If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Cardinal Hails Court's Abortion Ruling
On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 10:02:39 -0700, "Chris" wrote:
"Ms. MICHEL'LE" wrote in message ... From: (Shawn Hirn) In article , (Ms. MICHEL'LE) wrote: Cardinal Hails Court's Abortion Ruling WASHINGTON, D.C., APRIL 18, 2007 (Zenit.org).- The chairman of the U.S. bishops' Committee for Pro-Life Activities has welcomed the Supreme Court decision upholding a ban on partial birth abortion. Why would this surprise anyone? This news story warrants one paragraph at most. Why is it that SOME men have a problem with Pro-life? Could it be that they dont like paying child support? Taking care of their responsibilities?? Hmmmm? "Child support" is the man's responsibility ONLY legally. Only to homo sapient males that have the morals of a Hyena. A real man doesn't need a law to force him to do right to the children that he sired. Or to assist other children to the best of his ability. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Cardinal Hails Court's Abortion Ruling
"Robert" wrote in message ... On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 10:02:39 -0700, "Chris" wrote: "Ms. MICHEL'LE" wrote in message ... From: (Shawn Hirn) In article , (Ms. MICHEL'LE) wrote: Cardinal Hails Court's Abortion Ruling WASHINGTON, D.C., APRIL 18, 2007 (Zenit.org).- The chairman of the U.S. bishops' Committee for Pro-Life Activities has welcomed the Supreme Court decision upholding a ban on partial birth abortion. Why would this surprise anyone? This news story warrants one paragraph at most. Why is it that SOME men have a problem with Pro-life? Could it be that they dont like paying child support? Taking care of their responsibilities?? Hmmmm? "Child support" is the man's responsibility ONLY legally. Only to homo sapient males that have the morals of a Hyena. A real man doesn't need a law to force him to do right to the children that he sired. Or to assist other children to the best of his ability. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com Nowadays, it seems to me, the only people who talk about "real men" are feminists who are trying to get men to do what suits women. (By the way, I suggest you consult a dictionary about the meaning of "homo sapiens." The hyenas are laughing up their sleeves at you.) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Cardinal Hails Court's Abortion Ruling
"Robert" wrote in message ... On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 10:02:39 -0700, "Chris" wrote: "Ms. MICHEL'LE" wrote in message ... From: (Shawn Hirn) In article , (Ms. MICHEL'LE) wrote: Cardinal Hails Court's Abortion Ruling WASHINGTON, D.C., APRIL 18, 2007 (Zenit.org).- The chairman of the U.S. bishops' Committee for Pro-Life Activities has welcomed the Supreme Court decision upholding a ban on partial birth abortion. Why would this surprise anyone? This news story warrants one paragraph at most. Why is it that SOME men have a problem with Pro-life? Could it be that they dont like paying child support? Taking care of their responsibilities?? Hmmmm? "Child support" is the man's responsibility ONLY legally. Only to homo sapient males that have the morals of a Hyena. A real man doesn't need a law to force him to do right to the children that he sired. Or to assist other children to the best of his ability. The problem ailing you is your confusing "legal" with "moral". -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Cardinal Hails Court's Abortion Ruling
"Robert" wrote in message ... On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 22:43:29 -0700, "Chris" wrote: "Robert" wrote in message . .. On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 10:02:39 -0700, "Chris" wrote: "Ms. MICHEL'LE" wrote in message ... From: (Shawn Hirn) In article , (Ms. MICHEL'LE) wrote: Cardinal Hails Court's Abortion Ruling WASHINGTON, D.C., APRIL 18, 2007 (Zenit.org).- The chairman of the U.S. bishops' Committee for Pro-Life Activities has welcomed the Supreme Court decision upholding a ban on partial birth abortion. Why would this surprise anyone? This news story warrants one paragraph at most. Why is it that SOME men have a problem with Pro-life? Could it be that they dont like paying child support? Taking care of their responsibilities?? Hmmmm? "Child support" is the man's responsibility ONLY legally. Only to homo sapient males that have the morals of a Hyena. A real man doesn't need a law to force him to do right to the children that he sired. Or to assist other children to the best of his ability. The problem ailing you is your confusing "legal" with "moral". A no good son of a bitch, that has to be forced to support his children, whines about a "un fair law" , has no sense of morals. Like a Hyena. A moral man requires no force to do right by his children. A mother ****er like you that whines about being forced to support his children has no morals. And a woman who gets pregnant with no intention of ever supporting her own children, but depends on a man or Big Daddy Gubmint to take care of her responsibilities is immoral. I guess you would also have to say that a woman who brings a child into this world then dumps it at a hospital or fire station is equally immoral, because she had the sex, then chose to walk away from the responsibilities that she, herself, helped create. Right? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Cardinal Hails Court's Abortion Ruling
Robert wrote:
On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 22:43:29 -0700, "Chris" wrote: "Robert" wrote in message . .. On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 10:02:39 -0700, "Chris" wrote: "Ms. MICHEL'LE" wrote in message ... From: (Shawn Hirn) In article , (Ms. MICHEL'LE) wrote: Cardinal Hails Court's Abortion Ruling WASHINGTON, D.C., APRIL 18, 2007 (Zenit.org).- The chairman of the U.S. bishops' Committee for Pro-Life Activities has welcomed the Supreme Court decision upholding a ban on partial birth abortion. Why would this surprise anyone? This news story warrants one paragraph at most. Why is it that SOME men have a problem with Pro-life? Could it be that they dont like paying child support? Taking care of their responsibilities?? Hmmmm? "Child support" is the man's responsibility ONLY legally. Only to homo sapient males that have the morals of a Hyena. A real man doesn't need a law to force him to do right to the children that he sired. Or to assist other children to the best of his ability. The problem ailing you is your confusing "legal" with "moral". A no good son of a bitch, that has to be forced to support his children, whines about a "un fair law" , has no sense of morals. Greedy goose-stepping fascist want to steal money from innocent people so that you can sit on your ass. You have no morals and don't give a **** about justice. All you care about is forcing your 19th century paternalism upon people. -- Ray Fischer |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Cardinal Hails Court's Abortion Ruling
On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 22:43:29 -0700, "Chris" wrote:
"Robert" wrote in message .. . On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 10:02:39 -0700, "Chris" wrote: "Ms. MICHEL'LE" wrote in message ... From: (Shawn Hirn) In article , (Ms. MICHEL'LE) wrote: Cardinal Hails Court's Abortion Ruling WASHINGTON, D.C., APRIL 18, 2007 (Zenit.org).- The chairman of the U.S. bishops' Committee for Pro-Life Activities has welcomed the Supreme Court decision upholding a ban on partial birth abortion. Why would this surprise anyone? This news story warrants one paragraph at most. Why is it that SOME men have a problem with Pro-life? Could it be that they dont like paying child support? Taking care of their responsibilities?? Hmmmm? "Child support" is the man's responsibility ONLY legally. Only to homo sapient males that have the morals of a Hyena. A real man doesn't need a law to force him to do right to the children that he sired. Or to assist other children to the best of his ability. The problem ailing you is your confusing "legal" with "moral". A no good son of a bitch, that has to be forced to support his children, whines about a "un fair law" , has no sense of morals. Like a Hyena. A moral man requires no force to do right by his children. A mother ****er like you that whines about being forced to support his children has no morals. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Cardinal Hails Court's Abortion Ruling
"Robert" wrote in message ... On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 22:43:29 -0700, "Chris" wrote: "Robert" wrote in message . .. On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 10:02:39 -0700, "Chris" wrote: "Ms. MICHEL'LE" wrote in message ... From: (Shawn Hirn) In article , (Ms. MICHEL'LE) wrote: Cardinal Hails Court's Abortion Ruling WASHINGTON, D.C., APRIL 18, 2007 (Zenit.org).- The chairman of the U.S. bishops' Committee for Pro-Life Activities has welcomed the Supreme Court decision upholding a ban on partial birth abortion. Why would this surprise anyone? This news story warrants one paragraph at most. Why is it that SOME men have a problem with Pro-life? Could it be that they dont like paying child support? Taking care of their responsibilities?? Hmmmm? "Child support" is the man's responsibility ONLY legally. Only to homo sapient males that have the morals of a Hyena. A real man doesn't need a law to force him to do right to the children that he sired. Or to assist other children to the best of his ability. The problem ailing you is your confusing "legal" with "moral". A no good son of a bitch, that has to be forced to support his children, whines about a "un fair law" , has no sense of morals. Like a Hyena. A moral man requires no force to do right by his children. A mother ****er like you that whines about being forced to support his children has no morals. -- A moral man person has no problem supporting thier children. Most people In this group are moral people. A sane and Intelligent perosn realizes that the ncp has to get by as well without undue burden on thier part. You are niether sane or intelligent. You are a nazi, because you have said all fathers should be locked up forcibly, work 70 hour weeks, and be give all thier money to the all powerful, n'er do wrong mommy. Your father must have ****ed over you and your mother, but you fail to recognize hats far from the truth In most of todays situations. To sum It all up, you are WRONG, and TWISTED In all of your beliefs. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Cardinal Hails Court's Abortion Ruling
Dusty Steenbock wrote:
"Robert" wrote in message ... On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 22:43:29 -0700, "Chris" wrote: "Robert" wrote in message ... On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 10:02:39 -0700, "Chris" wrote: "Ms. MICHEL'LE" wrote in message ... From: (Shawn Hirn) In article , (Ms. MICHEL'LE) wrote: Cardinal Hails Court's Abortion Ruling WASHINGTON, D.C., APRIL 18, 2007 (Zenit.org).- The chairman of the U.S. bishops' Committee for Pro-Life Activities has welcomed the Supreme Court decision upholding a ban on partial birth abortion. Why would this surprise anyone? This news story warrants one paragraph at most. Why is it that SOME men have a problem with Pro-life? Could it be that they dont like paying child support? Taking care of their responsibilities?? Hmmmm? "Child support" is the man's responsibility ONLY legally. Only to homo sapient males that have the morals of a Hyena. A real man doesn't need a law to force him to do right to the children that he sired. Or to assist other children to the best of his ability. The problem ailing you is your confusing "legal" with "moral". A no good son of a bitch, that has to be forced to support his children, whines about a "un fair law" , has no sense of morals. Like a Hyena. A moral man requires no force to do right by his children. A mother ****er like you that whines about being forced to support his children has no morals. -- A moral man person has no problem supporting thier children. Most people In this group are moral people. A sane and Intelligent perosn realizes that the ncp has to get by as well without undue burden on thier part. An intelligent person realizes you cannot legislate morality. Robert proves how stupid he is with his frothing You are niether sane or intelligent. You are a nazi, because you have said all fathers should be locked up forcibly, work 70 hour weeks, and be give all thier money to the all powerful, n'er do wrong mommy. Your father must have ****ed over you and your mother, but you fail to recognize hats far from the truth In most of todays situations. To sum It all up, you are WRONG, and TWISTED In all of your beliefs. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Cardinal Hails Court's Abortion Ruling
"teachrmama" wrote in message ... "Robert" wrote in message ... On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 22:43:29 -0700, "Chris" wrote: "Robert" wrote in message . .. On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 10:02:39 -0700, "Chris" wrote: "Ms. MICHEL'LE" wrote in message ... From: (Shawn Hirn) In article , (Ms. MICHEL'LE) wrote: Cardinal Hails Court's Abortion Ruling WASHINGTON, D.C., APRIL 18, 2007 (Zenit.org).- The chairman of the U.S. bishops' Committee for Pro-Life Activities has welcomed the Supreme Court decision upholding a ban on partial birth abortion. Why would this surprise anyone? This news story warrants one paragraph at most. Why is it that SOME men have a problem with Pro-life? Could it be that they dont like paying child support? Taking care of their responsibilities?? Hmmmm? "Child support" is the man's responsibility ONLY legally. Only to homo sapient males that have the morals of a Hyena. A real man doesn't need a law to force him to do right to the children that he sired. Or to assist other children to the best of his ability. The problem ailing you is your confusing "legal" with "moral". A no good son of a bitch, that has to be forced to support his children, whines about a "un fair law" , has no sense of morals. Like a Hyena. A moral man requires no force to do right by his children. A mother ****er like you that whines about being forced to support his children has no morals. And a woman who gets pregnant with no intention of ever supporting her own children, but depends on a man or Big Daddy Gubmint to take care of her responsibilities is immoral. I guess you would also have to say that a woman who brings a child into this world then dumps it at a hospital or fire station is equally immoral, because she had the sex, then chose to walk away from the responsibilities that she, herself, helped create. Right? But that's............................................ ... different. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Bush: State won't appeal ruling allowing teen's abortion | wexwimpy | Foster Parents | 0 | May 3rd 05 06:28 PM |
MICHIGAN: Attorney General Mike Cox Hails Passage of Child SupportBills | David Briggman | Child Support | 6 | December 22nd 04 03:46 AM |
Ex-Boyfriend Can't Stop Abortion A woman's right to have an abortion"is not subject to being vetoed by a woman's husband or partner," said Conahan, | Clisby | Pregnancy | 0 | January 19th 04 08:36 PM |
Abortion ruling | Ronni | Child Support | 12 | January 1st 04 04:51 PM |