If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Who has the ultimate right to choose?
"elizabeth" wrote in message ups.com... On Apr 2, 11:02 pm, (Ray Fischer) wrote: elizabeth wrote: Then she alone bears the SOLE responsibility for such choice and any resulting consequences, right? Nope. BOTH parents are supposed to support the child. The usual sexist double standard. Too bad men feel that's optional . .. It's already optional for women. Wrong. Women *are* responsible for support--and men who request custody do get it. Uhuh, and a guy I know just won the lottery. Clearly, you are unaware that women have the option of "drop-off" establishments for their newborns, adoption, or keeping the child. Sounds optional to me. I'd say it's much easier to toss in a few bucks every month than do the actual work, which is why I'd make it mandatory for the father to have sole physical custody. Guess mandatory paternity isn't good enough? Now you have to include mandatory custody. How many more double standards will it take before you're satisfied? Men would line up for vasectomies if this were the law of the land. My guess is you would have more women than men lining up to get fixed assuming women would no longer get paid to bear children. if I were in charge, in such cases, I would make the woman get a job and make the man do all the actual childcare, with no vacations, under the supervision of parents who know how to raise children properly .. . if men knew they'd be FORCED TO DO THE WORK, they'd line up for vasectomies, and never miss a child support payment. And still more of the usual sexist double standards. Just the opposite. I want to stop women from trying to get on welfare and get child support by irresponsible breeding. Uhuh. That's why you promote designated fathers paying money to such women. Since we spew so much pronatalist propaganda on women, many of the least intelligent believe that breeding children is somehow enobling. It is anything but that, in our overpopulated world. Overpopulation is a matter of opinion, but forcing a man to pay money to a woman for her sole choice is a matter of FACT. so if you are one of those asshole deadbeats, get snipped, or maybe we should do it old school, with an axe. Because, after all, we cannot expect women to be responsible for their fertility. well, dearie, many women simply don't have access to safe, effective methods. There are no "free birth control pills for any women" anymore, and there is no female method as cheap, safe, and effective as vasectomies. And that should be the presumed father's problem because? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Who has the ultimate right to choose?
On Apr 10, 6:39�pm, "Chris" wrote:
"elizabeth" wrote in message ups.com... On Apr 2, 11:02 pm, (Ray Fischer) wrote: elizabeth wrote: Then she alone bears the SOLE responsibility for such choice and any resulting consequences, right? Nope. BOTH parents are supposed to support the child. The usual sexist double standard. Too bad men feel that's optional . .. It's already optional for women. Wrong. *Women *are* responsible for support--and men who request custody do get it. Uhuh, and a guy I know just won the lottery. Clearly, you are unaware that women have the option of "drop-off" establishments for their newborns, adoption, or keeping the child. Sounds optional to me. I'd say it's much easier to toss in a few bucks every month than do the actual work, which is why I'd make it mandatory for the father to have sole physical custody. Guess mandatory paternity isn't good enough? Now you have to include mandatory custody. How many more double standards will it take before you're satisfied? Men would line up for vasectomies if this were the law of the land. My guess is you would have more women than men lining up to get fixed assuming women would no longer get paid to bear children. if I were in charge, in such cases, I would make the woman get a job and make the man do all the actual childcare, with no vacations, under the supervision of parents who know how to raise children properly .. . *if men knew they'd be FORCED TO DO THE WORK, they'd line up for vasectomies, and never miss a child support payment. And still more of the usual sexist double standards. Just the opposite. *I want to stop women from trying to get on welfare and get child support by irresponsible breeding. Uhuh. That's why you promote designated fathers paying money to such women. Since we spew so much pronatalist propaganda on women, many of the least intelligent believe that breeding children is somehow enobling. It is anything but that, in our overpopulated world. Overpopulation is a matter of opinion, but forcing a man to pay money to a woman for her sole choice is a matter of FACT. so if you are one of those asshole deadbeats, get snipped, or maybe we should do it old school, with an axe. Because, after all, we cannot expect women to be responsible for their fertility. well, dearie, many women simply don't have access to safe, effective methods. There are no "free birth control pills for any women" anymore, and there is no female method as cheap, safe, and effective as vasectomies. And that should be the presumed father's problem because? - Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Really, bottom line is if the guy doesn't want to be a father, the LEAST he can do is use a condom. Not 100% but still better than nothing. However, most guys dont like them. But some will like being a father a LOT less..... If he didn't use a condom, then too bad. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Who has the ultimate right to choose?
Relayer wrote:
Really, bottom line is if the guy doesn't want to be a father, the LEAST he can do is use a condom. A classic anti-abortion argument. Not 100% but still better than nothing. However, most guys dont like them. But some will like being a father a LOT less..... If he didn't use a condom, then too bad. "If she wore a short skirt then she deserved to be raped." Same logic. -- Ray Fischer |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Who has the ultimate right to choose?
"Ray Fischer" wrote in message ... Relayer wrote: Really, bottom line is if the guy doesn't want to be a father, the LEAST he can do is use a condom. A classic anti-abortion argument. Not 100% but still better than nothing. However, most guys dont like them. But some will like being a father a LOT less..... If he didn't use a condom, then too bad. "If she wore a short skirt then she deserved to be raped." Same logic. Oh come on, Ray. A man who does not want to be a father but does want to engage in sexual intercourse could at least have the common sense to protect himself. It's HIS sperm--he should at least try to keep the little fellers corralled. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Who has the ultimate right to choose?
teachrmama wrote:
"Ray Fischer" wrote in message Relayer wrote: Really, bottom line is if the guy doesn't want to be a father, the LEAST he can do is use a condom. A classic anti-abortion argument. Not 100% but still better than nothing. However, most guys dont like them. But some will like being a father a LOT less..... If he didn't use a condom, then too bad. "If she wore a short skirt then she deserved to be raped." Same logic. Oh come on, Ray. A man who does not want to be a father but does want to engage in sexual intercourse could at least have the common sense to protect himself. The classic anti-abortion argument. It's HIS sperm--he should at least try to keep the little fellers corralled. And her egg. But more importantly, whether to have a child is still entirely her choice. -- Ray Fischer |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Who has the ultimate right to choose?
"Ray Fischer" wrote in message ... teachrmama wrote: "Ray Fischer" wrote in message Relayer wrote: Really, bottom line is if the guy doesn't want to be a father, the LEAST he can do is use a condom. A classic anti-abortion argument. Not 100% but still better than nothing. However, most guys dont like them. But some will like being a father a LOT less..... If he didn't use a condom, then too bad. "If she wore a short skirt then she deserved to be raped." Same logic. Oh come on, Ray. A man who does not want to be a father but does want to engage in sexual intercourse could at least have the common sense to protect himself. The classic anti-abortion argument. It's HIS sperm--he should at least try to keep the little fellers corralled. And her egg. But more importantly, whether to have a child is still entirely her choice. All the more reason for the man to protect himself--seeing as how at this point in time the system is going to enrich the woman at the expense of both the man and the child. Certainly there is nobody else out there protecting you. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Who has the ultimate right to choose?
"teachrmama" wrote in message ... "Ray Fischer" wrote in message ... Relayer wrote: Really, bottom line is if the guy doesn't want to be a father, the LEAST he can do is use a condom. A classic anti-abortion argument. Not 100% but still better than nothing. However, most guys dont like them. But some will like being a father a LOT less..... If he didn't use a condom, then too bad. "If she wore a short skirt then she deserved to be raped." Same logic. Oh come on, Ray. A man who does not want to be a father but does want to engage in sexual intercourse could at least have the common sense to protect himself. It's HIS sperm--he should at least try to keep the little fellers corralled. Protecting oneself is indeed a wise course of action. However, not locking the front door does NOT get the thief off the hook. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Who has the ultimate right to choose?
teachrmama wrote:
"Ray Fischer" wrote in message teachrmama wrote: "Ray Fischer" wrote in message Relayer wrote: Really, bottom line is if the guy doesn't want to be a father, the LEAST he can do is use a condom. A classic anti-abortion argument. Not 100% but still better than nothing. However, most guys dont like them. But some will like being a father a LOT less..... If he didn't use a condom, then too bad. "If she wore a short skirt then she deserved to be raped." Same logic. Oh come on, Ray. A man who does not want to be a father but does want to engage in sexual intercourse could at least have the common sense to protect himself. The classic anti-abortion argument. It's HIS sperm--he should at least try to keep the little fellers corralled. And her egg. But more importantly, whether to have a child is still entirely her choice. All the more reason for the man to protect himself--seeing as how at this point in time the system is going to enrich the woman at the expense of both the man and the child. Certainly there is nobody else out there protecting you. Time to change the system. Not that I expect it to happen soon because most women are more interested in protecting their priviledges than they are in equality. -- Ray Fischer |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Who has the ultimate right to choose?
"Ray Fischer" wrote in message ... teachrmama wrote: "Ray Fischer" wrote in message teachrmama wrote: "Ray Fischer" wrote in message Relayer wrote: Really, bottom line is if the guy doesn't want to be a father, the LEAST he can do is use a condom. A classic anti-abortion argument. Not 100% but still better than nothing. However, most guys dont like them. But some will like being a father a LOT less..... If he didn't use a condom, then too bad. "If she wore a short skirt then she deserved to be raped." Same logic. Oh come on, Ray. A man who does not want to be a father but does want to engage in sexual intercourse could at least have the common sense to protect himself. The classic anti-abortion argument. It's HIS sperm--he should at least try to keep the little fellers corralled. And her egg. But more importantly, whether to have a child is still entirely her choice. All the more reason for the man to protect himself--seeing as how at this point in time the system is going to enrich the woman at the expense of both the man and the child. Certainly there is nobody else out there protecting you. Time to change the system. Not that I expect it to happen soon because most women are more interested in protecting their priviledges than they are in equality. I agree. But, until then, you'd best be protecting yourself, right? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Who has the ultimate right to choose?
"teachrmama" wrote in message ... "Ray Fischer" wrote in message ... teachrmama wrote: "Ray Fischer" wrote in message teachrmama wrote: "Ray Fischer" wrote in message Relayer wrote: Really, bottom line is if the guy doesn't want to be a father, the LEAST he can do is use a condom. A classic anti-abortion argument. Not 100% but still better than nothing. However, most guys dont like them. But some will like being a father a LOT less..... If he didn't use a condom, then too bad. "If she wore a short skirt then she deserved to be raped." Same logic. Oh come on, Ray. A man who does not want to be a father but does want to engage in sexual intercourse could at least have the common sense to protect himself. The classic anti-abortion argument. It's HIS sperm--he should at least try to keep the little fellers corralled. And her egg. But more importantly, whether to have a child is still entirely her choice. All the more reason for the man to protect himself--seeing as how at this point in time the system is going to enrich the woman at the expense of both the man and the child. Certainly there is nobody else out there protecting you. Time to change the system. Not that I expect it to happen soon because most women are more interested in protecting their priviledges than they are in equality. I agree. But, until then, you'd best be protecting yourself, right? Double-edged sword. Are there immediate benefits to protecting yourself? Yes. However, if the vast majority of men "protect" themselves, then the chances of the system changing approaches zero. Why? Because this problem will be virtually non-existent; no complaints, crusades, etc.. Remember, the squeaky wheel gets the grease; or at least has a chance to get the grease. No squeak, no grease. So now we have a NEW problem; that of men shouldering the irresponsible woman's responsibility. But wait, they're already doing that. Besides, how will the human race continue with men protecting themselves? Last I checked, parthenogenesis in humans does not exist. The problem men are faced with is not unlike the problem that a woman utilizing an empty laundromat late at night faces. When she gets raped while doing her children's laundry, could you imagine the public outcry if it was suggested that she somehow deserved it because she did not "protect" herself? But yet, apply the SAME example to a man (regarding unprotected sex), and it's commonly accepted that he deserved it. Go figure. I guess you could say that no benefit is without its risks. But the man should NOT be forced to share a risk without the accompanying benefit! To my knowledge, being a parent isn't a crime; at least it's not if you are a woman. But if you are a man, you get fined with TWO DECADES of payments or prison, even if you were FORCED into parenthood. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Who has the ultimate right to choose? | Chris | Child Support | 295 | April 25th 07 04:19 PM |
Who has the ultimate right to choose? | Chris | Child Support | 0 | April 4th 07 06:37 PM |
World Ultimate Fighting | [email protected] | General | 0 | February 28th 07 08:34 AM |
Ultimate Mom's Day out! | [email protected] | General | 0 | September 4th 06 04:16 PM |
Execution--the ultimate child abuse! | Fern5827 | Spanking | 6 | February 8th 04 08:30 AM |