If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Mike broke COPYRIGHT law DIAPER pictures claimed of me!!
http://www.macconsult.com/diaperboy/94212_19.jpg
http://www.macconsult.com/diaperboy/95672_25.jpg http://www.macconsult.com/diaperboy/jwolf.jpg All are know gone! Mike stole these pictures from the site below in an effort to slander me!! big_baby's Diaper boy Micke Page http://www.big-baby.org/number.htm I still have his page in my IE scrapbook. I wonder if I should take a screenshot and post it. Then I bet Micke would have a problem with Mike. It says on Micke's page that his images are copyright. So Mike you broke the law in an effor to slander me? Enough of this nonsense. I need to put these trolls and filter. John |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
wrote:
All are know gone! Mike stole these pictures from the site below in an effort to slander me!! No, someone emailed them to me in late July of last year. I didn't post them anywhere, didn't even so much as mention them to anyone until brought up the subject in mid-September. I have to wonder how you knew I had them; maybe you were the one who sent them to me under an assumed identity. I still have his page in my IE scrapbook. I wonder if I should take a screenshot and post it. Yes, please do, as long as you include the full text I added below the thumbnails, the text that clearly stated I did not have any idea whether they're really you and was only posting them because you asked me to. -- Mike Rosenberg http://www.macconsult.com Macintosh consulting services for NE Florida http://bogart-tribute.net Tribute to Humphrey Bogart Toyota Prius fans: Check out alt.autos.toyota.prius |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Roger roger@. wrote:
You should probably look up the *legal* requirements for slander to be determined. Slander isn't even the appropriate term, since that refers to spoken words. He really should say libel instead, and I've told him this on several occasions. Of course, there is no copyright notice on either the page referenced nor the homepage Say, you're right! John, where exactly do you claim to have seen a copyright notice? I did see the home page specifically state, "This site has a lot of men in diaper pictures collected from news groups and pictures that people did send to me (with permission to place them) and of-course my own pictures too." However, nowhere does it distinguish which are which. -- Mike Rosenberg http://www.macconsult.com Macintosh consulting services for NE Florida http://bogart-tribute.net Tribute to Humphrey Bogart Toyota Prius fans: Check out alt.autos.toyota.prius |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
In one age, called the Second Age by some,
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past) someone claiming to be Mike Rosenberg wrote in message : Roger roger@. wrote: You should probably look up the *legal* requirements for slander to be determined. Slander isn't even the appropriate term, since that refers to spoken words. He really should say libel instead, and I've told him this on several occasions. Darn it, Mike: I was gonna play with him a bit before pointing that out. You *never* let me have any fun Of course, there is no copyright notice on either the page referenced nor the homepage Say, you're right! John, where exactly do you claim to have seen a copyright notice? I did see the home page specifically state, "This site has a lot of men in diaper pictures collected from news groups and pictures that people did send to me (with permission to place them) and of-course my own pictures too." However, nowhere does it distinguish which are which. Is it any wonder the snert and john are such good buddies? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Roger roger@. wrote:
Darn it, Mike: I was gonna play with him a bit before pointing that out. You *never* let me have any fun Dreadfully sorry, old chap! I doubt that he'd even give you the opportunity to play with him on this, though. -- Mike Rosenberg http://www.macconsult.com Macintosh consulting services for NE Florida http://bogart-tribute.net Tribute to Humphrey Bogart Toyota Prius fans: Check out alt.autos.toyota.prius |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
In article , Roger
roger@. wrote: In one age, called the Second Age by some, (an Age yet to come, an Age long past) someone claiming to be wrote in message .com: http://www.macconsult.com/diaperboy/94212_19.jpg http://www.macconsult.com/diaperboy/95672_25.jpg http://www.macconsult.com/diaperboy/jwolf.jpg All are know gone! Mike stole these pictures from the site below in an effort to slander me!! You should probably look up the *legal* requirements for slander to be determined. big_baby's Diaper boy Micke Page http://www.big-baby.org/number.htm I still have his page in my IE scrapbook. I wonder if I should take a screenshot and post it. Then I bet Micke would have a problem with Mike. It says on Micke's page that his images are copyright. No, it doesn't. It doesn't, as you note. But, saying they are copyrighted doesn'tmake it so. Why in the world would someone copyright that junk? Cathy -- "there's a dance or two in the old dame yet." - mehitabel C.Stevenson, M.D. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Cathy Stevenson wrote:
But, saying they are copyrighted doesn'tmake it so. Actually, it does. As long as the intellectual property in question is yours, putting a copyright notice on it does make it copyrighted. -- Mike Rosenberg http://www.macconsult.com Macintosh consulting services for NE Florida http://bogart-tribute.net Tribute to Humphrey Bogart Toyota Prius fans: Check out alt.autos.toyota.prius |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"Cathy Stevenson" wrote in message It doesn't, as you note. But, saying they are copyrighted doesn'tmake it so. Why in the world would someone copyright that junk? It doesn't have to. According to the copyright act of 1976, the copyright is automatically applicable the instant the "work" (in this case a photograph) is created. Nothing has to be registered for it to be protected by copyright law. Copyrights on photographs are automatic the moment the shutter is released and the invisible image is created on the negative. Check it out instead of guessing about it. It does not matter whether the website owner would care about the pictures being reused, what matters is the opinions of the persons that created the photographs. Unless, they all specifically assigned ALL rights to the photos to the diaper website guy. It's probably safe to reason that the guy that reused the photos (Mike?) probably didn't get specific permission from the original creators of the works. I suppose it's possible he did, but it seems quite unlikely. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Two questions...
What does this have to do with HPC's? Why is a broken thread suddenly appearing in this NG? "Anthony Fremont" wrote in message ... "Cathy Stevenson" wrote in message It doesn't, as you note. But, saying they are copyrighted doesn'tmake it so. Why in the world would someone copyright that junk? It doesn't have to. According to the copyright act of 1976, the copyright is automatically applicable the instant the "work" (in this case a photograph) is created. Nothing has to be registered for it to be protected by copyright law. Copyrights on photographs are automatic the moment the shutter is released and the invisible image is created on the negative. Check it out instead of guessing about it. It does not matter whether the website owner would care about the pictures being reused, what matters is the opinions of the persons that created the photographs. Unless, they all specifically assigned ALL rights to the photos to the diaper website guy. It's probably safe to reason that the guy that reused the photos (Mike?) probably didn't get specific permission from the original creators of the works. I suppose it's possible he did, but it seems quite unlikely. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Bill Cosby on Fatherhood-More influential than Spock? | Kane | Spanking | 26 | January 12th 05 11:04 PM |
What's in your Diaper Bag? | Hoister | Pregnancy | 23 | May 10th 04 07:51 PM |
Dirty Diaper song | Hillary Israeli | General | 4 | September 12th 03 07:08 PM |