If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Hi guys, here's one for you, Kane .... DA defends decision to drop burglary charges
On Tue, 26 Dec 2006 05:55:02 GMT, James Browns Soul
wrote: 0:- wrote: James Browns Soul wrote: 0:- wrote: 0:- wrote: Greegor wrote: Kane, There most certainly WAS enough evidence to violate this pervs PAROLE. My argument was that there was insufficient evidence of the charges claimed to prosecute. You are going on his past...and if you know anything about trial rules you would know that cannot be considered in trial. You can only charge and judge based on the crime in the charges. Past does not matter. If you do not think so, you need to look up the laws, and the rules of the court. But don't do that, you'll run out of things to bitch about almost immediately. The DA had NOTHING to go on. Only that he had entered through an unlocked door. You constantly jump to conclusions, you run on your emotions...which are pretty damned wild and ranting bull**** mostly, and you don't come to logical and FACT BASED conclusions. "Registered Sex Offender walks into home, assaults woman and the Prosecutor doesn't even charge him with assault. Notice the comments by people in New Mexico." I did not ARGUE ABOUT COMMENTS, PAROLE VIOLATIONS OR ANYTHING BUT THAT THE PROSECUTOR LIKELY COULD NOT MOUNT A GOOD CASE TO CHARGE THIS ****. I don't like the man, I'd shoot his ass and make make damn sure he was in my house when it happened, and the door wouldn't mattered. In most states (can't speak at the moment about NM) if someone enters, and refuses to leave, advances and will not stop on command, you can shot to stop him. Often that means until he stops moving. And it's not hard in those states to prove you were afraid for your life. The women, had she been armed, and used her gun likely would have not been charged with anything. Above are my comments. Kane Below, someone's response. In a sock, of course. Or, she shot might have shot her grandson dead cause she thought he was a 'burglar'. That's a much more likely outcome - wannabe cowboys usually end up shooting themselves or another family member while waiting for the 'bad' men. I'm going to invite you to provide proof of your claim and at the same time introduce you to my friends, well some of them, at talk.politics.guns Can't you folks on the gun group do something with this deluded state agent? You know him as Kane/d'geezer/Donald L. Fisher. He spams his neighbors children to usenet so his boss can cash in on adoption bonuses - he stalks, harasses, and falsely accuses innocent parents already abused by an out of control child welfare agency. He constantly rants that parents who spank their children are 'child abusing thugs' - rants for laws to imprison spanking parents and then has the nerve to post quotes from the founding fathers and the constitution in his sig. We're having a ball over on ASCPS watching this perverted koo-koo flop like a fish. I knew the gun comment would send him over the edge, but I didn't think he'd involve you folks on the gun group. Ten Hut - at ease - carry on men. I guess that you don't want your posts to end up in an appropriate forum where people with a vast knowledge base can refute your assertions and show just how much you actually don't know. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Hi guys, here's one for you, Kane .... DA defends decisionto drop burglary charges
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Hi guys, here's one for you, Kane .... DA defends decision to drop burglary charges
In talk.politics.guns Carl Nisarel
wrote: Ili'ili keiki "0:-" , men ne cunnon secgan to soðe: can I assume you are saying that people are more likely, if they have a gun or guns in their home to shot a family member than an intruder or themselves? A gun in the home is more likely to be used to shoot a family member or to commit suicide than shoot an intruder. You and your gunhugger buddies can deny it all you wish but that is an established fact. The established facts here a (a)that statement is bogus, and (b) you're too ****ing stupid to know what a grocery store is. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Hi guys, here's one for you, Kane .... DA defends decisionto drop burglary charges
James Browns Soul wrote:
0:- wrote: James Browns Soul wrote: 0:- wrote: 0:- wrote: Greegor wrote: Kane, There most certainly WAS enough evidence to violate this pervs PAROLE. My argument was that there was insufficient evidence of the charges claimed to prosecute. You are going on his past...and if you know anything about trial rules you would know that cannot be considered in trial. You can only charge and judge based on the crime in the charges. Past does not matter. If you do not think so, you need to look up the laws, and the rules of the court. But don't do that, you'll run out of things to bitch about almost immediately. The DA had NOTHING to go on. Only that he had entered through an unlocked door. You constantly jump to conclusions, you run on your emotions...which are pretty damned wild and ranting bull**** mostly, and you don't come to logical and FACT BASED conclusions. "Registered Sex Offender walks into home, assaults woman and the Prosecutor doesn't even charge him with assault. Notice the comments by people in New Mexico." I did not ARGUE ABOUT COMMENTS, PAROLE VIOLATIONS OR ANYTHING BUT THAT THE PROSECUTOR LIKELY COULD NOT MOUNT A GOOD CASE TO CHARGE THIS ****. I don't like the man, I'd shoot his ass and make make damn sure he was in my house when it happened, and the door wouldn't mattered. In most states (can't speak at the moment about NM) if someone enters, and refuses to leave, advances and will not stop on command, you can shot to stop him. Often that means until he stops moving. And it's not hard in those states to prove you were afraid for your life. The women, had she been armed, and used her gun likely would have not been charged with anything. Above are my comments. Kane Below, someone's response. In a sock, of course. Or, she shot might have shot her grandson dead cause she thought he was a 'burglar'. That's a much more likely outcome - wannabe cowboys usually end up shooting themselves or another family member while waiting for the 'bad' men. I'm going to invite you to provide proof of your claim and at the same time introduce you to my friends, well some of them, at talk.politics.guns Can't you folks on the gun group do something with this deluded state agent? You know him as Kane/d'geezer/Donald L. Fisher. He spams his neighbors children to usenet so his boss can cash in on adoption bonuses Not facts to support. A lie, in other words. - he stalks, harasses, and falsely accuses innocent parents already abused by an out of control child welfare agency. A flat out lie. In fact, the opposite is true. I refuse to allow the scum that infest ascps to stalk, harass and falsely accuse parents that are fighting CPS and those that have fought and won. He constantly rants that parents who spank their children are 'child abusing thugs' Lie. - rants for laws to imprison spanking parents Another lie. Prove your claims. and then has the nerve to post quotes from the founding fathers and the constitution in his sig. You and your cronies are the abusers of the Constitution here, lame-o. We're having a ball over on ASCPS watching this perverted koo-koo flop like a fish. I knew the gun comment would send him over the edge, but I didn't think he'd involve you folks on the gun group. You hoped it wouldn't. Because you and your cronies would be instantly exposed for the lying thugs you actually are. Ten Hut - at ease - carry on men. Yeah, that'll convince them of your credibility. R R R R R .... 0:- There's a number of them that are excellent researchers and maintain repositories of actual data on such things, as I am and do myself. But you aren't likely to believe me...so, can I assume you are saying that people are more likely, if they have a gun or guns in their home to shot a family member than an intruder or themselves? If I am framing this incorrectly, I hope you'll correct me, and introduce yourself to talk.politics.guns. Feel free on your way in, to stop, do a little research, and bring your evidence for your claims with you. Best wishes, Kane |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
False rape charges | [email protected] | Child Support | 3 | February 26th 07 11:17 PM |
WDNNSCPS | 0:-> | Foster Parents | 29 | October 23rd 06 05:11 AM |
We don need no steenkin' CPS. | 0:-> | Spanking | 223 | July 19th 06 07:32 AM |
Mum defends decision to give son MMR jab | Mark Probert | Kids Health | 1 | March 3rd 05 07:23 PM |
Help Eliminate an Instrument of Child Torture | Kane | Spanking | 34 | December 29th 03 04:54 AM |