A Parenting & kids forum. ParentingBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » ParentingBanter.com forum » alt.support » Child Support
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

COURTS REFUSE TO SEE FATHERS AS NECESSARY



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 7th 09, 10:32 AM posted to alt.child-support
Dusty
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 340
Default COURTS REFUSE TO SEE FATHERS AS NECESSARY

http://www.silive.com/siadvance/stor...970.xml&coll=1

COURTS REFUSE TO SEE FATHERS AS NECESSARY
Saturday, February 07, 2009
Staten Island Advance
I read with interest how "More Staten Island dads are waging custody wars."

But I keep asking, "Why?"

Why do custody courts "award" the child of divorce to one parent (usually
the mother) if both parents are fit and loving?


And why do these same courts order the other parent (usually the dad) to pay
child support if both parents earn an equitable amount?

Could it be because the state has a stake in broken families? Many people do
not know that for every child support order, the state receives money from
Washington. And the larger the child-support order, the more the state
receives.

I guess my cry of "why?" is actually a cry of "Waah!"

The only aspect of sole custody sadder than taking a child away from a fit
father is taking a father away from a child.

When will our legal system realize this wisdom? Children need both parents!


  #2  
Old March 7th 09, 09:22 PM posted to alt.child-support
DB[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 266
Default COURTS REFUSE TO SEE FATHERS AS NECESSARY

Children have a right to both parents, the State needs to keep their greedy
hands out of a family's business!

"Dusty" wrote in message
...
http://www.silive.com/siadvance/stor...970.xml&coll=1

COURTS REFUSE TO SEE FATHERS AS NECESSARY
Saturday, February 07, 2009
Staten Island Advance
I read with interest how "More Staten Island dads are waging custody
wars."

But I keep asking, "Why?"

Why do custody courts "award" the child of divorce to one parent (usually
the mother) if both parents are fit and loving?


And why do these same courts order the other parent (usually the dad) to
pay child support if both parents earn an equitable amount?

Could it be because the state has a stake in broken families? Many people
do not know that for every child support order, the state receives money
from Washington. And the larger the child-support order, the more the
state receives.

I guess my cry of "why?" is actually a cry of "Waah!"

The only aspect of sole custody sadder than taking a child away from a fit
father is taking a father away from a child.

When will our legal system realize this wisdom? Children need both
parents!




 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Refuse CPS Services? Greegor Spanking 13 June 15th 07 03:54 AM
Refuse CPS Services? Greegor Spanking 0 June 9th 07 06:29 AM
Refuse CPS Services? Greegor Foster Parents 0 June 9th 07 06:29 AM
VACCINATIONS AND THE RIGHT TO REFUSE Ilena Rose Kids Health 6 December 13th 06 11:00 PM
VACCINATIONS AND THE RIGHT TO REFUSE Ilena Rose Kids Health 7 July 28th 06 03:18 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 ParentingBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.