Doananism - publically was We Doan Need No Steenkin' CPS

On Sat, 31 Jan 2004 08:03:36 -0800, Doan wrote:

On 17 Jan 2004, Kane wrote:

Discipline (a parent decided somewhat imprecisely where "spanking"
ends and "abuse" begins). Doan could have helped him discover the
"reasonable standard" measure, but somehow didn't come forward in
time....Doan? Doan? Where are you Doan?

LOL! Still showing everyone that you are still stupid?

LOL! No, just letting you show how stupid you are.

Missed the recent Canadian court finding on "reasonable" didn't you?
They can't figure it out and admit it. So they have cut the right to
spank to the barest of minimums, leaving a great many how have come
here and "made up their own minds" very much in the lurch.

They can't do, in Canada, legally what your buddies here claim is
okay.

Too lazy to
call your local DA or CPS on what is "reasonable"???

They don't know and neither do you. The question isn't, by the way,
what is "reasonable" but what is abusive. And you still haven't
provided the marker that would tell people where that boundary is, now
have you?

Studying up on the Embry study? Remember, you have a little chore
to
do before I'll discuss it with you.

Oops! Still talking about the Embry study, Kane?

Yet another public exhibition of Doanism, eh?

You brought up The Embry study out of the blue with NO prompting from
me for the express purpose of dodging The Question.

You, in your usual stupidity, challenged me to produce the study. And
then claimed you have the study yourself.

I recently asked you to name what was on a certain page, and you are
noticably unable to.

Any particular reason?

No punishment, right?

No, no punishment, though Embry used the word to describe a "sit and
watch" time out.

Now let's see if you really have the study and can tell me why I say
with confidence there was no proven use of punishment by any of the
participants.

That would assure everyone you aren't BSing.

I notice, by the way, either no one took you up on your offer to send
them a copy of the study (RRRR, it doesn't even exist in electronic
form, smartass - though I may, as a favor key it in as such one day)
via e-mail reply.

Or you're are practicing more of your public Doanism.

Doan, you've never had anything but bluff and lies since you first
posted here to the present. It's ALL smoke and mirrors with you and
you do it in public much to your embarrassment.

;-)

Nothing to offer eh? No measure for when spanking becomes abuse. No
proof one way or another if I ever claimed I was unspanked. No proof
you have the Embry Study.

Nothing by whackin' off publically....that's all yah got. Even Canada
is against yah....R R R R R

Doan

Poor Doanator.

{:-]

Kane