If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
LeapPad/LeapFrog thoughts wanted
My spouse and I have two areas of disagreement on the
LeapPad/Frog/Thing. I'd appreciate any input. They are in the areas of: 1. Should we buy a LeapPad "system" for our child? My view: While it seems fine, regular reading to her also suffices. Also, she often favors toys that are electronic (bells, whistles, noises, lights) over more simple things, and I worry what kind of trend that is setting for her long-term. It seems like the first step towards an older child that sits and plays video games too much, with the same lights, noises, etc. She does play imaginatively and she's active. And while we can afford it, the long-term costs of such a thing, with the extra books and such to buy, seem a tad high for the gains that one might have. Spouse's view: She already has a good vocabulary and she thinks that this will help her build it even more. While she may not quite be ready for it, we can still get it and she can get into it whenever she is ready. It shouldn't stunt her imagination at all, but assist it, and electronic items are just the way things are now (i.e., loud and flashy sit-and-spins instead of the old kind). It'll also be good for trips, a few of which we have coming up. Also, she has two smaller toys from that company, given as gifts, and she likes them both. 2. If we buy, should we get My First LeapPad, or just the regular LeapPad? My view: The regular LeapPad, going by comments on some of the websites (for whatever they are worth) is said to be more durable and user-friendly. The books on the "First" system are not secured and fall out when lifted up. Also, the pens tend to fail a bit more often, it is said. It isn't much cheaper, isn't more travel-friendly, and is just a lesser version of the original. (Note: The store that we were at tonight didn't have a copy of the "First" pad, so we couldn't hold/sample it, unlike the regular LeapPad. Spouse's View: My First LeapPad will be good on travel, the books can be secured with some work, and she could likely use it from the car seat. The pens are easily manageable to her (as she has done on the MagnaDoodle), and she's not as rough with her toys as some kids are, thus will be unlikely to cause harm to the thing. She's younger, and the First item is more appropriate to her age. Any thoughts, comments, suggestions, etc.? I know little about these beyond reading some reviews and seeing them briefly in the stores. I was hoping to get some input from those who are more experienced. If I'm way off, in your view, go ahead and say it, and I won't be offended. Thanks. ;-) P. Tierney |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
LeapPad/LeapFrog thoughts wanted
"P. Tierney" wrote in message news:1c8Pa.24540$N7.2778@sccrnsc03... My spouse and I have two areas of disagreement on the LeapPad/Frog/Thing. I'd appreciate any input. They are in the areas of: 1. Should we buy a LeapPad "system" for our child? My view: While it seems fine, regular reading to her also suffices. Also, she often favors toys that are electronic (bells, whistles, noises, lights) over more simple things, and I worry what kind of trend that is setting for her long-term. It seems like the first step towards an older child that sits and plays video games too much, with the same lights, noises, etc. She does play imaginatively and she's active. And while we can afford it, the long-term costs of such a thing, with the extra books and such to buy, seem a tad high for the gains that one might have. Spouse's view: She already has a good vocabulary and she thinks that this will help her build it even more. While she may not quite be ready for it, we can still get it and she can get into it whenever she is ready. It shouldn't stunt her imagination at all, but assist it, and electronic items are just the way things are now (i.e., loud and flashy sit-and-spins instead of the old kind). It'll also be good for trips, a few of which we have coming up. Also, she has two smaller toys from that company, given as gifts, and she likes them both. We have a LeapPad for my oldest daughter (4 1/2). She adores it. My middle dd, who is developmentally delayed, also adores it. We've taken it on several long car trips, most recently from Washington to California. Its done pretty good, all things considered. The books haven't done so well my middle dd, mostly because she is a very very rough child, but the actual LeapPad has survived being thrown, launched, left outside at Grandma's house, fought over.. etc. I personally, wouldn't bother with the First Leap-thingy. I looked at it when the two started fighting over the LeapPad, but I found that I liked the way the LeapPad grew with the child. I can get books that are suitable for the 3 year old, or books that are suitable for the almost-5year old. With the First LeapPad, you're sort of stuck with the pre-reading books, from what I could tell. I've never had a problem with either of the girls spending too much time on the LeapPad. I've never had to regulate how long they use it or anything. Usually my oldest will go through one book and then put it away for a couple days. It doesn't seem very video-gamey to me, mostly because there's not a lot of mindless play you can do with it. HTH, Denise |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
LeapPad/LeapFrog thoughts wanted
"P. Tierney" wrote in message news:1c8Pa.24540$N7.2778@sccrnsc03...
My spouse and I have two areas of disagreement on the LeapPad/Frog/Thing. I'd appreciate any input. They are in the areas of: 1. Should we buy a LeapPad "system" for our child? We have a LeapPad thing, and an almost 3yo boy, so I'll share our experience. But bear in mind he's only had it a couple weeks, and he's a little young based on LeapFrog's guideline (which says 4+). Grandma bought it, and all the cousins have had one (ages 4-10) and are said to enjoy them. All that said, DS is totally uninterested in it, except to make it make noise (it actually doesn't make lights). He has two books, one came with it and the other is Winnie-the-Pooh-does-math or something. He's asked me several times to read him that book, and has asked if I wanted him to read the book to me, but really doesn't want to have the thing read to him. My view: While it seems fine, regular reading to her also suffices. Also, she often favors toys that are electronic (bells, whistles, noises, lights) over more simple things, and I worry what kind of trend that is setting for her long-term. It seems like the first step towards an older child that sits and plays video games too much, with the same lights, noises, etc. She does play imaginatively and she's active. And while we can afford it, the long-term costs of such a thing, with the extra books and such to buy, seem a tad high for the gains that one might have. Spouse's view: She already has a good vocabulary and she thinks that this will help her build it even more. While she may not quite be ready for it, we can still get it and she can get into it whenever she is ready. It shouldn't stunt her imagination at all, but assist it, and electronic items are just the way things are now (i.e., loud and flashy sit-and-spins instead of the old kind). It'll also be good for trips, a few of which we have coming up. Also, she has two smaller toys from that company, given as gifts, and she likes them both. I'm with you on this one. But these days finding children's toys that *don't* make noise/lights is so hard (except for a few awesome stores and on-line sites. ToysRUs, forgetaboutit!) So far, there's nothing to be learned in the books we have that we don't already know or talk about. We've played some of the games together (counting in this case), but there's just nothing in it that we don't do with regular books anyway. Maybe when he's older and wants to play with it on his own it would be different, but then I think he'll be too old for it anyway. I'm not that interested in getting DS to learn to use a computer yet. Still at 3yo, I want him to learn by exploring things with his hands and mind, with or without me, not so much by pressing buttons. Also, *I* can't always understand the words coming out of the LeapFrog things (we also have a school bus with letters) so it's hard to imagine DS is actually learning anything. He likes the bus because he can press buttons and make music or sounds. OK, I admit it. He likes to play the wheels on the bus song 5 million times in a row. And it's a big yellow school bus, still a bit hit around here. 2. If we buy, should we get My First LeapPad, or just the regular LeapPad? My view: The regular LeapPad, going by comments on some of the websites (for whatever they are worth) is said to be more durable and user-friendly. The books on the "First" system are not secured and fall out when lifted up. Also, the pens tend to fail a bit more often, it is said. It isn't much cheaper, isn't more travel-friendly, and is just a lesser version of the original. (Note: The store that we were at tonight didn't have a copy of the "First" pad, so we couldn't hold/sample it, unlike the regular LeapPad. Spouse's View: My First LeapPad will be good on travel, the books can be secured with some work, and she could likely use it from the car seat. The pens are easily manageable to her (as she has done on the MagnaDoodle), and she's not as rough with her toys as some kids are, thus will be unlikely to cause harm to the thing. She's younger, and the First item is more appropriate to her age. Look at the books available for each and decide. I noticed at Zany Brainy the other day that the First LeapPad had some books with music and activities that I thought DS might actually enjoy more than the regular one he has. In anycase, since he's not all that interested in it, by the time he *might* like it, those books would probably be way too young for him. The regular one is kind of big; DS can't really sit in a seat by himself with it in his lap, as he'd have to for travel. Well I can't imagine he'd use headphones either so we wouldn't take it on public transportation, at least not as he currently uses it. Any thoughts, comments, suggestions, etc.? I know little about these beyond reading some reviews and seeing them briefly in the stores. I was hoping to get some input from those who are more experienced. If I'm way off, in your view, go ahead and say it, and I won't be offended. Thanks. ;-) P. Tierney So far, I wouldn't get one again. At least I didn't pay for it! Has your DD tried it out in the store? Or at a friend's house? You might see how interested she is and then decide. Take care, Lisa |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
LeapPad/LeapFrog thoughts wanted
Wow, you guys are really overthinking this, imo.
I just bought the regular LeapPad. My girls have liked it, but they really haven't shown that much interest in it. I just bought it because I thought it was a cool thing and the girls could take turns using it and perhaps bone up on the reading skills for my 6-year-old and maybe make math fun for my oldest daughter. It's gone on a few trips with us and held up with my three. I didn't even consider the First LeapPad, as my girls are much older than your daughter. Books for the regular leap pad is nice because you can buy a variety of books for it, so as your daughter grows you can buy more books. But, I don't think the interest is really going to be there for a while. It isn't like a Gameboy where you have to monitor its use. My girls are no where near on it enough to even be worried about it. And I can't imagine one toy being used so much by a baby that you will have to worry. They don't really have the attention span to over use it. I wouldn't worry over her imagination. -- Sue mom to three girls P. Tierney wrote in message news:1c8Pa.24540$N7.2778@sccrnsc03... My spouse and I have two areas of disagreement on the LeapPad/Frog/Thing. I'd appreciate any input. They are in the areas of: 1. Should we buy a LeapPad "system" for our child? My view: While it seems fine, regular reading to her also suffices. Also, she often favors toys that are electronic (bells, whistles, noises, lights) over more simple things, and I worry what kind of trend that is setting for her long-term. It seems like the first step towards an older child that sits and plays video games too much, with the same lights, noises, etc. She does play imaginatively and she's active. And while we can afford it, the long-term costs of such a thing, with the extra books and such to buy, seem a tad high for the gains that one might have. Spouse's view: She already has a good vocabulary and she thinks that this will help her build it even more. While she may not quite be ready for it, we can still get it and she can get into it whenever she is ready. It shouldn't stunt her imagination at all, but assist it, and electronic items are just the way things are now (i.e., loud and flashy sit-and-spins instead of the old kind). It'll also be good for trips, a few of which we have coming up. Also, she has two smaller toys from that company, given as gifts, and she likes them both. 2. If we buy, should we get My First LeapPad, or just the regular LeapPad? My view: The regular LeapPad, going by comments on some of the websites (for whatever they are worth) is said to be more durable and user-friendly. The books on the "First" system are not secured and fall out when lifted up. Also, the pens tend to fail a bit more often, it is said. It isn't much cheaper, isn't more travel-friendly, and is just a lesser version of the original. (Note: The store that we were at tonight didn't have a copy of the "First" pad, so we couldn't hold/sample it, unlike the regular LeapPad. Spouse's View: My First LeapPad will be good on travel, the books can be secured with some work, and she could likely use it from the car seat. The pens are easily manageable to her (as she has done on the MagnaDoodle), and she's not as rough with her toys as some kids are, thus will be unlikely to cause harm to the thing. She's younger, and the First item is more appropriate to her age. Any thoughts, comments, suggestions, etc.? I know little about these beyond reading some reviews and seeing them briefly in the stores. I was hoping to get some input from those who are more experienced. If I'm way off, in your view, go ahead and say it, and I won't be offended. Thanks. ;-) P. Tierney |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
LeapPad/LeapFrog thoughts wanted
We have one for our kids and they both love it. We bought it for my daughter
Christmas of 2001 and it is still used quite a bit. My son, who is 4 now uses it much more since my daughter can read very well and most of the books are too easy for her. I plan on buying her a Quantum pad for this year as I've been so impressed with the Leap Pad. Mind you, I am not thrilled with light up, loud, electronic toys. In fact, I've gotten rid of 99% of them but the leap pad, IMO is different. Both my kids have learned all of their states with capitals, basic reading skills like identifying words and whatnot and math skills like counting money and telling time. Plus the stories are interesting enough and to keep them occupied for 30 minutes in the car when I can't be reading to my son. Or we do the leap pad together on the sofa while dinner is baking or something. I would definately recommend it though! Kari mom to Kaylie (7) Noah (4) and #3 due Sept/Oct "P. Tierney" wrote in message news:1c8Pa.24540$N7.2778@sccrnsc03... My spouse and I have two areas of disagreement on the LeapPad/Frog/Thing. I'd appreciate any input. They are in the areas of: 1. Should we buy a LeapPad "system" for our child? My view: While it seems fine, regular reading to her also suffices. Also, she often favors toys that are electronic (bells, whistles, noises, lights) over more simple things, and I worry what kind of trend that is setting for her long-term. It seems like the first step towards an older child that sits and plays video games too much, with the same lights, noises, etc. She does play imaginatively and she's active. And while we can afford it, the long-term costs of such a thing, with the extra books and such to buy, seem a tad high for the gains that one might have. Spouse's view: She already has a good vocabulary and she thinks that this will help her build it even more. While she may not quite be ready for it, we can still get it and she can get into it whenever she is ready. It shouldn't stunt her imagination at all, but assist it, and electronic items are just the way things are now (i.e., loud and flashy sit-and-spins instead of the old kind). It'll also be good for trips, a few of which we have coming up. Also, she has two smaller toys from that company, given as gifts, and she likes them both. 2. If we buy, should we get My First LeapPad, or just the regular LeapPad? My view: The regular LeapPad, going by comments on some of the websites (for whatever they are worth) is said to be more durable and user-friendly. The books on the "First" system are not secured and fall out when lifted up. Also, the pens tend to fail a bit more often, it is said. It isn't much cheaper, isn't more travel-friendly, and is just a lesser version of the original. (Note: The store that we were at tonight didn't have a copy of the "First" pad, so we couldn't hold/sample it, unlike the regular LeapPad. Spouse's View: My First LeapPad will be good on travel, the books can be secured with some work, and she could likely use it from the car seat. The pens are easily manageable to her (as she has done on the MagnaDoodle), and she's not as rough with her toys as some kids are, thus will be unlikely to cause harm to the thing. She's younger, and the First item is more appropriate to her age. Any thoughts, comments, suggestions, etc.? I know little about these beyond reading some reviews and seeing them briefly in the stores. I was hoping to get some input from those who are more experienced. If I'm way off, in your view, go ahead and say it, and I won't be offended. Thanks. ;-) P. Tierney |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
LeapPad/LeapFrog thoughts wanted
We have these at school, for our younger children to take home and use
there. They've held up quite well (and its very amusing to see a 5th or 6th grader sit with a kindergartener in the cafeteria because the older child wants to play with the leap pad) Our children down to age 3 use the regular ones. Don't assume it will teach your child to read (I don't think you are-but we have some parents who think that this replaces them reading to their child-same with the books on tape that we send home). Get the leap-link, because it is much cheaper to download new materials than to keep buying them. When you download and print a new book, take it to a copy shop or teacher supply store and laminate it before giving it to your child. Buy multiple reusable cartridges so you can have more than one downloadable book, and save the downloaded file on your PC so you can download it to the cartridge when the child decides, 6 months later, that they want to do that book again! |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Electroinic Toys (was LeapPad/LeapFrog thoughts wanted)
"Nan" wrote:
Fwiw, I do tend to agree that not all toys need to be electronic, nor do they need to be touted as "educational", for that matter. And I tend to avoid electronic toys like the plague, in favor of the more traditional type. How successful are you (or anyone else?) at doing this? I've tried to do the same, but I still have two leapfrog products (gifts), a keyboard (which I like), sit and spin (which I asked for and received as a gift, but had no idea that it lights up and plays music), and a fair number of other little gadgets, mostly as gifts. And at my in-law's, *everything* makes tons of noise, all from toys that they bought at garage sales and the like. I've not avoided them to the same degree that I've avoided, for example, violent toys. But I've tried to minimize them and have not had a ton of success. Others? (And I've not decided on the LeapThing yet, btw. I'm still hoping to read some more messages, and perhaps look at the books, as someone here suggested.) P. Tierney |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
LeapPad/LeapFrog thoughts wanted
In article ,
"Cheryl M. \(ChatBrat\)" wrote: "P. Tierney" wrote in message news:1c8Pa.24540$N7.2778@sccrnsc03... Any thoughts, comments, suggestions, etc.? I know little about these beyond reading some reviews and seeing them briefly in the stores. I was hoping to get some input from those who are more experienced. If I'm way off, in your view, go ahead and say it, and I won't be offended. Thanks. ;-) P. Tierney Personally, I wouldn't own one/will not own one for our daughter. I am very much against anything that replaces parent/child reading time. As for the imagination squelching debate, the jury is still out on that one. When it comes to reading, nothing beats a big arm chair and a cuddly kid/parent combo imo. theother Cheryl You are assuming that the machine is always used to REPLACE parent/child reading time. While some families might use it that way, I suspect most use it as an additional activity. After all, you wouldn't insist that they never read or look at a book by themselves because parent/child reading time is important! It's just a tool, capable of being used well. meh -- Children won't care how much you know until they know how much you care |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
LeapPad/LeapFrog thoughts wanted
"Nan" wrote in message I honestly don't see how a LeapPad would "replace" parent/child reading time. If a parent still spends a good amount of time reading, the LeapPad is simply an additional tool, or toy. Nan I agree. My daughter still gets a ton of parent/child reading time. The LeapPad is just something she can do while I'm busy with her sisters or making dinner or when she's craving alone time. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Electroinic Toys (was LeapPad/LeapFrog thoughts wanted)
In article OmgPa.23122$OZ2.4100@rwcrnsc54,
"P. Tierney" wrote: "Nan" wrote: Fwiw, I do tend to agree that not all toys need to be electronic, nor do they need to be touted as "educational", for that matter. And I tend to avoid electronic toys like the plague, in favor of the more traditional type. How successful are you (or anyone else?) at doing this? I've tried to do the same, but I still have two leapfrog products (gifts), a keyboard (which I like), sit and spin (which I asked for and received as a gift, but had no idea that it lights up and plays music), and a fair number of other little gadgets, mostly as gifts. And at my in-law's, *everything* makes tons of noise, all from toys that they bought at garage sales and the like. I've not avoided them to the same degree that I've avoided, for example, violent toys. But I've tried to minimize them and have not had a ton of success. Others? (And I've not decided on the LeapThing yet, btw. I'm still hoping to read some more messages, and perhaps look at the books, as someone here suggested.) P. Tierney Until my kids were close to their teens, I did pretty well. Sometimes, I'd get frustrated to see some toy or game that I'd really liked that had been "turned" electronic. I can remember a few Christmases being delighted to realize that not one single gift required plugging in or batteries! On the other hand, there are some electronic things that I like and have gone out of my way to get, mostly in the music category (stereos, personal CD players) and some games (Simon Says). In fact, now, between the portable CD players and the PDAs in the house, I find I have to keep double and triple A batteries in the house. meh -- Children won't care how much you know until they know how much you care |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|