If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Difference between God and an MD?
WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN GOD AND AN MD?
See the very end of this post... THIS POST IS WORTH **BILLIONS** PER YEAR TO THE AMERICAN ECONOMY... Even if there weren't money to be saved, WHY are we letting medical dieties (MDs) knowingly close birth canals up to 30%? VAGINAS Why are we letting medical dieties (MDs) slice vaginas en masse (euphemism "routine episiotomy") - surgically/FRAUDULENTLY inferring they are doing everything possible to OPEN birth canals - even as they CLOSE birth canals - up to 30%? See "The most common diagnosis for hospitalization among all women..." at the very end of this post... PENISES Nearly 100% of babies join me in calling for an end to American medicine's grisly most frequent surgical behavior toward males. (Most babies SCREAM their support - but some are rendered unconscious by the intensity of the pain.) KEY POINT... ROUTINE INFANT CIRCUMCISION is *not* Jewish ritual circumcision. In late 1987, when I discovered American MDs using phony "babies can't feel pain" neurology to obtain consent to perform "no medical indication" routine infant circumcisions, I demanded an end to the obvious child abuse and called for a religious exemption for Jewish circumcision. Pediatricians (the AAP, Jan/Feb 1988 issues of Pediatrics) immediately called for opposition to ALL religious exemptions, saying in effect that if MDs were to be forced to stop circumcising - so would Jewish ritual circumcisers! Immediately thereafter (March 1988), the California Medical Association/CMA House of Delegates ignored its own Scientific Board and by voice vote instantly changed routine circumcision from "no medical indications" to "an effective public health measure." ("Unjustifiable physical pain" is the exact definition of child abuse in California. Child abusers can go to prison for up to six years per count. Calif. Penal Code Sec. 273a.) NOTE: Jewish ritual circumcision originally entailed leaving most of the foreskin on the penis - and it was FAST! "[T]he LORD met Moses and was about to kill him. But Zipporah took a flint knife, cut off her son's foreskin and touched Moses' feet with it...So the LORD let him alone...(Genesis 4:24-26)" http://www.holyspiritinteractive.net...y/zipporah.asp Routine infant circumcision is American medicine's $400 million dollar per year GRISLY most frequent surgical behavior toward males... Routine infant circumcision should have ended BILLIONS of dollars' worth of infant screams ago - back in 1987 when I exposed AAP's perpetuation of phony "babies can't feel pain" neurology... Ending this barbaric MD behavior toward babies (see "brutal" "barbaric" quotes below) would not only save $400 million dollars per year - it would stop the infant screams and (paradoxically) PRESERVE the surgery as a CHOICE American males could make for themselves in adulthood. (It is likely that - like most males on the planet - American males would NOT chooose circumcision in adulthood.) THINK ABOUT IT AS INFANTS SCREAM AND WRITHE AND BLEED (note: sometimes babies die or lose their penises)... "One-half to one-third of the skin on the...penile shaft is sliced off." http://www.infocirc.org/MensHlth.htm (paraphrasing Ronald Goldman, PhD, author of Circumcision: The Hidden Trauma) "The average circumcision cuts off what would grow into about 12 square inches of sexually sensitive skin." http://www.infocirc.org/MensHlth.htm (quoting Ronald Goldman, PhD, author of Circumcision: The Hidden Trauma) MDs ARE SLICING OFF PART OF THE BODY'S IMMUNE SYSTEM AT THE ENTRANCE TO THE GENITO-URINARY SYSTEM! THE PREPUCE (FORESKIN) HAS IMMUNOLOGICAL PROPERTIES! "...A review of the scientific literature...reveals that the actual effect of circumcision is the destruction of...clinically-demonstated hygienic and immunological properties of the prepuce and intact penis. "The sphincter action of the preputial orifice functions like a one way valve, blocking the entry of contaminants while allowing the passage of urine.7,8 "Ectopic sebaceous glands concentrated near the frenulum produce smegma.9-12 This natural emollient contains prostatic and seminal secretions, desquamated epithelial cells, and the mucin content of the urethral glands of Littré.13,14 It protects and lubricates the glans and inner lamella of the prepuce, facilitating erection, preputial eversion, and penetration during sexual intercourse. "The inner prepuce contains apocrine glands,15 which secrete cathepsin B...chymotrypsin, neutrophil elastase,16 cytokine (a non-antibody protein that generates an immune response on contact with specific antigens)17...pheromones such as androsterone18...[and lysozyme16]... "...Lysozyme...also found in tears, human milk, and other body fluids destroys bacterial cell walls..." From Fleiss P, Hodges F, Van Howe RS. Immunological functions of the human prepuce. Sex Trans Inf 1998;74(5):364-7... http://www.cirp.org/library/disease/STD/flei MDs ARE DE FACTO LEGAL CHILD ABUSERS MD-influenced prosecutors (DAs and AGs) are negligently looking the other way, thereby making MDs de facto legal child abusers. I will cc this to my old roommate at UCLA, Bill Hodgman, now chief deputy DA for LA County DA Mark Cooley via BEWA The first step in circumcision involves actually RIPPING foreskin from glans - euphemism "freeing adhesions" - as in, "[F]reeing adhesions, is tantamount to cruel and unusual punishment and is unfounded physiologically and medically." [Kaplan GW: Circumcision: An overview. Current Problems in Pediatrics, 1977;7(5):8] Most MDs rip and slice infant penises with NO ANESTHESIA Even *with* anesthesia, routine infant circumcision is still child abuse. PARENTS: IF YOU MUST HAVE YOUR SON'S FORESKIN AMPUTATED... PLEASE FIND A LEGAL CHILD ABUSER WHO USES ANESTHESIA (According to the medical literature, Mogen clamp and dorsal penile nerve block (DPNB) injections. "Ring block" is a recommended anesthesia alternative.) MDs KNOW IT IS CHILD ABUSE As indicated above... In late 1987, Pediatricians perpetuated phony "babies can't feel pain" neurology... [Poland et al. Pediatrics 1987;80:446]. Since there were "no medical indications" for routine infant circumcision, I asked the AAP/Poland et al. to help end it. I also called for religious exemptions for Jews... In the January 1988 issue of Pediatrics, AAP members were told to "vigorously oppose in the legislatures," all present and proposed religious exemptions and "defend the rights of all children to the protection and benefits of the law...". Translated: a religious circumcision exemption from the child abuse laws means medical circumcision is indeed child abuse; therefore we M.D.s must oppose ALL religious exemptions. If we are prosecuted, the rabbis and mohelim are going down with us. In the February 1988 issue of Pediatrics, the AAP recommended anonymity for PERPETRATORS of child abuse: "The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that all states adopt laws forbidding public disclosure...of information that identifies victims of child abuse, their families, AND PERPETRATORS [emphasis added]." In March 1988, the California Medical Association House of Delegates ignored its own Scientific Board and by voice vote created "an effective public health measure" out of "no medical indications." (CMA had long stated there were "no medical indications" for routine infant circumcision.) Weeks later, the AAP convened a circumcision task force which - when it made its report one year later - failed to mention that the phony CMA had declared routine infant circumcision "an effective public health measure." (!) Of course, AAP *also* failed to mention that American medicine's phony "babies can't feel pain" neurology had been exposed just months before the CMA discovered its new public health measure! AAP *still* hasn't acknowledged this understandable^^^ though unconscionable criminal negligence. ^^^It's understandable criminal negligence because MDs wish to stay out of prison. This "wish to stay out of prison" BIAS should be stated in every American medical article on circumcision because most American MDs have committed the crime. "Most doctors believe babies can't feel pain...Most doctors today...I bought it..." - Dean Edell, M.D. claiming on national television that his physician superiors at Cornell University taught him that babies don't have nerves in their genitals. (KGO-TV San Francisco, circa 1984) American MDs can't simply stop the mass child abuse because stopping the crime would be tantamount to admitting it. See Care of the Intact Penis http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2413 VAGINAS Coincidentally, American MDs senselessly slice most VAGINAS at around the same time they slice most PENISES... Mass vagina and and penis slicing - American medicine's most frequent surgical behaviors toward males and females - are obvious crimes of negligence which sometimes escalate to criminally negligent homicide. American OBs are slicing vaginas en masse (euphemism "routine episiotomy") - surgically/FRAUDULENTLY claiming to be doing everything possible to OPEN birth canals - even as they CLOSE birth canals - up to 30%. See Criminal medical CAM at Hawai'i's John A Burns School of Medicine http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2256 See also: Helping baby open birth canal (Why obstetrics is criminal medical CAM)... http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2391 With birth canals senselessly closed up to 30%... OBs are violently pushing on babies' spines (oxytocin, Cytotec, PGE2) and gruesomely pulling (hands, forceps, vacuums)... Sometimes babies die, sometimes babies get paralyzed - but most babies "only" have their necks gruesomely manipulated. ALL spinal manipulation is gruesome with the birth canal senselessly closed up to 30%. MDs are anti- HUMAN - in addition to being anti-Semitic... MDs knew about what I am talking about early last century.... Harvard obstetrician Arthur B. Emmons, MD wrote in 1913 "[M]oving backward of the tip of the sacrum...enlarges the available space not merely directly in proportion to the distance backward, but more nearly by the square of that distance." [Emmons, AB. A study of the variations in the female pelvis, based on observations made on 217 specimens of the American Indian squaw. Biometrika 1913; 9:34-47.] And here's what was added to Williams Obstetrics at my request: "It should be noted...that the increase in the diameter of the pelvic outlet occurs **only** if the sacrum is allowed to rotate posteriorly, that is, only if the sacrum is not forced anteriorly by the weight of the maternal pelvis against the delivery table or bed." [Cunningham, MacDonald, Leveno, Gant and Gilstrap, Williams Obstetrics Appleton-Lange 1993:285, **italics in original] Unfortunately, the authors of Williams Obstetrics left in their text - in the same paragraph (!) the "dorsal widens" bald lie that first called my attention to their text)!! NOTE: The authors of Williams Obstetrics started telling their "dorsal widens" bald lie back in the 70s when Ohlsen pointed out to them that they were still claiming that pelvic diameters don't change at delivery... http://home1.gte.net/gastaldo/part2ftc.html According to Kitzinger [1993] French obstetrician Michel Odent "would never risk a breech delivery with the mother in a dorsal or semi-seated position." ("Our only intervention will be to insist on the supported squatting position..." [Odent quoted in Kitzinger S. The Complete Book of Pregnancy and Childbirth. "conceived, edited and designed" in London by Dorling Kindersley Limited; published in New York by Alfred A. Knopf, Inc. 1993:264] QUESTION: If Odent would never risk a breech delivery with the mother dorsal or semi-seated, why is he silent as "[m]any doctors prefer to deliver breech babies with the woman in the lithotomy position." [Kitzinger, 1993:261] And why does Ms. Kitzinger herself unquestioningly advise semi-sitting (closing birth canal up to 30%) as an option? [Kitzinger, 1993:261] MDs (Hannah et al.) recently decreed that singleton term breeches be taken by cesarean section. http://www.reseau-naissance.com/rsn_...#reduire_siege Because breech deliveries are performed in lithotomy, Hannah et al. studied breech births with birth canals usually closed up to 30%. See Hannah et al.'s term breech tomfoolery/Gherman et al.'s fetal radiation fraud http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/1306 REMEMBER: Obstetricians are KNOWINGLY closing birth canals up to 30%... SIMPLE PROOF... According to the Merck Manual: "When shoulder dystocia occurs...the mother's thighs are hyperflexed to increase the diameter of the pelvic outlet..." http://www.merck.com/mrkshared/mmanu...er253/253g.jsp WHY are OBs and CNMwives (nurse midwives) waiting until the head is out and shoulders get stuck before giving the baby maximum pelvic outlet diameter? WHY are we letting OBs and CNMwives force babies' heads through birth canals senselessly closed up to 30%? (An estimated 4.6% of "healthy" term babies suffer unexplained brain bleeds! And babies actually suffer DENTS in their skulls - "pingpong" skull fractures - though most of these dents/"pingpong" fractures pop out.) THE KICKER OBs and CNMwives are KEEPING birth canals closed when babies' shoulders get stuck! The Merck Manual method for increasing the diameter of the pelvic outlet - merely hyperflexing the mother's thighs - is BAD McRoberts maneuver - and BAD McRoberts maneuver does not roll the woman off her sacrum and therefore does NOT increase the diameter of the pelvic outlet! See ACOG birth crime video evidence http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2300 WMPI/JASON GARDOSI, MD Here are the simple grisly biomechanics of semisitting (and dorsal) delivery clearly stated by Jason Gardosi, MD, director of the British National Health Service/NHS West Midlands Perinatal Institute/WMPI... "...the weight of the mother is in part taken on the sacrum which is therefore pushed upwards, thus decreasing the antero-posterior diameter of the pelvic outlet..." http://www.wmpi.net/reviews/oe/oe_shoulder_dystocia.htm Incredibly, the just quoted WMPI site states the grisly biomechanics of semisitting but then RECOMMENDS semisitting delivery (closing the birth canal), as in, "The second stage...You might want to remain in bed with your back propped up with pillows...As you push, try to let yourself 'open up' below..." http://www.preg.info/book/chapter11.htm WMPI/Jason Gardosi, MD is advising women to close their birth canals, then saying: "As you push, try to let yourself 'open up' below..." (!) ON A POSITIVE NOTE: The WMPI site does recommend a version of GOOD McRoberts if the shoulders get stuck... http://www.wmpi.net/reviews/oe/oe_shoulder_dystocia.htm LAUGHABLE: Gardosi says of himself: "Developed new obstetric aid, the 'Birth Cushion', for studying squatting during the second stage of labour." http://www.obgyn.net/board/gardosi.htm In fact, no one squatted in Gardosi's 1989 Lancet "randomised controlled trial of squatting." (!) See Edgbaston (UK) birth fraud (and 'the birth cushion') http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2387 NOTE: At one time, WMPI/Jason Gardosi, MD and his British OB pal Malcolm Griffiths got me censored from an international obstetric listserv for protesting this bizarre obstetric behavior - but fortunately not before two of my articles got posted... See http://forums.obgyn.net/forums/ob-gy...9707/0128.html See also: http://forums.obgyn.net/ob-gyn-l/OBGYNL.9707/0153.html MY BEST GUESS (as to why MDs haven't yet stopped the massive obstetric crime)? Stopping it would be tantamount to admitting it. PARDONS IN ADVANCE FOR MDs... As usual, I am in favor of pardons in advance for MDs (and MBs and anyone else who is senselessly closing birth canals). MDs are just academic prime cuts forced through this culture's most powerful mental meatgrinder - medical school. Pardons in advance will allow MDs to keep doing their valid medical work, making money to pay the inevitable civil damages. LADIES: It is EASY for you to allow your birth canal to OPEN the "extra" up to 30%. Just roll onto your side as you push your baby out - or deliver on hands-and-knees, kneeling, standing, squatting, etc. BEWARE though: Some MDs and MBs will let you "try" "alternative" delivery positions but will move you back to dorsal or semisitting (close your birth canal!) as you push your baby out! Talk to your MD or MB about this TODAY. MDs/MBs: If you must push or pull - and sometimes you must - first get the woman off her sacrum - off her back/butt. MDs are a protected class... I think there are geopolitical reasons for MDs having been chosen as a protected class... See Wild circumcision rhetoric of MDs/Israel's history http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2398 A RAY OF PEDIATRIC HOPE FOR HELPLESS INFANTS In 1995, the American Academy of Pediatrics/AAP officially stated in effect that MDs can no longer make infants scream and writhe and bleed and sometimes die...and hide behind PARENTS REQUEST IT cowardice... According to AAP, "[T]he pediatrician's responsibilities to his or her patient exist independent of parental desires... "...A[n infant's screaming writhing and bleeding obviously constitutes the - TDG] patient's reluctance or refusal to assent [and - TDG] should...carry considerable weight when the proposed intervention is not essential to his or her welfare and/or can be deferred without substantial risk... "[T]hose who care for children need to provide for measures to solicit assent and to attend to possible abuses of 'raw' power over children when ethical conflicts occur." AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS Informed Consent, Parental Permission, and Assent in Pediatric Practice(RE9510) Pediatrics Volume 95, Number 2 February, 1995, p. 314-317 http://www.aap.org/policy/00662.html INFANT CIRCUMCISION: A BRUTAL, BARBARIC PRACTICE... "After years of strapping babies down for this brutal procedure and listening to their screams, we couldn't take it any longer." [Sperlich BK, Conant M. Am J Nurs (Jun)1994:16. http://www.cirp.org/nrc/] "Nursing alert...[N]urses must consider their participation in a surgical procedure that involves no anesthesia to be a barbaric practice." (p. 205) Donna L. Wong's Essentials of Pediatric Nursing [1997] "[S]till all too often barbaric...[M.D.s]...would never allow older children or adults to be subjected to such practices, nor would they submit to it themselves..." [Veteran circumcision cheerleader Colonel Thomas E. Wiswell, MD in article in the April 24, 1997 New England Journal of Medicine] BOTTOMLINE... If I were a baby about to have my penis ripped and sliced again - I would want someone STOPPING the barbaric practice. That failing, I would want anesthetic. I say again: PARENTS: IF YOU MUST HAVE YOUR SON'S FORESKIN AMPUTATED... PLEASE FIND A LEGAL CHILD ABUSER WHO USES ANESTHESIA (According to the medical literature, Mogen clamp and dorsal penile nerve block (DPNB) injections are best - with "ring block" being an anesthesia alternative.) Sincerely, Todd Dr. Gastaldo PS1 ANTI-SEMITIC MDs: Again, when I discovered American MDs using phony "babies can't feel pain" neurology to obtain consent to perform "no medical indication" routine infant circumcisions, I demanded an end to the obvious child abuse and called for a religious exemption for Jewish circumcision. Pediatricians (the AAP) immediately called for opposition to ALL religious exemptions, saying in effect that if MDs were to be forced to stop circumcising - so would Jewish ritual circumcisers! Again: Jewish ritual circumcision originally entailed leaving most of the foreskin on the penis - and it was FAST! "[T]he LORD met Moses and was about to kill him. But Zipporah took a flint knife, cut off her son's foreskin and touched Moses' feet with it...So the LORD let him alone...(Genesis 4:24-26)" http://www.holyspiritinteractive.net...y/zipporah.asp See also: Ancient nude wrestling (also: Surgeon Peter: 'circumcision...best performed without anaesthetic') http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2432 PS2 SOME HAVE SAID THAT **I** AM ANTI-SEMITIC... Yes, perhaps it is wrong for me to call for a religious exemption that allows Jewish ritual circumcisers to harm the tiniest Semites. After all, just as there is no scientific evidence that non-Semitic infant foreskins should be amputated by MEDICAL dieties (MDs), there is no scientific evidence that a God wants tiny Semites to have *their* foreskins amputated - in whole or in part - fast or slow. As indicated above, I think American MDs are just stooges in a geopolitical game. See again: Ancient nude wrestling (also: Surgeon Peter: 'circumcision...best performed without anaesthetic') http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2432 Truth be told, this doctor of chiropractic/DC would be satisfied to stop medical deities (MDs) from senselessly closing birth canals up to 30%. It's a matter of CHIROPRACTIC PREVENTION (non-spinal prevention) of the putative chiropractic clinicial entity (vertebral subluxation)... Medical dieties (MDs) are taking tiny lives and paralyzing tiny limbs - and causing more putative vertebral subluxations than my fellow DCs will ever be able to adust by hand. Stopping medical dieties (MDs) from closing birth canals is the ultimate in CHIROPRACTIC PREVENTION. Stopping the mass vagina and penis slashing would just be chiropractic gravy - worth billions per year. Mass vagina MD slicing (trauma to the perineum) is "performed" for "free" - but... "The most common diagnosis for hospitalization among all women is trauma to perineum due to childbirth." (!) http://www.ahcpr.gov/data/hcup/factbk3/factbk3.htm WHY are we letting OBs knowingly close birth canals up to 30%? Why are we letting them slice vaginas en masse - surgically/FRAUDULENTLY pretending they are doing everything possible to OPEN birth canals - even as they close birth canals? The medical religion is an anti-HUMAN religion - in addition to being anti-Semitic. What is the difference between God and an MD? God doesn't think he's an MD! Thanks for reading, everyone. Sincerely, Todd Dr. Gastaldo Difference between God and an MD? http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2438 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Difference between God and an MD?
"Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message nk.net... WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN GOD AND AN MD? God might help you. An MD can't. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Difference between God and an MD?
maybe i'm just hormonal but WTF goes?
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Difference between God and an MD?
"tech27" wrote in message ... "Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message nk.net... WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN GOD AND AN MD? God might help you. An MD can't. MDs help *lots* of people. They just shouldn't be senselessly harming mothers and babies - en masse or otherwise. See again: Difference between God and an MD? http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2438 Oh, wait, tech27 was saying that MDs can't help *me* - LOL! Good one! |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
'Just hormonal' means up to 30% 'extra' room for baby - IF...
I wrote:
Difference between God and an MD? http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2438 "Christine" wrote: maybe i'm just hormonal but WTF goes? Christine, Here's the VAGINA part of what goes... MDs are slicing vaginas (euphemism "routine episiotomy") - surgically/FRAUDULENTLY inferring they are doing everything possible to OPEN birth canals - even as they CLOSE birth canals up to 30%... The simple instructions on how easy it is for a woman to allow her birth canal to OPEN the "extra" up to 30% were in my post... See again: Difference between God and an MD? http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2438 As noted on the subject line of this post, "just hormonal" (relaxin) means up to 30% of "extra" room for the baby - IF - you don't push your baby out on your back or butt (dorsal or semisitting).... Thanks for reading, Sincerely, Todd Dr. Gastaldo |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Difference between God and an MD?
After 30 years of festering in this cell and praying to GOD, my legs finally
enabled me to escape. Anth "tech27" wrote in message ... "Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message nk.net... WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN GOD AND AN MD? God might help you. An MD can't. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|