If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
No-spank flagship sinking
American public schools were the designated flagship of the no-spank
movement. With their professional trained childcare staff, ostensively in place to educate children in a scheme requiring *compulsory* attendance, schools were a key linchpin in the no-spank movement. As usually college educated females, teachers were in a position to bully and intimidate the typical mother married right out of high school or with a non-education degree. It was an advantage that no-spanks utilized to great effect. Schools would be aided and assisted by a feminist-dominated child welfare Schutzstaffel, and other strategically placed no-spank bureaucrats. Like teachers, feminists in child welfare were frequently better educated than the mothers with whom they came in contact. No-spank apologists in media were also enlisted to spread no-spank propaganda. No-spank was always good; spanking was always bad. It was the party line from hell. The stage was set for people like William Penn Elementary School principal Marlene Whitby. Despite her educational advantage and years of experience, Whitby never bothered to look at an available school bus video after one student accused another of stealing money. She never took the time to talk to the school bus driver on whose bus 8-year-old Katie White supposedly took $5 from another student. Instead, the plump princess in her perfect no-spank kingdom dragged little Katie from classroom to classroom in the school calling the innocent girl a thief and a liar in front of other students. While many other students realized the principal's actions were wrong, Katie's sister kicked the 8-year-old out of their shared bedroom because the principal said Katie was a thief and a liar. No teacher came to Katie's defense during her needless humiliation. Many parents were enraged. The Elizabeth Forward school district superintendent laid low. The school board, headed by a minister, stonewalled. The verbal abuse of a student was officially classified as a personnel matter. Katie's father, Ryan White, was officially helpless. Police were useless since there is no law against verbal abuse. The brave new world of no-spank had placed all the emphasis on physical violence and conveniently ignored the damage caused by verbal abuse. It was not a mere oversight since no-spanks are often verbally abusive. They needed this blind spot in the law to perpetuate their agenda. That way, verbally abusive no-spanks could and still can say nasty things about parents without fear of recrimination. When compared to physical abuse, psychological abuse gets a free ride in America. After decades of being intimidated by schoolteachers in a compulsory attendance scheme, parents began to understand how professional no-spanks play the game. When the Elizabeth Forward school system began to pretend nothing untoward happened to little Katie, parents began to take matters in their own hands. They talked among themselves. Then the parents besieged last Wednesday's school board meeting. Nervous school officials called in the police to protect the school board from the very people who elected them! Finally, things got so hot for Whitby that the verbally abusive principal resigned her cushy position before the end of the week. No one arrested her. No one fired her. Although in technical violation of a school system discipline policy, legally, Whitby had done nothing wrong. The good news is that parents are getting a good handle on the no-spank game. Parents understand that, having provided no real alternative to spanking, no-spanks are prone to often child-like verbal bullying of both parent and child. They also realize that no-spanks don't have any greater love for children than do their parents. No-spanks simply don't like spanking. The agenda is not about children; it's about what no-spanks want. Nothing more. That realization doesn't exactly endear no-spanks to parents. That is one reason why no-spanks have lost the home front and are only left with schools as their battleground. At the expense of a little girl, the parents in Elizabeth discovered that the verbally abusive childcare professional at William Penn Elementary School didn't really like children. Whitby didn't even have enough for little Katie to administer any "discipline procedure ....[to]... teach respect for the dignity of individuals." Nor, even after treating little Katie like a dog, did the verbally abusive principal have the good sense to issue a public apology. The inability of apologize is an almost universal characteristic of no-spanks. Their egos are so fragile that they can never be wrong. That is why, all too often, they have to hide behind educational and related credentials. It gives them an air of superiority and makes it easier for them to bully unsophisticated parents. When it comes to children, no-spanks are often about as helpful as a pushy French waiter in a fast-food restaurant. Like the verbally abuse principal, their bullying tactics usually cause more difficulties than they solve. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Giggles from opinions..giggle! was No-spank flagship sinking
Opinions wrote: American public schools were the designated flagship of the no-spank movement. My lordy, opinions, do you know anything? Try reading "The History of Childhood" by Llynd DeMause and "Centuries of Childhood" by Phbilippe Aries. In fact, try reading. With their professional trained childcare staff, ostensively in place to educate children in a scheme requiring *compulsory* attendance, schools were a key linchpin in the no-spank movement. This is almost too stupid to deserve a response. What do you know about the Fireside Movement, about Dame Schools, about early education? What do you know about Luther, Comenius, Hall, Froebel, Calvin, etc.? What do you know about the history of education? You spout lies after lies after lies. As usually college educated females, teachers were in a position to bully and intimidate the typical mother married right out of high school or with a non-education degree. It was an advantage that no-spanks utilized to great effect. Another totallyt ignorant and uninformed "opinion" response, who bases his/her popsts on opinion. I'm not cutting the post below, because it is too humorous, and would be hard to replicate. Thinking people will enjou the post. By the way, I have an opinion that the earth is indeed, flat. And I have an opinion that "bleeding" Schools would be aided and assisted by a feminist-dominated child welfare Schutzstaffel, and other strategically placed no-spank bureaucrats. Like teachers, feminists in child welfare were frequently better educated than the mothers with whom they came in contact. No-spank apologists in media were also enlisted to spread no-spank propaganda. No-spank was always good; spanking was always bad. It was the party line from hell. The stage was set for people like William Penn Elementary School principal Marlene Whitby. Despite her educational advantage and years of experience, Whitby never bothered to look at an available school bus video after one student accused another of stealing money. She never took the time to talk to the school bus driver on whose bus 8-year-old Katie White supposedly took $5 from another student. Instead, the plump princess in her perfect no-spank kingdom dragged little Katie from classroom to classroom in the school calling the innocent girl a thief and a liar in front of other students. While many other students realized the principal's actions were wrong, Katie's sister kicked the 8-year-old out of their shared bedroom because the principal said Katie was a thief and a liar. No teacher came to Katie's defense during her needless humiliation. Many parents were enraged. The Elizabeth Forward school district superintendent laid low. The school board, headed by a minister, stonewalled. The verbal abuse of a student was officially classified as a personnel matter. Katie's father, Ryan White, was officially helpless. Police were useless since there is no law against verbal abuse. The brave new world of no-spank had placed all the emphasis on physical violence and conveniently ignored the damage caused by verbal abuse. It was not a mere oversight since no-spanks are often verbally abusive. They needed this blind spot in the law to perpetuate their agenda. That way, verbally abusive no-spanks could and still can say nasty things about parents without fear of recrimination. When compared to physical abuse, psychological abuse gets a free ride in America. After decades of being intimidated by schoolteachers in a compulsory attendance scheme, parents began to understand how professional no-spanks play the game. When the Elizabeth Forward school system began to pretend nothing untoward happened to little Katie, parents began to take matters in their own hands. They talked among themselves. Then the parents besieged last Wednesday's school board meeting. Nervous school officials called in the police to protect the school board from the very people who elected them! Finally, things got so hot for Whitby that the verbally abusive principal resigned her cushy position before the end of the week. No one arrested her. No one fired her. Although in technical violation of a school system discipline policy, legally, Whitby had done nothing wrong. The good news is that parents are getting a good handle on the no-spank game. Parents understand that, having provided no real alternative to spanking, no-spanks are prone to often child-like verbal bullying of both parent and child. They also realize that no-spanks don't have any greater love for children than do their parents. No-spanks simply don't like spanking. The agenda is not about children; it's about what no-spanks want. Nothing more. That realization doesn't exactly endear no-spanks to parents. That is one reason why no-spanks have lost the home front and are only left with schools as their battleground. At the expense of a little girl, the parents in Elizabeth discovered that the verbally abusive childcare professional at William Penn Elementary School didn't really like children. Whitby didn't even have enough for little Katie to administer any "discipline procedure ...[to]... teach respect for the dignity of individuals." Nor, even after treating little Katie like a dog, did the verbally abusive principal have the good sense to issue a public apology. The inability of apologize is an almost universal characteristic of no-spanks. Their egos are so fragile that they can never be wrong. That is why, all too often, they have to hide behind educational and related credentials. It gives them an air of superiority and makes it easier for them to bully unsophisticated parents. When it comes to children, no-spanks are often about as helpful as a pushy French waiter in a fast-food restaurant. Like the verbally abuse principal, their bullying tactics usually cause more difficulties than they solve. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
To spank or not to spank | Doan | Spanking | 0 | January 23rd 05 07:11 AM |
Why would you spank if you didn't have to? | Kane | General | 0 | March 5th 04 10:13 PM |
And again he strikes........ Doan strikes ...... again! was Kids should work... | Kane | General | 2 | December 6th 03 03:28 AM |
And again he strikes........ Doan strikes ...... again! was Kids should work... | Kane | Spanking | 2 | December 6th 03 03:28 AM |
And again he strikes........ Doan strikes ...... again! was Kids should work... | Kane | Foster Parents | 2 | December 6th 03 03:28 AM |