)/app/home/contribution.asp?referrer=parent&backto=issue,10,1 6;journal,203,383;linkingpublicationresults,1:1004 62,1

You should spend some time learning more. The issue of the degree of
toxicity of methyl vs. ethyl is not clear cut.