A Parenting & kids forum. ParentingBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » ParentingBanter.com forum » alt.support » Child Support
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Child Support Debate Heats Up



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 9th 04, 12:00 AM
Dusty
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Child Support Debate Heats Up

Child Support Debate Heats Up

A comment published in the October issue of the American Political Science Association's "PS: Political Science and Politics" describes the argument against current child support guidelines as "concrete" and "alarming."

Guidelines are based on a model developed by the child support collection industry with the intent of arbitrarily increasing the average support order to 250 percent of what was deemed appropriate under established child support law. The increased debt and cash-flow resulting from increased award levels profits the government and private collection industry. Courts have upheld use of these guidelines by eliminating constitutional rights in favor of unchecked government power. As a result there has been a very disturbing and fundamental change in the relationship between family and government.

The comment, by child support researcher Roger F. Gay, follows debate in the same journal between Howard University political science professor Stephen Baskerville and Jo Michelle Beld, a St. Olaf College professor who served as a consultant on guidelines to the Child Support Enforcement Division of the Minnesota Department of Human Services.

Baskerville, Stephen (2002), "The Politics of Fatherhood" PS: Political Science and Politics Volume 35 No. 4, December, pp. 695-99. http://www.apsanet.org/PS/dec02/baskerville.cfm

Beld, Jo Michelle (2003), "Revisiting "The Politics of Fatherhood": Administrative Agencies, Family Life, and Public Policy." PS: Political Science and Politics Volume 36 No. 4, October, pp. 713-18. http://www.apsanet.org/PS/oct03/beld.pdf
(her reply to the above)

Baskerville, Stephen (PS 2003), "The Politics of Child Support" PS: Political Science and Politics Volume 36 No. 4, October. pp. 719-20. http://www.apsanet.org/PS/oct03/baskerville.pdf
(his reply to her comments)


------------------------------------------------------------
Eliminate the impossible and whatever
remains, no matter how improbable, must
be the truth.

---- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle ---

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mother's Paternity Fraud - US Supreme Court Case TrashBBRT Child Support 8 May 21st 04 05:52 PM
Sample Supreme Court Petition Wizardlaw Child Support 0 January 16th 04 03:47 AM
| | Kids should work... Kane Spanking 12 December 10th 03 02:30 AM
| | Kids should work... Kane Foster Parents 3 December 8th 03 11:53 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 ParentingBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.