If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
denying visits
"Gini" wrote in message news:HSaSh.1689$FC5.1338@trndny06... "Bob Whiteside" wrote "teachrmama" wrote "Dusty Steenbock" wrote "fathersrights" wrote It is obhvious you have not studied custody law for years.Otherwise you could recognize how valuable my advice has been.By your own postings it is obvious you lost your case. One does nort become successful by listening to what the hell Is a nort? I think it's a typo--he really meant "snort". Obhiviously. == Heh, I wonder if he uses that word in his "briefs." Most likely, yes. It is a highly technical legal term, after all. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
denying visits
On Apr 8, 3:13�pm, "teachrmama" wrote:
"Gini" wrote in message news:HSaSh.1689$FC5.1338@trndny06... "Bob Whiteside" *wrote "teachrmama" wrote "Dusty Steenbock" wrote "fathersrights" wrote It is obhvious you have not studied custody law for years.Otherwise you could recognize how valuable my advice has been.By your own postings it is obvious you lost your case. One does nort become successful *by listening to what the hell Is a nort? I think it's a typo--he really meant "snort". Obhiviously. == Heh, I wonder if he uses that word in his "briefs." Most likely, yes. *It is a highly technical legal term, after all.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I don't think this guy is a lawyer, but rather someone who fancies himself some kind of expert, and who really does nothing more than post the link to his website to sell high cost books. He does "broker" consultations between NCP's and the people who wrote the book at a $150 a an hour though. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
denying visits
"Relayer" wrote in message oups.com... On Apr 8, 3:13?pm, "teachrmama" wrote: "Gini" wrote in message news:HSaSh.1689$FC5.1338@trndny06... "Bob Whiteside" wrote "teachrmama" wrote "Dusty Steenbock" wrote "fathersrights" wrote It is obhvious you have not studied custody law for years.Otherwise you could recognize how valuable my advice has been.By your own postings it is obvious you lost your case. One does nort become successful by listening to what the hell Is a nort? I think it's a typo--he really meant "snort". Obhiviously. == Heh, I wonder if he uses that word in his "briefs." Most likely, yes. It is a highly technical legal term, after all.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I don't think this guy is a lawyer, but rather someone who fancies himself some kind of expert, and who really does nothing more than post the link to his website to sell high cost books. He does "broker" consultations between NCP's and the people who wrote the book at a $150 a an hour though. How sad. But every episode of injustice toward a specific group of people has spawned a substrata of slime willing to make money off of the misery engendered by the injustice. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
denying visits
"Relayer" wrote ................. I don't think this guy is a lawyer, but rather someone who fancies himself some kind of expert, == No....He's not a lawyer--A lawyer-wannabe spamming loser trying to profit off NCPs by making them think he has some magic snake oil when he hasn't even the most rudimentary knowledge of family law, courts or procedure. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
denying visits
"Gini" wrote in message news:GoeSh.913$Lm.23@trndny05... "Relayer" wrote ................ I don't think this guy is a lawyer, but rather someone who fancies himself some kind of expert, == No....He's not a lawyer--A lawyer-wannabe spamming loser trying to profit off NCPs by making them think he has some magic snake oil when he hasn't even the most rudimentary knowledge of family law, courts or procedure. Gini - He claims to be JD "licensed" to practice law in Illinois and several other states plus federal jurisdictions. Yet his name is not listed under any of the state or federal bar association membership lists. Does that mean he has been disbarred or he's just full of it? I thought a lawyer had to be a member of the bar to practice law in any state. The "licensed to practice" claim is cute but so far as I know doesn't meet the technical criteria to actually practice law by having a bar membership number. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
denying visits
"Bob Whiteside" wrote "Gini" wrote "Relayer" wrote ................ I don't think this guy is a lawyer, but rather someone who fancies himself some kind of expert, == No....He's not a lawyer--A lawyer-wannabe spamming loser trying to profit off NCPs by making them think he has some magic snake oil when he hasn't even the most rudimentary knowledge of family law, courts or procedure. Gini - He claims to be JD "licensed" to practice law in Illinois and several other states plus federal jurisdictions. Yet his name is not listed under any of the state or federal bar association membership lists. Does that mean he has been disbarred or he's just full of it? == He's full of it. I've seen him make too many elementary mistakes. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
denying visits
"fathersrights" wrote in message ... It is obhvious you have not studied custody law for years.Otherwise you could recognize how valuable my advice has been.By your own postings it is obvious you lost your case. One does nort become successful by listening to losers.You either had a poor or unpaid attorney, a meritless case for your custody or tried to run your case yourself. False dilemma. (see below) Just because you or a group of losers that gather on a newsgroup dont win your cases doesn't mean a father with a good case and a good lawyer cant win his case. ...... assumung there is a good judge and a good legal system. oe"Bob Whiteside" wrote in message ... "fathersrights" wrote in message ... With your attitude you are guaranteed to lose which you obviously have if you think this is false hope. You are obviously not aware the people who disagree with you have been through the system, have experience as custodial parents and non-custodial parents, and have studied family law issues for years. Your spamming of this group always seems to come down to basic differences in your theories versus our knowledge of practice. It's like going to a fathers rights attorney who claims to had made sophisticated and complex legal arguments on behalf of clients. When asked for examples of how they worked to change how judges normally rule, the attorneys cannot produce any anecdotes about how the outcomes were influenced by their arguments. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
denying visits
If you argue that your spouse is unfit because her own pleadings and actions
try to minimize vice maximize your time with the children while your pleadings ask for maximum involvement of both parents, you place your spouse in a legal box. She will either increase her offers or look foolish trying to explain to a cross examiner why she should have more time with the children than you and would run a serious risk of losing or not obtaining custody. Either way, you better your position and minimize emotional damage to the children. Even if you don't win custody, you will enjoy much more visitation than fathers usually are awarded. "fathersrights" wrote in message ... Case law is what was quoted in the original post. Common sense confirms the courts ruling that you cant make a logical case to deny a parent the RIGHT to babysit over third parties. "Relayer" wrote in message ups.com... On Apr 6, 8:44?pm, "fathersrights" wrote: Me thinks you protest too much. If the materials weren't effective you feminists wouldnt hate them so much. You totally neglect all the FREE help for fathers available at http://www.fathersrights.org;And fathers,if you think custody law doesn"t control in custody cases, no wonder you lost your case."Gini" wrote in message news:QBrQh.2833$gb6.2603@trndny07... "Chris" wrote "fathersrights" wrote ................ NOT when the custodial parent is the mother. == Chris, fathersrights is a long time scammer/spammer who is a for-profit peddler of worthless crap to NCPs. If you feel compelled to engage him, please at least trim his posts to as not to perpetuate his BS.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - 999/1000 times custody is decided by case law, not state statute. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
denying visits
"fatherforever" wrote in message ... If you argue that your spouse is unfit because her own pleadings and actions try to minimize vice maximize your time with the children while your pleadings ask for maximum involvement of both parents, you place your spouse in a legal box. She will either increase her offers or look foolish trying to explain to a cross examiner why she should have more time with the children than you and would run a serious risk of losing or not obtaining custody. Either way, you better your position and minimize emotional damage to the children. Even if you don't win custody, you will enjoy much more visitation than fathers usually are awarded. Assuming you are dealing with a sane "family court" system. "fathersrights" wrote in message ... Case law is what was quoted in the original post. Common sense confirms the courts ruling that you cant make a logical case to deny a parent the RIGHT to babysit over third parties. "Relayer" wrote in message ups.com... On Apr 6, 8:44?pm, "fathersrights" wrote: Me thinks you protest too much. If the materials weren't effective you feminists wouldnt hate them so much. You totally neglect all the FREE help for fathers available at http://www.fathersrights.org;And fathers,if you think custody law doesn"t control in custody cases, no wonder you lost your case."Gini" wrote in message news:QBrQh.2833$gb6.2603@trndny07... "Chris" wrote "fathersrights" wrote ................ NOT when the custodial parent is the mother. == Chris, fathersrights is a long time scammer/spammer who is a for-profit peddler of worthless crap to NCPs. If you feel compelled to engage him, please at least trim his posts to as not to perpetuate his BS.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - 999/1000 times custody is decided by case law, not state statute. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
6 mo dental visits | 00doc | Kids Health | 2 | April 3rd 05 04:11 PM |
NICU visits | DBB3 | Spanking | 14 | May 28th 04 01:58 PM |
dental visits? | Shena Delian O'Brien | Pregnancy | 37 | March 22nd 04 04:41 PM |
Should I suggest next visits? | Andrew | Single Parents | 4 | January 7th 04 04:25 PM |
Well child visits amidst the flu | Denise | General | 40 | December 14th 03 04:44 PM |