If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
Just pay the support...
Alls I can say is RI SUX for not having joint custody procedures. Take some
"boy butter" to court with you next time...might ease the pain a bit. |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
Just pay the support...
Alls I can say is RI SUX for not having joint custody procedures. Take some
"boy butter" to court with you next time...might ease the pain a bit. |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
Just pay the support...
Joe_College wrote:
Alls I can say is RI SUX for not having joint custody procedures. Take some "boy butter" to court with you next time...might ease the pain a bit. But WHY don't they have them? What possible advantage is it to the state, or anyone for that matter? - Ron ^*^ |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
Just pay the support...
Joe_College wrote:
Alls I can say is RI SUX for not having joint custody procedures. Take some "boy butter" to court with you next time...might ease the pain a bit. But WHY don't they have them? What possible advantage is it to the state, or anyone for that matter? - Ron ^*^ |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
Just pay the support...
Joe_College wrote:
Alls I can say is RI SUX for not having joint custody procedures. Take some "boy butter" to court with you next time...might ease the pain a bit. But WHY don't they have them? What possible advantage is it to the state, or anyone for that matter? - Ron ^*^ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|