If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Judge says bureaucracy is no excuse
Judge says bureaucracy is no excuse
http://www.journalstar.com/articles/...5273842571.txt By Margaret Reist/Lincoln Journal Star Here's one for the little guy: A judge has ordered the state Health and Human Services System to pay $819 in attorneys fees and chastised officials for allowing a problem with child support payments to end up in court. "The fact that (Health and Human Services) is a big organization is no excuse for it not doing what it was ordered to do by the court in the first place," Lancaster County District Judge Karen Flowers said in a decision signed Tuesday. The order stems from eight cases, all involving men who owe child support and are on disability. In each case, a portion of their disability checks was sent directly to their child or children's custodial parents. The payments - more than $1,000 in some cases - were supposed to be credited to their child support accounts. But they weren't, so the men didn't receive credit for making the payments - until their attorney took the department to court. Attorney Susan Ugai, who contracts with the Lancaster County public defender's office to represent the men, contacted HHS in April in an effort to solve the problem without litigation, Flowers' order says. At the request of department, Ugai sent copies of the orders to officials at HHS, even though they had been served with copies of the order requiring the credit. State officials said they were unsure exactly what action needed to be taken and Ugai again e-mailed them, explaining precisely what needed to be done, according to Flowers' order. Five months later, when the credits still hadn't been applied to her clients' accounts, she filed proceedings in court, asking the HHS to show why it shouldn't be found in contempt. "It was only after the contempt action was filed that credits were ultimately made," Flowers said. HHS spokeswoman Leah Bucco-White said the department was surprised by the ruling and was considering an appeal. Lawyers reviewing the ruling believe there is a basis for an appeal, Bucco-White said, but she declined to be more specific. In December 2001, the state took over processing child support from Nebraska's 93 counties. The system has been beset with problems since shortly after the changeover. Two years ago, a child support administrator was found in contempt for a record-keeping issue, although the finding was lifted less than two weeks later when a judge concluded the administrator had made a good-faith effort to fix the glitch that caused the problem. Ugai said she understood the department handled thousands of records but was frustrated by HHS officials' unresponsiveness. Not correcting the record could mean the men's wages or tax returns could be garnisheed, although that has not happened in these cases, she said. "I don't think they understand how dramatically they can affect someone's lives when they don't correct the record," Ugai said. Flowers ordered the department to pay the Lancaster County public defender's office $65 an hour for the time spent litigating the issue. The judge concluded Ugai made reasonable attempts to solve the problem without going to court but HHS chose not to give the cases reasonable attention. "The defendants should not have had to resort to litigation," Flowers said. -- "The most terrifying words in the English language a I'm from the government and I'm here to help." --- Ronald Reagan |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Hey...my current stomping grounds and a judge I am way familiar with.
"Dusty" wrote in message ... | Judge says bureaucracy is no excuse | | http://www.journalstar.com/articles/...5273842571.txt | By Margaret Reist/Lincoln Journal Star | | Here's one for the little guy: A judge has ordered the state Health and | Human Services System to pay $819 in attorneys fees and chastised officials | for allowing a problem with child support payments to end up in court. | | | | | "The fact that (Health and Human Services) is a big organization is no | excuse for it not doing what it was ordered to do by the court in the first | place," Lancaster County District Judge Karen Flowers said in a decision | signed Tuesday. | | The order stems from eight cases, all involving men who owe child support | and are on disability. In each case, a portion of their disability checks | was sent directly to their child or children's custodial parents. The | payments - more than $1,000 in some cases - were supposed to be credited to | their child support accounts. | | But they weren't, so the men didn't receive credit for making the payments - | until their attorney took the department to court. | | Attorney Susan Ugai, who contracts with the Lancaster County public | defender's office to represent the men, contacted HHS in April in an effort | to solve the problem without litigation, Flowers' order says. | | At the request of department, Ugai sent copies of the orders to officials at | HHS, even though they had been served with copies of the order requiring the | credit. | | State officials said they were unsure exactly what action needed to be taken | and Ugai again e-mailed them, explaining precisely what needed to be done, | according to Flowers' order. | | Five months later, when the credits still hadn't been applied to her | clients' accounts, she filed proceedings in court, asking the HHS to show | why it shouldn't be found in contempt. | | "It was only after the contempt action was filed that credits were | ultimately made," Flowers said. | | HHS spokeswoman Leah Bucco-White said the department was surprised by the | ruling and was considering an appeal. | | Lawyers reviewing the ruling believe there is a basis for an appeal, | Bucco-White said, but she declined to be more specific. | | In December 2001, the state took over processing child support from | Nebraska's 93 counties. The system has been beset with problems since | shortly after the changeover. | | Two years ago, a child support administrator was found in contempt for a | record-keeping issue, although the finding was lifted less than two weeks | later when a judge concluded the administrator had made a good-faith effort | to fix the glitch that caused the problem. | | Ugai said she understood the department handled thousands of records but was | frustrated by HHS officials' unresponsiveness. | | Not correcting the record could mean the men's wages or tax returns could be | garnisheed, although that has not happened in these cases, she said. | | "I don't think they understand how dramatically they can affect someone's | lives when they don't correct the record," Ugai said. | | Flowers ordered the department to pay the Lancaster County public defender's | office $65 an hour for the time spent litigating the issue. | | The judge concluded Ugai made reasonable attempts to solve the problem | without going to court but HHS chose not to give the cases reasonable | attention. | | "The defendants should not have had to resort to litigation," Flowers said. | | | -- | "The most terrifying words in the English language a | I'm from the government and I'm here to help." | --- Ronald Reagan | | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Judge: Child's Removal Was Unnecessary | wexwimpy | Foster Parents | 2 | August 6th 04 09:20 PM |
DCF wrkrs & perjury Judge writes DCF wrong. U trust them? | Fern5827 | Spanking | 0 | August 6th 04 03:04 PM |
Perhaps the judge wasn't paying attention in your case! | Kenneth S. | Child Support | 12 | June 29th 04 06:04 AM |
A judge in Britain finds out for himself | Kenneth S. | Child Support | 24 | May 20th 04 01:42 AM |
MA SJC Upholds Cover-Up of Due Process Violations by Family Court Judge | Dusty | Child Support | 4 | February 20th 04 04:34 PM |