A Parenting & kids forum. ParentingBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » ParentingBanter.com forum » misc.kids » Breastfeeding
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

USA source of monovalent MMR equivalents??



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 17th 03, 12:17 AM
Karen
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default USA source of monovalent MMR equivalents??

DS is now 3 and just had his first MMR a few eeks ago. Our family dr was
trying to get the individual vaccines for a year and was never able to.
We took ds to a pediatrician for his 3 yr check-up and they also checked
into the individual vaccines for us and found out that only the Rubella
is available separately (because they need it to give to adult women as
per the pregnancy issues w/ rubella), and the company which manufactured
the separate vaccines is not making them any more, so only the
combination is available. That's what the ped said. So we went ahead and
got the MMR, but only the MMR and have no reactions to report.

-Karen, mom to Henry-

  #2  
Old July 17th 03, 08:27 PM
Robyn Kozierok
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default USA source of monovalent MMR equivalents??

In article , Richard wrote:
Thanks, Karen. At least we (just barely) escaped the new
combined five-component pertussis-diphtheria-tetanus-inactivated
poliomyelitis-Haemophilus b conjugate vaccine.


I'll probably be sorry I asked, but what is the advantage of / obsession
with uncombined vaccines? The above combination represented 3 jabs for
my kids, and I'm sure *they* would have preferred a single shot. They had
them all at the same time anyhow, so in our case it would have been just
less pain, unless there is some disadvantage to mixing them in one shot
that goes beyond having to get them all at once. I presume there is
some theory that it is safer to get them in separate jabs, possibly at
separate times? Is there any research to support this? We're done with
vaccinations for a couple of years now, so this is mostly just curiosity.

Thanks,
--Robyn (mommy to Ryan 9/93 and Matthew 6/96 and Evan 3/01)

  #4  
Old July 17th 03, 11:22 PM
Karen
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default USA source of monovalent MMR equivalents??

Our own personal reasoning, based more on what seems common sense to us
and the fact that there are autoimmune issues in my family tree than on
necessarily anything that we've read,is that bombarding a still
developing immune system (some reading suggests the immune system isn't
mature until around age 5) with so many doses all at once of foreign
stuff for the body to figure out what to do with is unwise.

In our particular situation, we are concerned about a body which may
have genetic markers for autoimmune diseases being triggered into an
autoimmune reaction by a huge dose of vaccines. My thoughts on this are
based on my mother-gut-instinct and a general cynical and suspicious
view of any established ideas on anything, my husband's view on this
comes from having a background in science, incuding his undergraduate
degree in meolecular biology from a pretty major school for such things.

Personally, I don't care how many extra trips to the doctor's office we
have to make, and ds has always been nursed through every shot so he
really has no issues with shots. We are doing selective vax, so he
hasn't had quite as many shots anyway. I don't like this coersion into
getting medical treatment you don't want simply because individual doses
of the vaxs are no longer available. Ds would have been vaccinated for
MMR a year earlier had the individual doses been available, but the
government and medical establishment doesn't seem to want to trust
people with choice. Don't get me started!

-Karen, mom to Henry 3-

  #5  
Old July 18th 03, 02:56 AM
Scott Lindstrom
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default USA source of monovalent MMR equivalents??

Robyn Kozierok wrote:
In article , Richard wrote:

Thanks, Karen. At least we (just barely) escaped the new
combined five-component pertussis-diphtheria-tetanus-inactivated
poliomyelitis-Haemophilus b conjugate vaccine.



I'll probably be sorry I asked, but what is the advantage of / obsession
with uncombined vaccines? The above combination represented 3 jabs for
my kids, and I'm sure *they* would have preferred a single shot. They had
them all at the same time anyhow, so in our case it would have been just
less pain, unless there is some disadvantage to mixing them in one shot
that goes beyond having to get them all at once. I presume there is
some theory that it is safer to get them in separate jabs, possibly at
separate times? Is there any research to support this? We're done with
vaccinations for a couple of years now, so this is mostly just curiosity.



DD had a reaction to the Haemophilus vaccine -- although
I thought it was the Haemophilus A, not the b conjugate
vaccine (whatever that is -- it's been a while ) With
5 shots in one, it's kinda hard to tell what's causing what
if something goes awry.

Her reaction (fever) was fairly rare, btw, and certainly
can't be linked to the vaccine, but it did recur each time she
got the shot ( there were 2 or 3 of them )

Scott DD 10 and DS 7

  #6  
Old July 18th 03, 05:10 PM
Astromum
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default USA source of monovalent MMR equivalents??

Robyn Kozierok wrote:

I guess that was my main point. Is it known or believed that administering
the vaccines separately "nullif[ies] any chance of side effects"? Unless
parents are skipping the vaccines they consider too risky, which has its
own risks.


Can't help you there. I think this is one of the points that needs
to be addressed by future studies. Many people seem concerned about
it, and my gut feeling is that it makes sense the 3 shots in one
have a higher risk than 3 separate shots. However, I don't believe
the risks are ever truly zero, they are just a whole lot smaller
than the risks of your child getting ill with the disease.

--
-- Ilse
mom to Olaf (07/15/2002)
TTC #2
"What's the use of brains if you are a girl?"
Aletta Jacobs, first Dutch woman to receive a PhD

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
monovalent MMR vaccines available in the USA PF Riley Kids Health 7 December 7th 03 11:48 PM
monovalent MMR is available in USA Herself General 0 December 4th 03 09:39 PM
USA source of monovalent MMR equivalents?? Elana General (moderated) 15 July 18th 03 11:36 PM
Cdn source for domperidone Ducky Lawyer Breastfeeding 2 July 17th 03 08:55 PM
USA source of monovalent MMR equivalents?? Elana Breastfeeding 0 July 15th 03 10:05 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 ParentingBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.