If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Allopathy Inc personality traits
"john" wrote in message ... "Peter Bowditch" wrote in WHY PLEOMORPHISM IS UNKNOWN TO MODERN MEDICINE It's unknown for the same reason that miasma and humours are unknown to modern medicine, which is that medicine has moved beyond such ancient, meaningless ideas. RAOFL! Pleomorphism, the correct germ theory, would kill vaccination http://whale.to/v/pleomorphism.htm and it is telling that Pasteur was a fraud and plagarist http://whale.to/v/pasteur.html "We must infer that at least some and probably all three of those Russian peasants died because of Pasteur's vaccine, as did uncounted people later on....Only one thing is su ever since Pasteur developed his "vaccine," the cases of death from rabies have increased, not diminished."--Hans Ruesch "Through a physician in Brittany, Nonclercq came across a thick tome on the history of a medicine in which she read that, on his death bed, Louis Pasteur had declared: Claude Bernard war right... the microbe is nothing, the terrain is everything." What Pasteur omitted was that his confession had been based not on single insightful statement by France's leading physiologist, Bernard, but by Antoine Béchamp, the man with whom he had been locked in struggle for decades."--Christopher Bird "Orthodox virology omits toxicology, and is thus void. Toxicological causation is obvious and toxicology is avoided by the media like the plague. What does he mean by toxicology -- that the bacteria/virus/germs emit toxins (as they do) or that the bacteria/virus/germs only appear in response to toxins (orthopathic definition) ie the soil theory that says the germs are nothing the environment or internal milieu is everything? Forget the intellectual, scientific intrigue of virology. Yes, science has gone off on a barren tangent, except if there is madness in the method ie while it may not cure anything it does keep people sick and reliant on drugs. Without toxicology, virology is a mind-trap. Virology is the deadly virus. My sentiments exactly. Orthodoxy could claim that a "virus" has any number of fearful characteristics, but those characteristics are meaningless if the victims are poisoned. Poisoned by what exactly? Without poisoning, perhaps the virus is a nutrient. Perhaps there is no virus. Most likely, the "virus" is harmless human nucleic acid, rearranged as a response to poisoning, and thus always a test for said "virus" would be positive during periods of poisoning." Swine Flu 2009 by Jim West -- Carole www.conspiracee.com "If Tyranny and oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy." -James Madison, while a United States Congressman |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Allopathy Inc personality traits
On 10/19/10 6:35 PM, carole wrote:
wrote in message ... On 10/18/10 2:06 PM, carole wrote: "Bob Officer".@. wrote in message ... On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 03:27:58 +1100, in misc.health.alternative, wrote: "Bob Officer".@. wrote in message ... On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 21:14:35 +1100, in misc.health.alternative, wrote: "Bob Officer".@. wrote in message ... On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 13:55:43 +1100, in misc.health.alternative, wrote: What you're describing john sounds like the patriarchal culture, where the macho men reign by secrecy, authoritarian regimes, hierarchical systems and brute force. However, that doesn't sound like science at all. All the science that counts is published in publicly available journals, often available at libraries or over the internet for free. The abstracts (summaries) of the articles are almost always available for free. Ah yes, but Jeff, only certain health research is considered worthy of funding. Yes, research which shows promise. No, research which doesn't threaten big pharma. Who decides what is and what isn't worthy of funding? Well I guess you would actually look at avenues which haven't been explored. After all how many times do you spend money to find the evidence doesn't support Iridology or some other already explored avenue shown to be a failure? That was a rhetorical question bob. It didn't look like one, Carole. I actually thought it was a sarcastic question but a good one. I gave a good answer. Since we know the structure of the iris is fixed in a person to the extent it can be used for identification using iris scans, It pretty much places the practice of iridology into the area of pseudoscience...well not even really pseudo science, but pure bull****. We don't know that the iris is fixed bob. yes we do. http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/TechReports/UCAM-CL-TR-635.html http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_det...csnumber=38750 http://www.irisbase.com/ - non-functional http://google.com/patents?id=KRkpAAAAEBAJ http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/users/jgd1000/irisrecog.pdf http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~jgd1000/patrec.pdf http://www.cbsr.ia.ac.cn/users/zfhe/publications.html http://iris.nist.gov/ICE/ICE_2005_Re...0March2006.pdf According to a book that I have called The Science and Practice of Iridology by Bernard Jensen, where he consistently talks about iris changes caused by both disease and healing. Evidence please. A self-serving book doesn't count. The very first example where legend has it that in 1837, Von Peczely captured an owl and inso doing broke its leg, which showed up in the iris of the owl as a black line which gradually disappeared as the leg healed. You're calling a legend scientific evidence. Please, try harder. You make it too easy. When the health is deteriorating the irises get murkier with more overlay of signs of toxins, the lesions get darker, there may be more nerve rings, probably more clumping of fibres. However, under a healing regime the lesions are said to get lighter in color and eventually can disappear. and the Research and evidence to back this claim is where, so I can examine these data set? That's right they claim is all based on here-say, and what is now a considered a falsified assumption. The body of evidence and data is sufficient that the assumption upon which iridology is based is false. Yes bob, we all know about conventional statistics and how reliable they can be. It is a well known fact that many people as they get older develop murkier irises with discolouration and acid overlays, not to mention the scurf rings and arcus senilis (the arc of senility) - you know that while arc that goes between 11 and 1 oclock on the iris. So? Prove that this makes iridology accurate. Prove that allopathic medicine is accurate. Nice attempt at diversion. As we know, allopathic medicine is based on science and evidence. And you're telling us that iridology is based on legend. How many times does one spend time, money and effort to explore avenues which have proved fruitless, Carole? How many times does it have to be pointed out to you that, Claims based only on post hoc fallacies (like your cell salt cures) fall apart under the most simple examination and questioning. This isn't the fault of the therapies bob, but of the researchers. No if an avenue is shown to false, or the claims falsified, as in iridology how many times do you revisit blind canyons of beliefs which are contradicted by evidence? I wouldn't believe it was false by anything told to me by an allopath for starters, and wouldn't believe everything told to me by a failed iridologist either because the healing effects depend on the methodology used to achieve it. If the method is no good, no healing = no iris change. The iris doesn't change because of disease. If I am incorrect, provide good evidence that I am wrong. According to iridology the iris changes due to toxemia, and the amount of disease is directly proportional to the amount of toxemia. Too problems with this: There is is no such thing as "toxemia" as you describe. And there is no *good* evidence for anything you are saying. The best you have done is a legend. Jeff |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Allopathy Inc personality traits
On 10/19/10 6:44 PM, carole wrote:
"Peter wrote in message ... wrote: WHY PLEOMORPHISM IS UNKNOWN TO MODERN MEDICINE It's unknown for the same reason that miasma and humours are unknown to modern medicine, which is that medicine has moved beyond such ancient, meaningless ideas. Yes, medicine has now moved to $300,000 cancer treatments that may or may not prolong life. Gee, mostly prolong life. And cure cancer (over 1/2 of all cancers are cured now). It has moved to lifelong dependency on expensive drugs, transplants which cost $15k pa for anti-rejection drugs, and mass vaccinations at $10+ a pop which is a nice little money spinner when you multiply it by the total population. Yes, it certainly has "moved ahead" for some. And, please provide a better solution. One that has been proven to work scientifically. Not some iridology which, like most conjecture-based medicine, is based on a myth. Jeff Jeff |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Allopathy Inc personality traits
On 10/19/10 7:04 PM, carole wrote:
wrote in message ... "Peter wrote in WHY PLEOMORPHISM IS UNKNOWN TO MODERN MEDICINE It's unknown for the same reason that miasma and humours are unknown to modern medicine, which is that medicine has moved beyond such ancient, meaningless ideas. RAOFL! Pleomorphism, the correct germ theory, would kill vaccination http://whale.to/v/pleomorphism.htm and it is telling that Pasteur was a fraud and plagarist http://whale.to/v/pasteur.html "We must infer that at least some and probably all three of those Russian peasants died because of Pasteur's vaccine, as did uncounted people later on....Only one thing is su ever since Pasteur developed his "vaccine," the cases of death from rabies have increased, not diminished."--Hans Ruesch "Through a physician in Brittany, Nonclercq came across a thick tome on the history of a medicine in which she read that, on his death bed, Louis Pasteur had declared: Claude Bernard war right... the microbe is nothing, the terrain is everything." What Pasteur omitted was that his confession had been based not on single insightful statement by France's leading physiologist, Bernard, but by Antoine Béchamp, the man with whom he had been locked in struggle for decades."--Christopher Bird "Orthodox virology omits toxicology, and is thus void. Toxicological causation is obvious and toxicology is avoided by the media like the plague. What does he mean by toxicology -- that the bacteria/virus/germs emit toxins (as they do) or that the bacteria/virus/germs only appear in response to toxins (orthopathic definition) ie the soil theory that says the germs are nothing the environment or internal milieu is everything? Forget the intellectual, scientific intrigue of virology. Yes, science has gone off on a barren tangent, except if there is madness in the method ie while it may not cure anything it does keep people sick and reliant on drugs. Modern medicine cures over 1/2 the people with cancer. It does wonders to improve treatment after a heart attack or stroke. It is able to prevent blindness, kidney failure, heart attacks, stroke, and other diseases. Without toxicology, virology is a mind-trap. Virology is the deadly virus. My sentiments exactly. Orthodoxy could claim that a "virus" has any number of fearful characteristics, but those characteristics are meaningless if the victims are poisoned. Poisoned by what exactly? Without poisoning, perhaps the virus is a nutrient. Perhaps there is no virus. Most likely, the "virus" is harmless human nucleic acid, rearranged as a response to poisoning, and thus always a test for said "virus" would be positive during periods of poisoning." Swine Flu 2009 by Jim West |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Allopathy Inc personality traits
"carole" wrote in message "Orthodox virology omits toxicology, and is thus void. Toxicological causation is obvious and toxicology is avoided by the media like the plague. What does he mean by toxicology -- that the bacteria/virus/germs emit toxins (as they do) or that the bacteria/virus/germs only appear in response to toxins (orthopathic definition) ie the soil theory that says the germs are nothing the environment or internal milieu is everything? response to toxins http://whale.to/a/west_h.html most 'infections' are due to poisons, eg toxic air http://whale.to/a/toxic_air_h.html or DDT in milk, vaccines Virus used to mean poison |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Allopathy Inc personality traits
On 10/20/10 4:10 AM, john wrote:
wrote in message "Orthodox virology omits toxicology, and is thus void. Toxicological causation is obvious and toxicology is avoided by the media like the plague. What does he mean by toxicology -- that the bacteria/virus/germs emit toxins (as they do) or that the bacteria/virus/germs only appear in response to toxins (orthopathic definition) ie the soil theory that says the germs are nothing the environment or internal milieu is everything? response to toxins http://whale.to/a/west_h.html most 'infections' are due to poisons, eg toxic air http://whale.to/a/toxic_air_h.html or DDT in milk, vaccines Virus used to mean poison So? Virus now means a particular life form with particular characteristics. The websites you suggest show a complete lack of understanding of science and medicine. They do far more to hurt your argument than help it. Jeff |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Allopathy Inc personality traits
"Bob Officer" [email protected] wrote in message ... On Wed, 20 Oct 2010 09:22:14 +1100, in misc.health.alternative, "carole" wrote: According to a book that I have called The Science and Practice of Iridology by Bernard Jensen, where he consistently talks about iris changes caused by both disease and healing. So who do we believe, Bernard Jensen or Joshua David Mather Sr.? http://www.quackwatch.org/01Quackery...nfessions.html I can't recall ever seeing this confession before. Who was/is Joshua David Mather Snr? Do check your short term memory , Carole. you replied to a post yesterday or so which you referred to Mather. But I mean who is he and what does he do other than debunk iridology? -- Carole www.conspiracee.com Bob Officer finally admits it -"I am a tool" http://groups.google.com.au/group/mi...ss+epidemic%22 |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Allopathy Inc personality traits
"dr_jeff" wrote in message ... On 10/19/10 6:35 PM, carole wrote: Since we know the structure of the iris is fixed in a person to the extent it can be used for identification using iris scans, It pretty much places the practice of iridology into the area of pseudoscience...well not even really pseudo science, but pure bull****. We don't know that the iris is fixed bob. yes we do. http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/TechReports/UCAM-CL-TR-635.html http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_det...csnumber=38750 http://www.irisbase.com/ - non-functional http://google.com/patents?id=KRkpAAAAEBAJ http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/users/jgd1000/irisrecog.pdf http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~jgd1000/patrec.pdf http://www.cbsr.ia.ac.cn/users/zfhe/publications.html http://iris.nist.gov/ICE/ICE_2005_Re...0March2006.pdf According to a book that I have called The Science and Practice of Iridology by Bernard Jensen, where he consistently talks about iris changes caused by both disease and healing. Evidence please. A self-serving book doesn't count. The very first example where legend has it that in 1837, Von Peczely captured an owl and inso doing broke its leg, which showed up in the iris of the owl as a black line which gradually disappeared as the leg healed. You're calling a legend scientific evidence. Please, try harder. You make it too easy. I can think of a reason why iridology would be debunked as useless and that is because conventional medicine doesn't produce any healing signs, merely suppressing symptoms. Therefore it serves established medicine well to debunk iridology. When the health is deteriorating the irises get murkier with more overlay of signs of toxins, the lesions get darker, there may be more nerve rings, probably more clumping of fibres. However, under a healing regime the lesions are said to get lighter in color and eventually can disappear. and the Research and evidence to back this claim is where, so I can examine these data set? That's right they claim is all based on here-say, and what is now a considered a falsified assumption. The body of evidence and data is sufficient that the assumption upon which iridology is based is false. Yes bob, we all know about conventional statistics and how reliable they can be. It is a well known fact that many people as they get older develop murkier irises with discolouration and acid overlays, not to mention the scurf rings and arcus senilis (the arc of senility) - you know that while arc that goes between 11 and 1 oclock on the iris. So? Prove that this makes iridology accurate. Prove that allopathic medicine is accurate. Nice attempt at diversion. As we know, allopathic medicine is based on science and evidence. And you're telling us that iridology is based on legend. I don't know if iridology is based on science, I have always assumed it was but the type of science relates to alternative medicine and the ideas of detoxification, de-acidification, and natural healing. Drugs are generally considered to compound health problems rather than heal. How many times does one spend time, money and effort to explore avenues which have proved fruitless, Carole? How many times does it have to be pointed out to you that, Claims based only on post hoc fallacies (like your cell salt cures) fall apart under the most simple examination and questioning. This isn't the fault of the therapies bob, but of the researchers. No if an avenue is shown to false, or the claims falsified, as in iridology how many times do you revisit blind canyons of beliefs which are contradicted by evidence? I wouldn't believe it was false by anything told to me by an allopath for starters, and wouldn't believe everything told to me by a failed iridologist either because the healing effects depend on the methodology used to achieve it. If the method is no good, no healing = no iris change. The iris doesn't change because of disease. If I am incorrect, provide good evidence that I am wrong. According to iridology the iris changes due to toxemia, and the amount of disease is directly proportional to the amount of toxemia. Too problems with this: There is is no such thing as "toxemia" as you describe. Yes, there is toxemia (orthopathic definition) mostly caused by acidosis and nutritional deficiencies. A person who uses allopathic medicine wouldn't see any healing signs. They could experience healing signs with certain diets maybe, like the old naturapaths I've heard of. And there is no *good* evidence for anything you are saying. The best you have done is a legend. I can't think of anything offhand that can be considered as scientific proof but maybe it will come to me later. I do believe in iridology though despite the confession of an ex-iridologist, Joshua David Mather Sr. We don't really know for sure if he is an actual person, letalone if this is a true account. Even if it is a true account I could go through it and point out a few things that might ring alarm bells. -- Carole www.conspiracee.com "The universities do not teach all things ... so a doctor must seek out old wives, gypsies, sorcerers, wandering tribes, old robbers, and such outlaws and take lessons from them. A doctor must be a traveller . . . Knowledge is experience." -- Paracelsus (1493-1541) Jeff |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Allopathy Inc personality traits
"Bob Officer" [email protected] wrote in message ... On Wed, 20 Oct 2010 09:35:25 +1100, in misc.health.alternative, "carole" wrote: "dr_jeff" wrote in message ... On 10/18/10 2:06 PM, carole wrote: "Bob Officer".@. wrote in message ... On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 03:27:58 +1100, in misc.health.alternative, wrote: "Bob Officer".@. wrote in message ... On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 21:14:35 +1100, in misc.health.alternative, wrote: "Bob Officer".@. wrote in message ... On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 13:55:43 +1100, in misc.health.alternative, wrote: What you're describing john sounds like the patriarchal culture, where the macho men reign by secrecy, authoritarian regimes, hierarchical systems and brute force. However, that doesn't sound like science at all. All the science that counts is published in publicly available journals, often available at libraries or over the internet for free. The abstracts (summaries) of the articles are almost always available for free. Ah yes, but Jeff, only certain health research is considered worthy of funding. Yes, research which shows promise. No, research which doesn't threaten big pharma. Who decides what is and what isn't worthy of funding? Well I guess you would actually look at avenues which haven't been explored. After all how many times do you spend money to find the evidence doesn't support Iridology or some other already explored avenue shown to be a failure? That was a rhetorical question bob. It didn't look like one, Carole. I actually thought it was a sarcastic question but a good one. I gave a good answer. Since we know the structure of the iris is fixed in a person to the extent it can be used for identification using iris scans, It pretty much places the practice of iridology into the area of pseudoscience...well not even really pseudo science, but pure bull****. We don't know that the iris is fixed bob. yes we do. http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/TechReports/UCAM-CL-TR-635.html http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_det...csnumber=38750 http://www.irisbase.com/ - non-functional http://google.com/patents?id=KRkpAAAAEBAJ http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/users/jgd1000/irisrecog.pdf http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~jgd1000/patrec.pdf http://www.cbsr.ia.ac.cn/users/zfhe/publications.html http://iris.nist.gov/ICE/ICE_2005_Re...0March2006.pdf According to a book that I have called The Science and Practice of Iridology by Bernard Jensen, where he consistently talks about iris changes caused by both disease and healing. Evidence please. A self-serving book doesn't count. The very first example where legend has it that in 1837, A legend? A LEGEND? Von Peczely captured an owl and inso doing broke its leg, which showed up in the iris of the owl as a black line which gradually disappeared as the leg healed. You know the whine about you "being shown to be a fool"? You Just did it again... snip I should have put quote marks around some of that. Its a quote, ok? The very first example where "legend has it that in 1837, Von Peczely captured an owl and inso doing broke its leg", which showed up in the iris of the owl as a black line which gradually disappeared as the leg healed. -- Carole www.conspiracee.com Bob Officer finally admits it -"I am a tool" http://groups.google.com.au/group/mi...ss+epidemic%22 |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Allopathy Inc personality traits
"carole" wrote:
I do believe in iridology though despite the confession of an ex-iridologist, Joshua David Mather Sr. We don't really know for sure if he is an actual person, letalone if this is a true account. You don't see denial like that every day. -- Peter Bowditch aa #2243 The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com I'm @RatbagsDotCom on Twitter |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Personality profile for most Pharma zealots | john[_5_] | Kids Health | 3 | October 15th 10 11:05 AM |
Homeopathy vs allopathy - Part 2. | [email protected] | Kids Health | 32 | September 9th 06 03:24 PM |
Homeopathy vs allopathy. | [email protected] | Kids Health | 8 | August 11th 06 06:49 PM |
Miss Personality | bookers | Pregnancy | 2 | February 21st 05 02:46 AM |