Regarding Brandon's Tactics -- How do you like his style now?

Brandon D Cartwright wrote:

On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 03:06:14 GMT, "TomBa -NP-f36-"
wrote:

That really is a silly arguement. If the only thing keeping you (the
royal you, not you in particular) from stalking and assaulting children
is illegal pornography, then you should be seeking serious help.

So then the royal you would prefer potential child molesters to be on the
street stalking new victims instead of seeking a private source of
relief...

Thanx for the clarification!

Thank you for the clarification that all pedophiles *are* potential
child molesters who seemingly only need an Internet outage to be in
the streets assaulting children.
-----------------------------
Do you really know nothing at all about the Theory of Science behind
inferences of causation??? What a person does prior to a criminal
act cannot be shown to have caused that act, no matter how much you
would like to believe otherwise, if you cannot show that it inevitably
leads to those kinds of acts in others, and you cannot. It is like
blaming a movie for one person's crime without first asking if all
people who saw the novie ALSO did a similar crime!! It's illogical
nonsense. It's trying to connect things as causal by similarity
without actually showing any cause and effect.

It's like saying that a person taking masturbating must have caused
him to rape someone later on that same night, even when statistically
it actually made him LESS likely to rape.

It's like the 12th century notion of reasonableness and thinking
someone is a witch because she weighs more than a duck, ala Monty
Python and the Holy Grail. Now we make fun of that kind of logic
now, but YOU'RE doing the SAME kind of thing!!
Steve