Incorrect wording on child support order entered by my ex's lawyer

The court did not rule support ended at 18, the court ruled in our older
daughter that support continued until she graduated. Support for our
younger child was never an issue however his attorney submitted papers
changing her existing support order to reading her support ended at 18.
There is no statue of limitations in the case of a clerical error as
proven by my attorney during the hearing to vacate the incorrect order.

The court did not rule support ended at 18, the court ruled in our older
daughter that support continued until she graduated. Support for our
younger child was never an issue however his attorney submitted papers
changing her existing support order to reading her support ended at 18.
There is no statue of limitations in the case of a clerical error as
proven by my attorney during the hearing to vacate the incorrect order.

The court did not rule support ended at 18, the court ruled in our older
daughter that support continued until she graduated. Support for our
younger child was never an issue however his attorney submitted papers
changing her existing support order to reading her support ended at 18.
There is no statue of limitations in the case of a clerical error as
proven by my attorney during the hearing to vacate the incorrect order.

I agree that finding coming to an agreement prior to incurring major court
cost would have been the way to go, the problem there lies in the fact
that he was completely unwilling to compromise what so ever. Any contact
from me just seems anger him beyond belief. I also agree that the order
should have been read but the fact is, I never received a copy nor did my
attorney. I believed that what I heard in court was what was being
submitted and had no reason to question to the contrary. I have since
learned my lesson.
Prior to going to court I did try to reason with him, asking him to just
pay for the remaining 7 months, at which he yelled at me saying I was
threatening him, he said he didn't owe me anything and it was "Over" as he
put it. Due to the fact that I left him, he was and never will be willing
to come to any compromise and as he stated to my older daughter, he will
do everything in he can to break me financially.

I agree that finding coming to an agreement prior to incurring major court
cost would have been the way to go, the problem there lies in the fact
that he was completely unwilling to compromise what so ever. Any contact
from me just seems anger him beyond belief. I also agree that the order
should have been read but the fact is, I never received a copy nor did my
attorney. I believed that what I heard in court was what was being
submitted and had no reason to question to the contrary. I have since
learned my lesson.
Prior to going to court I did try to reason with him, asking him to just
pay for the remaining 7 months, at which he yelled at me saying I was
threatening him, he said he didn't owe me anything and it was "Over" as he
put it. Due to the fact that I left him, he was and never will be willing
to come to any compromise and as he stated to my older daughter, he will
do everything in he can to break me financially.

I agree that finding coming to an agreement prior to incurring major court
cost would have been the way to go, the problem there lies in the fact
that he was completely unwilling to compromise what so ever. Any contact
from me just seems anger him beyond belief. I also agree that the order
should have been read but the fact is, I never received a copy nor did my
attorney. I believed that what I heard in court was what was being
submitted and had no reason to question to the contrary. I have since
learned my lesson.
Prior to going to court I did try to reason with him, asking him to just
pay for the remaining 7 months, at which he yelled at me saying I was
threatening him, he said he didn't owe me anything and it was "Over" as he
put it. Due to the fact that I left him, he was and never will be willing
to come to any compromise and as he stated to my older daughter, he will
do everything in he can to break me financially.

I agree that finding coming to an agreement prior to incurring major court
cost would have been the way to go, the problem there lies in the fact
that he was completely unwilling to compromise what so ever. Any contact
from me just seems anger him beyond belief. I also agree that the order
should have been read but the fact is, I never received a copy nor did my
attorney. I believed that what I heard in court was what was being
submitted and had no reason to question to the contrary. I have since
learned my lesson.
Prior to going to court I did try to reason with him, asking him to just
pay for the remaining 7 months, at which he yelled at me saying I was
threatening him, he said he didn't owe me anything and it was "Over" as he
put it. Due to the fact that I left him, he was and never will be willing
to come to any compromise and as he stated to my older daughter, he will
do everything in he can to break me financially.

After reading the incorrect filed support order, I believe that it was
entered months after my older daughter had graduated. Its possible it was
an order modifing the support to reflect only 1 child. That is when I
believe the wording actually got changed. In my mind I have no doubt that
he knew from the day that order was entered that it was incorrect possible
even going so far as to plan it so he would be able to claim support
ended, releasing him of any obligations for post secondary support.

After reading the incorrect filed support order, I believe that it was
entered months after my older daughter had graduated. Its possible it was
an order modifing the support to reflect only 1 child. That is when I
believe the wording actually got changed. In my mind I have no doubt that
he knew from the day that order was entered that it was incorrect possible
even going so far as to plan it so he would be able to claim support
ended, releasing him of any obligations for post secondary support.

After reading the incorrect filed support order, I believe that it was
entered months after my older daughter had graduated. Its possible it was
an order modifing the support to reflect only 1 child. That is when I
believe the wording actually got changed. In my mind I have no doubt that
he knew from the day that order was entered that it was incorrect possible
even going so far as to plan it so he would be able to claim support
ended, releasing him of any obligations for post secondary support.