If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Has the American Cancer Society became the sales arm of the sunscreen industry
Recent studies have linked lack of Vitamin d to an increase risk of
several cancers. From "Sweeping cancer edit take vitamin d daily" From Friday's Globe and Mail June 8, 2007 at 12:00 AM EDT TORONTO - The Canadian Cancer Society plans to announce Friday that all adults should start taking vitamin D, coinciding with the release of a groundbreaking U.S. study indicating the supplement cuts the risk of cancer by an astounding 60 per cent. The move is believed to be the first time a major public-health organization has endorsed daily use of the sunshine vitamin as a cancer-prevention therapy for an entire population. It follows a flurry of research suggesting the low-cost vitamin confers a high degree of protection against a wide variety of cancers. There are also striking study results suggesting that people who develop the disease often have low blood levels of vitamin D. The American Cancer Society declined to follow and has not raised the amount of vitamin d it recommend. Can you trust the American Cancer Society ? I recent story in the New York times raises questions from .... " Doctors Bulk at Cancer Ad ,Citing Lack of Evidence" New Your Times July 10 2007 " The young woman in the American Cancer Society advertisement holds up a photograph of a smiling blonde. "My sister accidentally killed herself. She died of skin cancer," reads the headline. The public service announcement, financed by the sunscreen maker Neutrogena, is running in 15 women's magazines this summer. It warns readers that "left unchecked, skin cancer can be fatal," and urges them to "use sunscreen, cover up and watch for skin changes." The woman in the picture is a model, not a skin cancer victim. And the advertisement's implicit message - that those who die of skin cancer have themselves to blame - has provoked a sharp response from some public-health doctors, who say the evidence simply does not support it." It appears that evidence is not the only reason the ACS provides information The article notes that almost all skin cancer deaths are caused " Almost all of those deaths are from melanoma, which makes up only 6 percent of all skin-cancer cases." The article notes that some studies suggest that sun exposure improves survival in melanoma and that " Until that is made clear, many doctors say, it is premature to suggest that people are endangering their lives by failing to use sunscreen. " As for the effect of sunscreens the story notes..."We do have some pretty good evidence that sunscreen will reduce your risk of the less lethal forms of skin cancer," Dr. Kramer added. "There's very little evidence that sunscreens protect you against melanoma, yet you often hear that as the dominant message." Dr. Kramer works at the NIH . What was the response of the ACS? Dr. J. Leonard Lichtenfeld, deputy chief medical officer at the American Cancer Society, acknowledges that the advertisement is aggressive. "We have taken some license in taking that message and using it the way we've used it," he said, "because that's the way to get the message to our target audience." Has the ACS just become a sales rep for the highest bidder read the full Times story http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/10/he...th&oref=slogin and ask yourself are these guys looking out for me? Thanks Vince |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Has the American Cancer Society became the sales arm of the sunscreenindustry
bigvince wrote:
Recent studies have linked lack of Vitamin d to an increase risk of several cancers. From "Sweeping cancer edit take vitamin d daily" From Friday's Globe and Mail June 8, 2007 at 12:00 AM EDT TORONTO - The Canadian Cancer Society plans to announce Friday that all adults should start taking vitamin D, coinciding with the release of a groundbreaking U.S. study indicating the supplement cuts the risk of cancer by an astounding 60 per cent. For such a ground breaking study, I have not heard much press about it. For some cancers or all cancers, I wonder. I suspect it cuts down the risk of some cancers, but only for people who don't get enough vitamin D already (or make it themselves). The move is believed to be the first time a major public-health organization has endorsed daily use of the sunshine vitamin as a cancer-prevention therapy for an entire population. It follows a flurry of research suggesting the low-cost vitamin confers a high degree of protection against a wide variety of cancers. There are also striking study results suggesting that people who develop the disease often have low blood levels of vitamin D. The American Cancer Society declined to follow and has not raised the amount of vitamin d it recommend. Can you trust the American Cancer Society ? I recent story in the New York times raises questions from .... " Doctors Bulk at Cancer Ad ,Citing Lack of Evidence" New Your Times July 10 2007 " The young woman in the American Cancer Society advertisement holds up a photograph of a smiling blonde. "My sister accidentally killed herself. She died of skin cancer," reads the headline. Wow! The original article was from June 8, 2007, but they cite a July 10, 2007. The author must be good at predicting things. The public service announcement, financed by the sunscreen maker Neutrogena, is running in 15 women's magazines this summer. It warns readers that "left unchecked, skin cancer can be fatal," and urges them to "use sunscreen, cover up and watch for skin changes." The woman in the picture is a model, not a skin cancer victim. And the advertisement's implicit message - that those who die of skin cancer have themselves to blame - has provoked a sharp response from some public-health doctors, who say the evidence simply does not support it." It appears that evidence is not the only reason the ACS provides information The article notes that almost all skin cancer deaths are caused " Almost all of those deaths are from melanoma, which makes up only 6 percent of all skin-cancer cases." The article notes that some studies suggest that sun exposure improves survival in melanoma and that " Until that is made clear, many doctors say, it is premature to suggest that people are endangering their lives by failing to use sunscreen. " As for the effect of sunscreens the story notes..."We do have some pretty good evidence that sunscreen will reduce your risk of the less lethal forms of skin cancer," Dr. Kramer added. "There's very little evidence that sunscreens protect you against melanoma, yet you often hear that as the dominant message." Dr. Kramer works at the NIH . What was the response of the ACS? Dr. J. Leonard Lichtenfeld, deputy chief medical officer at the American Cancer Society, acknowledges that the advertisement is aggressive. "We have taken some license in taking that message and using it the way we've used it," he said, "because that's the way to get the message to our target audience." Has the ACS just become a sales rep for the highest bidder read the full Times story http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/10/he...th&oref=slogin and ask yourself are these guys looking out for me? Thanks Vince I understand your concerns about the ACS. I don't know how valid they are in real life, though. I think the ACS can continue to advertise for the sunscreen people while, at the same time, recommend vit D. Sort of how doctors recommend eating a healthy diet to prevent heart disease, but, at the same time recommend excercise. Jeff Jeff |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Has the American Cancer Society became the sales arm of the sunscreen industry
Wow! The original article was from June 8, 2007, but they cite a July
10, 2007. The author must be good at predicting things. Actually those in the know had read http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servl...andHealth/home Vitamin D casts cancer prevention in new light and new the results of the study before it went to press. Those in the know also have read studies showing impressive risk reductions with vitamin d in relation to breast, prostate, colon cancers so I think those who are gobsmacked by this research simply haven't been keeping in touch with Vitamin d /cancer research. WAKE UP WAKE UP Pay attention. Remember for eacth person who dies from Skin Cancer over 30 will die from those cancers that thrive in Vitamin D depleted bodies. What you have to realise is that sunlight primes the T cells in your skin to actually fight cancer, so a LITTLE sun exposure (without that dratted cancer inducing sunscreen) is part of your skins anti cancer protection programme. http://www.sciencentral.com/articles...e_id=218392932 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Has the American Cancer Society became the sales arm of the sunscreen industry
On Jul 12, 11:43 am, Jeff wrote:
bigvince wrote: Recent studies have linked lack of Vitamin d to an increase risk of several cancers. From "Sweeping cancer edit take vitamin d daily" From Friday's Globe and Mail June 8, 2007 at 12:00 AM EDT TORONTO - The Canadian Cancer Society plans to announce Friday that all adults should start taking vitamin D, coinciding with the release of a groundbreaking U.S. study indicating the supplement cuts the risk of cancer by an astounding 60 per cent. For such a ground breaking study, I have not heard much press about it. For some cancers or all cancers, I wonder. I suspect it cuts down the risk of some cancers, but only for people who don't get enough vitamin D already (or make it themselves). The move is believed to be the first time a major public-health organization has endorsed daily use of the sunshine vitamin as a cancer-prevention therapy for an entire population. It follows a flurry of research suggesting the low-cost vitamin confers a high degree of protection against a wide variety of cancers. There are also striking study results suggesting that people who develop the disease often have low blood levels of vitamin D. The American Cancer Society declined to follow and has not raised the amount of vitamin d it recommend. Can you trust the American Cancer Society ? I recent story in the New York times raises questions from .... " Doctors Bulk at Cancer Ad ,Citing Lack of Evidence" New Your Times July 10 2007 " The young woman in the American Cancer Society advertisement holds up a photograph of a smiling blonde. "My sister accidentally killed herself. She died of skin cancer," reads the headline. Wow! The original article was from June 8, 2007, but they cite a July 10, 2007. The author must be good at predicting things. Jeff it is two separate articles the first .... " Sweeping cancer edict: take vitamin D daily "; Globe and Mail, 7/8/07 " http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servl...andHealth/home TORONTO - The Canadian Cancer Society plans to announce Friday that all adults should start taking vitamin D, coinciding with the release of a groundbreaking U.S. study indicating the supplement cuts the risk of cancer by an astounding 60 per cent. The move is believed to be the first time a major public-health organization has endorsed daily use of the sunshine vitamin as a cancer-prevention therapy for an entire population. It follows a flurry of research suggesting the low-cost vitamin confers a high degree of protection against a wide variety of cancers. There are also striking study results suggesting that people who develop the disease often have low blood levels of vitamin D. Although it is not known how many of the approximately 160,000 cancer cases diagnosed annually in Canada might be avoided by regular popping of a vitamin D pill, the cancer society said these findings are so compelling it felt it had to start urging people to act on them......full story at link . Details the study and the quick action taken by the Canadian Cancer Society as a result.The ACS did not act on this information " Doctors Bulk at Cancer Ad ,Citing Lack of Evidence" New Your Times July 10 2007 " The young woman in the American Cancer Society advertisement holds up a photograph of a smiling blonde. "My sister accidentally killed herself. She died of skin cancer," reads the headline. The public service announcement, financed by the sunscreen maker Neutrogena, is running in 15 women's magazines this summer. It warns readers that "left unchecked, skin cancer can be fatal," and urges them to "use sunscreen, cover up and watch for skin changes." The woman in the picture is a model, not a skin cancer victim. And the advertisement's implicit message - that those who die of skin cancer have themselves to blame - has provoked a sharp response from some public-health doctors, who say the evidence simply does not support it." It appears that evidence is not the only reason the ACS provides information The article notes that almost all skin cancer deaths are caused " Almost all of those deaths are from melanoma, which makes up only 6 percent of all skin-cancer cases." The article notes that some studies suggest that sun exposure improves survival in melanoma and that " Until that is made clear, many doctors say, it is premature to suggest that people are endangering their lives by failing to use sunscreen. " As for the effect of sunscreens the story notes..."We do have some pretty good evidence that sunscreen will reduce your risk of the less lethal forms of skin cancer," Dr. Kramer added. "There's very little evidence that sunscreens protect you against melanoma, yet you often hear that as the dominant message." Dr. Kramer works at the NIH . What was the response of the ACS? Dr. J. Leonard Lichtenfeld, deputy chief medical officer at the American Cancer Society, acknowledges that the advertisement is aggressive. "We have taken some license in taking that message and using it the way we've used it," he said, "because that's the way to get the message to our target audience." Has the ACS just become a sales rep for the highest bidder read the full Times story http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/10/he...th&oref=slogin and ask yourself are these guys looking out for me? Thanks Vince Has the ACS just become a sales rep for the highest bidder read the full Times story http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/10/he...=1&th&emc=th&o... and ask yourself are these guys looking out for me? Thanks Vince I understand your concerns about the ACS. I don't know how valid they are in real life, though. I think the ACS can continue to advertise for the sunscreen people while, at the same time, recommend vit D. Sort of how doctors recommend eating a healthy diet to prevent heart disease, but, at the same time recommend excercise. Jeff you can't as the ad is paid for and the message is incompatible with the facts as the ad claims that sunscreens protect against melanoma but as the story noted "Dr. Kramer added. "There's very little evidence that sunscreens protect you against melanoma, yet you often hear that as the dominant message." Dr. Kramer works at the NIH . What was the response of the ACS? "and the head of the ACS said ...." Dr. J. Leonard Lichtenfeld, deputy chief medical officer at the American Cancer Society, acknowledges that the advertisement is aggressive. "We have taken some license in taking that message and using it the way we've used it," In other words we'll say what we want and that could cause health problems for those who limit sun exposure because as the story notes " " Almost all of those deaths are from melanoma, which makes up only 6 percent of all skin-cancer cases." The article notes that some studies suggest that sun exposure improves survival in melanoma and that " Until that is made clear, many doctors say, it is premature to suggest that people are endangering their lives by failing to use sunscreen. " Jeff your argument is with the honest doctors who complained about this practice of " "We have taken some license in taking that message and using it the way we've used it," he said, "because that's the way to get the message to our target audience." Ad the checks just role on in. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Has the American Cancer Society became the sales arm of the sunscreenindustry
bigvince wrote:
On Jul 12, 11:43 am, Jeff wrote: bigvince wrote: Recent studies have linked lack of Vitamin d to an increase risk of several cancers. From "Sweeping cancer edit take vitamin d daily" From Friday's Globe and Mail June 8, 2007 at 12:00 AM EDT TORONTO - The Canadian Cancer Society plans to announce Friday that all adults should start taking vitamin D, coinciding with the release of a groundbreaking U.S. study indicating the supplement cuts the risk of cancer by an astounding 60 per cent. For such a ground breaking study, I have not heard much press about it. For some cancers or all cancers, I wonder. I suspect it cuts down the risk of some cancers, but only for people who don't get enough vitamin D already (or make it themselves). The move is believed to be the first time a major public-health organization has endorsed daily use of the sunshine vitamin as a cancer-prevention therapy for an entire population. It follows a flurry of research suggesting the low-cost vitamin confers a high degree of protection against a wide variety of cancers. There are also striking study results suggesting that people who develop the disease often have low blood levels of vitamin D. The American Cancer Society declined to follow and has not raised the amount of vitamin d it recommend. Can you trust the American Cancer Society ? I recent story in the New York times raises questions from .... " Doctors Bulk at Cancer Ad ,Citing Lack of Evidence" New Your Times July 10 2007 " The young woman in the American Cancer Society advertisement holds up a photograph of a smiling blonde. "My sister accidentally killed herself. She died of skin cancer," reads the headline. Wow! The original article was from June 8, 2007, but they cite a July 10, 2007. The author must be good at predicting things. Jeff it is two separate articles the first .... " Sweeping cancer edict: take vitamin D daily "; Globe and Mail, 7/8/07 " http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servl...andHealth/home TORONTO - The Canadian Cancer Society plans to announce Friday that all adults should start taking vitamin D, coinciding with the release of a groundbreaking U.S. study indicating the supplement cuts the risk of cancer by an astounding 60 per cent. The move is believed to be the first time a major public-health organization has endorsed daily use of the sunshine vitamin as a cancer-prevention therapy for an entire population. It follows a flurry of research suggesting the low-cost vitamin confers a high degree of protection against a wide variety of cancers. There are also striking study results suggesting that people who develop the disease often have low blood levels of vitamin D. Although it is not known how many of the approximately 160,000 cancer cases diagnosed annually in Canada might be avoided by regular popping of a vitamin D pill, the cancer society said these findings are so compelling it felt it had to start urging people to act on them......full story at link . Details the study and the quick action taken by the Canadian Cancer Society as a result.The ACS did not act on this information " Doctors Bulk at Cancer Ad ,Citing Lack of Evidence" New Your Times July 10 2007 " The young woman in the American Cancer Society advertisement holds up a photograph of a smiling blonde. "My sister accidentally killed herself. She died of skin cancer," reads the headline. The public service announcement, financed by the sunscreen maker Neutrogena, is running in 15 women's magazines this summer. It warns readers that "left unchecked, skin cancer can be fatal," and urges them to "use sunscreen, cover up and watch for skin changes." The woman in the picture is a model, not a skin cancer victim. And the advertisement's implicit message - that those who die of skin cancer have themselves to blame - has provoked a sharp response from some public-health doctors, who say the evidence simply does not support it." It appears that evidence is not the only reason the ACS provides information The article notes that almost all skin cancer deaths are caused " Almost all of those deaths are from melanoma, which makes up only 6 percent of all skin-cancer cases." The article notes that some studies suggest that sun exposure improves survival in melanoma and that " Until that is made clear, many doctors say, it is premature to suggest that people are endangering their lives by failing to use sunscreen. " As for the effect of sunscreens the story notes..."We do have some pretty good evidence that sunscreen will reduce your risk of the less lethal forms of skin cancer," Dr. Kramer added. "There's very little evidence that sunscreens protect you against melanoma, yet you often hear that as the dominant message." Dr. Kramer works at the NIH . What was the response of the ACS? Dr. J. Leonard Lichtenfeld, deputy chief medical officer at the American Cancer Society, acknowledges that the advertisement is aggressive. "We have taken some license in taking that message and using it the way we've used it," he said, "because that's the way to get the message to our target audience." Has the ACS just become a sales rep for the highest bidder read the full Times story http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/10/he...th&oref=slogin and ask yourself are these guys looking out for me? Thanks Vince Has the ACS just become a sales rep for the highest bidder read the full Times story http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/10/he...=1&th&emc=th&o... and ask yourself are these guys looking out for me? Thanks Vince I understand your concerns about the ACS. I don't know how valid they are in real life, though. I think the ACS can continue to advertise for the sunscreen people while, at the same time, recommend vit D. Sort of how doctors recommend eating a healthy diet to prevent heart disease, but, at the same time recommend excercise. Jeff you can't as the ad is paid for and the message is incompatible with the facts as the ad claims that sunscreens protect against melanoma but as the story noted "Dr. Kramer added. "There's very little evidence that sunscreens protect you against melanoma, yet you often hear that as the dominant message." Dr. Kramer works at the NIH . What was the response of the ACS? "and the head of the ACS said ...." Dr. J. Leonard Lichtenfeld, deputy chief medical officer at the American Cancer Society, acknowledges that the advertisement is aggressive. "We have taken some license in taking that message and using it the way we've used it," In other words we'll say what we want and that could cause health problems for those who limit sun exposure because as the story notes " " Almost all of those deaths are from melanoma, which makes up only 6 percent of all skin-cancer cases." The article notes that some studies suggest that sun exposure improves survival in melanoma and that " Until that is made clear, many doctors say, it is premature to suggest that people are endangering their lives by failing to use sunscreen. " Jeff your argument is with the honest doctors who complained about this practice of " "We have taken some license in taking that message and using it the way we've used it," he said, "because that's the way to get the message to our target audience." Ad the checks just role on in. Don't tell me who my argument is with. I don't have any argument with them those you call "honest doctors." Actually, the Canadian Cancer Society both recommends a little daily sun and sun screens: http://www.cancer.ca/ccs/internet/standard/0,3182,3172_1176359459__langId-en,00.html http://www.cancer.ca/ccs/internet/standard/0,3182,3172_1046449084_1049663725_langId-en,00.html Jeff |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Has the American Cancer Society became the sales arm of the sunscreen industry
On Jul 12, 8:45 pm, Jeff wrote:
Don't tell me who my argument is with. I don't have any argument with them those you call "honest doctors." Sure you do Jeff at least a disagreement. The American Cancer Society ran this ad . Source NYT........" The young woman in the American Cancer Society advertisement holds up a photograph of a smiling blonde. "My sister accidentally killed herself. She died of skin cancer," reads the headline." .......Earlier you said I think the ACS can continue to advertise for the sunscreen people while, at the same time, recommend vit D. Sort of how doctors recommend eating a healthy diet to prevent heart disease, but, at the same time recommend excercise. If you agree that a deceptive ad that even ..."Dr. J. Leonard Lichtenfeld, deputy chief medical officer at the American Cancer Society, acknowledges that the advertisement is aggressive. "We have taken some license in taking that message and using it the way we've used it," then you disagree with the good and honest doctors mentioned in the piece i.e. those mentioned in the story "has provoked a sharp response from some public-health doctors, who say the evidence simply does not support it."Jeff see the outrage is about an ad that distorts the truth for sales. Who our these good and honest doctors that you disagree with.........Doctors like.." ' And the link between melanoma and sun exposure is not straightforward. Dr. Marianne Berwick, an epidemiologist at the University of New Mexico who studies skin cancer, led a study published in The Journal of the National Cancer Institute in 2005 finding that people who had a lot of sun exposure up to the time they got a diagnosis of melanoma actually had better survival rates than those who had little sun exposure.' And ...from times story "Until that is made clear, many doctors say, it is premature to suggest that people are endangering their lives by failing to use sunscreen. "It's just not that simple," said Dr. Barry Kramer, associate director for disease prevention at the National Institutes of Health. "We do have some pretty good evidence that sunscreen will reduce your risk of the less lethal forms of skin cancer," Dr. Kramer added. "There's very little evidence that sunscreens protect you against melanoma, yet you often hear that as the dominant message." full story http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/10/he...th&oref=slogin Jeff either you agree with the Good [ all leaders in their field] and honest Doctors quoted above saying that the science not other considerations should control the info put out be the ACS or you as you have already stated feel it is alright to " "We have taken some license in taking that message and using it the way we've used it," You have stated that you agree with that view. I could not disagree more strongly. Thanks Vince |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Has the American Cancer Society became the sales arm of the sunscreenindustry
bigvince wrote:
On Jul 12, 8:45 pm, Jeff wrote: Don't tell me who my argument is with. I don't have any argument with them those you call "honest doctors." Sure you do Jeff at least a disagreement. No, no disagreement at all. ... full story http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/10/he...th&oref=slogin Jeff either you agree with the Good [ all leaders in their field] and honest Doctors quoted above saying that the science not other considerations should control the info put out be the ACS or you as you have already stated feel it is alright to " "We have taken some license in taking that message and using it the way we've used it," You have stated that you agree with that view. I could not disagree more strongly. Thanks Vince I wasn't commenting on that at all. I was merely saying that the CCS says that one should get a certain amount of sun each day, but should also wear sunscreen to prevent getting too much. You appear to have an issue with the ad. I don't care to address the issue. Jeff |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Has the American Cancer Society became the sales arm of the sunscreen industry
On Jul 12, 10:16 pm, Jeff wrote:
You appear to have an issue with the ad. I don't care to address the issue. Jeff heres the ad from "" Doctors Bulk at Cancer Ad ,Citing Lack of Evidence" New Your Times July 10 2007 " The young woman in the American Cancer Society advertisement holds up a photograph of a smiling blonde. "My sister accidentally killed herself. She died of skin cancer," Heres your previous comments ; "I think the ACS can continue to advertise for the sunscreen people while, at the same time, recommend vit D." Jeff as the Times piece noted well respected physicians objected to the misleading nature of this ad. You have all ready said you see no problem with that practice.Sort of the sales mentality which is your right . but now you try to say you do not care to address the issue.Jeff you already have .The fact is good and honest doctors have chosen to talk about the misleading nature of this ad.The ACS representative said it was alright to Take "some license ' with the facts.and you "think the ACS can continue to advertise for the sunscreen people " obviously I agree with the doctors quoted in the piece they feel that the ACS should present the truth not be a shills distorting the evidence. Thanks Vince |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Has the American Cancer Society became the sales arm of the sunscreenindustry
bigvince wrote:
On Jul 12, 10:16 pm, Jeff wrote: You appear to have an issue with the ad. I don't care to address the issue. Jeff heres the ad from "" Doctors Bulk at Cancer Ad ,Citing Lack of Evidence" New Your Times July 10 2007 " The young woman in the American Cancer Society advertisement holds up a photograph of a smiling blonde. "My sister accidentally killed herself. She died of skin cancer," Heres your previous comments ; "I think the ACS can continue to advertise for the sunscreen people while, at the same time, recommend vit D." Jeff as the Times piece noted well respected physicians objected to the misleading nature of this ad. You have all ready said you see no problem with that practice. I never said that I don't see a problem with the practice. If I were mroe interested, I would examine the issue more carefully before commenting on it. Sort of the sales mentality which is your right . but now you try to say you do not care to address the issue.Jeff you already have .The fact is good and honest doctors have chosen to talk about the misleading nature of this ad.The ACS representative said it was alright to Take "some license ' with the facts.and you "think the ACS can continue to advertise for the sunscreen people " obviously I agree with the doctors quoted in the piece they feel that the ACS should present the truth not be a shills distorting the evidence. Thanks Vince |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sunscreen found to generate harmful compounds that promote skin cancer | Jan Drew | Kids Health | 1 | August 31st 06 07:43 AM |
AMERICAN HEALTH CARE INDUSTRY IS A SCAM! | Larry H. | Kids Health | 1 | August 26th 06 12:57 AM |
The American Birth Trauma Industry | [email protected] | Kids Health | 0 | April 3rd 06 06:52 AM |
sunscreen | glunk | General | 13 | August 8th 04 06:54 PM |