If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
From the "No duh!" files - Has bias pendulum swung against men?
"Moon Shyne" wrote in message
... "Dusty" wrote in message ... "Moon Shyne" wrote in message ... "Chris" wrote in message news:gURKf.4181$Sp2.1801@fed1read02... "Dusty" wrote in message ... Monday, February 20, 2006 snip As for health care, you hit the nail on the head. Why women, who already way outlive men, get the lion's share of health care escapes me. Maybe, at least in part, because men don't take responsibility for their own health care, and go see the doctor when needed? Unless it's to get viagra, or cialis, or whatever other erection-helpers there are now. Interesting priorities. More likely Moonie, it's because of the constant, incessant whining and complaining from self-centered, egotistical little bitches (like the one's at N.O.W., for example) that keep the spotlight directly on their so-called "problems" They have erectile dysfunction? Penis envy. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
From the "No duh!" files - Has bias pendulum swung against men?
"Moon Shyne" wrote in message
... "Kenneth S." wrote in message ... "Phil #3" wrote in message ink.net... "Moon Shyne" wrote in message ... "Chris" wrote in message news:gURKf.4181$Sp2.1801@fed1read02... "Dusty" wrote in message ... Monday, February 20, 2006 snip As for health care, you hit the nail on the head. Why women, who already way outlive men, get the lion's share of health care escapes me. Maybe, at least in part, because men don't take responsibility for their own health care, and go see the doctor when needed? Unless it's to get viagra, or cialis, or whatever other erection-helpers there are now. Interesting priorities. And you claim to not be sexist. "In part", women are the same, perhaps worse but to promote your version of sexism, you failed to mention that. You also failed to mention that in a *large* part, women are quick to waste medical resources because they tend to seek medical attention where none is needed. Have you ever considered seeing a professional to discover why you hate men or is it just too comfortable to blame all ills on men? Phil #3 Oddly enough, in what she says, Moonstruck has a tiny part of the answer to this question right. There IS evidence that men endanger their health by being unwilling to go for checkups. Remedying this reluctance is part of what responsible groups like the Men's Health Network are about. However, Moonstruck's nasty comments about Viagra are only another indication of her hatred of men. That would be incorrect. I don't hate men. I found it mildly amusing that so many insurances, in the past, wouldn't pay for birth control pills, but would pay for erection pills, however That's because a great many insurance companies once held the belief that procreation was a good thing. That is, it was until the radfems got on the band wagon and told everyone that being a mother was a terrible injustice to society. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
From the "No duh!" files - Has bias pendulum swung against men?
"Moon Shyne" wrote in message
... "Phil #3" wrote in message ink.net... "Moon Shyne" wrote in message ... "Chris" wrote in message news:gURKf.4181$Sp2.1801@fed1read02... "Dusty" wrote in message ... Monday, February 20, 2006 snip As for health care, you hit the nail on the head. Why women, who already way outlive men, get the lion's share of health care escapes me. Maybe, at least in part, because men don't take responsibility for their own health care, and go see the doctor when needed? Unless it's to get viagra, or cialis, or whatever other erection-helpers there are now. Interesting priorities. And you claim to not be sexist. "In part", women are the same, perhaps worse but to promote your version of sexism, you failed to mention that. You also failed to mention that in a *large* part, women are quick to waste medical resources because they tend to seek medical attention where none is needed. Have you ever considered seeing a professional to discover why you hate men or is it just too comfortable to blame all ills on men? I blamed no ills on anyone - simply proposed a "maybe". If men want more health care, why don't they just go get it? How did it become the women's fault that men don't seek and obtain their own healthcare? And what's your excuse for not having "gotten it" yet? You've had plenty of opportunity to get it, but refuse to. Is there something blocking your way? |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
From the "No duh!" files - Has bias pendulum swung against men?
"Dusty" wrote in message ... "Moon Shyne" wrote in message ... "Phil #3" wrote in message ink.net... "Moon Shyne" wrote in message ... "Chris" wrote in message news:gURKf.4181$Sp2.1801@fed1read02... "Dusty" wrote in message ... Monday, February 20, 2006 snip As for health care, you hit the nail on the head. Why women, who already way outlive men, get the lion's share of health care escapes me. Maybe, at least in part, because men don't take responsibility for their own health care, and go see the doctor when needed? Unless it's to get viagra, or cialis, or whatever other erection-helpers there are now. Interesting priorities. And you claim to not be sexist. "In part", women are the same, perhaps worse but to promote your version of sexism, you failed to mention that. You also failed to mention that in a *large* part, women are quick to waste medical resources because they tend to seek medical attention where none is needed. Have you ever considered seeing a professional to discover why you hate men or is it just too comfortable to blame all ills on men? I blamed no ills on anyone - simply proposed a "maybe". If men want more health care, why don't they just go get it? How did it become the women's fault that men don't seek and obtain their own healthcare? And what's your excuse for not having "gotten it" yet? You've had plenty of opportunity to get it, but refuse to. Is there something blocking your way? Ya know, Dusty - I just read your last 3 posts, all in response to my posts, and all slamming women in general, and me in particular. Did you have anything constructive to say, or are you just posting to vent your spleen on women in general, and me in particular? |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
From the "No duh!" files - Has bias pendulum swung against men?
"Moon Shyne" wrote in message ... "Kenneth S." wrote in message ... "Phil #3" wrote in message ink.net... "Moon Shyne" wrote in message ... "Chris" wrote in message news:gURKf.4181$Sp2.1801@fed1read02... "Dusty" wrote in message ... Monday, February 20, 2006 snip As for health care, you hit the nail on the head. Why women, who already way outlive men, get the lion's share of health care escapes me. Maybe, at least in part, because men don't take responsibility for their own health care, and go see the doctor when needed? Unless it's to get viagra, or cialis, or whatever other erection-helpers there are now. Interesting priorities. And you claim to not be sexist. "In part", women are the same, perhaps worse but to promote your version of sexism, you failed to mention that. You also failed to mention that in a *large* part, women are quick to waste medical resources because they tend to seek medical attention where none is needed. Have you ever considered seeing a professional to discover why you hate men or is it just too comfortable to blame all ills on men? Phil #3 Oddly enough, in what she says, Moonstruck has a tiny part of the answer to this question right. There IS evidence that men endanger their health by being unwilling to go for checkups. Remedying this reluctance is part of what responsible groups like the Men's Health Network are about. However, Moonstruck's nasty comments about Viagra are only another indication of her hatred of men. That would be incorrect. I don't hate men. I found it mildly amusing that so many insurances, in the past, wouldn't pay for birth control pills, but would pay for erection pills, however This is a false choice. It compares drugs for preventing pregnancies to drugs that facilitate sexual activity. The insurance companies are concerned about equality arguments and how they treat both genders. They classify birth control pills as birth control and don't cover male or female birth control options. Your argument tries to reclassify birth control pills from their intended use to a female sexual activity facilitator so they can be directly compared to ED drugs. A better comparison would be to compare ED drugs to female menopausal drug therapy. Both drugs do the same thing - help both genders adjust to changes in life and facilitate ongoing sexual activity. The true female counterpart to male ED pills is covered by insurance. BTW - If a woman can get her doctor to state birth control pills are prescribed for a reason other than birth control, the insurance companies will cover them. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
From the "No duh!" files - Has bias pendulum swung against men?
"Bob Whiteside" wrote in message ink.net... "Moon Shyne" wrote in message ... "Kenneth S." wrote in message ... "Phil #3" wrote in message ink.net... "Moon Shyne" wrote in message ... "Chris" wrote in message news:gURKf.4181$Sp2.1801@fed1read02... "Dusty" wrote in message ... Monday, February 20, 2006 snip As for health care, you hit the nail on the head. Why women, who already way outlive men, get the lion's share of health care escapes me. Maybe, at least in part, because men don't take responsibility for their own health care, and go see the doctor when needed? Unless it's to get viagra, or cialis, or whatever other erection-helpers there are now. Interesting priorities. And you claim to not be sexist. "In part", women are the same, perhaps worse but to promote your version of sexism, you failed to mention that. You also failed to mention that in a *large* part, women are quick to waste medical resources because they tend to seek medical attention where none is needed. Have you ever considered seeing a professional to discover why you hate men or is it just too comfortable to blame all ills on men? Phil #3 Oddly enough, in what she says, Moonstruck has a tiny part of the answer to this question right. There IS evidence that men endanger their health by being unwilling to go for checkups. Remedying this reluctance is part of what responsible groups like the Men's Health Network are about. However, Moonstruck's nasty comments about Viagra are only another indication of her hatred of men. That would be incorrect. I don't hate men. I found it mildly amusing that so many insurances, in the past, wouldn't pay for birth control pills, but would pay for erection pills, however This is a false choice. It wasn't any sort of choice at all - it was simply reality. It compares drugs for preventing pregnancies to drugs that facilitate sexual activity. The insurance companies are concerned about equality arguments and how they treat both genders. They classify birth control pills as birth control and don't cover male or female birth control options. Your argument tries to reclassify birth control pills from their intended use to a female sexual activity facilitator so they can be directly compared to ED drugs. I didn't try to reclassify anything - merely commented on what was the reality. A better comparison would be to compare ED drugs to female menopausal drug therapy. Both drugs do the same thing - help both genders adjust to changes in life and facilitate ongoing sexual activity. The true female counterpart to male ED pills is covered by insurance. BTW - If a woman can get her doctor to state birth control pills are prescribed for a reason other than birth control, the insurance companies will cover them. BTW - at this point in time, far more insurance programs cover BC pills for their intended purpose, too. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
From the "No duh!" files - Has bias pendulum swung against men?
"Moon Shyne" wrote in message ... "Bob Whiteside" wrote in message ink.net... "Moon Shyne" wrote in message ... "Kenneth S." wrote in message ... "Phil #3" wrote in message ink.net... "Moon Shyne" wrote in message ... "Chris" wrote in message news:gURKf.4181$Sp2.1801@fed1read02... "Dusty" wrote in message ... Monday, February 20, 2006 snip As for health care, you hit the nail on the head. Why women, who already way outlive men, get the lion's share of health care escapes me. Maybe, at least in part, because men don't take responsibility for their own health care, and go see the doctor when needed? Unless it's to get viagra, or cialis, or whatever other erection-helpers there are now. Interesting priorities. And you claim to not be sexist. "In part", women are the same, perhaps worse but to promote your version of sexism, you failed to mention that. You also failed to mention that in a *large* part, women are quick to waste medical resources because they tend to seek medical attention where none is needed. Have you ever considered seeing a professional to discover why you hate men or is it just too comfortable to blame all ills on men? Phil #3 Oddly enough, in what she says, Moonstruck has a tiny part of the answer to this question right. There IS evidence that men endanger their health by being unwilling to go for checkups. Remedying this reluctance is part of what responsible groups like the Men's Health Network are about. However, Moonstruck's nasty comments about Viagra are only another indication of her hatred of men. That would be incorrect. I don't hate men. I found it mildly amusing that so many insurances, in the past, wouldn't pay for birth control pills, but would pay for erection pills, however This is a false choice. It wasn't any sort of choice at all - it was simply reality. It compares drugs for preventing pregnancies to drugs that facilitate sexual activity. The insurance companies are concerned about equality arguments and how they treat both genders. They classify birth control pills as birth control and don't cover male or female birth control options. Your argument tries to reclassify birth control pills from their intended use to a female sexual activity facilitator so they can be directly compared to ED drugs. I didn't try to reclassify anything - merely commented on what was the reality. A better comparison would be to compare ED drugs to female menopausal drug therapy. Both drugs do the same thing - help both genders adjust to changes in life and facilitate ongoing sexual activity. The true female counterpart to male ED pills is covered by insurance. BTW - If a woman can get her doctor to state birth control pills are prescribed for a reason other than birth control, the insurance companies will cover them. BTW - at this point in time, far more insurance programs cover BC pills for their intended purpose, too. Take heart. I uncovered this from a couple of years ago by Carey Roberts: "The American Heart Association has recently launched their “Go Red for Women” educational program – which totally ignores the fact that men have a 70% higher risk of dying from heart disease than women. The Pfizer drug company, headquartered in New York City, is the company that manufacturers – and earns millions of dollars annually from – Viagra, which treats erectile dysfunction (http://www.viagra.com). But it turns out that Pfizer is also a sponsor of the sexist “Go Red for Women” program! In other words, when you buy Viagra, the profits are turned around to support a gender-biased program at the American Heart Association. There’s something wrong with this picture." So it works out for women's advantage ... again. Phil #3 |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
From the "No duh!" files - Has bias pendulum swung against men?
"Moon Shyne" wrote in message
... "Dusty" wrote in message ... "Moon Shyne" wrote in message ... "Phil #3" wrote in message ink.net... "Moon Shyne" wrote in message ... "Chris" wrote in message news:gURKf.4181$Sp2.1801@fed1read02... "Dusty" wrote in message ... Monday, February 20, 2006 snip As for health care, you hit the nail on the head. Why women, who already way outlive men, get the lion's share of health care escapes me. Maybe, at least in part, because men don't take responsibility for their own health care, and go see the doctor when needed? Unless it's to get viagra, or cialis, or whatever other erection-helpers there are now. Interesting priorities. And you claim to not be sexist. "In part", women are the same, perhaps worse but to promote your version of sexism, you failed to mention that. You also failed to mention that in a *large* part, women are quick to waste medical resources because they tend to seek medical attention where none is needed. Have you ever considered seeing a professional to discover why you hate men or is it just too comfortable to blame all ills on men? I blamed no ills on anyone - simply proposed a "maybe". If men want more health care, why don't they just go get it? How did it become the women's fault that men don't seek and obtain their own healthcare? And what's your excuse for not having "gotten it" yet? You've had plenty of opportunity to get it, but refuse to. Is there something blocking your way? Ya know, Dusty - I just read your last 3 posts, all in response to my posts, and all slamming women in general, and me in particular. Did you have anything constructive to say, or are you just posting to vent your spleen on women in general, and me in particular? Now there's a load of crap. Other then the post to you about not "getting it" (and no, there was nothing sexual inferred, it was about you opening your mind instead of your mouth), I can't see where I slammed you for much of anything. And as for targeting "women in general", you are, once again, waaaaay off base. I slammed, quite deliberately, the radfems. I left out, also quite deliberately, females that posses the ability of processing a rational thought and the ability to form coherent ideas and express them without getting emotional or paranoid. Which is something that, quite obviously, you are both unable and unwilling to even make an attempt at. Once again Moonie, you've been caught in another outright lie. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
From the "No duh!" files - Has bias pendulum swung against men?
"Dusty" wrote in message ... "Moon Shyne" wrote in message ... "Dusty" wrote in message ... "Moon Shyne" wrote in message ... "Phil #3" wrote in message ink.net... "Moon Shyne" wrote in message ... "Chris" wrote in message news:gURKf.4181$Sp2.1801@fed1read02... "Dusty" wrote in message ... Monday, February 20, 2006 snip As for health care, you hit the nail on the head. Why women, who already way outlive men, get the lion's share of health care escapes me. Maybe, at least in part, because men don't take responsibility for their own health care, and go see the doctor when needed? Unless it's to get viagra, or cialis, or whatever other erection-helpers there are now. Interesting priorities. And you claim to not be sexist. "In part", women are the same, perhaps worse but to promote your version of sexism, you failed to mention that. You also failed to mention that in a *large* part, women are quick to waste medical resources because they tend to seek medical attention where none is needed. Have you ever considered seeing a professional to discover why you hate men or is it just too comfortable to blame all ills on men? I blamed no ills on anyone - simply proposed a "maybe". If men want more health care, why don't they just go get it? How did it become the women's fault that men don't seek and obtain their own healthcare? And what's your excuse for not having "gotten it" yet? You've had plenty of opportunity to get it, but refuse to. Is there something blocking your way? Ya know, Dusty - I just read your last 3 posts, all in response to my posts, and all slamming women in general, and me in particular. Did you have anything constructive to say, or are you just posting to vent your spleen on women in general, and me in particular? Now there's a load of crap. Other then the post to you about not "getting it" (and no, there was nothing sexual inferred, it was about you opening your mind instead of your mouth), I can't see where I slammed you for much of anything. And as for targeting "women in general", you are, once again, waaaaay off base. I slammed, quite deliberately, the radfems. I left out, also quite deliberately, females that posses the ability of processing a rational thought and the ability to form coherent ideas and express them without getting emotional or paranoid. Which is something that, quite obviously, you are both unable and unwilling to even make an attempt at. Once again Moonie, you've been caught in another outright lie. Quitely clearly, you have nothing constructive to say. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
From the "No duh!" files - Has bias pendulum swung against men?
Moon Shyne wrote: "Dusty" wrote in message ... "Moon Shyne" wrote in message ... "Dusty" wrote in message ... "Moon Shyne" wrote in message ... "Phil #3" wrote in message ink.net... "Moon Shyne" wrote in message ... "Chris" wrote in message news:gURKf.4181$Sp2.1801@fed1read02... "Dusty" wrote in message news:bIWdnc9ArfSUVWfenZ2dnUVZ_sCdnZ2d@adel phia.com... Monday, February 20, 2006 snip As for health care, you hit the nail on the head. Why women, who already way outlive men, get the lion's share of health care escapes me. Maybe, at least in part, because men don't take responsibility for their own health care, and go see the doctor when needed? Unless it's to get viagra, or cialis, or whatever other erection-helpers there are now. Interesting priorities. And you claim to not be sexist. "In part", women are the same, perhaps worse but to promote your version of sexism, you failed to mention that. You also failed to mention that in a *large* part, women are quick to waste medical resources because they tend to seek medical attention where none is needed. Have you ever considered seeing a professional to discover why you hate men or is it just too comfortable to blame all ills on men? I blamed no ills on anyone - simply proposed a "maybe". If men want more health care, why don't they just go get it? How did it become the women's fault that men don't seek and obtain their own healthcare? And what's your excuse for not having "gotten it" yet? You've had plenty of opportunity to get it, but refuse to. Is there something blocking your way? Ya know, Dusty - I just read your last 3 posts, all in response to my posts, and all slamming women in general, and me in particular. Did you have anything constructive to say, or are you just posting to vent your spleen on women in general, and me in particular? Now there's a load of crap. Other then the post to you about not "getting it" (and no, there was nothing sexual inferred, it was about you opening your mind instead of your mouth), I can't see where I slammed you for much of anything. And as for targeting "women in general", you are, once again, waaaaay off base. I slammed, quite deliberately, the radfems. I left out, also quite deliberately, females that posses the ability of processing a rational thought and the ability to form coherent ideas and express them without getting emotional or paranoid. Which is something that, quite obviously, you are both unable and unwilling to even make an attempt at. Once again Moonie, you've been caught in another outright lie. Quitely clearly, you have nothing constructive to say. ....said the yapping terrier. - Ron ^*^ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Another pendulum that has swung too far.... | Pohaku Kane | Foster Parents | 0 | December 15th 05 11:24 PM |