A Parenting & kids forum. ParentingBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » ParentingBanter.com forum » alt.parenting » Spanking
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Guilty until proven innocent: Parents accused of child abuse by DCFSfight to clear their names



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 14th 08, 05:54 AM posted to alt.support.child-protective-services,alt.support.foster-parents,alt.dads-rights.unmoderated,alt.parenting.spanking
fx
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,848
Default Guilty until proven innocent: Parents accused of child abuse by DCFSfight to clear their names

Guilty until proven innocent: Parents accused of child abuse by DCFS
fight to clear their names

http://www.bnd.com/news/local/story/327965.html

BY GEORGE PAWLACZYK AND BETH HUNDSDORFER
News-Democrat

The Illinois Department of Children and Family Services wrongly placed
more than 3,000 people on the state's official list of child abusers
over a five-year period, a News-Democrat investigation found.

That's an error rate of one in four, based on more than 11,000 cases
where people appealed to have their names removed from the list.

Parents and foster parents accused of child abuse or neglect can lose
their reputations, their jobs, even their children.

"They're not all bad, there are good ones," Nick Brunstein said of state
child abuse investigators, "but the bad ones have the power of God, and
with the stroke of a pen they can ruin your life."

Brunstein and his wife, Judi, of Belleville, are former foster parents
who battled the DCFS to clear their names and won, but spent thousands
of dollars on legal fees and lost their children.

"We went through two years of absolute hell," Judi Brunstein said.

A review of state child abuse records by the newspaper found that more
than 80,000 people were placed on the child abuse list -- called the
State Central Register -- from Jan. 1, 2002, to Aug. 1, 2007. Of those,
11,473 people appealed, and 3,051, or 27 percent, won their appeals and
had their names removed from the list or saw their cases tossed out due
to lack of evidence.

Another 1,426 appeals were denied; 3,178 were abandoned or withdrawn by
the accused; 3,289 cases were closed or dismissed through various
administrative processes, and 529 appeals were pending.

While DCFS will not release copies of administrative law judges'
decisions, several were obtained by the newspaper from parents who appealed.

DCFS spokesman Kendall Marlowe acknowledged that mistakes are made, but
he said the vast majority of people on the State Central Register were
placed there properly, and that most remain on the list for the required
minimum of five years. He declined further comment.

Child abuse investigations are based on a lower standard of proof, or
"credible evidence," despite a 2004 recommendation by the Illinois
Supreme Court that DCFS raise the standard to "a preponderance of the
evidence" -- the standard used in civil courts.

As with all court proceedings, getting to the truth can be difficult,
and winning an appeal doesn't necessarily mean that in every case there
was no abuse or neglect.

"A lot of what happens at these hearings is it becomes a legal process,
not ... whether it happened or not, but whether enough evidence is
presented," said Meryl Paniak, the DCFS' chief administrative law judge.
"So does that mean some people are probably unfounded and shouldn't be?
Yes. And it's the same thing with some who are indicated and probably
shouldn't be."

However, attorneys who regularly represent parents at appeals hearings
-- which are closed to the public -- say that many child abuse
investigations are so flawed they are unreliable.

"They're supposed to be thorough. They're supposed to be fair. They're
supposed to follow their own rules. And in the majority of cases where
we represent people, that's not what's happening," attorney Diane
Redleaf, executive director of the nonprofit Family Defense Center in
Chicago, said.

"We see so many cases where the basic rules are being ignored completely
by the state investigators," she said.

Critics say the child welfare agency's caseworkers, bound by a legal
mandate to protect children, are too quick to turn on the very people
they rely on to make the system work, mainly dedicated and loving
parents, including foster and adoptive parents.

"I've told my friends not to adopt, not to foster through DCFS. They
will get it in the teeth if they do," said Tom Kennedy, a Clayton, Mo.,
lawyer formerly based in Alton who has many Illinois clients. "On the
one hand, they do a very bad job of investigating real serious cases of
abuse. On the other hand, they don't know how to rule out unmerited,
unwarranted claims."

A 2006 News-Democrat series "Lethal Lapses" reported that 53 children
died while under DCFS' care after flawed investigations by caseworkers
who did not follow their own rules.

Supporters of the system say where child abuse is suspected, caseworkers
must first protect children.

"All the social workers I saw in my own research were much more afraid
of leaving a child in a home where they could be harmed than they were
of falsely accusing a parent," said Jennifer Reich, an assistant
professor in the Department of Sociology and Criminology at the
University of Denver.

In most child abuse cases there are no criminal charges, but people
still need to hire a lawyer to fight the child abuser designation the
state has placed on them -- even though many are poor and can't afford
legal help, Kennedy said.

They also must agree to cooperate fully with state investigators
--usually by accepting a state-drafted safety plan -- or risk losing
their children immediately.

For that reason, many people simply choose not to fight back, parental
advocates say.

"If you don't have a lawyer, you are lost," said Chicago attorney Robert
Lehrer, who formerly worked as a public guardian safeguarding abused
children's rights.

"DCFS is always represented by a lawyer who does nothing else. Most
people don't appeal. They can't afford a lawyer and don't believe they
have a chance," he said.

Sign and they'll go away

When a state official came knocking in February 2007, Nick and Judi
Brunstein already had been cleared of allegations that landed them on
the state's list of child abusers.

But they didn't know it yet, because their lawyer had not been notified
of the hearing judge's ruling.

Nevertheless, a DCFS worker offered to return their foster care license
and close the case if they signed a paper saying they were guilty of
licensing violations, the couple said.

"I told her that there is no way that we are going to sign anything and
admit to something we didn't do," said Nick Brunstein, a retired Army
officer and Desert Storm veteran.

The oldest of the Brunsteins' three foster children -- an 11-year-old
girl diagnosed as schizophrenic and bipolar -- accused the couple of
physically and emotionally abusing them.

She also said the Brunsteins were being overly strict by requiring the
children to do chores and homework.

The day after the caseworker's visit, the Belleville couple learned that
DCFS administrative law judge Judy Heineken believed them and ordered
their names removed from the child abuse list. They recently got their
foster care license back.

Heineken's 25-page ruling criticized DCFS caseworkers for basic errors
in the investigation and for presenting an abuse case dependent on the
uncorroborated word of the 11-year-old.

The judge also chastised the agency's main expert witness, a Belleville
psychologist, who didn't know the girl was schizophrenic and bipolar
because she never checked her medical files.

Heineken said school officials, friends and neighbors "wholly refuted"
the girl's accusations. She also noted the Brunsteins repeatedly asked
DCFS to resume supplying the same mental illness medication the girl
received when living with other foster parents, but the agency refused.

Fighting DCFS cost the Brunsteins $20,000 to hire a lawyer. And the
three girls they hoped to adopt -- ages 2, 5 and 11 -- were taken from
them and never returned.

"I don't know if you can call this a win," Nick Brunstein said. "Our
savings are wiped out, and our caseworker who wanted to take our foster
kids and hurt us did exactly that. No one at DCFS will be held accountable."

Today, the Brunsteins are parents again. The day before the DCFS worker
came to the door, a surrogate mother delivered their daughter, Grace.

"Kids get bruises and scrapes when they play," said Judi Brunstein as
she watched Grace, now 14 months old, play with toys. "We are going to
be on their radar for the slightest thing. It wouldn't surprise me if
some day they try to get Grace."

Advice: Abandon son

People appeal for reasons other than being on the child abuse list.
Sometimes it's for more financial aid for foster and adoptive children.

Gary and Beverly Waltrip of Decatur appealed for more aid for their
13-year-old son, diagnosed as schizophrenic, bipolar and sexually
aggressive with a borderline I.Q.

Data supplied by DCFS show that of 262 appeals for more money during the
2002-07 period, a judge granted 96 of them, or 37 percent.

DCFS supervisors wouldn't allow the Waltrips' 13-year-old adopted son to
return home when he was taken to a Decatur area hospital after he
allegedly sexually molested his older adopted brother. DCFS officials
told the parents the teen's brothers and sisters could not be exposed to
the youth until he received treatment and was no longer a threat to the
other children.

So the Waltrips placed their other adopted son and biological children
temporarily with relatives.

The Waltrips tried to get the teen into a residential treatment program,
as a DCFS psychiatrist recommended. Yet for nearly two years while the
family's other children lived apart and the boy's condition
deteriorated, caseworkers stalled, dispensed false information and
failed to provide the financial assistance necessary for residential
treatment, an outraged DCFS administrative law judge wrote in 2006.

Judge Susan Wambach heard the Waltrips' request for increased services
for their son during an appeals hearing. Wambach ruled in their favor
and granted increased financial aid that allowed the boy to be placed in
the Onarga Academy, a treatment center about an hour's drive from Decatur.

During the hearing, Wambach learned that when police detained the boy in
connection with the alleged sexual molestation, a frantic Beverly
Waltrip called a DCFS adoption specialist for help. The specialist
advised Beverly to let the prison system take him.

"It is shocking that an employee of the department would advise an
adoptive parent to request that the court system send their child to
prison," Wambach wrote in her 25-page decision.

Later, the same adoption specialist was promoted to child abuse
investigator. She could not be reached.

"You would think it would be us working with them to help the kids. But
it's not. It was them against us," Gary Waltrip said.

Fewer protections

Often, it's the most vulnerable families that come under DCFS scrutiny.

"The brunt of the system falls on the poor ... who cannot afford to
appeal," said Lehrer, the Chicago attorney.

"While they need to go after people who are guilty of serious child
abuse -- sexual abuse, burns, fractures -- the truth is that these kinds
of cases represent a very modest number. Most of the investigations do
not involve real abuse," he said.

People who are accused of child abuse, or "indicated," and appeal don't
have the same protections as in criminal proceedings and are presumed
guilty until proven innocent.

And names can get out, even though the state child abuse register is
closed to the public, lawyers and exonerated parents say. The list is
open to social workers, police officers, school officials, even members
of neighborhood park district boards.

Lehrer said that evidentiary rules at DCFS hearings, which are closed to
the public, allow both sides to introduce hearsay evidence that would be
banned from a criminal courtroom.

While wrongly listing parents as child abusers is "terrible," it is not
the result of malice on the part of DCFS investigators, said Reich, the
University of Denver sociology and criminology professor.

"I think there is in this system -- because of its low burden of proof
-- a logical belief that it's easy to identify abusers and mistakes
aren't going to be made, but that's not true," she said.

Challenging the systemDCFS caseworkers ordered Kim Cooper to put a fence
around her yard and new locks on her doors and windows at a cost of
$5,000 because her severely mentally disabled daughter kept getting out.

The single mother from Collinsville also had to agree to allow a private
agency worker hired by DCFS to sleep on the couch to provide 24-hour
supervision.

Caseworkers first became involved when a neighbor called to say the
13-year-old girl, who has autism, was in their swimming pool.

While Cooper was talking to a DCFS caseworker one day at her kitchen
table, the teen somehow slipped past them and ran outside. Cooper and
the state employee gave chase and finally caught the girl.

The fence and locks proved ineffective.

After that, Cooper refused further DCFS demands, which landed her on the
state child abuse list, indicated for neglect. Cooper appealed, and a
DCFS hearing judge eventually sided with her. But while Cooper waited
for that ruling, caseworkers removed the girl from the home.

"They took her out of my arms," Cooper said. "I didn't know where she was."

The next day, Cooper filed an emergency petition and went to court to
get her daughter back. A St. Clair County judge ordered the child's
immediate return.

Cooper found her daughter in a Granite City hospital's psychiatric wing.

"She was on a mattress on the floor. There wasn't anything else in the
room. It was awful," she said. "It's the most horrible thing I've ever
been through."

Contact reporters George Pawlaczyk at or 239-2625,
and Beth Hundsdorfer at
or 239-2570.







CURRENTLY CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES VIOLATES MORE CONSTITUTIONALLY
GUARANTEED LIBERTIES & CIVIL RIGHTS ON A DAILY BASIS THEN ALL OTHER
AGENCIES COMBINED INCLUDING THE NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY/CENTRAL
INTELLIGENCE AGENCY WIRETAPPING PROGRAMS....

CPS Does not protect children...
It is sickening how many children are subject to abuse, neglect and even
killed at the hands of Child Protective Services.

every parent should read the free handbook from
connecticut dcf watch..

http://www.connecticutdcfwatch.com

Number of Cases per 100,000 children in the US
These numbers come from The National Center on
Child Abuse and Neglect in Washington. (NCCAN)
Recent numbers have increased significantly for CPS

*Perpetrators of Maltreatment*

Physical Abuse CPS/Foster care 160, biological Parents 59
Sexual Abuse CPS/Foster care 112, biological Parents 13
Neglect CPS/Foster care 410, biological Parents 241
Medical Neglect CPS/Foster care 14 biological Parents 12
Fatalities CPS/Foster care 6.4, biological Parents 1.5

Imagine that, 6.4 children die at the hands of the very agencies that
are supposed to protect them and only 1.5 at the hands of parents per
100,000 children. CPS perpetrates more abuse, neglect, and sexual abuse
and kills more children then parents in the United States. If the
citizens of this country hold CPS to the same standards that they hold
parents too. No judge should ever put another child in the hands of ANY
government agency because CPS nationwide is guilty of more harm and
death than any human being combined. CPS nationwide is guilty of more
human rights violations and deaths of children then the homes from which
they were removed. When are the judges going to wake up and see that
they are sending children to their death and a life of abuse when
children are removed from safe homes based on the mere opinion of a
bunch of social workers.


CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES, HAPPILY DESTROYING THOUSANDS OF INNOCENT
FAMILIES YEARLY NATIONWIDE AND COMING TO YOU'RE HOME SOON...


BE SURE TO FIND OUT WHERE YOUR CANDIDATES STANDS ON THE ISSUE OF
REFORMING OR ABOLISHING CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES ("MAKE YOUR CANDIDATES
TAKE A STAND ON THIS ISSUE.") THEN REMEMBER TO VOTE ACCORDINGLY IF THEY
ARE "FAMILY UNFRIENDLY" IN THE NEXT ELECTION...
  #2  
Old May 15th 08, 04:42 PM posted to alt.support.child-protective-services,alt.support.foster-parents,alt.dads-rights.unmoderated,alt.parenting.spanking
dragonsgirl
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 369
Default Guilty until proven innocent: Parents accused of child abuse by DCFS fight to clear their names


"fx" wrote in message
...
Guilty until proven innocent: Parents accused of child abuse by DCFS fight
to clear their names

snipped

I had my own experiences with Illinois DFS about sixteen years ago when
someone made a false report that I was not feeding my newborn child.
The investigator came to my home and I allowed her to enter and search, as
well as talk to my kids.
During her investigation she found that my child 'looked thin', but that
there were dirty bottles in the sink that were obviously recently used,
formula, and no signs of abuse or neglect.
Regardless, the investigator insisted that I take my child to the local
trauma center to be examined. I was told that if I did not do so the
investigator would take custody of the child immediately and do so.

I arrived at the trauma center and explained to the nurse why I was there.
I also explained that I had complained in the hospital shortly after the
child's birth about what I felt was excessive spit up.
I said that I had been told that it was nothing, likely 'meconium' in her
stomach.
When a week passed I had called the hospital (the only place I could take
her unless it was an emergency as our insurance dictated) 50 miles away
where she was born and asked for an appointment, again, with the complaint
of excessive spit up. I was again given the 'meconium' story. This time I
was told that it would clear up within a few days.
Again, a week later, I called and requested an appointment, again explaining
the spit up and pointing out that my child would be due for a one month
check up soon anyway. They gave me an appointment for weeks later.
In the mean time, I explained to the trauma center staff that a home health
nurse had been visiting my home every week and weighing my child and that I
had complained several times to the nurse (still even remember her name)
about the spit up. I told the staff that it seemed to me that my child spit
up a good part of what she ate, but that she was certainly gaining size for
all I could see as her clothing was becoming smaller and I had had to
already move her from newborn sizes to 3 months. I told them that another
of my children was allergic to regular formula, and that I had thought this
may be the case with my daughter so I got permission from the doctor to put
her on soy. When that didn't seem to help I began breast feeding again, as
I had stopped in the hospital thinking that it might be causing her trouble
because of the meds I was taking for thyroid and asthma.

The physician came into the room and examined my daughter and said that she
weighed less than birth weight, and that he could see no sigs of abuse or
neglect to her. In fact, he commented specifically that her skin was plump
and colorful, her eyes and moth were moist which indicated to him that she
had, indeed, been fed regularly, and he appeared to be impressed that she
did not have a bald spot on her head...indicative of a child being laid for
long periods of time. He said that those spots were common in all babies,
but that the most hair loss occurred in children who were neglected, and my
daughter had no hair loss what so ever.

The doctor also told me that he was called by the DFS worker and told to
make a neglect report before I even arrived. He said that he told her he
would do so only after examining the child and finding signs of abuse or
neglect. He said that when he contacted her back he would not be giving her
the report that she wanted because he saw no signs of abuse or neglect in my
child. He did say, however, that she needed to be admitted to the hospital
to get her weight back up and find the cause of her excessive spit up, as
this would be the root cause of her failure to thrive.

My daughter was admitted to a hospital relatively close to our home, and
there the nurses and attending were asked to make a neglect report. After
one day the cause of my daughter's FTT was found...she had gastric reflux.
She was placed on a medication called Reglan and was put on a high calorie
diet and began gaining weight rapidly. Because it was obvious to staff at
this hospital that the gastric reflux was the cause of the FTT they also
refused to make a neglect report.

When the worker found out that they were also refusing she had my child
moved to the hospital 50 miles away.

There she requested, again, that staff make a neglect report. They complied
as an 'ass covering' matter.

Because there was no evidence to back up this report, as the medical records
showed by all accounts, even those of hospital that made the neglect report,
that there was no verifiable abuse or neglect, the workers supervisor
refused to take my child into protective custody. She cited that the courts
would not take kindly to a child being removed on medical conditions beyond
my control, and because I could verify that the child had received medical
care between birth and the time of hospitalization, as well as that I had
complained many times both shortly after birth and the following weeks about
the spitting up, I had acted appropriately and was not guilty of neglect.

This worker was irate that she could not remove my child from my home, and
she wasted a lot of hot air letting me know how she felt about it. She did
manage to open a service case, and for weeks I listened to her rant in
regard to my child...at one point telling my husband and I that she wanted
to adopt our daughter.

Eventually I became weary of the service plan. Not that I minded most of
it...there were 'between a rock and a hard place' incidents that occurred.
For instance: I lived on the lake, and DFS had given me a 'home maker'
worker. One day, while outside at the pier with my kids teaching my son how
to fish, the worker showed up for her appointment with me. The neighbor's
child was in the lake swimming and the worker advised me that she would be
making a neglect report against me as the 'responsible adult' if I did not
direct the neighbor's child to get out of the water because there was no one
supervising him. I told the worker that his mother was right inside their
house only about 20 feet away, and that if it was an issue she should go
knock on the door and talk to her. She said no, that I was the adult
present and it was my responsibility. I gathered up my children and started
back into my house and said 'No, now YOU are the responsible adult, make a
report on yourself'.

At another visit the worker verbally attacked me when I took crayons away
from my five year old who was writing on the wall with them. She said 'How
dare you stifle his creativity like that???' I was living in a rental
house, and could not afford to pay for the repainting from the damage my son
could do with the crayons and stated that he had paper, he could write on
that, not the wall. She was very angry with me when she left that day.

There were many incidents such as these...in one the worker told me that I
MUST take my five year old son in the shower with me so that he would not be
unsupervised for even a second. One day she witnessed my husband kissing me
goodbye when he left the house and had the nerve to tell me that she could
report me for exhibiting sexual behaviors in front of the children.

When I had my fill I lef the state...I had planned to after recovering from
the birth of my daughter anyway, but had never told DFS that this had been
part of my plan. When I called the worker, after moving, and told her that
I had moved she hunted me down and sent a worker to investigate me in the
state I had moved to. When the investigating worker arrived she said that
she had talked to the Illinois worker personally, that she had learned that
reports had been made after the initial 'not feeding baby' report, and that
they were petty but numerous and all made by the same caseworker who handled
the case. She said that the worker demanded that she open a case here, and
that she be allowed to manage that case from Illinois. The worker here said
that they aren't real tolerant of having someone try to dictate to them as
this Illnois worker had, and that she would perform her own investigation
and if she saw fit she would open a case, if not, then she wouldn't.

After seeing my kids, checking my daughter's medical records, etc, she
declined the opportunity.

It was my first case experience with DFS, and I learned from that that
experience that it apparently isn't always about abuse and neglect.
Sometimes it's about obsession.


  #3  
Old May 15th 08, 07:46 PM posted to alt.support.child-protective-services,alt.support.foster-parents,alt.dads-rights.unmoderated,alt.parenting.spanking
krp[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 22
Default Guilty until proven innocent: Parents accused of child abuse by DCFS fight to clear their names


"dragonsgirl" wrote in message
...

Betty a simple question. Since you ADMIT DV against your own child - where
do you find the GALL to toss rocks at Greg?
Where the hell do you come off with all that angry sanctimony? You know,
some folks MIGHT understand losing your cool with the kid. BUT you 100%
DESERVE to be judged by the very SAME yardstick you have applied with Greg.



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Dynamic of Shame in Interactions Between Child Protective Services and Families Falsely Accused of Child Abuse.. Greegor Spanking 4 January 15th 07 10:38 PM
The Dynamic of Shame in Interactions Between Child Protective Services and Families Falsely Accused of Child Abuse.. Greegor Foster Parents 4 January 15th 07 10:38 PM
The circumcision decision: Parents aren't guilty of child abuse Todd Gastaldo Pregnancy 0 January 31st 05 07:02 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 ParentingBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.