Empowering boys

"Tiffany" wrote in message
...

'Kate wrote in message
...
On Wed, 3 Mar 2004 10:19:48 -0500, "Tiffany"
Kate wrote:
ROFL... that's hysterical!

Tiffany, you posted questioning Vicki's statement and yet you haven't
even bothered to follow the link that she took the time to post. If
you
had, you would have posted more than "we were arguing?"

At best, that makes you look foolish. "Argue" has many
connotations.
When used with "the point" it is different from the emotionally
charged
arguing. Go ahead and tell me you knew that and I will tell you that
your posts do not indicate anything more than a rudimentary
understanding of the meaning of words. On second thought, don't
bother
with the link. You woudn't understand it.

'Kate




Kate..... I have not addressed any of your posts for ages...... this is
why.
If you got nothing nice to say, don't say anything at all.

Please read the FAQ. The part under why are people so gosh darn mean
should clear this up.

Your post is not
constructive in anyway

That depends on your interpretation of constructive.

and you are now being those you use to always
complain about.

I don't complain about other people. I don't attempt to tell others
what to do. I am telling you how you appear to me and believe me, I'm
not the only one who has noticed.

If others have issues with me, they sure haven't mentioned it to me. Or
maybe it is not I who is childish?



I haven't had the chance to reply to all V's posts to me so
no.... I didn't look at the link. When I look at the link, I will reply
to
her post concerning that issue. So step off your high horse.

I doubt that. And if my post pushes you to learn a little something
before you make up your mind and post nonsense, then good. That was the
purpose.

You think you are teaching me something? You think YOU could push me to
learn something before making up my mind? Again, get off your high horse
Kate.

Vic's reply addressed specifically to me made it look like we have been
going back and forth when in fact we haven't. I was just bringing that
to
light to her. Get off that high horse.

Come up to where the rest of the world lives. You're an adult now,
Tiffany and you are responsible for your own education.

Oh yes.... there are some here that know exactly what this is all
about.....
nothing at all about the post. lol.... get real.

shaking her head Grow up little girl.

'Kate


If I need to grow up, why is it you started with the throwing of the
insults. Yes, I am a little girl, thank you. LMAO

I've always liked 'little' girls ;-)


T

P.Fritz wrote in message
...

"Tiffany" wrote in message
...

'Kate wrote in message
...
On Wed, 3 Mar 2004 10:19:48 -0500, "Tiffany"
Kate wrote:
ROFL... that's hysterical!

Tiffany, you posted questioning Vicki's statement and yet you
haven't
even bothered to follow the link that she took the time to post. If
you
had, you would have posted more than "we were arguing?"

At best, that makes you look foolish. "Argue" has many
connotations.
When used with "the point" it is different from the emotionally
charged
arguing. Go ahead and tell me you knew that and I will tell you
that
your posts do not indicate anything more than a rudimentary
understanding of the meaning of words. On second thought, don't
bother
with the link. You woudn't understand it.

'Kate




Kate..... I have not addressed any of your posts for ages...... this
is
why.
If you got nothing nice to say, don't say anything at all.

Please read the FAQ. The part under why are people so gosh darn mean
should clear this up.

Your post is not
constructive in anyway

That depends on your interpretation of constructive.

and you are now being those you use to always
complain about.

I don't complain about other people. I don't attempt to tell others
what to do. I am telling you how you appear to me and believe me, I'm
not the only one who has noticed.

If others have issues with me, they sure haven't mentioned it to me. Or
maybe it is not I who is childish?



I haven't had the chance to reply to all V's posts to me so
no.... I didn't look at the link. When I look at the link, I will
reply
to
her post concerning that issue. So step off your high horse.

I doubt that. And if my post pushes you to learn a little something
before you make up your mind and post nonsense, then good. That was
the
purpose.

You think you are teaching me something? You think YOU could push me to
learn something before making up my mind? Again, get off your high horse
Kate.

Vic's reply addressed specifically to me made it look like we have
been
going back and forth when in fact we haven't. I was just bringing
that
to
light to her. Get off that high horse.

Come up to where the rest of the world lives. You're an adult now,
Tiffany and you are responsible for your own education.

Oh yes.... there are some here that know exactly what this is all
about.....
nothing at all about the post. lol.... get real.

shaking her head Grow up little girl.

'Kate


If I need to grow up, why is it you started with the throwing of the
insults. Yes, I am a little girl, thank you. LMAO

I've always liked 'little' girls ;-)



Why? You don't like some cushin' for the pushin'?

T

"Sky KIng" wrote in message
l.net...

That is something for mothers to talk to their preteen sons about, not
an
assault counselor, I come in after the fact.

Why not fathers talking to their sons? Moms can talk to their
daughters.



You are absolutely right and should do so. I was thinking about the time when
I had to talk to my son about sex. I was not being gender biased. Sorry.
V

"Lisa" wrote in message
.. .

"Sky KIng" wrote in message
l.net...
In article ,
says...


That is something for mothers to talk to their preteen sons about,
not an
assault counselor, I come in after the fact.

Why not fathers talking to their sons? Moms can talk to their
daughters.




You think he'd step up to the plate after having ****ed off before the
child was born?

Try again


Whoa nellie! Where did *that* come from?
V

V wrote in message
...

"Sky KIng" wrote in message
l.net...

That is something for mothers to talk to their preteen sons about,
not
an
assault counselor, I come in after the fact.

Why not fathers talking to their sons? Moms can talk to their
daughters.



You are absolutely right and should do so. I was thinking about the time
when
I had to talk to my son about sex. I was not being gender biased. Sorry.
V



I don't think you were being gender biased. Both parents should talk to the
kids, that way they see both sides of the card. Unfortutanly both parents
aren't always there. How much longer before you have the talk?

T

'Kate wrote in message ...
On Mon, 1 Mar 2004 22:22:37 -0500, "Paul Fritz"


'Kate wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 1 Mar 2004 08:56:41 -0500, "P.Fritz"

Last time I looked, it wasn't just 'men' sitting on the bench.

And before you bring up the strawman 'men make up most of the
legislature'
arguement........women are the voting majority.

They vote on what is put in front of them ... by a congress that is
at
least 80% male.

Same lame old feminitwit arguement.....I thought you were smarter than
that.

the vote that putsthe pols in office is what establishes their boting
principals....or lack thereof.

Ho hum. I state the obvious and you state... what was it. Oh yeah.
Nothing of substance.

That chip is affecting your ability to think rationally.

snicker hardly.......you didn't state the obvious, you IGNORED the
obvious. You seem to be the one that has lost the rational thought ability.

"As president, I will put American government and our legal system back on
the side of women. I will stand up for their security, ensure their safety,
support their rights, and guarantee their dignity. This nation can do no
less." - John Kerry, March 8, 2003.

"P.Fritz" wrote in message
...
"

If every one of those rapes were to a female under the age of 18, the
cumulative amount over 18 years would be 1296 per 100,000. not even close
to 1 in 4


Where are you getting under 18?
UCR is stats that are reported ONLY not reported is a guestimate.
You did all that figuring to prove a point?
V


As I suspected, your 'stats' (while well intended) ............and
accounting for underreporting are phony.

"V" wrote in message
...

"P.Fritz" wrote in message
...
"

If every one of those rapes were to a female under the age of 18, the
cumulative amount over 18 years would be 1296 per 100,000. not even
close
to 1 in 4


Where are you getting under 18?
UCR is stats that are reported ONLY not reported is a guestimate.
You did all that figuring to prove a point?
V

LMAO...........why don't you quit while you are behind. Not only did you
snip the points that showed your allegations to be hogwash, you can't even
comprehend the one point you left in.

BTW..........The guessatmate would have to be 20 times the reported amount
AND all (reported and guesstimated) would have to be against those under
18.........it just goes to show how phony your misandrist phony headline
stats are.




As I suspected, your 'stats' (while well intended) ............and
accounting for underreporting are phony.

"Tiffany" wrote in message
...

P.Fritz wrote in message
...

"Tiffany" wrote in message
...

'Kate wrote in message
...
On Wed, 3 Mar 2004 10:19:48 -0500, "Tiffany"

Kate wrote:
ROFL... that's hysterical!

Tiffany, you posted questioning Vicki's statement and yet you
haven't
even bothered to follow the link that she took the time to post.
If
you
had, you would have posted more than "we were arguing?"

At best, that makes you look foolish. "Argue" has many
connotations.
When used with "the point" it is different from the emotionally
charged
arguing. Go ahead and tell me you knew that and I will tell you
that
your posts do not indicate anything more than a rudimentary
understanding of the meaning of words. On second thought, don't
bother
with the link. You woudn't understand it.

'Kate




Kate..... I have not addressed any of your posts for ages......
this
is
why.
If you got nothing nice to say, don't say anything at all.

Please read the FAQ. The part under why are people so gosh darn
mean
should clear this up.

Your post is not
constructive in anyway

That depends on your interpretation of constructive.

and you are now being those you use to always
complain about.

I don't complain about other people. I don't attempt to tell others
what to do. I am telling you how you appear to me and believe me,
I'm
not the only one who has noticed.

If others have issues with me, they sure haven't mentioned it to me.
Or
maybe it is not I who is childish?



I haven't had the chance to reply to all V's posts to me so
no.... I didn't look at the link. When I look at the link, I will
reply
to
her post concerning that issue. So step off your high horse.

I doubt that. And if my post pushes you to learn a little something
before you make up your mind and post nonsense, then good. That was
the
purpose.

You think you are teaching me something? You think YOU could push me
to
learn something before making up my mind? Again, get off your high
horse
Kate.

Vic's reply addressed specifically to me made it look like we have
been
going back and forth when in fact we haven't. I was just bringing
that
to
light to her. Get off that high horse.

Come up to where the rest of the world lives. You're an adult now,
Tiffany and you are responsible for your own education.

Oh yes.... there are some here that know exactly what this is all
about.....
nothing at all about the post. lol.... get real.

shaking her head Grow up little girl.

'Kate


If I need to grow up, why is it you started with the throwing of the
insults. Yes, I am a little girl, thank you. LMAO

I've always liked 'little' girls ;-)



Why? You don't like some cushin' for the pushin'?

Can you say 'Spinner' LMAO



T

"Tiffany" wrote in message
...

V wrote in message
...

"Sky KIng" wrote in message
l.net...

That is something for mothers to talk to their preteen sons
about,
not
an
assault counselor, I come in after the fact.

Why not fathers talking to their sons? Moms can talk to their
daughters.



You are absolutely right and should do so. I was thinking about the time
when
I had to talk to my son about sex. I was not being gender biased. Sorry.
V



I don't think you were being gender biased. Both parents should talk to
the
kids, that way they see both sides of the card. Unfortutanly both parents
aren't always there. How much longer before you have the talk?

T

I think it's important to be upfront with kids and to use appropriate labels
for things. No wee wee in my house, ya call it what it is. I'm sure my
kids know more than what I am probably aware of, but I'm hoping I don't balk
when the time comes... which will be pretty soon I'm afraid.

Christine