Child Support Guidelines are UNFAIR! Lets join together to fight them!

"Werebat" wrote in message
news:w1LSe.9065$Cc5.3519@lakeread06...

Dusty wrote:

"Werebat" wrote in message
news:dZISe.9054$Cc5.6602@lakeread06...

[snip]

Oh come on, there must be something left to squable over! How about
Ron's

Ruby Slippers? Or the sky being blue? Perhaps the price of rice in
China..

What in the Hell is all this? I've got "issues" to the point where
people who accuse me of being "sick" score brownie points with Gini, and
now I've got ruby slippers?

I don't even know what that could mean... Guess it's all a sign for me
to go back to trolling...

- Ron ^*^


Ron, click your heals (while wearing the Ruby Slippers) three times and
repeat "I want to go home". If you do this enough times, you'll wake up
in
Michigan, at Mike Cox's house.

So I'm Mike Cox now, is it? From the young people, such disrespect I get!

- Ron ^*^

No you idiot, AT his house. I never said you were him. Do I have to
explain everything to you??

"Werebat" wrote in message
news:j0LSe.9063$Cc5.3305@lakeread06...

Dusty wrote:
"Werebat" wrote in message
news:zrKSe.9059$Cc5.8019@lakeread06...

Alan Harding wrote:

In message j6qSe.7265$Cc5.698@lakeread06, Werebat

writes

[snip]

And the use of 'use' in your post indicates...

Your use of the "'" instead of """ in your post indicates that you are a
cocksucking faggot with a wig fetish.

- Ron ^*^

That's tellin' 'em Ron.

Your use of "tellin'" and "'em" in your post indicates that you are a
redneck who likes to perch precariously on your porch rocking chair and
spend the entire afternoon snackin' from the cracker barrel. Also, you
voted for Badnarik.

- Ron ^*^

ROTFLMAO!!!!

Ron, you are such a card. Thanks for the laugh.

Gini wrote:
"Werebat" wrote in message
news:LNOSe.9106$Cc5.6310@lakeread06...


Gini wrote:


"Werebat" wrote in message
newsvKSe.9061$Cc5.5554@lakeread06...

.................................


You know the one I mean -- the one you widely crossposted with soc.men
in the headers -- the very same one you posted in alt.child-support
(but didn't crosspost) under your Werebat name within 4 minutes of the
Ed Bergin one. Funny how "Ed" had all the same major header settings
you have including the ISP #.

Yeah, that was a joke post. Nice super-sleuthing. I forged my headers
there because I know a number of people have killfiled "Werebat" on
talk.origins. That was it.

====
Damn! I was so proud of your progress. Now this. Say it aint't so, Ron!
Maybe there's a local self-help group
you can get into.
====

"Progress"?

Gini, you seriously haven't caught any of my alternate personas HERE over
the last year or so? Really?

===
I seriously haven't been paying attention, Ron. I've had more significant
family matters to attend to and my time here
has been quite limited. The times I have read the posts, I've been quite
brief and haven't followed any nonsensical
threads as they have become quite predictable and boring. Since this is the
genre your ruse postings fall under, I simply
missed them (if, that is, they really existed at all). In other words,
Ron...I don't care. I can say that it isn't your modus operandi
to post serious posts along with ruse postings and you have participated
seriously in this group for many months. So, what ruse postings have you
made in this group lately? Show me the posts, Ron.
===

Hmm... You "don't care", yet you want me to show you the posts...
Yeah, THAT'S the ticket... :^)

- Ron ^*^

Dusty wrote:

"Werebat" wrote in message
news:LNOSe.9106$Cc5.6310@lakeread06...


Gini wrote:


"Werebat" wrote in message
newsvKSe.9061$Cc5.5554@lakeread06...

.................................


You know the one I mean -- the one you widely crossposted with soc.men
in the headers -- the very same one you posted in alt.child-support
(but didn't crosspost) under your Werebat name within 4 minutes of the
Ed Bergin one. Funny how "Ed" had all the same major header settings
you have including the ISP #.

Yeah, that was a joke post. Nice super-sleuthing. I forged my headers
there because I know a number of people have killfiled "Werebat" on
talk.origins. That was it.

====
Damn! I was so proud of your progress. Now this. Say it aint't so, Ron!
Maybe there's a local self-help group
you can get into.
====

"Progress"?

Gini, you seriously haven't caught any of my alternate personas HERE
over the last year or so? Really?

- Ron ^*^


OMG!!! He, er, I mean, she used quotes!! Ron's actually a Ronnie?!?

Your use of "OMG!!!" indicates that you are a pert-breasted teenaged girl.

- Ron ^*^

Bob Whiteside wrote:

"Werebat" wrote in message
news:SMOSe.9105$Cc5.582@lakeread06...


Interestingly enough, I never seem to have trouble getting people to
realize when I am posting something that is meant to be taken seriously.
In fact, I can't remember a time when someone has failed to take
seriously a post that I meant to be taken seriously.


What a bunch of total BS! You have been challenged here numerous times for
posting under erroneous personas. You have acknolwedged doing it to
"stimulate discusions." If only you can determine whether a post is serious
or not, no one in this newsgroup can refute your claim. However, you do
have a history of posting total BS scenarios and you have been caught doing
it! A lot of us don't take your postings seriously. And we have no way to
determine which postings are real and which postings are fabrications.

Yes you do, liar. It's patently obvious.


So, looks like you're wrong again!


I disagree! I think she has a point!

On the top of her head, maybe.


If you're just one of those people who thinks that "flowers are red, and
green leaves are green", and you get your panties in a bunch when they
aren't seen the way they always have been seen -- then I'm happy to be
bunching your panties! That's just one of those things I like to do.


That's just more BS to try to cover up your tendencies to post BS and then
back away from it. Attacking a critic is not a good way to win this
argument.

There is NO "winning" this argument, period. It would be pointless to
try to do so. And no, it is not BS -- it really is one of those things
I like to do.

- Ron ^*^

Jill wrote:

On Sun, 04 Sep 2005 23:17:04 -0400, Werebat
wrote:



Jill wrote:


On Sun, 04 Sep 2005 18:25:22 -0400, Werebat
wrote:

Is the above supposed to be tongue in cheek or is that an admission
that you really were trying to troll in soc.men recently? That is,
before I inadvertantly outed you.

Eh? When did I deny that, after I was outed?


Where did I say you denied it?

Why would I have to make an admission that I was "really" trying to
troll in soc.men if I'd never denied having done so?


Because it wasn't crossposted here. Considering your fondness for
crossposting, I wonder why that series of trolling attempts wasn't
posted here as well. Just how do you come to leave alt.child-support
out of most of your mischief in other NG's?

Why, Jill, that would be out of respect for the seriousness of the
topics discussed here. You ought to be ashamed of yourself.


BTW, I noted the stupid Bush Bashing post (Meteorological Terroism?)
you sent under a different name [Ed Bergin] late on 9/2.

Oh, you're a Bush fan. THAT explains it...


Whether or not I'm a "Bush fan" has nothing to do with the off topic
idiocy of your forged header post. Trolling and spamming are not
widely thought of as funny or cute.

Funny. Three people sent me e-mails about that post saying how much
they liked it, and one person put it up on their website. Looks like
you're wrong. You also might want to look up the definition of "spamming".


You crossposted it to a series of NG's and you got 3 positive
responses! Oh my, how impressive. LOL.

Hmm.


How many who thought the joke unfunny responded? How many trashed it
without opening it? How many killfiled "Ed" in response to reading
it?

Hmm.


You don't know if your joke was more positively or negatively received
but a paltry 3 positive replies doesn't mean squat.

But your own negativity now DOES mean something, right?


That some other
idiot allegedly put it on his website is also devoid of any real
meaning.

But what does provide us with "real meaning" on Usenet?


While you're at it, explain to me, in non-subjective terms, why that
post was "stupid" or "idiotic".


Because that is my opinion of it. I am entitled to view it any way I
choose to. Obviously your mileage varies and so be it.

You've never read "The Onion", have you? The post in question was
written with almost the same style, and in the same spirit.

I guess what I find so interesting here is why you choose to spew so
much vitriol over an obvious joke post. In a separate thread. I mean,
I obviously hit a raw nerve with what I wrote. If you just didn't find
it funny, you would've said to yourself, "Meh, whatever" and left it at
that. I'm sure lots of other people did. But what you write here
indicates that you are actually quite angry about it. It goes beyond
not finding the post particularly funny. It makes me wonder about your
own issues. Normal people do not blow up about things like that.

Me, one of my quirks is that I'm easily offended by people who are
easily offended. Which is why you are drawing my attention right now.


BTW, you neatly stepped around making an explanation as to why you
didn't crosspost your stupid joke with a "forged" header from
alt.child-support.

You never asked me to explain that.

I don't know, I just felt like posting here with my normal handle. Does
that really need an explanation? Why?


And you attacked MoonShyne for her behavior on usenet. I never
thought the day would come where I'd post something that indirectly
defends her but I guess Hell just froze over.

Umm... You're upset because I didn't forge my headers?

You're silly! :^)


You troll and spam and have the gall to point a finger at her for
behaving badly. That makes you a hypocrite. And a troll. There's
your explanation.

To be a hypocrite Moonie, I'd have to find your personal info and
post it on a sex site. I have no intentions of doing that.

As for being a troll, yeah, I am one. So? What are you gonna do about
it, netcop? Huh? What are you gonna DO about it?


Wouldn't it have been easier to send it all out at once or do you
think this NG has a greater tolerance for trolling than the other
groups?

Eh?

You don't make any sense. If I thought this NG had a greater tolerance
for trolling, wouldn't I be MORE likely to forge my headers here?


It makes perfect sense. The *content* of your idiot post was what
made it trolling...duh. It was off topic to this NG every bit as much
as to the others "Ed" spammed. That you used your normal "handle"
here indicates you thought the good people here were more tolerant of
your spam than other groups might be.

So, you'd be upset if I forged my headers... But you're also upset that
I didn't forge my headers? You're weird.

If you're just upset that I posted something that was off-topic, I'm
wondering why you don't equally flame every other off-topic poster here
and elsewhere. I've obviously hit a nerve with you.


You know the one I mean -- the one you widely crossposted with soc.men
in the headers -- the very same one you posted in alt.child-support
(but didn't crosspost) under your Werebat name within 4 minutes of the
Ed Bergin one. Funny how "Ed" had all the same major header settings
you have including the ISP #.

Yeah, that was a joke post. Nice super-sleuthing. I forged my headers
there because I know a number of people have killfiled "Werebat" on
talk.origins. That was it.


Super-sleuthing? Thank you but you give me far too much credit. Your
idea of forging headers is rather pedestrian. All you did was change
the name of the sender and remove the word "CHAOS" from the
organizaion setting. Everything else matched including your ISP #.

LOL it did the job I wanted it to do. Never play an ace when a deuce
will do, you know?


Not too bright, eh?

Nice ad hominem. You seem to share a taste for them with Moonshyne.


You think I'm the only one on usenet who reads
headers?

I think that killfiles rarely do. Which was the point, in case you
missed it.


You probably didn't get the "job" done nearly as well as you
think considering all you got was 3 responses out of how many groups
spammed.

This word, "spam"... I do not think it means what you think that it
means...


All things considered, I don't think you've been unfairly criticized
by Gini or Dusty based on this kind of stuff.

But what, specifically, is the criticism? Do you think that I really
wear ruby slippers? Do you think that someone calling me "sick" somehow
elevates their level of stability in your eyes? Hmm?


Hmm? This discussion has been about your behavior, not theirs.

Oh, has it? I'm sorry, I should have taken a moment to look at the header.


Why don't you try reading the contents instead?

Oh, I did, it's just that I didn't know that this entire discussion was
specifically about my behavior. It was pretty evident to YOU, though.
Interesting...


I
don't know if you're sick or not and if you wear ruby slippers I'd
rather not hear about it. I just don't think your behavior is
consistent and it makes it harder to take you seriously when you are
trying to make a serious point. HTH.

Interestingly enough, I never seem to have trouble getting people to
realize when I am posting something that is meant to be taken seriously.
In fact, I can't remember a time when someone has failed to take
seriously a post that I meant to be taken seriously.

So, looks like you're wrong again!


The only time I was wrong about you is when I took your previous posts
seriously.

Really? You think that NONE of my previous posts have been in earnest, now?

Interesting...


If you're just one of those people who thinks that "flowers are red, and
green leaves are green", and you get your panties in a bunch when they
aren't seen the way they always have been seen -- then I'm happy to be
bunching your panties! That's just one of those things I like to do.


You don't know anything about how I think. You don't know anything
about my panties either. You don't even know anything about how you
think, apparently because you don't do it often.

Again with the ad hominems. You seem to get off on telling me that I am
"stupid" and that my posts are "idiotic". I wonder where this is coming
from... Why the need for these put-downs? It's a bit childish, don't
you think? Sorta caves in that soapbox you're preaching on.

- Ron ^*^

Dusty wrote:

"Werebat" wrote in message
news:w1LSe.9065$Cc5.3519@lakeread06...

Dusty wrote:


"Werebat" wrote in message
news:dZISe.9054$Cc5.6602@lakeread06...

[snip]


Oh come on, there must be something left to squable over! How about

Ron's


Ruby Slippers? Or the sky being blue? Perhaps the price of rice in

China..


What in the Hell is all this? I've got "issues" to the point where
people who accuse me of being "sick" score brownie points with Gini, and
now I've got ruby slippers?

I don't even know what that could mean... Guess it's all a sign for me
to go back to trolling...

- Ron ^*^


Ron, click your heals (while wearing the Ruby Slippers) three times and
repeat "I want to go home". If you do this enough times, you'll wake up

in

Michigan, at Mike Cox's house.

So I'm Mike Cox now, is it? From the young people, such disrespect I get!

- Ron ^*^


No you idiot, AT his house. I never said you were him. Do I have to
explain everything to you??

You have to explain THIS. You mentioned me having ruby slippers, and
I'm curious where that came from.

My guess at the moment is that it was just a random bit of humor that
might not really have anything to "get" about it. But if there is, I'm
curious what it is.

The thing is, if I'm anyone from the Wizard of Oz, it's a flying monkey.
I mean, come on.

- Ron ^*^

Dusty wrote:

"Werebat" wrote in message
news:j0LSe.9063$Cc5.3305@lakeread06...

Dusty wrote:

"Werebat" wrote in message
news:zrKSe.9059$Cc5.8019@lakeread06...


Alan Harding wrote:


In message j6qSe.7265$Cc5.698@lakeread06, Werebat



writes

[snip]


And the use of 'use' in your post indicates...

Your use of the "'" instead of """ in your post indicates that you are a
cocksucking faggot with a wig fetish.

- Ron ^*^

That's tellin' 'em Ron.

Your use of "tellin'" and "'em" in your post indicates that you are a
redneck who likes to perch precariously on your porch rocking chair and
spend the entire afternoon snackin' from the cracker barrel. Also, you
voted for Badnarik.

- Ron ^*^


ROTFLMAO!!!!

Ron, you are such a card. Thanks for the laugh.

I aim to please.

- Ron ^*^

"Werebat" wrote in message
news:S3RSe.9173$Cc5.6982@lakeread06...


Gini wrote:
"Werebat" wrote in message
news:LNOSe.9106$Cc5.6310@lakeread06...

.................................................. ......
====
Damn! I was so proud of your progress. Now this. Say it aint't so, Ron!
Maybe there's a local self-help group
you can get into.
====

"Progress"?

Gini, you seriously haven't caught any of my alternate personas HERE over
the last year or so? Really?

===
I seriously haven't been paying attention, Ron. I've had more
significant family matters to attend to and my time here
has been quite limited. The times I have read the posts, I've been quite
brief and haven't followed any nonsensical
threads as they have become quite predictable and boring. Since this is
the genre your ruse postings fall under, I simply
missed them (if, that is, they really existed at all). In other words,
Ron...I don't care. I can say that it isn't your modus operandi
to post serious posts along with ruse postings and you have participated
seriously in this group for many months. So, what ruse postings have you
made in this group lately? Show me the posts, Ron.
===

Hmm... You "don't care", yet you want me to show you the posts... Yeah,
THAT'S the ticket... :^)
====
I don't care. You accused me of missing it. I said prove it. You didn't
prove it.
Still waiting.
====

- Ron ^*^

"Jill" wrote in message
news ...........................
Because it wasn't crossposted here. Considering your fondness for
crossposting, I wonder why that series of trolling attempts wasn't
posted here as well. Just how do you come to leave alt.child-support
out of most of your mischief in other NG's?
=====
He likes us. He needs us. He posted a lot of ruse posts here when he first
showed up.
We caught him repeatedly. He even began posting malicious posts and signing
my name to them.
I had to notify the group to check headers to make sure what they were
reading was really written
by me. Still, eventually I had to notify the group I would no longer be
posting here because I couldn't take the
chance that some would actually believe Ron's posts were from me and I could
not be responsibile
for giving out bad information on topics of significant importance to those
who come to this group
looking for real help and guidance. He later stopped trolling the group and
settled into genuine participation and
most here accepted that (but with reservation, I'm sure).
=====