If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
The right to abandon your child (aka - Roe v. Wade for Men)
"tonita" wrote in consequences. Don't have sex with someone you wouldn't want to become a parent with. Ever hear of Beer? If only we could all live in a perfect world and be as smart as you! So is it right to sentence a man to death if is can't pay the extortionate CS rates? |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
The right to abandon your child (aka - Roe v. Wade for Men)
"DB" wrote in message . net... "tonita" wrote in consequences. Don't have sex with someone you wouldn't want to become a parent with. Ever hear of Beer? If only we could all live in a perfect world and be as smart as you! So is it right to sentence a man to death if is can't pay the extortionate CS rates? Responsible people don't drink so much beer that they have irresponsible sex. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
The right to abandon your child (aka - Roe v. Wade for Men)
I think we're missing the point of this. What is being asked of the
court is a man who had no interest in fathering and parenting a child was duped by a woman who is forcing this man into parenting a child via child support. The woman named in the suit had a choice; She could have aborted the pregnancy, put the child up for adoption, or in this case, kept the baby. The man however, had no choice. He was ordered by the court to parent the child via child support. This, according to the suit, is unconstitutional. I agree with this argument. The other thoughts or opinions that have been discussed so far here are irrelevant. If the woman has a choice, so should the man |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
The right to abandon your child (aka - Roe v. Wade for Men)
R said
I think we're missing the point of this. What is being asked of the court is a man who had no interest in fathering and parenting a child was duped by a woman who is forcing this man into parenting a child via child support. The woman named in the suit had a choice; She could have aborted the pregnancy, put the child up for adoption, or in this case, kept the baby. The man however, had no choice. He was ordered by the court to parent the child via child support. This, according to the suit, is unconstitutional. I agree with this argument. The other thoughts or opinions that have been discussed so far here are irrelevant. If the woman has a choice, so should the man Seems to me that the man made a choice as well - women don't generally become pregnant all by themselves. Casey |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
The right to abandon your child (aka - Roe v. Wade for Men)
"R" wrote in message oups.com... I think we're missing the point of this. What is being asked of the court is a man who had no interest in fathering and parenting a child was duped by a woman who is forcing this man into parenting a child via child support. Paying "child support" says NOTHING about parenting any child. The woman named in the suit had a choice; She could have aborted the pregnancy, put the child up for adoption, or in this case, kept the baby. The man however, had no choice. He was ordered by the court to parent the child via child support. This, according to the suit, is unconstitutional. I agree with this argument. The other thoughts or opinions that have been discussed so far here are irrelevant. If the woman has a choice, so should the man Not only is she in the driver's seat when it comes to post-conception choice for BOTH of them, but she is also in the driver's seat when it comes to who gets to spend BOTH their incomes. Sounds fair to me. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
The right to abandon your child (aka - Roe v. Wade for Men)
R wrote: I think we're missing the point of this. What is being asked of the court is a man who had no interest in fathering and parenting a child was duped by a woman who is forcing this man into parenting a child via child support. The woman named in the suit had a choice; She could have aborted the pregnancy, put the child up for adoption, or in this case, kept the baby. The man however, had no choice. He was ordered by the court to parent the child via child support. This, according to the suit, is unconstitutional. I agree with this argument. The other thoughts or opinions that have been discussed so far here are irrelevant. If the woman has a choice, so should the man I agree with R here. If the woman does have a choice.. then so should the man. However the only large problem I can see here is that ROE vs WADE was never ment to be used as the ability to force men in CS. R vs W was never meant to be anything more then declaring that women have the right to choose for themselves if an operation can be conducted on them. It has nothing to do with Parental rights... It has nothing to do deciding paternity ect.. all the way down the line. So I applaud the efforts of such a case. However I don't think it will honestly have much of an effect as the Courts will probably come up with a ruling that will clarify such things. And that stuff like CS has be decided in the Legislature, not the courts. To me the only way we can protect my fellow men from such an unfair thing at this juncture in the game is education. Start teaching our men from an early age. Drill it into them that these women are evil, and want something from you. And we as men need to protect our sperm like it's a rare comdity. SpiderHam77 |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
The right to abandon your child (aka - Roe v. Wade for Men)
"Casey" wrote in message news:wGEQf.53077$Dh.45044@dukeread04... R said I think we're missing the point of this. What is being asked of the court is a man who had no interest in fathering and parenting a child was duped by a woman who is forcing this man into parenting a child via child support. The woman named in the suit had a choice; She could have aborted the pregnancy, put the child up for adoption, or in this case, kept the baby. The man however, had no choice. He was ordered by the court to parent the child via child support. This, according to the suit, is unconstitutional. I agree with this argument. The other thoughts or opinions that have been discussed so far here are irrelevant. If the woman has a choice, so should the man Seems to me that the man made a choice as well - women don't generally become pregnant all by themselves. Casey It is stated in this case that the man was told the women he was banging couldn't get pregnant. So he made a choice to have sex with someone he couldn't get knocked up. A pretty good choice, to bad it back fired. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
The right to abandon your child (aka - Roe v. Wade for Men)
Seems to me that the man made a choice as well - women don't generally
become pregnant all by themselves. THat's true but, beyond the scope of this discussion AND this suit as well. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
The right to abandon your child (aka - Roe v. Wade for Men)
"Joy" ) spouts misandry:
"DB" wrote in message . net... "tonita" wrote in consequences. Don't have sex with someone you wouldn't want to become a parent with. Ever hear of Beer? If only we could all live in a perfect world and be as smart as you! So is it right to sentence a man to death if is can't pay the extortionate CS rates? Responsible people don't drink so much beer that they have irresponsible sex. Responsible people make sure that they have a *willing* co-parent, *before* whelping a sprog. Thus, by *your* standard, ALL single-by-CHOICE mommies are unfit. Thanks for making that fact clear ! Andre |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
The right to abandon your child (aka - Roe v. Wade for Men)
Casey ) demands special rights for women:
R said I think we're missing the point of this. What is being asked of the court is a man who had no interest in fathering and parenting a child was duped by a woman who is forcing this man into parenting a child via child support. The woman named in the suit had a choice; She could have aborted the pregnancy, put the child up for adoption, or in this case, kept the baby. The man however, had no choice. He was ordered by the court to parent the child via child support. This, according to the suit, is unconstitutional. I agree with this argument. The other thoughts or opinions that have been discussed so far here are irrelevant. If the woman has a choice, so should the man. Exactly right, R. Rights for all, not just right for those with a uterus... Seems to me that the man made a choice as well - women don't generally become pregnant all by themselves. That is exactly the case *against* ALL women's-only POST-coital choices. Please notify your local legislative representatives that, as you oppose post coital choice for men, you also oppose ALL post coital choices for women. Petard. Hoist. You. laughs " Men are people who deserve equal rights, too ? " gasped the annoyed and incredulous WomenFirster. Rights for all, or rights for none. All else is special interest group bigotry. Andre |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NFJA Position Statement: Child Support Enforcement Funding | Dusty | Child Support | 0 | March 2nd 06 12:49 AM |
AL: Court issues history-making decision in child custody case | Dusty | Child Support | 1 | August 3rd 05 01:07 AM |
Child Support Policy and the Welfare of Women and Children | Dusty | Child Support | 0 | May 13th 04 12:46 AM |
Kids should work. | ChrisScaife | Foster Parents | 16 | December 7th 03 04:27 AM |
So much for the claims about Sweden | Kane | Spanking | 10 | November 5th 03 06:31 AM |