If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Man walks into office and kills ex-girlfriend over child support
What probably happened in this case is that he didn't have any money 20
years ago which is why the bitch didn't go after him before, and may have only made or come into some recently. The sneaky bitch found out about it and in her greed tried to get her hands on it. But why would she need it now? The kid is grown, so obviously they survived and had the money to survive. Besides, what's a 40 yo bitch doing having a kid anyway and ruining the best years of a man's life when he should be enjoying his youth.Well one good thing about this is at least he won't have to pay the money and will have plenty to spend in prison ) wrote in message oups.com... Yeah. You read that right. He drove all the way from Arizona to Ukiah in California and shot the succubus in the head. And then he walked next door to the courthouse and surrendered. You gotta hand it to him. There's only so much abuse a man can take before reacting. And this is the kind of man that pushes back, violently. But of course, since he's the wrong gender, the politically-incorrect sex, and the abuse was done under the auspices of the law, heck, the system is what made it possible for the "remote-control" abuse to happen, he is going to suffer. Just imagine the judge's glee as he sentenced him to four life terms. When a man controls his wife's finances, its domestic violence. When a woman controls her husband's finances, its child support or alimony and it is business as usual. UKIAH, Calif.-A man convicted of killing his former girlfriend because she was trying to collect two decades' worth of child support payments was sentenced to life in prison. Howard Raff, 55, was sentenced Tuesday by a Mendocino County Superior Court judge to four life terms in prison. Raff was convicted in June of first-degree murder with three special allegations-lying in wait, murder for financial gain and using a firearm-in the shooting death of Virginia Larkin, 60. Raff said in a videotaped confession that he drove from Arizona to California to kill Larkin. He described walking into the Ukiah law office where she worked in November of last year, shooting her in the head, then turning himself in at the courthouse. He told jurors the killing was justified because Larkin was trying to bankrupt him. After dodging the court-ordered $200-per-month payments for 22 years, the debt had grown to $85,500 with interest. "It is incomprehensible to the court how a decision to kill can be motivated by court-ordered child support," Judge Ronald Brown said at the sentencing. Raff said he planned to appeal his conviction. Can you believe that? Its so terribly sad that two lives had to be wasted because of an unfair system which profits by nailing men to crosses. How many more men and women need to die before the bigwigs agree that it is time to stop whipping the slaves? Of course, the importance of men is not the same as that of women... I think one woman dying is worth 100 or 150 men. Can anyone refresh me on what the current comparable worth ratio is? The man probably made a choice - either slave away for the next two decades to pay the ever-growing amount (can you imagine what the interest on $85,500 would be?) with the court-appointed thugs making his life a living hell, with prison only a bout of unemployment away, or end it all and make a statement. This man is one of the walking wounded. But since he dared to visit harm on a member of the royal sex, he is being punished accordingly. I wonder how many life terms Clara Harris got? Or how about Mary Winkler? How about any of the numerous women who hire other men to murder their husbands? Oh wait, they are not punished at all. The same way that a white person could kill a negro and get away just a few short decades ago, women are getting away today. Raff is planning to appeal - my guess is that he planned to sacrifice himself for the greater cause of men's rights. Its incredibly hard to penetrate the lace curtain in matters like this, but I'll be waiting for more news about his plight. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Man walks into office and kills ex-girlfriend over child support
"Then he's not guilty by reason of insanity ) No, but you would be. Learn what is the difference between insanity and nonsensical, dipweed. Buzz off moron. -- Does the name Pavlov ring a bell? Aratzio - Usenet ruiner #2 |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Man walks into office and kills ex-girlfriend over child support
"Avenger" wrote "Gini" wrote "John Larkin" wrote wrote: Yeah. You read that right. He drove all the way from Arizona to Ukiah in California and shot the succubus in the head. And then he walked next door to the courthouse and surrendered. You gotta hand it to him. There's only so much abuse a man can take before reacting. And this is the kind of man that pushes back, violently. So he'll spend the rest of his life with another guy in a tiny bunk-bed prison cell, instead of being out and economizing, or even running away to Brazil and starting over there. That doesn't sound like a sensible reaction to me. == These things don't happen when the person is being "sensible." They happen when the person has lost the ability to think sensibly. Then he's not guilty by reason of insanity ) == Well, that's kind of a stretch, but it might get him a decent plea out of a lazy DA. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Man walks into office and kills ex-girlfriend over child support
"Aratzio" wrote "Avenger" wrote "Gini" wrote "John Larkin" ................................... So he'll spend the rest of his life with another guy in a tiny bunk-bed prison cell, instead of being out and economizing, or even running away to Brazil and starting over there. That doesn't sound like a sensible reaction to me. == These things don't happen when the person is being "sensible." They happen when the person has lost the ability to think sensibly. Then he's not guilty by reason of insanity ) No, but you would be. Learn what is the difference between insanity and nonsensical, dipweed. == "Dipweed?" |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Man walks into office and kills ex-girlfriend over child support
On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 22:46:06 GMT, "Avenger"
wrote: What probably happened in this case is that he didn't have any money 20 years ago which is why the bitch didn't go after him before, and may have only made or come into some recently. The sneaky bitch found out about it and in her greed tried to get her hands on it. But why would she need it now? The kid is grown, so obviously they survived and had the money to survive. Besides, what's a 40 yo bitch doing having a kid anyway and ruining the best years of a man's life when he should be enjoying his youth.Well one good thing about this is at least he won't have to pay the money and will have plenty to spend in prison ) He wouldn't pay 200 a month to help support his own child? John |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Man walks into office and kills ex-girlfriend over child support
On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 22:47:40 GMT, in the land of alt.aratzio,
"Avenger" got double secret probation for writing: "Then he's not guilty by reason of insanity ) No, but you would be. Learn what is the difference between insanity and nonsensical, dipweed. Buzz off moron. 1. Make me, cum receptacle. 2. The irony of someone with your limited intellect implying that anyone could possibly be a moron is most likely lost on you. I was hoping for more of your eloquent requests for face time. Those are some of your funnier fare. The pointless pseudo-threats. Great ****. -- Does the name Pavlov ring a bell? Aratzio - Usenet ruiner #2 |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Man walks into office and kills ex-girlfriend over child support
"John Larkin" wrote in message ... On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 22:46:06 GMT, "Avenger" wrote: What probably happened in this case is that he didn't have any money 20 years ago which is why the bitch didn't go after him before, and may have only made or come into some recently. The sneaky bitch found out about it and in her greed tried to get her hands on it. But why would she need it now? The kid is grown, so obviously they survived and had the money to survive. Besides, what's a 40 yo bitch doing having a kid anyway and ruining the best years of a man's life when he should be enjoying his youth.Well one good thing about this is at least he won't have to pay the money and will have plenty to spend in prison ) He wouldn't pay 200 a month to help support his own child? Maybe he didn't have it at the time. Who knows? The best I've been able to find out is that they were never married, and that the woman refused to let him have a relationship with the child. I haven't been able to find out when the order was issued, whether or not it was ongoing support from the birth of the child, or support assigned when the child was 15, and ordered back to the birth of the child, leaving him at the starting gate with a staggering arrearage. The most I've found is that the child was born sometime in the 80s, maybe. I would certainly like to know way more about this story. As the wife of a man-who- found-out-he-had-a-child-just-before-said-child-turned-13, I can tell you that the blow to ones financial well-being is substantial. And my husband, due to current laws, only had to pay 2 years of instant arrearages. It used to be that arrearages were assigned back to the birth of the child, including pregnancy and birth expenses--well padded, of course. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Man walks into office and kills ex-girlfriend over child support
teachrmama" wrote in message
... "John Larkin" wrote in message ... On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 22:46:06 GMT, "Avenger" wrote: What probably happened in this case is that he didn't have any money 20 years ago which is why the bitch didn't go after him before, and may have only made or come into some recently. The sneaky bitch found out about it and in her greed tried to get her hands on it. But why would she need it now? The kid is grown, so obviously they survived and had the money to survive. Besides, what's a 40 yo bitch doing having a kid anyway and ruining the best years of a man's life when he should be enjoying his youth.Well one good thing about this is at least he won't have to pay the money and will have plenty to spend in prison ) He wouldn't pay 200 a month to help support his own child? Was there a DNA test? Was none 20 years ago so this Ho may be lying. In 80% of these cases the man isn't even the father. Maybe he didn't have it at the time. Who knows? The best I've been able to find out is that they were never married, and that the woman refused to let him have a relationship with the child. I haven't been able to find out when the order was issued, whether or not it was ongoing support from the birth of the child, or support assigned when the child was 15, and ordered back to the birth of the child, leaving him at the starting gate with a staggering arrearage. The most I've found is that the child was born sometime in the 80s, maybe. I would certainly like to know way more about this story. As the wife of a man-who- found-out-he-had-a-child-just-before-said-child-turned-13, I can tell you that the blow to ones financial well-being is substantial. And my husband, due to current laws, only had to pay 2 years of instant arrearages. It used to be that arrearages were assigned back to the birth of the child, including pregnancy and birth expenses--well padded, of course. Why would a man have to pay birth expenses lol |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Man walks into office and kills ex-girlfriend over child support
"Gini" wrote in message news:yIxmi.3745$Gx5.1884@trndny02... "Aratzio" wrote "Avenger" wrote "Gini" wrote "John Larkin" .................................. So he'll spend the rest of his life with another guy in a tiny bunk-bed prison cell, instead of being out and economizing, or even running away to Brazil and starting over there. That doesn't sound like a sensible reaction to me. == These things don't happen when the person is being "sensible." They happen when the person has lost the ability to think sensibly. Then he's not guilty by reason of insanity ) No, but you would be. Learn what is the difference between insanity and nonsensical, dipweed. == "Dipweed?" Ignore ratso, we believe he may be retarded and in special ed. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Man walks into office and kills ex-girlfriend over child support
"Gini" wrote in message news:vuxmi.5262$yx4.1686@trndny08... "Avenger" wrote "Gini" wrote "John Larkin" wrote wrote: Yeah. You read that right. He drove all the way from Arizona to Ukiah in California and shot the succubus in the head. And then he walked next door to the courthouse and surrendered. You gotta hand it to him. There's only so much abuse a man can take before reacting. And this is the kind of man that pushes back, violently. So he'll spend the rest of his life with another guy in a tiny bunk-bed prison cell, instead of being out and economizing, or even running away to Brazil and starting over there. That doesn't sound like a sensible reaction to me. == These things don't happen when the person is being "sensible." They happen when the person has lost the ability to think sensibly. Then he's not guilty by reason of insanity ) == Well, that's kind of a stretch, but it might get him a decent plea out of a lazy DA. Nah; he's the wrong gender. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Per the CSE office of Texas, a parent ONLY has a duty to support children... | whatamess | Child Support | 0 | May 4th 07 08:38 PM |
VIRGINIA: State Senate kills bill to allow fathers to prepay child support obligations | [email protected] | Child Support | 0 | February 21st 06 02:17 AM |
US Office of Child Support Enforcement Statistics | Patrick Lee | Child Support | 2 | November 15th 05 01:30 AM |
Man who owed child support crashes truck through office doors | Don | Child Support | 33 | August 29th 04 05:46 AM |
OHIO Child-support office tried to hide $17,000 overpayment | Dave Briggman | Child Support | 18 | April 28th 04 11:34 PM |