Mark's Probert's Continual Harassing

Jan's Illiteracy

====

In the Matter of Mark Probert (Admitted as Mark S. Probert), a
Suspended Attorney, Respondent.
Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District, Petitioner.

92-02731

SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT

183 A.D.2d 282; 590 N.Y.S.2d 747

November 9, 1992, Decided

PRIOR HISTORY: [***1]

Disciplinary proceedings instituted by the Grievance Committee for the
Tenth Judicial District. Respondent was admitted to the Bar on
February 15, 1978, at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme
Court in the Second Judicial Department, under the name Mark S.
Probert.

DISPOSITION: Ordered that the petitioner's motion to impose discipline
upon the respondent based upon his failure to appear or answer is
granted; and it is further,

HEADNOTES: Attorney and Client - Disciplinary Proceedings

Respondent attorney, who is charged with 22 counts of failing to
cooperate with investigations of alleged misconduct by the Grievance
Committee, and who has failed to answer or appear, is disbarred.

COUNSEL:

Frank A. Finnerty, Jr., Westbury (Muriel L. Gennosa of counsel), for
petitioner.

JUDGES: Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Bracken, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ.,
concur.

Ordered that the petitioner's motion to impose discipline upon the
respondent based upon his failure to appear or answer is granted; and
it is further,

Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90, effective immediately,
the respondent, Mark Probert, is disbarred and his name is stricken
from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondent shall continue to comply with this Court's
rules governing the conduct of disbarred, suspended and resigned
attorneys (22 NYCRR 691.10); and it is further,

Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary [***2] Law § 90, the respondent,
Mark Probert, is commanded to continue to desist and refrain (1) from
practicing law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk or
employee of another, (2) from appearing as an attorney or
counselor-at-law before any court, Judge, Justice, board, commission
or other public authority, (3) from giving to another an opinion as to
the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto, and (4)
from holding himself out in any way as an attorney and
counselor-at-law.

OPINIONBY: Per Curiam.

OPINION: [*282]

[**747] By decision and order of this Court dated September 29,
1989, the respondent was suspended from the practice of law until the
further order of this Court based upon his failure to cooperate with
the Grievance Committee. By further order of this Court dated June 4,
1992, the Grievance Committee was authorized to institute and
prosecute a disciplinary proceeding [*283] against the respondent
and the Honorable Moses M. Weinstein was appointed as Special Referee.

[**748] A notice of petition and petition was personally served upon
the respondent on July 2, 1992. No answer was forthcoming. The
petitioner now moves to hold the [***3] respondent in default. The
motion was personally served upon the respondent on August 14, 1992.
The respondent has failed to submit any papers in response to the
default motion.

The charges involve 22 counts of the respondent's failure to cooperate
with the Grievance Committee in its investigations into complaints of
professional misconduct.

The charges, if established, would require the imposition of a
disciplinary sanction against the respondent. Since the respondent has
chosen not to appear or answer in these proceedings, the charges must
be deemed established. The petitioner's motion to hold the respondent
in default and impose discipline is, therefore, granted. Accordingly,
the respondent is disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of
attorneys and counselors-at-law, effective immediately




http://www.humanticsfoundation.com/p...stprobert.html

LadyLollipop wrote:
Jan's Illiteracy

**** you

"LadyLollipop" wrote in message
news:a7Nre.59865$nG6.53761@attbi_s22...
Jan's Illiteracy

====

In the Matter of Mark Probert (Admitted as Mark S. Probert), a


I have seen this garbage before. How do you know that this is the same Mark
Probert who we are lucky to have as a member of this group?

Mark says he is not the same one: That is good enough for me.

Jeff

So Jan starts a thread entitled "Mark Probert's Continual
Harassing"...then she posts a 13 year old legal petition that might not
even pertain to "our" Mark Probert...and she posts a link to Ilena "I'm
crazy and I am too" Rose's hate page...

....does this strike anyone else as just a little bit hypocritical?

Mark, MD

wrote:
So Jan starts a thread entitled "Mark Probert's Continual
Harassing"...then she posts a 13 year old legal petition that might not
even pertain to "our" Mark Probert...and she posts a link to Ilena "I'm
crazy and I am too" Rose's hate page...

...does this strike anyone else as just a little bit hypocritical?

Mark, MD

Yes. But not surprising.

Cathy

LadyLollipop:

Please remove misc.kids.breastfeeding from this Thread and all follow-ups.

Thank you,
Larry

"Jeff" wrote in message
ink.net...

"LadyLollipop" wrote in message
news:a7Nre.59865$nG6.53761@attbi_s22...
Jan's Illiteracy

====

In the Matter of Mark Probert (Admitted as Mark S. Probert), a


I have seen this garbage before. How do you know that this is the same
Mark Probert who we are lucky to have as a member of this group?

You have been told.



Mark says he is not the same one: That is good enough for me.

Jeff

Rigggggggggggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhttttttttttttttttttttt ttttt.

Liars believe other liars.

Jan

wrote in message
oups.com...
So Jan starts a thread entitled "Mark Probert's Continual
Harassing"...then she posts a 13 year old legal petition that might not
even pertain to "our" Mark Probert...and she posts a link to Ilena "I'm
crazy and I am too" Rose's hate page...

...does this strike anyone else as just a little bit hypocritical?

Mark, MD

O000000000000000000000

Now we hear form Mark MD.

He was silent when Mark posted

Jan's Illiteracy

What he calls

Ilena "I'm crazy and I am too" Rose's hate page...

Is, if fact

EXACTLY

What Mark has done.

So, we have Mark MD lying for Mark Probert Disbarred attorney, known and
proven liar.

It DOES pretain to *our* Mark Probert

The only Mark S Probert is NY.

Our very own *Marla*

From: "Marla Maples"
To:
Subject: Listserv?
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2002 06:50:44 -0800
Good morning!
I am a woman who was harmed by breast implants. I had them removed, but I am
still sick with FM and CFS.
I read the newsgroup where you are medciless atacked. I feel so sorry for
you.
I see that you have a support listserv. Can I sign up? That way, I can avoid
reading all that horrible stuff.
Marla Maples
Medford, OR

Our very own own whos's wife sends me three e-mails out of the blue for
absoluutely no reason, while all the bitching goes on about others
contacting wives

Mark want to know how this strikes anyone??

What a hoot.

Anyone of the *gang* which we know beyond a doubt has LIED with and FOR each
other, that's one reason they are known as a *gang*

Welcome to EVIL *organized medicine*

Jan

"LadyLollipop" wrote in message
news:qJ_re.62072$nG6.42820@attbi_s22...

"Jeff" wrote in message
ink.net...

"LadyLollipop" wrote in message
news:a7Nre.59865$nG6.53761@attbi_s22...
Jan's Illiteracy

====

In the Matter of Mark Probert (Admitted as Mark S. Probert), a


I have seen this garbage before. How do you know that this is the same
Mark Probert who we are lucky to have as a member of this group?

You have been told.

Yes, I have been told that that is not the same Mark Probert.

In a city with 6 million people, it is not that uncommon for too people to
have the same name.


Mark says he is not the same one: That is good enough for me.

Jeff

Rigggggggggggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhttttttttttttttttttttt ttttt.

Liars believe other liars.

Nice comeback.

Now, please come back with real evidence.

jeff

Jan

LadyLollipop wrote:
"Jeff" wrote in message
ink.net...

"LadyLollipop" wrote in message
news:a7Nre.59865$nG6.53761@attbi_s22...

Jan's Illiteracy

====

In the Matter of Mark Probert (Admitted as Mark S. Probert), a


I have seen this garbage before. How do you know that this is the same
Mark Probert who we are lucky to have as a member of this group?


You have been told.

Told by whom? A bigot who relies on a stalker for information!

There is no credibility from those two.

Mark says he is not the same one: That is good enough for me.

Jeff


Rigggggggggggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhttttttttttttttttttttt ttttt.

Liars believe other liars.

Like I said above, a bigot who relies on a stalker for information. For
once, nincompoop, you are correct.