A Parenting & kids forum. ParentingBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » ParentingBanter.com forum » alt.parenting » Spanking
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

One quarter million Juveniles tried as Adults in US courts



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 27th 03, 06:46 PM
Doan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default One quarter million Juveniles tried as Adults in US courts


On 21 Jun 2003, Chris C. wrote:

Fern & Doan,

I find this interesting that lavonne is attempting to invoke her
research training, or lack of it, to contradict her previous notions
on equal rights for children.

Non-spanker by choice,
Chris C.
TX

It's nothing new, just a typical logic of the anti-spanking zealotS!
Logic and anti-spanking zealotS... are they mutually exclusive? :-)

PS-Don't give out family or personal information on this newsgroup.
The "cohort" and "cohort" wannabees monitor and report (often
erroneous unsupported information)---so use your common sense on
posting info.

I have already taking precaution and detected Kane9 snooping around
my site digging for personal information on me. How pathetic!

Doan


Doan wrote in message ...
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, LaVonne Carlson wrote:

Hey Fern,

You have concluded that parental disempowerment and statistical manipulation
has resulted in 250,000 juveniles being tried as adults. Please discuss the
evidence for your factual claim.

LaVonne

What??? Don't you want them to have the "same protection" as adults? ;-)

Doan



  #2  
Old June 27th 03, 08:44 PM
Kane
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default One quarter million Juveniles tried as Adults in US courts

On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 10:46:41 -0700, Doan wrote:


On 21 Jun 2003, Chris C. wrote:

Fern & Doan,

I find this interesting that lavonne is attempting to invoke her
research training, or lack of it, to contradict her previous

notions
on equal rights for children.

Non-spanker by choice,
Chris C.
TX

It's nothing new, just a typical logic of the anti-spanking zealotS!
Logic and anti-spanking zealotS... are they mutually exclusive? :-)

PS-Don't give out family or personal information on this newsgroup.
The "cohort" and "cohort" wannabees monitor and report (often
erroneous unsupported information)---so use your common sense on
posting info.

I have already taking precaution


Why would you need to be "taking precaution?

Are you doing something that would be reportable? Want to share?

Would the University of California take exception to you posting
through their server? Are you on company time?

and detected Kane9


"detected"? r r r r r. In this ng I as much as advertised to you that
I had discovered you worked for USC. I asked, openly, for you to say
hello to certain "women" who of course are the names of various
servers your posts come through.

I wrote to you in a language your ancestors used, and that most
recently.

Like you had to "detect" anything.

You couldn't detect your own asshole with your nose up it.

snooping around
my site digging


"snooping", "digging" around a publically posted web page?

for personal information on me.


Are you telling us you have something to be ashamed of?

What "personal" information on your now missing web page was not for
public consumption then?

I notice you took down your web page at the USC student and employee
site quickly enough...though I can't say as I'm the only one that
visited. Can you?

How pathetic!


You've never googled anyone, never gone to their web site, observed
and or noted their personal information, their politics, hobbies,
etc.?

If you have then you are as "pathetic" as I. Are you?

One track mind, is what you have Doan. It shows in all your posts
clearly. Your attitude toward children, your excuses for abusive
parents, your attempts to claim others aren't logical or honest when
it's just a coverup for how dishonest and stupid you are.

Those who don't want to be known should take pains to make themselves
scarce. It's hardly the fault of other users of the Internet if you
post information about yourself and they visit it, now is it?

If it had been a hot babe visiting and then getting in touch with you
I'll bet you wouldn't have thought her pathetic. And that's one of the
reasons students post such pages on their college or university web
sites; to make contact with others. You just want to be choosy about
who goes there, eh?

For a sys admin you are woefully ignorant of the operations of and
reason for the Interent, aren't you?

By the way, you aren't the pathetic little creep that ILLEGALLY
invaded my work station system using a custom trojan, that I caught on
the first try and dropped into my tailored honeypot, are you? I
maintain layers of security you can't even imagine, little pup.

I know exactly how dangerous to others child abusers and their
defenders are and what they are capable of.

I've had a world, literally, of support and help in tracing the source
on that illegal invasion and own the person that did it. I have their
name, home address, phone number, auto license plate number, drivers
license number, and the description that law enforcement provided and
much more. It all sits quietly in my attorney's safe.

I also have the same kind of info on those that helped him. It's in
the same safe.

Yah wanna play with the big boys Doan, yah got to bring a bigger dog.

Doan


Yer nothing but a loud mouthed little pup that stupidly babbles like a
schoolboy.

Kane
  #3  
Old June 28th 03, 09:22 PM
Doan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default One quarter million Juveniles tried as Adults in US courts

On 27 Jun 2003, Kane wrote:

On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 10:46:41 -0700, Doan wrote:


On 21 Jun 2003, Chris C. wrote:

Fern & Doan,

I find this interesting that lavonne is attempting to invoke her
research training, or lack of it, to contradict her previous

notions
on equal rights for children.

Non-spanker by choice,
Chris C.
TX

It's nothing new, just a typical logic of the anti-spanking zealotS!
Logic and anti-spanking zealotS... are they mutually exclusive? :-)

PS-Don't give out family or personal information on this newsgroup.
The "cohort" and "cohort" wannabees monitor and report (often
erroneous unsupported information)---so use your common sense on
posting info.

I have already taking precaution


Why would you need to be "taking precaution?

Are you doing something that would be reportable? Want to share?

LOL! Not with you, Kane9! ;-) I don't hide behind a fake email address
neither. ;-)

Would the University of California take exception to you posting
through their server? Are you on company time?

Why don't you ask your master, Chris Dugan, about that? :-)

and detected Kane9


"detected"? r r r r r. In this ng I as much as advertised to you that
I had discovered you worked for USC. I asked, openly, for you to say
hello to certain "women" who of course are the names of various
servers your posts come through.

Now what does that have to do with the topic of this newsgroup? Did I ever
claim to be "teaching math at a college level" like your master Chris
Dugan??? :-0

I wrote to you in a language your ancestors used, and that most
recently.

Like you had to "detect" anything.

You couldn't detect your own asshole with your nose up it.

Haha! Speaking like a "never spanked" children! But you could, right?
:-)

snooping around
my site digging


"snooping", "digging" around a publically posted web page?

for personal information on me.


Are you telling us you have something to be ashamed of?

What "personal" information on your now missing web page was not for
public consumption then?

I notice you took down your web page at the USC student and employee
site quickly enough...though I can't say as I'm the only one that
visited. Can you?

Have you ever heard of IP logging? ;-)

How pathetic!


You've never googled anyone, never gone to their web site, observed
and or noted their personal information, their politics, hobbies,
etc.?

Not unless it related to the claim they made! ;-) Now, since when did I
claim to have an M.A in biology and teaching math at a college level???
;-)

If you have then you are as "pathetic" as I. Are you?


No one can be as pathetic as you, Kane9? ;-)

One track mind, is what you have Doan. It shows in all your posts
clearly. Your attitude toward children, your excuses for abusive
parents, your attempts to claim others aren't logical or honest when
it's just a coverup for how dishonest and stupid you are.

At least I didn't claim to have been "never-spanked"! OUCH!!! ;-)

Those who don't want to be known should take pains to make themselves
scarce. It's hardly the fault of other users of the Internet if you
post information about yourself and they visit it, now is it?

Nope! They just hide behind a fake email address! ;-)

If it had been a hot babe visiting and then getting in touch with you
I'll bet you wouldn't have thought her pathetic. And that's one of the
reasons students post such pages on their college or university web
sites; to make contact with others. You just want to be choosy about
who goes there, eh?

Sure! If I have a choice between a hot babe and Kane9, it is just logical
to choose the hot babe. :-)

For a sys admin you are woefully ignorant of the operations of and
reason for the Interent, aren't you?

I am no sys admin and have never claimed to be anything more a college
student who spanked when misbehaved as a child, like about 98% of college
students. :-)

By the way, you aren't the pathetic little creep that ILLEGALLY
invaded my work station system using a custom trojan, that I caught on
the first try and dropped into my tailored honeypot, are you? I
maintain layers of security you can't even imagine, little pup.

Got an IP address and log? Or are you just showing how stupid you are
on subject you have no clude of? ;-)

I know exactly how dangerous to others child abusers and their
defenders are and what they are capable of.

and 90%+ of the parents in the USA are child abusers, right? ;-)

I've had a world, literally, of support and help in tracing the source
on that illegal invasion and own the person that did it. I have their
name, home address, phone number, auto license plate number, drivers
license number, and the description that law enforcement provided and
much more. It all sits quietly in my attorney's safe.

I also have the same kind of info on those that helped him. It's in
the same safe.

ROTFLH!!! And Chris Dugan really teaches "math at the college" level! ;-)

Yah wanna play with the big boys Doan, yah got to bring a bigger dog.

You meant I have to bring your dad??? ;-)

Yer nothing but a loud mouthed little pup that stupidly babbles like a
schoolboy.

Oops! That would be you, Kane9! What did you call your mom, again? ;-)

Doan

  #4  
Old June 29th 03, 12:29 AM
Kane
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default One quarter million Juveniles tried as Adults in US courts

On Sat, 28 Jun 2003 13:22:40 -0700, Doan wrote:

On 27 Jun 2003, Kane wrote:

On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 10:46:41 -0700, Doan wrote:


On 21 Jun 2003, Chris C. wrote:

Fern & Doan,

I find this interesting that lavonne is attempting to invoke her
research training, or lack of it, to contradict her previous

notions
on equal rights for children.

Non-spanker by choice,
Chris C.
TX

It's nothing new, just a typical logic of the anti-spanking

zealotS!
Logic and anti-spanking zealotS... are they mutually exclusive?

:-)

PS-Don't give out family or personal information on this

newsgroup.
The "cohort" and "cohort" wannabees monitor and report (often
erroneous unsupported information)---so use your common sense on
posting info.

I have already taking precaution


Why would you need to be "taking precaution?

Are you doing something that would be reportable? Want to share?

LOL! Not with you, Kane9! ;-)


Of course not.

I don't hide behind a fake email address
neither. ;-)


That's nice. Then why are you concerned about people you must take
"precautions" against, eh? Apparently you have something to hide or
you wouldn't be so concerned about how comes to your web site.

Would the University of California take exception to you posting
through their server? Are you on company time?

Why don't you ask your master, Chris Dugan, about that? :-)


Sorry, don't know him.


and detected Kane9


"detected"? r r r r r. In this ng I as much as advertised to you

that
I had discovered you worked for USC. I asked, openly, for you to

say
hello to certain "women" who of course are the names of various
servers your posts come through.

Now what does that have to do with the topic of this newsgroup?


Note a thing, but it does have to do with the topic C brought up and
you responded to, thus starting a thread you now wish would go away.

Did I ever
claim to be "teaching math at a college level" like your master Chris
Dugan??? :-0


Not that I know of. Relevance please?

I wrote to you in a language your ancestors used, and that most
recently.

Like you had to "detect" anything.

You couldn't detect your own asshole with your nose up it.

Haha! Speaking like a "never spanked" children! But you could,

right?
:-)


All you got in your little pistol eh? How pathetic.

snooping around
my site digging


"snooping", "digging" around a publically posted web page?

for personal information on me.


Are you telling us you have something to be ashamed of?

What "personal" information on your now missing web page was not

for
public consumption then?

I notice you took down your web page at the USC student and

employee
site quickly enough...though I can't say as I'm the only one that
visited. Can you?

Have you ever heard of IP logging? ;-)


Sure, do it all the time.

Have you heard of anonymity, tunneling, and proxy servers? I'm sure
you have, bright boy.

How pathetic!


You've never googled anyone, never gone to their web site, observed
and or noted their personal information, their politics, hobbies,
etc.?

Not unless it related to the claim they made! ;-)


So why would someone else be pathetic but not you doing the same
thing?

Now, since when did I
claim to have an M.A in biology and teaching math at a college

level???
;-)


Haven't to my knowledge. More diversion there, child?

If you have then you are as "pathetic" as I. Are you?


No one can be as pathetic as you, Kane9? ;-)


Sure you can. You don't even have to try harder.

One track mind, is what you have Doan. It shows in all your posts
clearly. Your attitude toward children, your excuses for abusive
parents, your attempts to claim others aren't logical or honest

when
it's just a coverup for how dishonest and stupid you are.

At least I didn't claim to have been "never-spanked"! OUCH!!! ;-)


Who has, except The Plant, and it's not even sure...a very likely sign
of suppression.

Those who don't want to be known should take pains to make

themselves
scarce. It's hardly the fault of other users of the Internet if you
post information about yourself and they visit it, now is it?

Nope! They just hide behind a fake email address! ;-)


If they have been attacked would you suggest they post in the open
with IP flying? How quaint.

They have the good sense to conceal their location. You, on the other
hand, just whine when someone takes a look at your publically posted
information.

Why is that I wonder?

If it had been a hot babe visiting and then getting in touch with

you
I'll bet you wouldn't have thought her pathetic. And that's one of

the
reasons students post such pages on their college or university web
sites; to make contact with others. You just want to be choosy

about
who goes there, eh?

Sure! If I have a choice between a hot babe and Kane9, it is just

logical
to choose the hot babe. :-)


No choice was suggested. Only that you can't post your data publically
and then fly into a childish fit of babbling fear when it's viewed. If
you wanna connect with hot babes why don't you continue your cruising
the porno sites?

For a sys admin you are woefully ignorant of the operations of and
reason for the Interent, aren't you?

I am no sys admin and have never claimed to be anything more a

college
student who spanked when misbehaved as a child, like about 98% of

college
students. :-)


Why thank you Doan. I knew you were stupid enough to take the bait and
give me the information I wanted. Keep playing with me. I love to
dance.

That you were spanked is obvious. And that you surpress knowing what
it's turned you into goes along: you are an apologist for child
abusers, and rather stupid.

By the way, you aren't the pathetic little creep that ILLEGALLY
invaded my work station system using a custom trojan, that I caught

on
the first try and dropped into my tailored honeypot, are you? I
maintain layers of security you can't even imagine, little pup.

Got an IP address and log?


Oh, much much more than that, child. A couple of dozen traceroutes
with considerable results when I explored further on owners, with the
help of sys admins and their records. You may be playing what you
think is a silly little game with no consequences, but I'm not.

Or are you just showing how stupid you are


Sorry, wrong subject. It's you that I'm showing the stupidity of. You
just gave me a critical piece of information.

on subject you have no clude of? ;-)


I got a good deal more than a "clude" twit.

I know exactly how dangerous to others child abusers and their
defenders are and what they are capable of.

and 90%+ of the parents in the USA are child abusers, right? ;-)


Not quite that high I'd reckon. But too high. Many spankers are
ignorant of the results of their acts against their children, and
human children are rather resiliant and manage to survive it, but
witness the level of crime and low morals in this country. See if you
can figure out what that 90% manages to produce.

I've had a world, literally, of support and help in tracing the

source
on that illegal invasion and own the person that did it. I have

their
name, home address, phone number, auto license plate number,

drivers
license number, and the description that law enforcement provided

and
much more. It all sits quietly in my attorney's safe.

I also have the same kind of info on those that helped him. It's in
the same safe.

ROTFLH!!! And Chris Dugan really teaches "math at the college"

level! ;-)

Yah got me there. I have no idea. He probably does. Somehow I'm more
inclined to trust him that you. Now why is that I wonder.

Want to bet on what I just told you? Keep playing around at this game
and see what it gets you.

Yah wanna play with the big boys Doan, yah got to bring a bigger

dog.

You meant I have to bring your dad??? ;-)


My dad screwed your mom?

Well, hello brother.


Yer nothing but a loud mouthed little pup that stupidly babbles

like a
schoolboy.

Oops! That would be you, Kane9!


I'm impressed with the cleverness of your comeback. Who would have
ever thought of that ploy?

What did you call your mom, again? ;-)


"Mother" as opposed to you calling yours "Spot" or "thit cho".

But I have to admit I'm insulted that you'd claim my father duma and
produced you, little Em. Tsk tsk tsk.


Doan


You haven't the faintest idea how far over your head you are, do you?

I'll give you a clue. I know about half the staff of the school where
you are a "student" and I know exactly what you do there.

Relax. I'm nothing like the vicious thugs you champion. I never make a
move on the innocent. As long as you don't have kids and beat them so
I find out about it, or you, or your cohort, do not attack me you are
as safe as you were in your litter at your momma's teat.

I'll make sure those who manage my affairs follow my direction on this
matter.

But be advised: that is a posture you had best maintain vigorously.

Kane
  #5  
Old June 29th 03, 08:02 PM
Doan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default One quarter million Juveniles tried as Adults in US courts

On 28 Jun 2003, Kane wrote:

On Sat, 28 Jun 2003 13:22:40 -0700, Doan wrote:

On 27 Jun 2003, Kane wrote:

On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 10:46:41 -0700, Doan wrote:


On 21 Jun 2003, Chris C. wrote:

Fern & Doan,

I find this interesting that lavonne is attempting to invoke her
research training, or lack of it, to contradict her previous
notions
on equal rights for children.

Non-spanker by choice,
Chris C.
TX

It's nothing new, just a typical logic of the anti-spanking

zealotS!
Logic and anti-spanking zealotS... are they mutually exclusive?

:-)

PS-Don't give out family or personal information on this

newsgroup.
The "cohort" and "cohort" wannabees monitor and report (often
erroneous unsupported information)---so use your common sense on
posting info.

I have already taking precaution

Why would you need to be "taking precaution?

Are you doing something that would be reportable? Want to share?

LOL! Not with you, Kane9! ;-)


Of course not.

You are right, I don't share with dogs, Kane9. :-) Especially dog like
you who called his/her mother a ....! ;-)

I don't hide behind a fake email address
neither. ;-)


That's nice. Then why are you concerned about people you must take
"precautions" against, eh? Apparently you have something to hide or
you wouldn't be so concerned about how comes to your web site.

I just don't like like rabid dog like you. :-)
Would the University of California take exception to you posting
through their server? Are you on company time?

Why don't you ask your master, Chris Dugan, about that? :-)


Sorry, don't know him.

He is your master and just gave a bad whipping in this newsgroup. So
bad that you ran away from him with you tail between your legs. :-)


and detected Kane9

"detected"? r r r r r. In this ng I as much as advertised to you

that
I had discovered you worked for USC. I asked, openly, for you to

say
hello to certain "women" who of course are the names of various
servers your posts come through.

Now what does that have to do with the topic of this newsgroup?


Note a thing, but it does have to do with the topic C brought up and
you responded to, thus starting a thread you now wish would go away.

Who is C????

Did I ever
claim to be "teaching math at a college level" like your master Chris
Dugan??? :-0


Not that I know of. Relevance please?

If I ever make such a claim then you are right to check on my credential.
Since I am not making any claim regarding what I do, your attempt to dig
up personal information about me is a pathetic attempt to discredit me.
:-)
I wrote to you in a language your ancestors used, and that most
recently.

Like you had to "detect" anything.

You couldn't detect your own asshole with your nose up it.

Haha! Speaking like a "never spanked" children! But you could,

right?
:-)


All you got in your little pistol eh? How pathetic.

Ain't got a rebuttal? That is truly pathetic, Kane9! ;-)

snooping around
my site digging

"snooping", "digging" around a publically posted web page?

for personal information on me.

Are you telling us you have something to be ashamed of?

What "personal" information on your now missing web page was not

for
public consumption then?

I notice you took down your web page at the USC student and

employee
site quickly enough...though I can't say as I'm the only one that
visited. Can you?

Have you ever heard of IP logging? ;-)


Sure, do it all the time.

Have you heard of anonymity, tunneling, and proxy servers? I'm sure
you have, bright boy.

How do you it without leaving an IP, stupid Kane9. :-)

How pathetic!

You've never googled anyone, never gone to their web site, observed
and or noted their personal information, their politics, hobbies,
etc.?

Not unless it related to the claim they made! ;-)


So why would someone else be pathetic but not you doing the same
thing?

One is relevant since they brought into the discussion first; the other is
just low-life underhand tactics fit for a dog like you. :-)

Now, since when did I
claim to have an M.A in biology and teaching math at a college

level???
;-)


Haven't to my knowledge. More diversion there, child?

That is what your master, Chris Dugan, claimed!!!

If you have then you are as "pathetic" as I. Are you?


No one can be as pathetic as you, Kane9? ;-)


Sure you can. You don't even have to try harder.

So you are now admitting that you are pathetic, Kane9??? You are stupider
than I thought! Is that because your parents spanked you or you just
inherited it? ;-)

One track mind, is what you have Doan. It shows in all your posts
clearly. Your attitude toward children, your excuses for abusive
parents, your attempts to claim others aren't logical or honest

when
it's just a coverup for how dishonest and stupid you are.

At least I didn't claim to have been "never-spanked"! OUCH!!! ;-)


Who has, except The Plant, and it's not even sure...a very likely sign
of suppression.

You claimed of "never-spanked" is a lie, Kane9? A suppression? Or just
a sign of your stupidity? ;-)

Those who don't want to be known should take pains to make

themselves
scarce. It's hardly the fault of other users of the Internet if you
post information about yourself and they visit it, now is it?

Nope! They just hide behind a fake email address! ;-)


If they have been attacked would you suggest they post in the open
with IP flying? How quaint.

Nope, they covered their track by cleaning up logs. You are showing
your stupidity again. :-)

They have the good sense to conceal their location. You, on the other
hand, just whine when someone takes a look at your publically posted
information.

Why is that I wonder?

Because I hate dogs, Kane9. :-)

If it had been a hot babe visiting and then getting in touch with

you
I'll bet you wouldn't have thought her pathetic. And that's one of

the
reasons students post such pages on their college or university web
sites; to make contact with others. You just want to be choosy

about
who goes there, eh?

Sure! If I have a choice between a hot babe and Kane9, it is just

logical
to choose the hot babe. :-)


No choice was suggested. Only that you can't post your data publically
and then fly into a childish fit of babbling fear when it's viewed. If
you wanna connect with hot babes why don't you continue your cruising
the porno sites?

Is that how you met your master, Chris Dugan? ;-) FWIW, there is no
hot babes at porno sites, just old men like you surfing with one hand. ;-)

For a sys admin you are woefully ignorant of the operations of and
reason for the Interent, aren't you?

I am no sys admin and have never claimed to be anything more a

college
student who spanked when misbehaved as a child, like about 98% of

college
students. :-)


Why thank you Doan. I knew you were stupid enough to take the bait and
give me the information I wanted. Keep playing with me. I love to
dance.

Anytime, Kane. I didn't know that you can teach an old dog new trick!
;-})
That you were spanked is obvious. And that you surpress knowing what
it's turned you into goes along: you are an apologist for child
abusers, and rather stupid.

And you are an perfect example of a "never-spanked" child. Chris Dugan
must be proud to have you on his side. :-0

By the way, you aren't the pathetic little creep that ILLEGALLY
invaded my work station system using a custom trojan, that I caught

on
the first try and dropped into my tailored honeypot, are you? I
maintain layers of security you can't even imagine, little pup.

Got an IP address and log?


Oh, much much more than that, child. A couple of dozen traceroutes
with considerable results when I explored further on owners, with the
help of sys admins and their records. You may be playing what you
think is a silly little game with no consequences, but I'm not.

You are showing your stupidity again. What does traceroutes have to
do with it? A dozen traceroutes, Kane9??? Give me a break! :-)

Or are you just showing how stupid you are


Sorry, wrong subject. It's you that I'm showing the stupidity of. You
just gave me a critical piece of information.

Really? I thought you already alredy have them in a safe! ;-)

on subject you have no clude of? ;-)


I got a good deal more than a "clude" twit.

Yup! You also have a good mother! ;-)

I know exactly how dangerous to others child abusers and their
defenders are and what they are capable of.

and 90%+ of the parents in the USA are child abusers, right? ;-)


Not quite that high I'd reckon. But too high. Many spankers are
ignorant of the results of their acts against their children, and
human children are rather resiliant and manage to survive it, but
witness the level of crime and low morals in this country. See if you
can figure out what that 90% manages to produce.

The best country in the world. God bless the USA! ;-)
BTW, how high is the crime rate in Singapore, Kane9. See, how stupid
your claim is! ;-)

I've had a world, literally, of support and help in tracing the

source
on that illegal invasion and own the person that did it. I have

their
name, home address, phone number, auto license plate number,

drivers
license number, and the description that law enforcement provided

and
much more. It all sits quietly in my attorney's safe.

I also have the same kind of info on those that helped him. It's in
the same safe.

ROTFLH!!! And Chris Dugan really teaches "math at the college"

level! ;-)

Yah got me there. I have no idea. He probably does. Somehow I'm more
inclined to trust him that you. Now why is that I wonder.

Because he is your master. It is obvious that you are still loyal to him
even after the recent whipping he gave you. :-)

Want to bet on what I just told you? Keep playing around at this game
and see what it gets you.

A little dog, Kane9, which I can roast when other anti-spanking zealotS
ran away because they are too afraid to face me head on. Where is your
master Chris Dugan now, Kane9? ;-)

Yah wanna play with the big boys Doan, yah got to bring a bigger

dog.

You meant I have to bring your dad??? ;-)


My dad screwed your mom?

Your dad cheated on your mom? C'mon, Kane9. :-)

Well, hello brother.

Are you sure? Have you asked your mom? ;-)


Yer nothing but a loud mouthed little pup that stupidly babbles

like a
schoolboy.

Oops! That would be you, Kane9!


I'm impressed with the cleverness of your comeback. Who would have
ever thought of that ploy?

Thank you! Even you master, Chris Dugan, can't outclever me. :-)

What did you call your mom, again? ;-)


"Mother" as opposed to you calling yours "Spot" or "thit cho".

I have never brought me mother into this thread, unlike you. Your
mom must be proud. She is a non-spanker, right? ;-)

But I have to admit I'm insulted that you'd claim my father duma and
produced you, little Em. Tsk tsk tsk.

Your English confused me here. I have never made any claim about your
father. Please clarify.

You haven't the faintest idea how far over your head you are, do you?

I'll give you a clue. I know about half the staff of the school where
you are a "student" and I know exactly what you do there.

Really? And this is relevant to what?

Relax. I'm nothing like the vicious thugs you champion. I never make a
move on the innocent. As long as you don't have kids and beat them so
I find out about it, or you, or your cohort, do not attack me you are
as safe as you were in your litter at your momma's teat.

Is this a veiled threat, Kane9?

I'll make sure those who manage my affairs follow my direction on this
matter.

I don't care much about your "affairs". But I will think about you
everytime I go to the bathroom and have to wipe my .... I do wash
my hands throughly after though. ;-)

But be advised: that is a posture you had best maintain vigorously.

OOH! I AM TREMBLING WITH FEAR! ;-)

Doan
Kane9


  #6  
Old June 30th 03, 07:32 AM
Doan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default One quarter million Juveniles tried as Adults in US courts

On 29 Jun 2003, Kane wrote:

On Sun, 29 Jun 2003 12:02:48 -0700, Doan wrote:

On 28 Jun 2003, Kane wrote:

On Sat, 28 Jun 2003 13:22:40 -0700, Doan wrote:

On 27 Jun 2003, Kane wrote:

On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 10:46:41 -0700, Doan wrote:


On 21 Jun 2003, Chris C. wrote:

Fern & Doan,

I find this interesting that lavonne is attempting to invoke

her
research training, or lack of it, to contradict her previous
notions
on equal rights for children.

Non-spanker by choice,
Chris C.
TX

It's nothing new, just a typical logic of the anti-spanking
zealotS!
Logic and anti-spanking zealotS... are they mutually exclusive?
:-)

PS-Don't give out family or personal information on this
newsgroup.
The "cohort" and "cohort" wannabees monitor and report (often
erroneous unsupported information)---so use your common sense

on
posting info.

I have already taking precaution

Why would you need to be "taking precaution?

Are you doing something that would be reportable? Want to share?

LOL! Not with you, Kane9! ;-)

Of course not.

You are right, I don't share with dogs, Kane9. :-) Especially dog

like
you who called his/her mother a ....! ;-)

I don't hide behind a fake email address
neither. ;-)

That's nice. Then why are you concerned about people you must take
"precautions" against, eh? Apparently you have something to hide or
you wouldn't be so concerned about how comes to your web site.

I just don't like like rabid dog like you. :-)
Would the University of California take exception to you posting
through their server? Are you on company time?

Why don't you ask your master, Chris Dugan, about that? :-)

Sorry, don't know him.

He is your master and just gave a bad whipping in this newsgroup. So
bad that you ran away from him with you tail between your legs. :-)


and detected Kane9

"detected"? r r r r r. In this ng I as much as advertised to you
that
I had discovered you worked for USC. I asked, openly, for you to
say
hello to certain "women" who of course are the names of various
servers your posts come through.

Now what does that have to do with the topic of this newsgroup?

Note a thing, but it does have to do with the topic C brought up

and
you responded to, thus starting a thread you now wish would go

away.

Who is C????

Did I ever
claim to be "teaching math at a college level" like your master

Chris
Dugan??? :-0

Not that I know of. Relevance please?

If I ever make such a claim then you are right to check on my

credential.
Since I am not making any claim regarding what I do, your attempt to

dig
up personal information about me is a pathetic attempt to discredit

me.
:-)
I wrote to you in a language your ancestors used, and that most
recently.

Like you had to "detect" anything.

You couldn't detect your own asshole with your nose up it.

Haha! Speaking like a "never spanked" children! But you could,
right?
:-)

All you got in your little pistol eh? How pathetic.

Ain't got a rebuttal? That is truly pathetic, Kane9! ;-)

snooping around
my site digging

"snooping", "digging" around a publically posted web page?

for personal information on me.

Are you telling us you have something to be ashamed of?

What "personal" information on your now missing web page was not
for
public consumption then?

I notice you took down your web page at the USC student and
employee
site quickly enough...though I can't say as I'm the only one

that
visited. Can you?

Have you ever heard of IP logging? ;-)

Sure, do it all the time.

Have you heard of anonymity, tunneling, and proxy servers? I'm sure
you have, bright boy.

How do you it without leaving an IP, stupid Kane9. :-)

How pathetic!

You've never googled anyone, never gone to their web site,

observed
and or noted their personal information, their politics,

hobbies,
etc.?

Not unless it related to the claim they made! ;-)

So why would someone else be pathetic but not you doing the same
thing?

One is relevant since they brought into the discussion first; the

other is
just low-life underhand tactics fit for a dog like you. :-)

Now, since when did I
claim to have an M.A in biology and teaching math at a college
level???
;-)

Haven't to my knowledge. More diversion there, child?

That is what your master, Chris Dugan, claimed!!!

If you have then you are as "pathetic" as I. Are you?

No one can be as pathetic as you, Kane9? ;-)

Sure you can. You don't even have to try harder.

So you are now admitting that you are pathetic, Kane9??? You are

stupider
than I thought! Is that because your parents spanked you or you just
inherited it? ;-)

One track mind, is what you have Doan. It shows in all your

posts
clearly. Your attitude toward children, your excuses for abusive
parents, your attempts to claim others aren't logical or honest
when
it's just a coverup for how dishonest and stupid you are.

At least I didn't claim to have been "never-spanked"! OUCH!!! ;-)

Who has, except The Plant, and it's not even sure...a very likely

sign
of suppression.

You claimed of "never-spanked" is a lie, Kane9? A suppression? Or

just
a sign of your stupidity? ;-)

Those who don't want to be known should take pains to make
themselves
scarce. It's hardly the fault of other users of the Internet if

you
post information about yourself and they visit it, now is it?

Nope! They just hide behind a fake email address! ;-)

If they have been attacked would you suggest they post in the open
with IP flying? How quaint.

Nope, they covered their track by cleaning up logs. You are showing
your stupidity again. :-)

They have the good sense to conceal their location. You, on the

other
hand, just whine when someone takes a look at your publically

posted
information.

Why is that I wonder?

Because I hate dogs, Kane9. :-)

If it had been a hot babe visiting and then getting in touch

with
you
I'll bet you wouldn't have thought her pathetic. And that's one

of
the
reasons students post such pages on their college or university

web
sites; to make contact with others. You just want to be choosy
about
who goes there, eh?

Sure! If I have a choice between a hot babe and Kane9, it is just
logical
to choose the hot babe. :-)

No choice was suggested. Only that you can't post your data

publically
and then fly into a childish fit of babbling fear when it's viewed.

If
you wanna connect with hot babes why don't you continue your

cruising
the porno sites?

Is that how you met your master, Chris Dugan? ;-) FWIW, there is no
hot babes at porno sites, just old men like you surfing with one

hand. ;-)

For a sys admin you are woefully ignorant of the operations of

and
reason for the Interent, aren't you?

I am no sys admin and have never claimed to be anything more a
college
student who spanked when misbehaved as a child, like about 98% of
college
students. :-)

Why thank you Doan. I knew you were stupid enough to take the bait

and
give me the information I wanted. Keep playing with me. I love to
dance.

Anytime, Kane. I didn't know that you can teach an old dog new

trick!
;-})
That you were spanked is obvious. And that you surpress knowing

what
it's turned you into goes along: you are an apologist for child
abusers, and rather stupid.

And you are an perfect example of a "never-spanked" child. Chris

Dugan
must be proud to have you on his side. :-0

By the way, you aren't the pathetic little creep that ILLEGALLY
invaded my work station system using a custom trojan, that I

caught
on
the first try and dropped into my tailored honeypot, are you? I
maintain layers of security you can't even imagine, little pup.

Got an IP address and log?

Oh, much much more than that, child. A couple of dozen traceroutes
with considerable results when I explored further on owners, with

the
help of sys admins and their records. You may be playing what you
think is a silly little game with no consequences, but I'm not.

You are showing your stupidity again. What does traceroutes have to
do with it? A dozen traceroutes, Kane9??? Give me a break! :-)

Or are you just showing how stupid you are

Sorry, wrong subject. It's you that I'm showing the stupidity of.

You
just gave me a critical piece of information.

Really? I thought you already alredy have them in a safe! ;-)

on subject you have no clude of? ;-)

I got a good deal more than a "clude" twit.

Yup! You also have a good mother! ;-)

I know exactly how dangerous to others child abusers and their
defenders are and what they are capable of.

and 90%+ of the parents in the USA are child abusers, right? ;-)

Not quite that high I'd reckon. But too high. Many spankers are
ignorant of the results of their acts against their children, and
human children are rather resiliant and manage to survive it, but
witness the level of crime and low morals in this country. See if

you
can figure out what that 90% manages to produce.

The best country in the world. God bless the USA! ;-)
BTW, how high is the crime rate in Singapore, Kane9. See, how stupid
your claim is! ;-)

I've had a world, literally, of support and help in tracing the
source
on that illegal invasion and own the person that did it. I have
their
name, home address, phone number, auto license plate number,
drivers
license number, and the description that law enforcement

provided
and
much more. It all sits quietly in my attorney's safe.

I also have the same kind of info on those that helped him. It's

in
the same safe.

ROTFLH!!! And Chris Dugan really teaches "math at the college"
level! ;-)

Yah got me there. I have no idea. He probably does. Somehow I'm

more
inclined to trust him that you. Now why is that I wonder.

Because he is your master. It is obvious that you are still loyal to

him
even after the recent whipping he gave you. :-)

Want to bet on what I just told you? Keep playing around at this

game
and see what it gets you.

A little dog, Kane9, which I can roast when other anti-spanking

zealotS
ran away because they are too afraid to face me head on. Where is

your
master Chris Dugan now, Kane9? ;-)

Yah wanna play with the big boys Doan, yah got to bring a bigger
dog.

You meant I have to bring your dad??? ;-)

My dad screwed your mom?

Your dad cheated on your mom? C'mon, Kane9. :-)

Well, hello brother.

Are you sure? Have you asked your mom? ;-)


Yer nothing but a loud mouthed little pup that stupidly babbles
like a
schoolboy.

Oops! That would be you, Kane9!

I'm impressed with the cleverness of your comeback. Who would have
ever thought of that ploy?

Thank you! Even you master, Chris Dugan, can't outclever me. :-)

What did you call your mom, again? ;-)

"Mother" as opposed to you calling yours "Spot" or "thit cho".

I have never brought me mother into this thread, unlike you. Your
mom must be proud. She is a non-spanker, right? ;-)

But I have to admit I'm insulted that you'd claim my father duma

and
produced you, little Em. Tsk tsk tsk.

Your English confused me here. I have never made any claim about

your
father. Please clarify.

You haven't the faintest idea how far over your head you are, do

you?

I'll give you a clue. I know about half the staff of the school

where
you are a "student" and I know exactly what you do there.

Really? And this is relevant to what?

Relax. I'm nothing like the vicious thugs you champion. I never

make a
move on the innocent. As long as you don't have kids and beat them

so
I find out about it, or you, or your cohort, do not attack me you

are
as safe as you were in your litter at your momma's teat.

Is this a veiled threat, Kane9?

I'll make sure those who manage my affairs follow my direction on

this
matter.

I don't care much about your "affairs". But I will think about you
everytime I go to the bathroom and have to wipe my .... I do wash
my hands throughly after though. ;-)

But be advised: that is a posture you had best maintain vigorously.

OOH! I AM TREMBLING WITH FEAR! ;-)

Doan


Thank you again for the information. Apparently you DID understand my
message, loud and clear. It's quite amusing to watch you squirm and
try to fend off facts, little EM.

Kane

What? Unable to refute a single point of mine, Kane9? Now you chose to
run away with your tail between your legs...still barking. You are truely
pathetic! ;-)

Doan

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
misc.kids FAQ on Childhood Vaccinations, Part 2/4 [email protected] Info and FAQ's 0 December 15th 03 10:41 AM
misc.kids FAQ on Childhood Vaccinations, Part 1/4 [email protected] Info and FAQ's 1 December 15th 03 10:41 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2017 ParentingBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.