If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#91
|
|||
|
|||
Deadbeats
I think that most of the men here really do want to support their
children (emotionally and financially). It's the system of making that happen that ****es them off. No arguments with that. It is very far from perfect but I sure haven't come up with a better system. It's the 'absolute' statements that **** ME off: CP=Always a women NCP=Always a man Custody should always be 50% (my ex can't even take care of himself, let alone a child. And he doesn't want 50% anyway.) Having a child is solely the womans idea/ability/responsibility/problem (takes two to tango, remember?) CP (who is always a woman) spends all the cs money on herself and doesn't spend a dime on the kids. Woman is evil and should be killed and thrown off a bridge. (my personal favorite) Zimm Pammie1 wrote: I am really shocked at the comments that the men are making. It is really sad that a Man would not want to provide for his own flesh and blood. I mean coming up with a plan to make extra money so he can move overseas. What is that? You, as a man had sex and made that child. You are responsible reguardless of how you may feel. I am a single mom of a 31/2 year old. Child care alone cost me $588 a month. That's not including keeping a roof over her head, food, health insurance and the list goes on. I just don't understand how a person would want to live knowing that he/she has left all the resposiblity on one person when it took 2 to make the kid/s. I feel that as long as there is child support enforcement than these men would stop having all these babies. If you don't want to pay then you don't need to play. My vote is for anyone who is all for going after deadbeat dads. |
#92
|
|||
|
|||
Deadbeats
In article outparenting.com,
Pammie1 says... I know I hear a lot of people complain about the amount being so high. The people still don't want to pay even if the amount was low. It all boils down to, "you should have thought about it before you decided to have sex." I know as a single parent I should have thought about things too. We live and learn. Just tough out the 18+ years and learn from your past experience. ==== Pammie, *you* are complaining about the cost of kids being so high. You admit you should not have had kids you aren't prepared to support, but rather than work to increase *your* ability to support your kids, you want to sue their dad. Why is it that toughing it out for 18 years doesn't apply to you? It seems you have fallen hook, line and sinker for the feminist belief that child support is a god-given right because women are too weak, helpless and lack the dignity to stand on their own two feet. I'm sure you will find this shocking but there are a lot of women who are standing on their own two feet and raising their children with dignity regardless of what the fathers chose to do. ==== ==== |
#93
|
|||
|
|||
Deadbeats
In article outparenting.com,
Pammie1 says... I know I hear a lot of people complain about the amount being so high. The people still don't want to pay even if the amount was low. It all boils down to, "you should have thought about it before you decided to have sex." I know as a single parent I should have thought about things too. We live and learn. Just tough out the 18+ years and learn from your past experience. ==== Pammie, *you* are complaining about the cost of kids being so high. You admit you should not have had kids you aren't prepared to support, but rather than work to increase *your* ability to support your kids, you want to sue their dad. Why is it that toughing it out for 18 years doesn't apply to you? It seems you have fallen hook, line and sinker for the feminist belief that child support is a god-given right because women are too weak, helpless and lack the dignity to stand on their own two feet. I'm sure you will find this shocking but there are a lot of women who are standing on their own two feet and raising their children with dignity regardless of what the fathers chose to do. ==== ==== |
#94
|
|||
|
|||
Deadbeats
In article outparenting.com,
Pammie1 says... I know I hear a lot of people complain about the amount being so high. The people still don't want to pay even if the amount was low. It all boils down to, "you should have thought about it before you decided to have sex." I know as a single parent I should have thought about things too. We live and learn. Just tough out the 18+ years and learn from your past experience. ==== Pammie, *you* are complaining about the cost of kids being so high. You admit you should not have had kids you aren't prepared to support, but rather than work to increase *your* ability to support your kids, you want to sue their dad. Why is it that toughing it out for 18 years doesn't apply to you? It seems you have fallen hook, line and sinker for the feminist belief that child support is a god-given right because women are too weak, helpless and lack the dignity to stand on their own two feet. I'm sure you will find this shocking but there are a lot of women who are standing on their own two feet and raising their children with dignity regardless of what the fathers chose to do. ==== ==== |
#95
|
|||
|
|||
Deadbeats
In article , Zimm says...
I think that most of the men here really do want to support their children (emotionally and financially). It's the system of making that happen that ****es them off. No arguments with that. It is very far from perfect but I sure haven't come up with a better system. It's the 'absolute' statements that **** ME off: CP=Always a women NCP=Always a man Custody should always be 50% (my ex can't even take care of himself, let alone a child. And he doesn't want 50% anyway.) Having a child is solely the womans idea/ability/responsibility/problem (takes two to tango, remember?) CP (who is always a woman) spends all the cs money on herself and doesn't spend a dime on the kids. Woman is evil and should be killed and thrown off a bridge. (my personal favorite) ==== Bob-Bob speaks for no one but Bob-Bob (and Chris). As far as 50/50 custody--it should be the default arrangement *unless* one parent wishes to opt out and pay 50% of the cost needs of the child/children. It is really very simple. It is the state that has made it obscene for dads and complicated for all involved. ==== ==== Zimm Pammie1 wrote: I am really shocked at the comments that the men are making. It is really sad that a Man would not want to provide for his own flesh and blood. I mean coming up with a plan to make extra money so he can move overseas. What is that? You, as a man had sex and made that child. You are responsible reguardless of how you may feel. I am a single mom of a 31/2 year old. Child care alone cost me $588 a month. That's not including keeping a roof over her head, food, health insurance and the list goes on. I just don't understand how a person would want to live knowing that he/she has left all the resposiblity on one person when it took 2 to make the kid/s. I feel that as long as there is child support enforcement than these men would stop having all these babies. If you don't want to pay then you don't need to play. My vote is for anyone who is all for going after deadbeat dads. |
#96
|
|||
|
|||
Deadbeats
In article , Zimm says...
I think that most of the men here really do want to support their children (emotionally and financially). It's the system of making that happen that ****es them off. No arguments with that. It is very far from perfect but I sure haven't come up with a better system. It's the 'absolute' statements that **** ME off: CP=Always a women NCP=Always a man Custody should always be 50% (my ex can't even take care of himself, let alone a child. And he doesn't want 50% anyway.) Having a child is solely the womans idea/ability/responsibility/problem (takes two to tango, remember?) CP (who is always a woman) spends all the cs money on herself and doesn't spend a dime on the kids. Woman is evil and should be killed and thrown off a bridge. (my personal favorite) ==== Bob-Bob speaks for no one but Bob-Bob (and Chris). As far as 50/50 custody--it should be the default arrangement *unless* one parent wishes to opt out and pay 50% of the cost needs of the child/children. It is really very simple. It is the state that has made it obscene for dads and complicated for all involved. ==== ==== Zimm Pammie1 wrote: I am really shocked at the comments that the men are making. It is really sad that a Man would not want to provide for his own flesh and blood. I mean coming up with a plan to make extra money so he can move overseas. What is that? You, as a man had sex and made that child. You are responsible reguardless of how you may feel. I am a single mom of a 31/2 year old. Child care alone cost me $588 a month. That's not including keeping a roof over her head, food, health insurance and the list goes on. I just don't understand how a person would want to live knowing that he/she has left all the resposiblity on one person when it took 2 to make the kid/s. I feel that as long as there is child support enforcement than these men would stop having all these babies. If you don't want to pay then you don't need to play. My vote is for anyone who is all for going after deadbeat dads. |
#97
|
|||
|
|||
Deadbeats
In article , Zimm says...
I think that most of the men here really do want to support their children (emotionally and financially). It's the system of making that happen that ****es them off. No arguments with that. It is very far from perfect but I sure haven't come up with a better system. It's the 'absolute' statements that **** ME off: CP=Always a women NCP=Always a man Custody should always be 50% (my ex can't even take care of himself, let alone a child. And he doesn't want 50% anyway.) Having a child is solely the womans idea/ability/responsibility/problem (takes two to tango, remember?) CP (who is always a woman) spends all the cs money on herself and doesn't spend a dime on the kids. Woman is evil and should be killed and thrown off a bridge. (my personal favorite) ==== Bob-Bob speaks for no one but Bob-Bob (and Chris). As far as 50/50 custody--it should be the default arrangement *unless* one parent wishes to opt out and pay 50% of the cost needs of the child/children. It is really very simple. It is the state that has made it obscene for dads and complicated for all involved. ==== ==== Zimm Pammie1 wrote: I am really shocked at the comments that the men are making. It is really sad that a Man would not want to provide for his own flesh and blood. I mean coming up with a plan to make extra money so he can move overseas. What is that? You, as a man had sex and made that child. You are responsible reguardless of how you may feel. I am a single mom of a 31/2 year old. Child care alone cost me $588 a month. That's not including keeping a roof over her head, food, health insurance and the list goes on. I just don't understand how a person would want to live knowing that he/she has left all the resposiblity on one person when it took 2 to make the kid/s. I feel that as long as there is child support enforcement than these men would stop having all these babies. If you don't want to pay then you don't need to play. My vote is for anyone who is all for going after deadbeat dads. |
#98
|
|||
|
|||
Deadbeats
"Zimm" wrote in message ... I think that most of the men here really do want to support their children (emotionally and financially). It's the system of making that happen that ****es them off. No arguments with that. It is very far from perfect but I sure haven't come up with a better system. It's the 'absolute' statements that **** ME off: CP=Always a women NCP=Always a man Custody should always be 50% (my ex can't even take care of himself, let alone a child. And he doesn't want 50% anyway.) Having a child is solely the womans idea/ability/responsibility/problem (takes two to tango, remember?) CP (who is always a woman) spends all the cs money on herself and doesn't spend a dime on the kids. Woman is evil and should be killed and thrown off a bridge. (my personal favorite) You left out a few: Men won't support their own flesh and blood. Men aren't interested in parenting. All men are deadbeats. Having sex with a woman is consent to becoming a father. If men don't want children they should wear condoms even if the woman claims to be using birth control. Fathers quit their jobs to avoid paying CS. Fathers who don't pay CS deserve to go to jail. Fathers only want joint custody to reduce CS payments. If it wasn't for all the CS enforcement fathers wouldn't pay. There's more, but you get the point. |
#99
|
|||
|
|||
Deadbeats
"Zimm" wrote in message ... I think that most of the men here really do want to support their children (emotionally and financially). It's the system of making that happen that ****es them off. No arguments with that. It is very far from perfect but I sure haven't come up with a better system. It's the 'absolute' statements that **** ME off: CP=Always a women NCP=Always a man Custody should always be 50% (my ex can't even take care of himself, let alone a child. And he doesn't want 50% anyway.) Having a child is solely the womans idea/ability/responsibility/problem (takes two to tango, remember?) CP (who is always a woman) spends all the cs money on herself and doesn't spend a dime on the kids. Woman is evil and should be killed and thrown off a bridge. (my personal favorite) You left out a few: Men won't support their own flesh and blood. Men aren't interested in parenting. All men are deadbeats. Having sex with a woman is consent to becoming a father. If men don't want children they should wear condoms even if the woman claims to be using birth control. Fathers quit their jobs to avoid paying CS. Fathers who don't pay CS deserve to go to jail. Fathers only want joint custody to reduce CS payments. If it wasn't for all the CS enforcement fathers wouldn't pay. There's more, but you get the point. |
#100
|
|||
|
|||
Deadbeats
"Zimm" wrote in message ... I think that most of the men here really do want to support their children (emotionally and financially). It's the system of making that happen that ****es them off. No arguments with that. It is very far from perfect but I sure haven't come up with a better system. It's the 'absolute' statements that **** ME off: CP=Always a women NCP=Always a man Custody should always be 50% (my ex can't even take care of himself, let alone a child. And he doesn't want 50% anyway.) Having a child is solely the womans idea/ability/responsibility/problem (takes two to tango, remember?) CP (who is always a woman) spends all the cs money on herself and doesn't spend a dime on the kids. Woman is evil and should be killed and thrown off a bridge. (my personal favorite) You left out a few: Men won't support their own flesh and blood. Men aren't interested in parenting. All men are deadbeats. Having sex with a woman is consent to becoming a father. If men don't want children they should wear condoms even if the woman claims to be using birth control. Fathers quit their jobs to avoid paying CS. Fathers who don't pay CS deserve to go to jail. Fathers only want joint custody to reduce CS payments. If it wasn't for all the CS enforcement fathers wouldn't pay. There's more, but you get the point. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Deadbeats | frankjones | Child Support | 57 | April 18th 04 01:05 AM |
Cox Strategy Targets Child Support Deadbeats | Fighting for kids | Child Support | 75 | November 14th 03 10:07 AM |
Deadbeats here to stay | Fighting for kids | Child Support | 0 | November 8th 03 02:50 AM |