If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#91
|
|||
|
|||
U.N. rules Canada should ban spanking
"Julie Pascal" wrote
Shall we talk about Nuclear Submarines? I don't know anything about Nuclear Submarines. Remember the Underdog cartoons about Commander McBragg? Give Kane time and I'm sure he'll come up with Nuclear Submarine credentials. He served in the Boar War also. I'm told it's a very good opportunity to get advanced degrees through correspondence. Between alerts perhaps the ultimate quiet place to read? g |
#92
|
|||
|
|||
Ray attempts Biblical justification: was U.N. rules Canadashould ban spanking
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, LaVonne Carlson wrote: Actually, Dennis, the proof is not upon you. What is your evidence that spanking has been used for centuries with the adverse effects psychologists claim it has upon children? Empirical evidence please, Dennis -- not your opinion. You state this as fact, base your claim with data supporting your factual statement. So, you're requiring him to post his "cites"? And a multitude of studies spanning several decades exist showing that spanking is linked to long and short term risk factors and no studies that show spanking to be preferrable to alternative forms of discipline that do not involve hitting, hurting, shaming, or demeaning a child. If you have studies that support your position, I'd love to read them. Please post your sources. Of course, if you have studies that support your position, I'd love to read them. Please post your sources. Hey, for all I know, you've posted your sources before, but this little crossposted thread is all I've ever seen of you, and you've posted no such sources that I've seen. |
#93
|
|||
|
|||
Ray attempts Biblical justification: was U.N. rulesCanadashould ban spanking
Jon Houts wrote: On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, LaVonne Carlson wrote: And a multitude of studies spanning several decades exist showing that spanking is linked to long and short term risk factors and no studies that show spanking to be preferrable to alternative forms of discipline that do not involve hitting, hurting, shaming, or demeaning a child. If you have studies that support your position, I'd love to read them. Please post your sources. I have posted these sources, and updated them since 1996. You can find them in the archives. Find them, read them, and lets discuss them. LaVonne |
#94
|
|||
|
|||
Ray attempts Biblical justification: was U.N. rulesCanadashould ban spanking
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003, LaVonne Carlson wrote:
Jon Houts wrote: On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, LaVonne Carlson wrote: And a multitude of studies spanning several decades exist showing that spanking is linked to long and short term risk factors and no studies that show spanking to be preferrable to alternative forms of discipline that do not involve hitting, hurting, shaming, or demeaning a child. If you have studies that support your position, I'd love to read them. Please post your sources. I have posted these sources, and updated them since 1996. You can find them in the archives. Find them, read them, and lets discuss them. LaVonne LOL! Is this the same LaVonne that has been running away from debating me for over 16 WEEKS! ;-) Doan |
#95
|
|||
|
|||
| U.N. rules Canada should ban spanking
Kane AKA AKA Frank Andrews
AKA Commander McBrag said he worked at SAC under LeMay. There was a Frank M Andrews who worked with LeMay and did great things for what would become the Air Force. But he died in 1943. Andrews Air Force Base was named after him. And our Frank says that he worked under LeMay in the 1950's? Was Kane a Frank Junior, working for his deceased father's old boss? At an air base named for Frank's Dad? And yes, is him because he posted in some homeschooling newsgroups with his personal fears about Christian Reconstructionism. It's him. This is what tipped his hand: From: ) Subject: Not sufficiently spanked........ Newsgroups: alt.parenting.spanking Date: 2003-10-06 17:32:47 PST Football Players In Sodomy Case May Be Tried As Adults Team's Season Canceled http://www.wftv.com/news/2534849/detail.html POSTED: 1:14 p.m. EDT October 6, 2003 UPDATED: 2:08 p.m. EDT October 6, 2003 HONESDALE, Pa. -- A prosecutor says he will seek to have three high school football players from Long Island, N.Y., tried as adults on charges that they sodomized and hazed younger teammates at a preseason training camp in northeast Pennsylvania. Wayne County District Attorney Mark Zimmer held a news conference Monday, describing the crimes as "horrific." Three N.Y. high school football players who are accused of sodomizing younger teammates at a training camp may be tried as adults. They allegedly sodomized a 13-year-old and two 14-year-olds with a broomstick, pine cones and golf balls. Two of the players who are accused are 16 and one is 17. They allegedly sodomized a 13-year-old and two 14-year-old boys with a broomstick, pine cones and golf balls. snip.......click the URL above for the complete story........... The alleged perps must have come from the 10% or so minority of children that are "never spanked." It's obvious that these boys weren't sufficiently spanked by their parents or they'd have developed consciences and been unable to do such foul things to others. Right, Spankers? Kane |
#97
|
|||
|
|||
U.N. rules Canada should ban spanking
(Greg Hanson) wrote in message
. com... Julie: When you were in a homeschool newsgroup, did you supect that Frank Andrews was being such a charmer under the name Kane? Think of his SAC and LeMay claims and you might find it interesting that a Frank M Andrews did serve with LeMay, died in 1943 and Andrews AFB was named after him. Is Kane a Frank Jr. claiming to BE their father? Or some other variety of psycho? The TEXT BELOW is easily recognizable to readers of alt.support.child-protective-services as Kane. Really? What is the "tipoff?" "Frank" has tried to fake me but not done much of a job of it. In one post he simply hijacked a post of mine and cancelled out the original in USENET and google. wrote in message . com... Newsgroups: misc.education.home-school.misc, ott.education.homeschooling Date: 2003-10-20 19:44:30 PST snip Exactly! That's so in tune with our experience. We are long removed from direct homeschooling - our 4 children are aged 22 to 43 - but the same principles still apply. We often got the feeling we so often had to just jump back and give them room with an occasional foray into doing some rigorous learning ourselves right along with them. I didn't learn calculus until my children did. We are still active in homeschooling politically though, and I try to read each new book that comes out. I recently came across a treasure in a book by Ann Larson-Fischer, Fundamentals of Homeschooling. The title made me think it was going to be a bore, but she told the truth from my view point...she wrote this book that can make it possible for anyone looking for a system of homeschooling to find what they and their family can best apply to their situation. This is a gem and going to be one of the great classics of homeschooling writing. Though it's been out since January I think the title has kept it from being discovered. But the libraries are starting to stock more copies of it and renewing interest in her last book, Homeschooling In Oregon: The Handbook...and that book had some of the same qualities and it wasn't really all the limited to Oregon homeschooing issues. I'm going out and buying some copies for my children for Christmas presents. I did a google on the title and author and came up with: http://nettlepatch.net/homeschool/ The reviews cannot adequately describe the quality of writing and easy to read style that I found. I wish we'd had this when we started homeschooling in the 60's. Frank I'm looking for signs of "Kane" in "Frank"'s post and am unable to find any. Point them out to me. Kane |
#98
|
|||
|
|||
Ray attempts Biblical justification: was U.N. rules Canadashould ban spanking
On Sat, 11 Oct 2003, LaVonne Carlson wrote: Ray Drouillard wrote: Pro 23:13 Don't withhold correction from a child. If you punish him with the rod, he will not die. If you advocate everything in the Old Testament, you advocate capital punishment for rebellious children, for adulterers, for women who are not virgins when they marry. Jesus' disciples tried this thinking when they desired to stone the woman at the well. Jesus intervened. Funny about that, isn't it. I didn't realize that "Why do You speak with her?" meant "Let's kill her!" Or, are you somewhere other than John 4? |
#99
|
|||
|
|||
Ray attempts Biblical justification: was U.N. rules Canadashould ban spanking
On Sat, 11 Oct 2003, LaVonne Carlson wrote: Ray Drouillard wrote: Proverbs is not a book of law, but a book of wise counsel. We are free to disregard it -- at our own risk, of course. God's wisdom does not pass away. He may change the rules as the situation merits, but the wise advice in Proverbs still stands. So why did Jesus so openly defy the Old Testament? I see nothing in His words that recommend hitting children with rods as a parenting strategy. In fact, he recommends a millstone around the neck and being cast into the depths of the sea for anyone who offends a child. Most translations say "causes to sin" or "causes to stumble" rather than "offend." And when his disciplines want to stone a woman for wanton behavior )as the OT recommends), he stops them, forgives the woman, and tells her to "go and sin no more." That was the scribes and Pharisees, not His disciplines(sic), and they weren't exactly following the OT law were they, bringing only the woman like that? |
#100
|
|||
|
|||
U.N. rules Canada should ban spanking
On 12 Oct 2003, Kane wrote: "Ray Drouillard" wrote "LaVonne Carlson" wrote I see nothing in His words that recommend hitting children with rods as a parenting strategy. Correct. Unlike the laws for divorce, he did not change the counsel regarding child rearing. Odd, he spoke directely to them and you have have disregarded the meaning below. No, Ray's rightly disregarding your (and LaVonne's) misinterpretation of the passage in question. In fact, he recommends a millstone around the neck and being cast into the depths of the sea for anyone who offends a child. This would be another great opportunity for Brandon or Kanga to explain to us how the archaic (Webster's lists the meaning of "offend" above as being "obsolete") language of the KJV isn't misleading to a modern reader. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Debate on spanking | Doan | General | 0 | June 12th 04 08:30 PM |
A great article on spanking | Doan | General | 0 | February 28th 04 11:27 AM |
| | Kids should work... | Kane | General | 13 | December 10th 03 02:30 AM |
Kids should work. | LaVonne Carlson | General | 22 | December 7th 03 04:27 AM |
And again he strikes........ Doan strikes ...... again! was Kids should work... | Kane | General | 2 | December 6th 03 03:28 AM |