A Parenting & kids forum. ParentingBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » ParentingBanter.com forum » misc.kids » Pregnancy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Difference between God and an MD?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 8th 04, 07:44 PM
Todd Gastaldo
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Difference between God and an MD?

WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN GOD AND AN MD?

See the very end of this post...



THIS POST IS WORTH **BILLIONS** PER YEAR TO THE AMERICAN ECONOMY...

Even if there weren't money to be saved, WHY are we letting medical dieties
(MDs) knowingly close birth canals up to 30%?

VAGINAS

Why are we letting medical dieties (MDs) slice vaginas en masse (euphemism
"routine episiotomy") - surgically/FRAUDULENTLY inferring they are doing
everything possible to OPEN birth canals - even as they CLOSE birth canals -
up to 30%?

See "The most common diagnosis for hospitalization among all women..." at
the very end of this post...

PENISES

Nearly 100% of babies join me in calling for an end to American medicine's
grisly most frequent surgical behavior toward males. (Most babies SCREAM
their support - but some are rendered unconscious by the intensity of the
pain.)

KEY POINT...

ROUTINE INFANT CIRCUMCISION is *not* Jewish ritual circumcision.

In late 1987, when I discovered American MDs using phony "babies can't feel
pain" neurology to obtain consent to perform "no medical indication" routine
infant circumcisions, I demanded an end to the obvious child abuse and
called for a religious exemption for Jewish circumcision.

Pediatricians (the AAP, Jan/Feb 1988 issues of Pediatrics) immediately
called for opposition to ALL religious exemptions, saying in effect that if
MDs were to be forced to stop circumcising - so would Jewish ritual
circumcisers!

Immediately thereafter (March 1988), the California Medical Association/CMA
House of Delegates ignored its own Scientific Board and by voice vote
instantly changed routine circumcision from "no medical indications" to "an
effective public health measure." ("Unjustifiable physical pain" is the
exact definition of child abuse in California. Child abusers can go to
prison for up to six years per count. Calif. Penal Code Sec. 273a.)

NOTE: Jewish ritual circumcision originally entailed leaving most of the
foreskin on the penis - and it was FAST!

"[T]he LORD met Moses and was about to kill him. But Zipporah took a flint
knife, cut off her son's foreskin and touched Moses' feet with it...So the
LORD let him alone...(Genesis 4:24-26)"
http://www.holyspiritinteractive.net...y/zipporah.asp



Routine infant circumcision is American medicine's $400 million dollar per
year GRISLY most frequent surgical behavior toward males...

Routine infant circumcision should have ended BILLIONS of dollars' worth of
infant screams ago - back in 1987 when I exposed AAP's perpetuation of phony
"babies can't feel pain" neurology...

Ending this barbaric MD behavior toward babies (see "brutal" "barbaric"
quotes below) would not only save $400 million dollars per year - it would
stop the infant screams and (paradoxically) PRESERVE the surgery as a CHOICE
American males could make for themselves in adulthood. (It is likely that -
like most males on the planet - American males would NOT chooose
circumcision in adulthood.)

THINK ABOUT IT

AS INFANTS SCREAM AND WRITHE AND BLEED (note: sometimes babies die or lose
their penises)...

"One-half to one-third of the skin on the...penile shaft is sliced
off." http://www.infocirc.org/MensHlth.htm (paraphrasing Ronald Goldman,
PhD,
author of Circumcision: The Hidden Trauma)

"The average circumcision cuts off what would grow into
about 12 square inches of sexually sensitive skin."
http://www.infocirc.org/MensHlth.htm (quoting Ronald Goldman, PhD, author of
Circumcision: The Hidden Trauma)



MDs ARE SLICING OFF PART OF THE BODY'S IMMUNE SYSTEM AT THE ENTRANCE TO THE
GENITO-URINARY SYSTEM!

THE PREPUCE (FORESKIN) HAS IMMUNOLOGICAL PROPERTIES!

"...A review of the scientific literature...reveals that the actual effect
of circumcision is the destruction of...clinically-demonstated hygienic and
immunological properties of the prepuce and intact penis.

"The sphincter action of the preputial orifice functions like a one way
valve, blocking the entry of contaminants while allowing the passage of
urine.7,8

"Ectopic sebaceous glands concentrated near the frenulum produce smegma.9-12
This natural emollient contains prostatic and seminal secretions,
desquamated epithelial cells, and the mucin content of the urethral glands
of Littré.13,14 It protects and lubricates the glans and inner lamella of
the prepuce, facilitating erection, preputial eversion, and penetration
during sexual intercourse.

"The inner prepuce contains apocrine glands,15 which secrete cathepsin
B...chymotrypsin, neutrophil elastase,16 cytokine (a non-antibody protein
that generates an immune response on contact with specific
antigens)17...pheromones such as androsterone18...[and lysozyme16]...

"...Lysozyme...also found in tears, human milk, and other body fluids
destroys bacterial cell walls..."

From Fleiss P, Hodges F, Van Howe RS. Immunological functions of the human
prepuce. Sex Trans Inf 1998;74(5):364-7...
http://www.cirp.org/library/disease/STD/flei



MDs ARE DE FACTO LEGAL CHILD ABUSERS

MD-influenced prosecutors (DAs and AGs) are negligently looking the other
way, thereby making MDs de facto legal child abusers.

I will cc this to my old roommate at UCLA, Bill Hodgman, now chief deputy DA
for LA County DA Mark Cooley via

BEWA The first step in circumcision involves actually RIPPING foreskin
from glans - euphemism "freeing adhesions" - as in,

"[F]reeing adhesions, is tantamount to cruel and unusual punishment and is
unfounded physiologically and medically." [Kaplan GW: Circumcision: An
overview.
Current Problems in Pediatrics, 1977;7(5):8]

Most MDs rip and slice infant penises with NO ANESTHESIA

Even *with* anesthesia, routine infant circumcision is still child abuse.



PARENTS: IF YOU MUST HAVE YOUR SON'S FORESKIN AMPUTATED...

PLEASE FIND A LEGAL CHILD ABUSER WHO USES ANESTHESIA

(According to the medical literature, Mogen clamp and dorsal penile nerve
block (DPNB) injections. "Ring block" is a recommended anesthesia
alternative.)



MDs KNOW IT IS CHILD ABUSE

As indicated above...

In late 1987, Pediatricians perpetuated phony "babies can't feel pain"
neurology... [Poland et al. Pediatrics 1987;80:446].

Since there were "no medical indications" for routine infant
circumcision, I asked the AAP/Poland et al. to help end it.

I also called for religious exemptions for Jews...

In the January 1988
issue of Pediatrics, AAP members were told
to
"vigorously oppose in the legislatures," all present and proposed
religious exemptions and "defend the rights
of all children to the protection and benefits of the law...".

Translated: a religious circumcision exemption from the child abuse
laws means medical circumcision is indeed child abuse; therefore we
M.D.s must oppose ALL religious exemptions. If we are prosecuted, the
rabbis and mohelim are going down
with us.

In the February 1988 issue of Pediatrics, the AAP recommended anonymity
for PERPETRATORS of child abuse: "The American Academy of Pediatrics
recommends that all states adopt laws forbidding public disclosure...of
information that identifies victims of child abuse, their families, AND
PERPETRATORS [emphasis added]."

In March 1988, the California Medical Association House of
Delegates ignored
its own Scientific Board and by voice vote created "an effective public
health measure" out of "no medical indications." (CMA had long stated there
were "no medical indications" for routine infant circumcision.)

Weeks later, the AAP convened a circumcision task force which - when it made
its report one year later - failed to mention that the phony CMA had
declared routine infant circumcision "an effective public health measure."
(!)

Of course, AAP *also* failed to mention that American medicine's phony
"babies can't feel pain" neurology had been exposed just months before the
CMA discovered its new public health measure!

AAP *still* hasn't acknowledged this understandable^^^ though unconscionable
criminal negligence.

^^^It's understandable criminal negligence because MDs wish to stay out of
prison. This "wish to stay out of prison" BIAS should be stated in every
American medical article on circumcision because most American MDs have
committed the crime.

"Most doctors believe babies can't feel pain...Most doctors today...I
bought it..."
- Dean Edell, M.D. claiming on national television that his physician
superiors at Cornell University taught him that babies don't have nerves
in their genitals. (KGO-TV San Francisco, circa 1984)

American MDs can't simply stop the mass child abuse because stopping the
crime would be tantamount to admitting it.

See Care of the Intact Penis
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2413

VAGINAS

Coincidentally, American MDs senselessly slice most VAGINAS at around the
same time they slice most PENISES...

Mass vagina and and penis slicing - American medicine's most frequent
surgical behaviors toward males and females - are obvious crimes of
negligence which sometimes escalate to criminally negligent homicide.

American OBs are slicing vaginas en masse (euphemism "routine episiotomy") -
surgically/FRAUDULENTLY claiming to be doing everything possible to OPEN
birth canals - even as they CLOSE birth canals - up to 30%.

See Criminal medical CAM at Hawai'i's John A Burns School of Medicine
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2256

See also: Helping baby open birth canal (Why obstetrics is criminal medical
CAM)...
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2391

With birth canals senselessly closed up to 30%...

OBs are violently pushing on babies' spines (oxytocin, Cytotec, PGE2) and
gruesomely pulling (hands, forceps, vacuums)...

Sometimes babies die, sometimes babies get paralyzed - but most babies
"only" have their necks gruesomely manipulated.

ALL spinal manipulation is gruesome with the birth canal senselessly closed
up to 30%.

MDs are anti- HUMAN - in addition to being anti-Semitic...

MDs knew about what I am talking about early last century....

Harvard obstetrician Arthur B. Emmons, MD wrote in 1913

"[M]oving backward of the tip of the sacrum...enlarges the
available space not merely directly in proportion to the distance backward,
but more nearly by the square of that distance." [Emmons, AB. A study of the
variations in the female pelvis, based on observations made on 217 specimens
of the
American Indian squaw. Biometrika 1913; 9:34-47.]

And here's what was added to Williams Obstetrics at my
request:

"It should be noted...that the increase in the diameter of the
pelvic outlet occurs **only** if the sacrum is allowed to rotate
posteriorly, that is,
only if the sacrum is not forced anteriorly by the weight of the maternal
pelvis against the delivery table or bed." [Cunningham, MacDonald, Leveno,
Gant and Gilstrap, Williams Obstetrics Appleton-Lange 1993:285, **italics in
original]

Unfortunately, the authors of Williams Obstetrics left in their text - in
the same paragraph (!)
the "dorsal widens" bald lie that first called my attention to their
text)!!

NOTE: The authors of Williams Obstetrics started telling their "dorsal
widens" bald lie back in the 70s when Ohlsen pointed out to them that they
were still claiming that pelvic diameters don't change at delivery...
http://home1.gte.net/gastaldo/part2ftc.html


According to Kitzinger [1993]

French obstetrician Michel Odent "would never risk a
breech delivery with the mother in a dorsal or semi-seated position." ("Our
only intervention will be to insist on the supported squatting position..."
[Odent quoted in Kitzinger S. The
Complete Book of Pregnancy and Childbirth. "conceived, edited and
designed" in London by Dorling Kindersley Limited; published in New York
by Alfred A. Knopf, Inc. 1993:264]


QUESTION: If Odent would never risk a breech delivery with the mother
dorsal or
semi-seated, why is he silent as "[m]any doctors prefer to deliver
breech babies with the woman in the lithotomy position." [Kitzinger,
1993:261]

And why does Ms. Kitzinger herself unquestioningly advise
semi-sitting (closing birth canal up to 30%) as an option? [Kitzinger,
1993:261]

MDs (Hannah et al.) recently decreed that singleton term breeches be taken
by cesarean section.
http://www.reseau-naissance.com/rsn_...#reduire_siege

Because breech deliveries are performed in lithotomy, Hannah
et al. studied breech births with birth canals usually closed up to 30%.

See Hannah et al.'s term breech tomfoolery/Gherman et al.'s fetal radiation
fraud
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/1306

REMEMBER: Obstetricians are KNOWINGLY closing birth canals up to
30%...

SIMPLE PROOF...

According to the Merck Manual:

"When shoulder dystocia occurs...the mother's thighs are hyperflexed to
increase the diameter of the pelvic outlet..."
http://www.merck.com/mrkshared/mmanu...er253/253g.jsp

WHY are OBs and CNMwives (nurse midwives) waiting until the
head is
out and shoulders get stuck before giving the baby maximum pelvic outlet
diameter?

WHY are we letting OBs and CNMwives force babies' heads through birth canals
senselessly closed up to 30%?

(An estimated 4.6% of "healthy" term babies suffer unexplained brain bleeds!
And babies actually suffer DENTS in their skulls - "pingpong" skull
fractures - though most of these dents/"pingpong" fractures pop out.)

THE KICKER

OBs and CNMwives are
KEEPING birth canals closed when babies' shoulders get stuck!

The Merck Manual method for increasing the diameter of the pelvic
outlet - merely hyperflexing the mother's thighs - is BAD McRoberts
maneuver - and BAD McRoberts maneuver does not roll the woman off her sacrum
and therefore
does
NOT increase the diameter of the pelvic outlet!

See ACOG birth crime video evidence
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2300

WMPI/JASON GARDOSI, MD

Here are the simple grisly biomechanics of semisitting (and dorsal)
delivery clearly stated by Jason Gardosi, MD, director of the
British National Health Service/NHS West Midlands Perinatal
Institute/WMPI...

"...the weight of the mother is in part taken on the sacrum which is
therefore pushed upwards, thus decreasing the antero-posterior diameter of
the pelvic outlet..."
http://www.wmpi.net/reviews/oe/oe_shoulder_dystocia.htm

Incredibly, the just quoted WMPI site states the grisly biomechanics of
semisitting but then RECOMMENDS semisitting delivery (closing the birth
canal), as
in,

"The second stage...You might want to remain in bed with your back propped
up with pillows...As you push, try to let yourself 'open up' below..."
http://www.preg.info/book/chapter11.htm

WMPI/Jason Gardosi, MD is advising women to close their birth canals,
then saying: "As you push, try to let yourself 'open up' below..." (!)

ON A POSITIVE NOTE: The WMPI site does recommend a version of GOOD McRoberts
if
the shoulders get stuck...
http://www.wmpi.net/reviews/oe/oe_shoulder_dystocia.htm

LAUGHABLE: Gardosi says of himself:

"Developed new obstetric aid, the 'Birth Cushion', for studying squatting
during the second stage of labour."
http://www.obgyn.net/board/gardosi.htm

In fact, no one squatted in Gardosi's 1989 Lancet "randomised controlled
trial of squatting." (!)

See Edgbaston (UK) birth fraud (and 'the birth
cushion')
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2387

NOTE: At one time, WMPI/Jason Gardosi, MD and his British OB pal Malcolm
Griffiths got
me censored from an international obstetric listserv for protesting this
bizarre
obstetric behavior - but fortunately not before two of my articles got
posted...

See http://forums.obgyn.net/forums/ob-gy...9707/0128.html

See also: http://forums.obgyn.net/ob-gyn-l/OBGYNL.9707/0153.html

MY BEST GUESS (as to why MDs haven't yet stopped the massive obstetric
crime)?

Stopping it would be
tantamount to admitting it.

PARDONS IN ADVANCE FOR MDs...

As usual, I am in favor of pardons in advance for MDs (and MBs and anyone
else who is senselessly closing birth canals). MDs are just
academic prime cuts forced through this culture's most powerful mental
meatgrinder - medical school.

Pardons in advance will allow MDs to keep doing their valid medical work,
making money to pay the inevitable civil damages.

LADIES: It is EASY for you to allow your birth canal to OPEN the "extra" up
to 30%.
Just roll onto your side as you push your baby out - or deliver on
hands-and-knees, kneeling, standing, squatting, etc.

BEWARE though: Some MDs and MBs will let you "try" "alternative"
delivery positions but will move you back to dorsal or semisitting (close
your birth canal!) as you push your baby out!

Talk to your MD or MB about this TODAY.

MDs/MBs: If you must push or pull - and sometimes you must - first get the
woman off her sacrum - off her back/butt.


MDs are a protected class...

I think there are geopolitical reasons for MDs having been chosen as a
protected class...

See Wild circumcision rhetoric of MDs/Israel's history
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2398

A RAY OF PEDIATRIC HOPE FOR HELPLESS INFANTS

In 1995, the American Academy of Pediatrics/AAP officially
stated in
effect that MDs can no longer make infants scream and writhe and bleed and
sometimes die...and hide behind PARENTS REQUEST IT cowardice...

According to AAP,

"[T]he pediatrician's responsibilities to his or her patient exist
independent of parental desires...

"...A[n infant's screaming writhing and bleeding obviously constitutes
the - TDG] patient's reluctance or refusal to assent [and - TDG]
should...carry considerable weight when the proposed intervention is not
essential to his or her welfare
and/or can be deferred without substantial risk...

"[T]hose who care for children need to provide for measures to solicit
assent and to attend to possible abuses of 'raw' power over children when
ethical conflicts occur."
AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS
Informed Consent, Parental Permission, and Assent in Pediatric
Practice(RE9510)
Pediatrics Volume 95, Number 2 February, 1995, p. 314-317
http://www.aap.org/policy/00662.html



INFANT CIRCUMCISION: A BRUTAL, BARBARIC PRACTICE...

"After years of strapping babies down for this brutal procedure and
listening to their screams, we couldn't take it any longer." [Sperlich
BK, Conant M. Am J Nurs (Jun)1994:16. http://www.cirp.org/nrc/]

"Nursing alert...[N]urses must consider their participation in a
surgical procedure that involves no anesthesia to be a barbaric
practice." (p. 205) Donna L. Wong's Essentials of
Pediatric Nursing [1997]

"[S]till all too often barbaric...[M.D.s]...would never allow older children
or
adults to be subjected to such practices, nor would they submit to it
themselves..." [Veteran circumcision cheerleader Colonel Thomas E. Wiswell,
MD in article in the April 24, 1997 New England Journal of
Medicine]


BOTTOMLINE...

If I were a baby about to have my penis ripped and sliced again - I would
want someone STOPPING the barbaric practice.

That failing, I would want anesthetic.

I say again:

PARENTS: IF YOU MUST HAVE YOUR SON'S FORESKIN AMPUTATED...

PLEASE FIND A LEGAL CHILD ABUSER WHO USES ANESTHESIA

(According to the medical literature, Mogen clamp and dorsal penile nerve
block (DPNB) injections are best - with "ring block" being an anesthesia
alternative.)

Sincerely,

Todd

Dr. Gastaldo


PS1 ANTI-SEMITIC MDs: Again, when I discovered American MDs using phony
"babies can't feel pain" neurology to obtain consent to perform "no medical
indication" routine infant circumcisions, I demanded an end to the obvious
child abuse and called for a religious exemption for Jewish circumcision.

Pediatricians (the AAP) immediately called for opposition to ALL religious
exemptions, saying in effect that if MDs were to be forced to stop
circumcising - so would Jewish ritual circumcisers!

Again: Jewish ritual circumcision originally entailed leaving most of the
foreskin on the penis - and it was FAST!

"[T]he LORD met Moses and was about to kill him. But Zipporah took a flint
knife, cut off her son's foreskin and touched Moses' feet with it...So the
LORD let him alone...(Genesis 4:24-26)"
http://www.holyspiritinteractive.net...y/zipporah.asp

See also: Ancient nude wrestling (also: Surgeon Peter: 'circumcision...best
performed without anaesthetic')
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2432

PS2 SOME HAVE SAID THAT **I** AM ANTI-SEMITIC...

Yes, perhaps it is wrong for me to call for a religious exemption that
allows Jewish ritual circumcisers to harm the tiniest Semites. After all,
just as there is no scientific evidence that non-Semitic infant foreskins
should be amputated by MEDICAL dieties (MDs), there is no scientific
evidence that a God wants tiny Semites to have *their* foreskins amputated -
in whole or in part - fast or slow.

As indicated above, I think American MDs are just stooges in a geopolitical
game.

See again: Ancient nude wrestling (also: Surgeon Peter: 'circumcision...best
performed without anaesthetic')
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2432

Truth be told, this doctor of chiropractic/DC would be satisfied to stop
medical deities (MDs) from senselessly closing birth canals up to 30%.

It's a matter of CHIROPRACTIC PREVENTION (non-spinal prevention) of the
putative chiropractic clinicial entity (vertebral subluxation)...

Medical dieties (MDs) are taking tiny lives and paralyzing tiny limbs - and
causing more putative vertebral subluxations than my fellow DCs will ever be
able to adust by hand.

Stopping medical dieties (MDs) from closing birth canals is the ultimate in
CHIROPRACTIC PREVENTION.

Stopping the mass vagina and penis slashing would just be chiropractic
gravy - worth billions per year.

Mass vagina MD slicing (trauma to the perineum) is "performed" for "free" -
but...

"The most common diagnosis for hospitalization among all women is trauma to
perineum due to childbirth." (!)
http://www.ahcpr.gov/data/hcup/factbk3/factbk3.htm

WHY are we letting OBs knowingly close birth canals up to 30%?

Why are we letting them slice vaginas en masse - surgically/FRAUDULENTLY
pretending they are doing everything possible to OPEN birth canals - even as
they close birth canals?

The medical religion is an anti-HUMAN religion - in addition to being
anti-Semitic.

What is the difference between God and an MD?

God doesn't think he's an MD!

Thanks for reading, everyone.

Sincerely,

Todd

Dr. Gastaldo


Difference between God and an MD?
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2438


  #2  
Old April 8th 04, 08:59 PM
tech27
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Difference between God and an MD?


"Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message
nk.net...
WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN GOD AND AN MD?

God might help you. An MD can't.



  #3  
Old April 8th 04, 09:50 PM
Christine
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Difference between God and an MD?

maybe i'm just hormonal but WTF goes?

  #4  
Old April 8th 04, 10:19 PM
Todd Gastaldo
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Difference between God and an MD?


"tech27" wrote in message
...

"Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message
nk.net...
WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN GOD AND AN MD?

God might help you. An MD can't.


MDs help *lots* of people. They just shouldn't be senselessly harming
mothers and babies - en masse or otherwise.

See again: Difference between God and an MD?
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2438

Oh, wait, tech27 was saying that MDs can't help *me* - LOL!

Good one!


  #5  
Old April 8th 04, 10:26 PM
Todd Gastaldo
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default 'Just hormonal' means up to 30% 'extra' room for baby - IF...

I wrote:

Difference between God and an MD?
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2438

"Christine" wrote:

maybe i'm just hormonal but WTF goes?


Christine,

Here's the VAGINA part of what goes...

MDs are slicing vaginas (euphemism "routine episiotomy") -
surgically/FRAUDULENTLY inferring they are doing everything possible to OPEN
birth canals - even as they CLOSE birth canals up to 30%...

The simple instructions on how easy it is for a woman to allow her birth
canal to OPEN the "extra" up to 30% were in my post...

See again: Difference between God and an MD?
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2438

As noted on the subject line of this post, "just hormonal" (relaxin) means
up to 30% of "extra" room for the baby - IF - you don't push your baby out
on your back or butt (dorsal or semisitting)....

Thanks for reading,

Sincerely,

Todd

Dr. Gastaldo



  #6  
Old April 10th 04, 12:07 PM
Anth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Difference between God and an MD?

After 30 years of festering in this cell and praying to GOD, my legs finally
enabled me to escape.
Anth

"tech27" wrote in message
...

"Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message
nk.net...
WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN GOD AND AN MD?

God might help you. An MD can't.





 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 ParentingBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.