Deadbeat dad, singer & Ruben Studdard look-alike Sean Levert died of natural causes; prob. faked his death to avoid paying all that C.S.

"DVD" wrote in message
...
Phil wrote:

"DVD" wrote in message
...

Phil wrote:

I don't see an answer to my hypothetical situation yet, afraid to
be honest?


Which is what, exactly?


Based on the tag line, should a wealthy child molester (or the meth
dealer) get custody just because he pays child support? Yes or no is
fine.


You mean like a "yes" or "no" to the question "Do you still beat your
wife"?

No, a yes no question like the one above. Try to be honest once and
tell me what you think.

The question cannot be answered by "yes" or "no" except to obtain an
incorrect or incomplete answer. Your attempt to force a "yes" or "no"
answer without explanation is just another attempt at dishonesty.
There are too many possible factors involved. If he has not been charged
and found guilty, the answer would most likely be "Yes", especially if
the claim was made by an angry wife and doubly so if they were involved
in a divorce.


I think that without a valid and proven charge, men should be just as
qualified as women to have custody.

In this case the guy molests children, tell the truth, should he have
custody?

Presupposing that he molested children based on the charge of an angry
soon-to-be-ex that is hoping to limit his "visitation" time with his
children to obtain a greater child support "award" or after being proven
in a court of law or what, exactly. Where did the claim originate and
why?


I think I answered this already.
The truth is, this is one of the little falsehoods divorce attorneys
encourage women to use in divorce and custody cases, accusing the
father of being a molester, even of his own children, or a drunk or
womanizer or many other things when the fact is, he is not. The
favorite is accusing him of abuse (or fear of abuse) even though
there is no abuse. Judges err on the side of caution even to the
point of allowing the man to be punished simply because he was
accused by an angry and irrational wife, not convicted. And it works.

In this case the man is a child molester, he molests children.

Proven or claimed by someone with an agenda?

Should he get custody just because he pays support? Why can't you be
honest and answer a simple question?

Because you're being typically dishonest. When you give me details, I
will give you an answer.
Phil #3