If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
How does Dan Sullivan overcome real world process like THIS?
How does Dan Sullivan overcome real world process like THIS?
http://kennebecjournal.mainetoday.co.../3070647.shtml Thursday, September 7, 2006 Civil lawsuit rife with errors committed by state The defendant is stripped of his assets by a civil suit before the trial. During trial, the prosecutor blocks the defendant's request for DNA testing. The jury is told that there is no other suspect when there were half a dozen. (One who knew the victim and had motive and opportunity was under indictment for molesting the victim's half-sister; he sends that girl away so that she cannot testify and never stands trial.) A state police detective testifies that he is reading a confession from his notes, although no such words are in his notes. A county detective alters "How could I kill her?" to read " Why did I kill her?" He also testifies that the defendant said, "I told my wife that I did something bad," when his notes actually read, "I told my wife something bad happened." The attorney general's office "subsumes" these notes into the secret state file, where they cannot be examined. Six days after an appeal is filed the AG's office incinerates potential DNA evidence. The deputy AG hides the results of an investigation of a DNA test. And so on. A panel selected by the attorney general, charged with investigating charges of official misconduct, operating without due process, never talking with defense lawyers, giving no explanations, and refusing to answer any questions, finds no fault. Where did this happen? In a banana republic? In a communist country? A mid-eastern dictatorship? Texas? No. This all happened in our dear old state of Maine. William Bunting Whitefield |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
ot
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
How does Dan Sullivan overcome real world process like THIS?
Why did you "ot" this Dan?
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
How does Dan Sullivan overcome real world process like THIS?
Greegor wrote: Why did you "ot" this Dan? Okay, I'll bite on your original question, even if you are boring Dan to sleep. "How does Dan Sullivan overcome real world process like THIS?" I'm extremely familiar with some of Dan's real world battles with CPS and how he won. If you'll show me which of his CPS battles were like "this," pointing to this, then to the same thing in his "case," then I'll do my best to answer your question if it applies to his particular battles. Deal? And keep it down. He needs his rest. He's surely exhausted from LHAO for so long. R R R R R...me too. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
How does Dan Sullivan overcome real world process like THIS?
How does Dan Sullivan overcome real world process like THIS?
http://kennebecjournal.mainetoday.co.../3070647.shtml Civil lawsuit rife with errors committed by state The defendant is stripped of his assets by a civil suit before the trial. During trial, the prosecutor blocks the defendant's request for DNA testing. The jury is told that there is no other suspect when there were half a dozen. (One who knew the victim and had motive and opportunity was under indictment for molesting the victim's half-sister; he sends that girl away so that she cannot testify and never stands trial.) A state police detective testifies that he is reading a confession from his notes, although no such words are in his notes. A county detective alters "How could I kill her?" to read " Why did I kill her?" He also testifies that the defendant said, "I told my wife that I did something bad," when his notes actually read, "I told my wife something bad happened." The attorney general's office "subsumes" these notes into the secret state file, where they cannot be examined. Six days after an appeal is filed the AG's office incinerates potential DNA evidence. The deputy AG hides the results of an investigation of a DNA test. And so on. A panel selected by the attorney general, charged with investigating charges of official misconduct, operating without due process, never talking with defense lawyers, giving no explanations, and refusing to answer any questions, finds no fault. Where did this happen? In a banana republic? In a communist country? A mid-eastern dictatorship? Texas? No. This all happened in our dear old state of Maine. William Bunting Whitefield |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
How does Dan Sullivan overcome real world process like THIS?
Greegor wrote: How does Dan Sullivan overcome real world process like THIS? http://kennebecjournal.mainetoday.co.../3070647.shtml Civil lawsuit rife with errors committed by state What would Bob Jarovits recommend? Constitutional Law, of course!!!! And an Appeal!!! |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
How does Dan Sullivan overcome real world process like THIS?
Greegor wrote:
How does Dan Sullivan overcome real world process like THIS? http://kennebecjournal.mainetoday.co.../3070647.shtml Civil lawsuit rife with errors committed by state The defendant is stripped of his assets by a civil suit before the trial. During trial, the prosecutor blocks the defendant's request for DNA testing. The jury is told that there is no other suspect when there were half a dozen. (One who knew the victim and had motive and opportunity was under indictment for molesting the victim's half-sister; he sends that girl away so that she cannot testify and never stands trial.) A state police detective testifies that he is reading a confession from his notes, although no such words are in his notes. A county detective alters "How could I kill her?" to read " Why did I kill her?" He also testifies that the defendant said, "I told my wife that I did something bad," when his notes actually read, "I told my wife something bad happened." The attorney general's office "subsumes" these notes into the secret state file, where they cannot be examined. Six days after an appeal is filed the AG's office incinerates potential DNA evidence. The deputy AG hides the results of an investigation of a DNA test. And so on. A panel selected by the attorney general, charged with investigating charges of official misconduct, operating without due process, never talking with defense lawyers, giving no explanations, and refusing to answer any questions, finds no fault. Where did this happen? In a banana republic? In a communist country? A mid-eastern dictatorship? Texas? No. This all happened in our dear old state of Maine. William Bunting Whitefield Already answered. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Parent-Child Negotiations | Nathan A. Barclay | Spanking | 623 | January 28th 05 04:24 AM |
How Children REALLY React To Control | Chris | General | 444 | July 20th 04 07:14 PM |
MA SJC Upholds Cover-Up of Due Process Violations by Family Court Judge | Dusty | Child Support | 4 | February 20th 04 04:34 PM |
A Plant's Motivation? | Kane | Spanking | 44 | October 16th 03 01:51 PM |
A Plant's Motivation? | Kane | Foster Parents | 46 | October 16th 03 01:51 PM |