If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Family Court Child Abuse
This sort of thing also happens very frequently in the U.S.
In the U.S. feminists and other advocates for mothers have successfully obscured the central point in these disputes. These activists usually prevail in court because they argue that mothers have a constitutionally protected right of freedom of travel. For some reason or other, advocates for fathers are letting them get away with this misleading argument. Yes, of course, mothers should be able to exercise their right to travel to Outer Mongolia if they want. However, they shouldn't be able to take the children with them. Edmund Esterbauer wrote: "A mother has successfully appealed orders restraining her and her children from moving to another town, away from the father. The Full Court of the Family Court allowed an appeal against the decision of a trial Judge to prohibit a mother of three boys aged 13, 11 and 9 from moving with the boys from Vermont South (in Melbourne's eastern suburbs) to Drysdale (near Geelong), a distance of about 115 km. The facts were that the parties separated in 1998. The Family Court made orders that provided for the children to reside with their father during school term from Wednesday evening until Sunday evening on alternate weekends, and for him to have contact with them on each other Wednesday after school. The orders also provided for the sharing of school holidays and special days such as birthdays." CCH This case illustrates how criminal and abusive Nicholson has become towards children. He shows his complete contempt for children and their wishes or their welfare. Nicholson also completely ignored the children's wishes in R v R (2000). He claims: " 22. Her Honour then set about a consideration of each of the relevant factors under s 68F(2). She considered the wishes of the elder children, stating that they were of an age where any clear expression of such wishes should be given significant weight. Whilst the eldest child had said he wanted to go to Drysdale, his views were described by the Court expert, Mr Papaleo, as being "cautious and non-committal at the highest level". The youngest child did not want to move. While not stated expressly, it seems clear that in the circumstances of some conflict of view between the brothers, her Honour did not in the end give significant weight to their views in her decision, and no issue was taken with that approach on appeal." http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/c.../2003/280.html Nicholson gives no consideration to the impact the move will have on the children. Naturally Nicholson cites a Kirby decision; AMS v AIF, one that totally ignores the welfare of children. Note the nice cosy relationship Nicholson has with Kirby who is a homosexual activist on the High Court. Kirby is a judge who advocates and promotes experimentation on unborn children and who has recently valued the life of a child as $100 000. Nicholson by amazing coincidence is also an advocate of homosexual family rights to have children. These two are developing a nice, sweet and cosy relationship. After all to Kirby children are things to be chopped up and experimented on and to Nicholson things to ignored and used as chattel. The stolen generation of children will hold these child abusers accountable. -- "The true value of democracy is to serve as a sanitary precaution protecting us against the abuse of power...In its present form ..It has ceased to be a safeguard of personal liberty, a restraint from abuse of government power..It has on the contrary, become the main cause of a progressive and accelerating increase in the power and weight of the administrative machine." Friedrich A. Hayek |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Most families *at risk* w CPS' assessment tools broad, vague | Kane | General | 13 | February 20th 04 07:02 PM |
Kids should work. | LaVonne Carlson | General | 22 | December 7th 03 05:27 AM |
Kids should work. | ChrisScaife | Spanking | 16 | December 7th 03 05:27 AM |
A Plant's Motivation? | Kane | Spanking | 44 | October 16th 03 01:51 PM |