If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
Bleak over a baby (semi-OT)
"Dagny" wrote in message link.net... Nope, this absolutely depresses me too. Strollers for little babies and baby buckets (car seats carried into stores) depress me. I don't know why the mom doesn't like her kid enough to put her in a sling/carrier. I hope they all have bad backs. I do make some use of various paraphenalia but not NEARLY to the extent of my peers. And I happen to think that I can PLAY more with my baby if he's in the stroller whereas the play options are not as plentiful if he's in a carrier. I often hear about how if you have a sling, you can walk around nursing hands-free - I happen to think THAT's depressing. What mother wouldn't want to cuddle with her nursling? Seriously what's up with all the judging? I don't know what's in these people's lives; how would I even presume to know what's "best"? Jeanne |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
Bleak over a baby (semi-OT)
"Dagny" wrote in message link.net... "Nikki" wrote in message ... Dagny wrote: Bad backs are a reason to use strollers, and cold weather and not disturbing a nap are reasons to leave the child in the carseat and/or snap the child in a travel system. I'm not being defensive as I was one of those mothers that held mine. I didn't even own an infant seat for Hunter and didn't have one for Luke until he was 3 months old. My stroller never left my property. I just carried them around in my arms, didn't even have a sling. Still I really don't understand what the problem is with sitting a content and happy baby down in a seat of some kind while mom does her shopping. Why is *just because it is easier* not an acceptable reason if everyone is happy and content. I never said anything about wanting people to work for no reason. There's a fine line between "happy and content" and "brain dead, unstimulated, has learned that he can't look to mom for input about the world because mom is forever out of view behind a stroller, big flat spot on the back of her head." A fine line! You have a very bleak view of the world, I feel sorry for you. Judy |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
Bleak over a baby (semi-OT)
"Nikki" wrote in message ... Beth wrote: Now I know for a fact that this baby was planned, wanted, and his folks love him deeply. He's a happy little fellow who smiles promiscuously! That doesn't sound bleak to me. IMO you are taking a snap shot of equipment and not looking at the actual baby. Well, how about a snapshot of the equipment *and* a look at the actual baby? :-) While he seemed happy, it just saddened me to see him getting mechanical nourishment and comfort. Can't help it. It just looks so awful to me. I imagine that he got more human attention when his mom was not so busy, though. Once, when my DS was 3 days old, he had to spend a couple hours in the nursery at the hospital and the nurses kept him in a swing because he was so "difficult." Granted, I was pretty hormonal 3 days postpartum, but the sight of my little guy warehoused in that violently rocking swing soured me for good on the contraptions. Someone had given me a second-hand Graco swing which I never did assemble, even though I was one of those mothers who had to cook and eat one-handed, pee while wearing the baby in a sling, and considered 5 minutes a real vacation. A swing might have bought me a little time to myself, I suppose, but DS soon graduated to playing on the floor around 3 months and life got a lot easier. Beth |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
Bleak over a baby (semi-OT)
"Bruce and Jeanne" wrote in message ... Do any of you feel this way about other parenting styles, or am I just particularly insufferable? :-) The latter. I know. :-) I took some aspirin and am hoping to be better from now on. ;-) Beth |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
Bleak over a baby (semi-OT)
"Linz" wrote in message ... On Mon, 1 Mar 2004 13:49:58 -0600, "Beth" wrote: "CY" wrote in message news:5RJ0c.7750$Zp.2984@fed1read07... Even the diaper?? I was surprised at how yellow the urine was. My own DS might have faintly yellow pee after a fairly solid night of sleep, but even at 2 months he was waking up with clear urine in his diaper. Wondering if feeding formula keeps babies somewhat less hydrated as a rule or if this was an exception. Was it cloth or a dispo? That might affect the colour? My guess is that it is the B vitamins in the formula. --angela |
#66
|
|||
|
|||
Bleak over a baby (semi-OT)
"Chotii" wrote in message ... Was it cloth or a dispo? That might affect the colour? My guess is that it is the B vitamins in the formula. That sounds good. Have tried various kinds of disposables on DS and none of them looked yellow. But I would have yellow milk when taking B-complex, and he would pee yellow for well over 24 hours after I took the pill. Even so, this diaper was more of a deep amber, not the lemonade color of vitamin B pee. Beth |
#67
|
|||
|
|||
Bleak over a baby (semi-OT)
Beth wrote: "Nikki" wrote in message ... Beth wrote: Now I know for a fact that this baby was planned, wanted, and his folks love him deeply. He's a happy little fellow who smiles promiscuously! That doesn't sound bleak to me. IMO you are taking a snap shot of equipment and not looking at the actual baby. Well, how about a snapshot of the equipment *and* a look at the actual baby? :-) While he seemed happy, it just saddened me to see him getting mechanical nourishment and comfort. Can't help it. It just looks so awful to me. I imagine that he got more human attention when his mom was not so busy, though. But this response seems illogical, to me. If you see a loved, happy baby in these circumstances, I would expect you would rethink your ideas on what makes a baby happy - not have a knee-jerk reaction that it's "bleak." Clisby |
#68
|
|||
|
|||
Bleak over a baby (semi-OT)
"Dagny" wrote
Nope, this absolutely depresses me too. Strollers for little babies and baby buckets (car seats carried into stores) depress me. I don't know why the mom doesn't like her kid enough to put her in a sling/carrier. I hope they all have bad backs. Or, perhaps, like DD, the baby doesn't like slings or Baby Bjorns and the baby bucket is the best possible choice for a non-screaming baby. Actually, with DD, the stroller was the best choice and I put her in it everywhere we went. Our choice was in my arms or in the stroller, so when we went out she was in her stroller most of the time. She's a bit more flexible now, but not much so she still spends a lot of time in my arms or in the stroller. Some babies don't like to be held in slings, etc. and it has nothing to do with the mom's parenting theories. -- Melissa (in Los Angeles) Mum to Elizabeth 4/13/03 |
#69
|
|||
|
|||
Bleak over a baby (semi-OT)
"Clisby" wrote in message ... But this response seems illogical, to me. Yes, it is illogical and reflexive. I never claimed that I was operating from logic in this respect. Beth |
#70
|
|||
|
|||
Bleak over a baby (semi-OT)
-- ------------------------------------------------- A woman becomes preeminent, she is expected to have enthusiasms. "Kereru" wrote in message ... "Dagny" wrote in message link.net... "Nikki" wrote in message ... Dagny wrote: Bad backs are a reason to use strollers, and cold weather and not disturbing a nap are reasons to leave the child in the carseat and/or snap the child in a travel system. I'm not being defensive as I was one of those mothers that held mine. I didn't even own an infant seat for Hunter and didn't have one for Luke until he was 3 months old. My stroller never left my property. I just carried them around in my arms, didn't even have a sling. Still I really don't understand what the problem is with sitting a content and happy baby down in a seat of some kind while mom does her shopping. Why is *just because it is easier* not an acceptable reason if everyone is happy and content. I never said anything about wanting people to work for no reason. There's a fine line between "happy and content" and "brain dead, unstimulated, has learned that he can't look to mom for input about the world because mom is forever out of view behind a stroller, big flat spot on the back of her head." A fine line! You have a very bleak view of the world, I feel sorry for you. I'm bitter right now about some other things and it spills into all areas of my life, but yes I do have a very bleak view of many artificial methods of Western parenting. But you know, thanks for the extra condescension It's a fine line because it gets to the point in my opinion where the CHILD doesn't know the difference between good and bad contentedness, between happy engaged and happy zoned out, how would the parent? How would the parent even know what their child was capable of? -- Dagny |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
misc.kids FAQ on Prenatal Testing - Overview and Personal Stories | [email protected] | Pregnancy | 1 | April 17th 04 12:52 PM |
misc.kids FAQ on the Pregnancy AFP Screen and the Triple Screen | [email protected] | Pregnancy | 0 | January 16th 04 09:15 AM |
Baby item recs againhigh chair etc | Jill | Pregnancy | 11 | January 13th 04 05:17 PM |
Question about sling/attachment parenting (long, sorry) | Vijay | Pregnancy | 23 | November 11th 03 08:12 AM |