A Parenting & kids forum. ParentingBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » ParentingBanter.com forum » alt.parenting » Spanking
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

CPS Must Comply with 4th Amendment



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 16th 06, 03:15 AM posted to alt.support.child-protective-services,alt.parenting.spanking,alt.support.foster-parents
Greegor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,243
Default CPS Must Comply with 4th Amendment

http://www.aclutx.org/article.php?aid=396

ACLU, Texas Eagle Forum, Liberty Legal Institute and Others File Joint
Brief Arguing CPS Must Comply with 4th Amendment

Austin, TX - Today, the American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of
Texas joined with leading conservative and libertarian organizations to
file a brief with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in
support of the Gates family, in a case involving a warrantless raid of
the Gates home and seizure of their children by the Defendants, Texas
Department of Family and Protective Services (CPS) and Fort Bend County
Sheriff's Office.

The Gates' children were taken by Defendants from their home in a jail
wagon at the conclusion of the raid on February 11, 2000 and scattered
to foster homes, before being returned to the Gates' the following
Monday after a court hearing.

The brief argues that Defendants violated the Gates' Fourth Amendment
right to be free from unreasonable search and seizures, their
heightened procedural due process rights triggered by their paramount
liberty interest under the U.S. Constitution to direct the upbringing
of their children, and their analogous rights as recognized by the
Texas Constitution. The brief also maintains that Defendants' routine
practice of conducting such warrantless seizures of children, even in
the absence of any immediate danger of physical abuse or emergency, is
contrary to Texas law.

Joining the ACLU as amici curae in filing this brief are the Texas
Eagle Forum, the Liberty Legal Institute, the Texas Home School
Coalition, and the Libertarian Party of Texas.

ACLU of Texas Executive Director Will Harrell stated, "The ACLU of
Texas is proud to join with prominent conservative and libertarian
groups in this important case. We don't always agree, but we do agree
that the Fourth Amendment requires probable cause and a warrant for
non-emergency searches and seizures, and that this interest is
particularly strong when the sanctity of the family is involved."

Harrell continued, "The ACLU and the other parties to the brief share a
concern that CPS, while having a legitimate purpose, regularly
oversteps constitutional bounds and that in our free society, there is
a dire need for a bright- line restriction on their ability to intrude
into the private lives and homes of Texans. The state can ensure that
children are not being abused without violating the constitutional
rights of their parents, and indeed the very children it seeks to
protect."

The brief is authored by Marc A. Levin, an Austin attorney and former
law clerk at the Fifth Circuit who is known for his commitment to
individual liberty. The Fifth Circuit is based in New Orleans and the
case is being appealed from the U.S. District Court for the Southern
District of Texas, Houston, Judge Lynn Hughes. The case is No. 06-20763
and is styled:

GARY W GATES, JR; MELISSA GATES ; Individually and as next friends to
Sarah Gates, Derodrick Gates, Travis Gates, Raquel Gates, Cynthia
Gates, Cassandra Gates, Timothy Gates, Andrew Gates, Alexis Gates, and
Marcus Gates; GARY WILTON GATES; GEORGE GATES; SCOTT GATES
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
vs.
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PROTECTIVE AND REGULATORY SERVICES; ET AL.
Defendants-Appellees

To view the brief, please click here.
http://www.aclutx.org/files/GatesFif...CuraeBrief.pdf

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Repeal the Bradley Amendment Dusty Child Support 4 March 14th 06 01:50 AM
NJ: Ruling on indigent parents reversed Dusty Child Support 1 March 13th 06 10:32 PM
Who voted for the Bradley Amendment? Werebat Child Support 2 February 8th 06 07:08 PM
Senate amendment would let foster children keep full stipend wexwimpy Foster Parents 0 March 30th 04 09:45 PM
. The Bradley Amendment . Jeff Relf Child Support 0 January 4th 04 06:34 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 ParentingBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.