If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message ink.net... PREGNANT WOMEN: OBs are routinely closing birth canals up to 30% and routinely keeping birth canals closed when babies get stuck. REPLY Todd, This is news to everybody. Can you please post at least once or twice per month more? Joel It's easy to allow your birth canal to OPEN the "extra" up to 30%. See THE SOLUTION at the very end of this post. *CHIROPRACTIC* CAUSES APNEA IN BABIES? What exactly do Paul L.P. Brand, MD et al. [2005] mean by "manual therapy"? And why the deafening silence about the gruesome spinal manipulation of MD-obstetricians the most prolific spinal manipulators? (More on this below.) Here's the apnea in babies/"manual therapy" quote... Brand et al.^^^ write: "...22% of infants showed short episodes of apnoea during manual therapy of the spine, and...one case has been described in which such apnoea resulted in death...Given the absence of evidence of beneficial effects of spinal manipulation in infants and in view of its potential risks, manual therapy, chiropractic and osteopathy should not be used in infants with the [kinetic imbalance due to subocciptal strain/KISS-syndrome]..." ^^^Brand PL, Engelbert RH, Helders PJ, Offringa M. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2005 Mar 26;149(13):703-7. PubMed abstract OPEN LETTER (archived for global access at http://groups.google.com) Paul L.P. Brand, MD Isala Klinieken Amalia kinderafdeling Postbus 10.500 8000 GM Zwolle THE NETHERLANDS Paul, Since you are opposed to MDs and others TREATING the kinetic imbalance due to suboccipital strain/KISS-syndrome with spinal manipulation... Surely you can muster some opposition to MD-obstetricians CAUSING kinetic imbalance due to suboccipital strain/KISS-syndrome with spinal manipulation. MD-obstetricians are the most prolific spinal manipulators of infant spines - and they are GRUESOME spinal manipulators - senselessly closing birth canals up to 30% - sometimes pulling so hard they rip spinal nerves out of tiny spinal cords. MD-obstetricians may be causing strokes/cerebral palsy in some babies with their gruesome spinal mainpulation. See the two Open Letters below. Todd Dr. Gastaldo OPEN LETTER #1 Emergency room physician Carlos A. Camargo, Jr., MD/Kim et al.^^^ write: "Given the growing evidence of benefits and hazards from popular CAM...therapies [e.g. chiropractic], [emergency department/ED] staff should consider raising this health issue with their patients." [Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Apr;12(4):377-80. PubMed abstract] ^^^Kim S, Hohrmann JL, Clark S, Munoz KN, Braun JE, Doshi A, Radeos MS, Camargo CA Jr. OPEN LETTER (archived for global access at http://groups.google.com) Carlos A. Camargo, Jr., MD Massachusetts General Hospital 326 Cambridge Street Suite 410, Boston, MA 02114 Carlos, I suspect by your mention hazards of chiropractic that you are alluding to hazards of spinal manipulation. Emergency department/ED staffs may not be aware that CAM spinal manipulation injuries happen FAR more frequently in hospitals. Hospital-based CAM spinal manipulators (MD-obstetricians) are closing birth canals up to 30%, keeping birth canals closed the "extra" up to 30% when babies get stuck - and pulling with hands forceps and vacuum extractors. Sometimes hospital-based CAM practitioners (MD-obstetricians) pull so hard they rip spinal nerves out of tiny spinal cords. Some babies die - some babies get paralyzed - most "only" suffer gruesome spinal manipulation. ALL spinal manipulation is gruesome with the birth canal senselessly closed the "extra" up to 30%. (Remember: OBs are KEEPING birth canals closed the "extra" up to 30% when babies get stuck - as they pull with hands, forceps and vacuums.. See OB Lie #4 below.) Emergency department/ED staffs may not be aware that hospital-based CAM practitioners (MD-obstetricians) are slicing vaginas/abdomens en masse (episiotomy/c-section) - surgically/fraudulently inferring they are doing/have done everything possible to open birth canals even as they CLOSE birth canals the "extra" up to 30%. Emergency department/ED staffs should immediately stop hospital-based CAM practitioners (MD-obstetricians) from closing birth canals the "extra" up to 30%. It's an emergency. Sincerely, Todd Dr. Gastaldo PS1 I suspect hospital-based CAM practitioners (MD-obstetricians) are committing child abuse - so I have been reporting it... See Women can sue: UCLA OBs slicing vaginas illegally: It's sexual assault http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3404 PS2 THE FOUR OB LIES OB LIE #1. After MASSIVE change in the AP pelvic outlet diameter was clinically demonstrated in 1911 and radiographically demonstrated in 1957, the authors of Williams Obstetrics began erroneously claiming that pelvic diamaters DON'T CHANGE at delivery. OB LIE #2. After Ohlsen pointed out in 1973 that pelvic diameters DO change - the authors of Williams Obstetrics began erroneously claiming that their most frequent delivery position - dorsal - widens the outlet. OB LIE #3. After I pointed out in 1992 that dorsal CLOSES - and so does semisitting - the authors of Williams Obstetrics - put the correct biomechanics in their 1993 edition - but kept in their text (in the same paragraph!) - the dorsal widens bald lie that first called my attention to their text... OB LIE #4. OBs are actually KEEPING birth canals closed when babies get stuck - and claiming they are doing everything to allow the birth canal open maximally. (ACOG Shoulder Dystocia video - also forceps and vacuum births are performed with the mother in lithotomy.) See Make birth better: Dan Rather, before you leave CBS... http://health.groups.yahoo.com*/grou...t/message/2983 I noted some of the OB lies in an Open Letter to the FTC years ago... http://home1.gte.net/gastaldo/*part2ftc.html RELEVANT AMA PRINCIPLES OF MEDICAL ETHICS.... "[AMA physician[s] shall...strive to expose those physicians...who engage in fraud or deception." "[AMA p]hysician[s] shall...seek changes in those requirements which are contrary to the best interests of the patient." "[AMA p]hysician[s] shall...make relevant information available to patients, colleagues, and the public..." http://www.psych.org/psych_pra*ct/et...ions53101*.cfm AMA physicians are ignoring their own stated ethics - babies be damned. EMERGENCY. PREGNANT WOMEN: By using semisitting and dorsal delivery, OBs are closing birth canals up to 30%. Also, when babies get stuck, OBs KEEP women semisitting and dorsal - they KEEP the birth canal closed the "extra" up to 30% as they pull with hands, forceps and vacuums. THE SOLUTION: To allow your birth canal to OPEN the "extra" up to 30%, simply roll onto your side as you push your baby out - BUT BEWARE - some OBs will let pregnant women "try" alternative delivery positions - but will roll them back to semisitting/dorsal - close their birth canals the "extra" up to 30% for the actual delivery. Talk to your OB. OPEN LETTER #2 UCSF: COULD OBs BE CAUSING STROKES IN BABIES? See below. STROKES IN BABIES --- CEREBRAL PALSY "[The rate of p]erinatal arterial ischemic stroke (PAS)...a common cause of hemiplegic cerebral palsy...increased dramatically when multiple risk factors were present." --Janet Lee, MS et al.^^^ JAMA. 2005 Feb 9;293(6):723-9. PubMed abstract http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/293/6/723 ^^^Janet Lee, MS; Lisa A. Croen, PhD; Kendall H. Backstrand, BA; Cathleen K. Yoshida, MS; Louis H. Henning, BA; Camilla Lindan, MD; Donna M. Ferriero, MD; Heather J. Fullerton, MD; A. J. Barkovich, MD; Yvonne W. Wu, MD, MPH OPEN LETTER (archived for global access at http://groups.google.com) Janet Lee, MS et al. via: Lisa A. Croen, PhD Division of Research Kaiser Foundation Research Institute Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, Calif. 94612, USA. Yvonne W. Wu, MD, MPH Department of Neurology University of California, San Francisco 94143-0136, USA Janet Lee, MS et al., I recently reported to UCLA Police Chief Karl T. Ross that UCLA MD-obstetricians may be causing stroke in some infants because they routinely close birth canals up to 30% and keep birth canals closed the "extra" up to 30% when babies get stuck. See Strokes in babies (also: Chiro with headache and slurred speech) http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3429 I am interested in your professional opinions. Could the fact that MD-obstetricians routinely close birth canals up to 30% and keep birth canals closed the "extra" up to 30% when babies get stuck have anything to do with the rate of perinatal arterial ischemic stroke/PAS? I ask because you wrote that the rate of perinatal arterial ischemic stroke (PAS) increased dramatically when multiple risk factors were present... Some of the risk factors you listed are quite relevant to the grisly spectacle of OBs routinely closing birth canals up to 30% and routinely keeping birth canals closed when babies get stuck, as in, FETAL HEART RATE ABNORMALITY: Over three times as many stroke infants vs. control infants. (46% vs 14%, P.001) PROLONGED SECOND STAGE: Over five times as many stroke infants vs. control infants. (25% vs 4%, P.001) EMERGENCY CESAREAN DELIVERY: Over twice as many stroke infants vs. control infants.(35% vs 13%, P = .002) (OR) VACUUM EXTRACTION: Over twice as many stroke infants vs. control infants (24% vs 11%, P = .04), Of course, regardless whether MD-obstetricians are causing strokes in babies... MD-obstetricians have no business closing birth canals up to 30% or keeping birth canals closed the "extra" up to 30% when babies get stuck - or lying to cover-up. See the Four OB Lies below. It's mass child abuse - which is why I reported it to UCLA Chief of Police Karl T. Ross, mentioned above. The MDs among you are mandatory suspected child abuse reporters. If you suspect child abuse - please immediately report - it's the law. BTW, I am in favor of pardons in advance for MDs. As medical students, MDs are TRAINED to perform child abuse. More mass child abuse - perhaps also (perhaps) relevant to strokes in infants... MD-obstetricians at UCLA are "usually" clamping umbilical cords "within 15 to 20 seconds" - which means they are routinely robbing babies of massive amounts of blood volume - which may have some bearing on the infant stroke rate. See Strokes in babies (also: Chiro with headache and slurred speech) http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3429 Thanks for reading. Sincerely, Todd Dr. Gastaldo Born and raised in LA County Graduated UCLA (Biochem 1975) Graduated Los Angeles College of Chiropractic (DC, 1979) Living in Hillsboro, Oregon (503) 640-0456 PS THE FOUR OB LIES OB LIE #1. After MASSIVE change in the AP pelvic outlet diameter was clinically demonstrated in 1911 and radiographically demonstrated in 1957, the authors of Williams Obstetrics began erroneously claiming that pelvic diamaters DON'T CHANGE at delivery. OB LIE #2. After Ohlsen pointed out in 1973 that pelvic diameters DO change - the authors of Williams Obstetrics began erroneously claiming that their most frequent delivery position - dorsal - widens the outlet. OB LIE #3. After I pointed out in 1992 that dorsal CLOSES - and so does semisitting - the authors of Williams Obstetrics - put the correct biomechanics in their 1993 edition - but kept in their text (in the same paragraph!) - the dorsal widens bald lie that first called my attention to their text... OB LIE #4. OBs are actually KEEPING birth canals closed when babies get stuck - and claiming they are doing everything to allow the birth canal open maximally. (ACOG Shoulder Dystocia video - also forceps and vacuum births are performed with the mother in lithotomy.) See Make birth better: Dan Rather, before you leave CBS... http://health.groups.yahoo.com*/grou...t/message/2983 I noted some of the OB lies in an Open Letter to the FTC years ago... http://home1.gte.net/gastaldo/*part2ftc.html RELEVANT AMA PRINCIPLES OF MEDICAL ETHICS.... "[AMA physician[s] shall...strive to expose those physicians...who engage in fraud or deception." "[AMA p]hysician[s] shall...seek changes in those requirements which are contrary to the best interests of the patient." "[AMA p]hysician[s] shall...make relevant information available to patients, colleagues, and the public..." http://www.psych.org/psych_pra*ct/et...ions53101*.cfm AMA physicians are ignoring their own stated ethics - babies be damned. EMERGENCY. PREGNANT WOMEN: By using semisitting and dorsal delivery, OBs are closing birth canals up to 30%. Also, when babies get stuck, OBs KEEP women semisitting and dorsal - they KEEP the birth canal closed the "extra" up to 30% as they pull with hands, forceps and vacuums. THE SOLUTION: To allow your birth canal to OPEN the "extra" up to 30%, simply roll onto your side as you push your baby out - or use other "alternative" delivery positions. JUST BEWARE - some OBs will let pregnant women "try" alternative delivery positions - but will roll them back to semisitting/dorsal - close their birth canals the "extra" up to 30% for the actual delivery. Talk to your OB. Copied to: UCLA Police Chief Karl T. Ross via . END the Open Letters Dr. Gastaldo sends to Dr. Brand The MD-obstetrician spinal manipulation crime is so obvious - the silence of chiropractors so deafening - it would not surprise me to learn that MDs (Brand et al. and Kim et al., see above) are doing studies to KEEP chiropractors cowed into silence out of fear that THEIR (the chiropractors') spinal manipulation practices will be adversely effected if they speak out to stop MD-obstetricians from closing birth canals up to 30% and gruesomely - sometimes fatally - manipulating most babies' spines. As a doctor of chiropractic myself, it was very difficult to put on my subject line Brand et al.'s indication of apnea in babies being caused by MDs and others who manipulate the spines of babies... But there it was right smack in the medical literature... "...22% of infants showed short episodes of apnoea during manual therapy of the spine, and...one case has been described in which such apnoea resulted in death...Given the absence of evidence of beneficial effects of spinal manipulation in infants and in view of its potential risks, manual therapy, chiropractic and osteopathy should not be used in infants with the [kinetic imbalance due to subocciptal strain/KISS-syndrome]..." ^^^Brand PL, Engelbert RH, Helders PJ, Offringa M. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2005 Mar 26;149(13):703-7. PubMed abstract I am reassessing my own recommendation that mothers take their babies to doctors of chiropractic - or any other practitioners who manipulate babies' spines. Some (most?) doctors of chiropractic are SO gentle - but until I know what Brand et. al. meant by "manual therapy" well....22% is a big number...I don't think babies should be made to suffer apnea during spinal manipulation... MDs and others who treat KISS (or vertebral subluxation) with spinal manipulation must be made aware of the report of Brand et al. Pregnant women must also be made aware of Brand et al.'s report. Hence this post to the usenet newsgroup misc.kids.pregnancy. To Dr. Brand I say again... Since you are opposed to MDs and others TREATING the kinetic imbalance due to suboccipital strain/KISS-syndrome with spinal manipulation... Surely you can muster some opposition to MD-obstetricians CAUSING kinetic imbalance due to suboccipital strain/KISS-syndrome with spinal manipulation. MD-obstetricians are the most prolific spinal manipulators of infant spines - and they are GRUESOME spinal manipulators - senselessly closing birth canals up to 30% - sometimes pulling so hard they rip spinal nerves out of tiny spinal cords. MD-obstetricians may be causing strokes/cerebral palsy in some babies with their gruesome spinal mainpulation. See the two Open Letters [above]. Thanks for reading everyone. Sincerely, Todd Dr. Gastaldo EMERGENCY. PREGNANT WOMEN: By using semisitting and dorsal delivery, OBs are closing birth canals up to 30%. Also, when babies get stuck, OBs KEEP women semisitting and dorsal - they KEEP the birth canal closed the "extra" up to 30% as they pull with hands, forceps and vacuums. THE SOLUTION: To allow your birth canal to OPEN the "extra" up to 30%, simply roll onto your side as you push your baby out - or use other "alternative" delivery positions. JUST BEWARE - some OBs will let pregnant women "try" alternative delivery positions - but will roll them back to semisitting/dorsal - close their birth canals the "extra" up to 30% for the actual delivery. Talk to your OB. This Open Letter to Paul L.P. Brand, MD will be archived for global access in the Google usenet archive. Search http://groups.google.com for "Chiropractic causes apnea in babies?" |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Todd, one chiropractor around here who was
opening birth canals got in huge trouble for it. joel "Joel M. Eichen" wrote in message ... "Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message ink.net... PREGNANT WOMEN: OBs are routinely closing birth canals up to 30% and routinely keeping birth canals closed when babies get stuck. REPLY Todd, This is news to everybody. Can you please post at least once or twice per month more? Joel It's easy to allow your birth canal to OPEN the "extra" up to 30%. See THE SOLUTION at the very end of this post. *CHIROPRACTIC* CAUSES APNEA IN BABIES? What exactly do Paul L.P. Brand, MD et al. [2005] mean by "manual therapy"? And why the deafening silence about the gruesome spinal manipulation of MD-obstetricians the most prolific spinal manipulators? (More on this below.) Here's the apnea in babies/"manual therapy" quote... Brand et al.^^^ write: "...22% of infants showed short episodes of apnoea during manual therapy of the spine, and...one case has been described in which such apnoea resulted in death...Given the absence of evidence of beneficial effects of spinal manipulation in infants and in view of its potential risks, manual therapy, chiropractic and osteopathy should not be used in infants with the [kinetic imbalance due to subocciptal strain/KISS-syndrome]..." ^^^Brand PL, Engelbert RH, Helders PJ, Offringa M. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2005 Mar 26;149(13):703-7. PubMed abstract OPEN LETTER (archived for global access at http://groups.google.com) Paul L.P. Brand, MD Isala Klinieken Amalia kinderafdeling Postbus 10.500 8000 GM Zwolle THE NETHERLANDS Paul, Since you are opposed to MDs and others TREATING the kinetic imbalance due to suboccipital strain/KISS-syndrome with spinal manipulation... Surely you can muster some opposition to MD-obstetricians CAUSING kinetic imbalance due to suboccipital strain/KISS-syndrome with spinal manipulation. MD-obstetricians are the most prolific spinal manipulators of infant spines - and they are GRUESOME spinal manipulators - senselessly closing birth canals up to 30% - sometimes pulling so hard they rip spinal nerves out of tiny spinal cords. MD-obstetricians may be causing strokes/cerebral palsy in some babies with their gruesome spinal mainpulation. See the two Open Letters below. Todd Dr. Gastaldo OPEN LETTER #1 Emergency room physician Carlos A. Camargo, Jr., MD/Kim et al.^^^ write: "Given the growing evidence of benefits and hazards from popular CAM...therapies [e.g. chiropractic], [emergency department/ED] staff should consider raising this health issue with their patients." [Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Apr;12(4):377-80. PubMed abstract] ^^^Kim S, Hohrmann JL, Clark S, Munoz KN, Braun JE, Doshi A, Radeos MS, Camargo CA Jr. OPEN LETTER (archived for global access at http://groups.google.com) Carlos A. Camargo, Jr., MD Massachusetts General Hospital 326 Cambridge Street Suite 410, Boston, MA 02114 Carlos, I suspect by your mention hazards of chiropractic that you are alluding to hazards of spinal manipulation. Emergency department/ED staffs may not be aware that CAM spinal manipulation injuries happen FAR more frequently in hospitals. Hospital-based CAM spinal manipulators (MD-obstetricians) are closing birth canals up to 30%, keeping birth canals closed the "extra" up to 30% when babies get stuck - and pulling with hands forceps and vacuum extractors. Sometimes hospital-based CAM practitioners (MD-obstetricians) pull so hard they rip spinal nerves out of tiny spinal cords. Some babies die - some babies get paralyzed - most "only" suffer gruesome spinal manipulation. ALL spinal manipulation is gruesome with the birth canal senselessly closed the "extra" up to 30%. (Remember: OBs are KEEPING birth canals closed the "extra" up to 30% when babies get stuck - as they pull with hands, forceps and vacuums.. See OB Lie #4 below.) Emergency department/ED staffs may not be aware that hospital-based CAM practitioners (MD-obstetricians) are slicing vaginas/abdomens en masse (episiotomy/c-section) - surgically/fraudulently inferring they are doing/have done everything possible to open birth canals even as they CLOSE birth canals the "extra" up to 30%. Emergency department/ED staffs should immediately stop hospital-based CAM practitioners (MD-obstetricians) from closing birth canals the "extra" up to 30%. It's an emergency. Sincerely, Todd Dr. Gastaldo PS1 I suspect hospital-based CAM practitioners (MD-obstetricians) are committing child abuse - so I have been reporting it... See Women can sue: UCLA OBs slicing vaginas illegally: It's sexual assault http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3404 PS2 THE FOUR OB LIES OB LIE #1. After MASSIVE change in the AP pelvic outlet diameter was clinically demonstrated in 1911 and radiographically demonstrated in 1957, the authors of Williams Obstetrics began erroneously claiming that pelvic diamaters DON'T CHANGE at delivery. OB LIE #2. After Ohlsen pointed out in 1973 that pelvic diameters DO change - the authors of Williams Obstetrics began erroneously claiming that their most frequent delivery position - dorsal - widens the outlet. OB LIE #3. After I pointed out in 1992 that dorsal CLOSES - and so does semisitting - the authors of Williams Obstetrics - put the correct biomechanics in their 1993 edition - but kept in their text (in the same paragraph!) - the dorsal widens bald lie that first called my attention to their text... OB LIE #4. OBs are actually KEEPING birth canals closed when babies get stuck - and claiming they are doing everything to allow the birth canal open maximally. (ACOG Shoulder Dystocia video - also forceps and vacuum births are performed with the mother in lithotomy.) See Make birth better: Dan Rather, before you leave CBS... http://health.groups.yahoo.com*/grou...t/message/2983 I noted some of the OB lies in an Open Letter to the FTC years ago... http://home1.gte.net/gastaldo/*part2ftc.html RELEVANT AMA PRINCIPLES OF MEDICAL ETHICS.... "[AMA physician[s] shall...strive to expose those physicians...who engage in fraud or deception." "[AMA p]hysician[s] shall...seek changes in those requirements which are contrary to the best interests of the patient." "[AMA p]hysician[s] shall...make relevant information available to patients, colleagues, and the public..." http://www.psych.org/psych_pra*ct/et...ions53101*.cfm AMA physicians are ignoring their own stated ethics - babies be damned. EMERGENCY. PREGNANT WOMEN: By using semisitting and dorsal delivery, OBs are closing birth canals up to 30%. Also, when babies get stuck, OBs KEEP women semisitting and dorsal - they KEEP the birth canal closed the "extra" up to 30% as they pull with hands, forceps and vacuums. THE SOLUTION: To allow your birth canal to OPEN the "extra" up to 30%, simply roll onto your side as you push your baby out - BUT BEWARE - some OBs will let pregnant women "try" alternative delivery positions - but will roll them back to semisitting/dorsal - close their birth canals the "extra" up to 30% for the actual delivery. Talk to your OB. OPEN LETTER #2 UCSF: COULD OBs BE CAUSING STROKES IN BABIES? See below. STROKES IN BABIES --- CEREBRAL PALSY "[The rate of p]erinatal arterial ischemic stroke (PAS)...a common cause of hemiplegic cerebral palsy...increased dramatically when multiple risk factors were present." --Janet Lee, MS et al.^^^ JAMA. 2005 Feb 9;293(6):723-9. PubMed abstract http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/293/6/723 ^^^Janet Lee, MS; Lisa A. Croen, PhD; Kendall H. Backstrand, BA; Cathleen K. Yoshida, MS; Louis H. Henning, BA; Camilla Lindan, MD; Donna M. Ferriero, MD; Heather J. Fullerton, MD; A. J. Barkovich, MD; Yvonne W. Wu, MD, MPH OPEN LETTER (archived for global access at http://groups.google.com) Janet Lee, MS et al. via: Lisa A. Croen, PhD Division of Research Kaiser Foundation Research Institute Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, Calif. 94612, USA. Yvonne W. Wu, MD, MPH Department of Neurology University of California, San Francisco 94143-0136, USA Janet Lee, MS et al., I recently reported to UCLA Police Chief Karl T. Ross that UCLA MD-obstetricians may be causing stroke in some infants because they routinely close birth canals up to 30% and keep birth canals closed the "extra" up to 30% when babies get stuck. See Strokes in babies (also: Chiro with headache and slurred speech) http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3429 I am interested in your professional opinions. Could the fact that MD-obstetricians routinely close birth canals up to 30% and keep birth canals closed the "extra" up to 30% when babies get stuck have anything to do with the rate of perinatal arterial ischemic stroke/PAS? I ask because you wrote that the rate of perinatal arterial ischemic stroke (PAS) increased dramatically when multiple risk factors were present... Some of the risk factors you listed are quite relevant to the grisly spectacle of OBs routinely closing birth canals up to 30% and routinely keeping birth canals closed when babies get stuck, as in, FETAL HEART RATE ABNORMALITY: Over three times as many stroke infants vs. control infants. (46% vs 14%, P.001) PROLONGED SECOND STAGE: Over five times as many stroke infants vs. control infants. (25% vs 4%, P.001) EMERGENCY CESAREAN DELIVERY: Over twice as many stroke infants vs. control infants.(35% vs 13%, P = .002) (OR) VACUUM EXTRACTION: Over twice as many stroke infants vs. control infants (24% vs 11%, P = .04), Of course, regardless whether MD-obstetricians are causing strokes in babies... MD-obstetricians have no business closing birth canals up to 30% or keeping birth canals closed the "extra" up to 30% when babies get stuck - or lying to cover-up. See the Four OB Lies below. It's mass child abuse - which is why I reported it to UCLA Chief of Police Karl T. Ross, mentioned above. The MDs among you are mandatory suspected child abuse reporters. If you suspect child abuse - please immediately report - it's the law. BTW, I am in favor of pardons in advance for MDs. As medical students, MDs are TRAINED to perform child abuse. More mass child abuse - perhaps also (perhaps) relevant to strokes in infants... MD-obstetricians at UCLA are "usually" clamping umbilical cords "within 15 to 20 seconds" - which means they are routinely robbing babies of massive amounts of blood volume - which may have some bearing on the infant stroke rate. See Strokes in babies (also: Chiro with headache and slurred speech) http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3429 Thanks for reading. Sincerely, Todd Dr. Gastaldo Born and raised in LA County Graduated UCLA (Biochem 1975) Graduated Los Angeles College of Chiropractic (DC, 1979) Living in Hillsboro, Oregon (503) 640-0456 PS THE FOUR OB LIES OB LIE #1. After MASSIVE change in the AP pelvic outlet diameter was clinically demonstrated in 1911 and radiographically demonstrated in 1957, the authors of Williams Obstetrics began erroneously claiming that pelvic diamaters DON'T CHANGE at delivery. OB LIE #2. After Ohlsen pointed out in 1973 that pelvic diameters DO change - the authors of Williams Obstetrics began erroneously claiming that their most frequent delivery position - dorsal - widens the outlet. OB LIE #3. After I pointed out in 1992 that dorsal CLOSES - and so does semisitting - the authors of Williams Obstetrics - put the correct biomechanics in their 1993 edition - but kept in their text (in the same paragraph!) - the dorsal widens bald lie that first called my attention to their text... OB LIE #4. OBs are actually KEEPING birth canals closed when babies get stuck - and claiming they are doing everything to allow the birth canal open maximally. (ACOG Shoulder Dystocia video - also forceps and vacuum births are performed with the mother in lithotomy.) See Make birth better: Dan Rather, before you leave CBS... http://health.groups.yahoo.com*/grou...t/message/2983 I noted some of the OB lies in an Open Letter to the FTC years ago... http://home1.gte.net/gastaldo/*part2ftc.html RELEVANT AMA PRINCIPLES OF MEDICAL ETHICS.... "[AMA physician[s] shall...strive to expose those physicians...who engage in fraud or deception." "[AMA p]hysician[s] shall...seek changes in those requirements which are contrary to the best interests of the patient." "[AMA p]hysician[s] shall...make relevant information available to patients, colleagues, and the public..." http://www.psych.org/psych_pra*ct/et...ions53101*.cfm AMA physicians are ignoring their own stated ethics - babies be damned. EMERGENCY. PREGNANT WOMEN: By using semisitting and dorsal delivery, OBs are closing birth canals up to 30%. Also, when babies get stuck, OBs KEEP women semisitting and dorsal - they KEEP the birth canal closed the "extra" up to 30% as they pull with hands, forceps and vacuums. THE SOLUTION: To allow your birth canal to OPEN the "extra" up to 30%, simply roll onto your side as you push your baby out - or use other "alternative" delivery positions. JUST BEWARE - some OBs will let pregnant women "try" alternative delivery positions - but will roll them back to semisitting/dorsal - close their birth canals the "extra" up to 30% for the actual delivery. Talk to your OB. Copied to: UCLA Police Chief Karl T. Ross via . END the Open Letters Dr. Gastaldo sends to Dr. Brand The MD-obstetrician spinal manipulation crime is so obvious - the silence of chiropractors so deafening - it would not surprise me to learn that MDs (Brand et al. and Kim et al., see above) are doing studies to KEEP chiropractors cowed into silence out of fear that THEIR (the chiropractors') spinal manipulation practices will be adversely effected if they speak out to stop MD-obstetricians from closing birth canals up to 30% and gruesomely - sometimes fatally - manipulating most babies' spines. As a doctor of chiropractic myself, it was very difficult to put on my subject line Brand et al.'s indication of apnea in babies being caused by MDs and others who manipulate the spines of babies... But there it was right smack in the medical literature... "...22% of infants showed short episodes of apnoea during manual therapy of the spine, and...one case has been described in which such apnoea resulted in death...Given the absence of evidence of beneficial effects of spinal manipulation in infants and in view of its potential risks, manual therapy, chiropractic and osteopathy should not be used in infants with the [kinetic imbalance due to subocciptal strain/KISS-syndrome]..." ^^^Brand PL, Engelbert RH, Helders PJ, Offringa M. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2005 Mar 26;149(13):703-7. PubMed abstract I am reassessing my own recommendation that mothers take their babies to doctors of chiropractic - or any other practitioners who manipulate babies' spines. Some (most?) doctors of chiropractic are SO gentle - but until I know what Brand et. al. meant by "manual therapy" well....22% is a big number...I don't think babies should be made to suffer apnea during spinal manipulation... MDs and others who treat KISS (or vertebral subluxation) with spinal manipulation must be made aware of the report of Brand et al. Pregnant women must also be made aware of Brand et al.'s report. Hence this post to the usenet newsgroup misc.kids.pregnancy. To Dr. Brand I say again... Since you are opposed to MDs and others TREATING the kinetic imbalance due to suboccipital strain/KISS-syndrome with spinal manipulation... Surely you can muster some opposition to MD-obstetricians CAUSING kinetic imbalance due to suboccipital strain/KISS-syndrome with spinal manipulation. MD-obstetricians are the most prolific spinal manipulators of infant spines - and they are GRUESOME spinal manipulators - senselessly closing birth canals up to 30% - sometimes pulling so hard they rip spinal nerves out of tiny spinal cords. MD-obstetricians may be causing strokes/cerebral palsy in some babies with their gruesome spinal mainpulation. See the two Open Letters [above]. Thanks for reading everyone. Sincerely, Todd Dr. Gastaldo EMERGENCY. PREGNANT WOMEN: By using semisitting and dorsal delivery, OBs are closing birth canals up to 30%. Also, when babies get stuck, OBs KEEP women semisitting and dorsal - they KEEP the birth canal closed the "extra" up to 30% as they pull with hands, forceps and vacuums. THE SOLUTION: To allow your birth canal to OPEN the "extra" up to 30%, simply roll onto your side as you push your baby out - or use other "alternative" delivery positions. JUST BEWARE - some OBs will let pregnant women "try" alternative delivery positions - but will roll them back to semisitting/dorsal - close their birth canals the "extra" up to 30% for the actual delivery. Talk to your OB. This Open Letter to Paul L.P. Brand, MD will be archived for global access in the Google usenet archive. Search http://groups.google.com for "Chiropractic causes apnea in babies?" |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Joel M. Eichen" wrote in message ... "Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message ink.net... PREGNANT WOMEN: OBs are routinely closing birth canals up to 30% and routinely keeping birth canals closed when babies get stuck. REPLY Todd, This is news to everybody. Can you please post at least once or twice per month more? I will try. : ) Seriously though Joel... The grisly spectacle of OBs closing birth canasl up to 30% is news to thousands of babies per day up-close-and-personal. The grisly OB crime is also news to many (most?) new PREGNANT LURKERS - which is why I post this news daily. This is a NEWSgroup after all. Todd Joel It's easy to allow your birth canal to OPEN the "extra" up to 30%. See THE SOLUTION at the very end of this post. *CHIROPRACTIC* CAUSES APNEA IN BABIES? What exactly do Paul L.P. Brand, MD et al. [2005] mean by "manual therapy"? And why the deafening silence about the gruesome spinal manipulation of MD-obstetricians the most prolific spinal manipulators? (More on this below.) Here's the apnea in babies/"manual therapy" quote... Brand et al.^^^ write: "...22% of infants showed short episodes of apnoea during manual therapy of the spine, and...one case has been described in which such apnoea resulted in death...Given the absence of evidence of beneficial effects of spinal manipulation in infants and in view of its potential risks, manual therapy, chiropractic and osteopathy should not be used in infants with the [kinetic imbalance due to subocciptal strain/KISS-syndrome]..." ^^^Brand PL, Engelbert RH, Helders PJ, Offringa M. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2005 Mar 26;149(13):703-7. PubMed abstract OPEN LETTER (archived for global access at http://groups.google.com) Paul L.P. Brand, MD Isala Klinieken Amalia kinderafdeling Postbus 10.500 8000 GM Zwolle THE NETHERLANDS Paul, Since you are opposed to MDs and others TREATING the kinetic imbalance due to suboccipital strain/KISS-syndrome with spinal manipulation... Surely you can muster some opposition to MD-obstetricians CAUSING kinetic imbalance due to suboccipital strain/KISS-syndrome with spinal manipulation. MD-obstetricians are the most prolific spinal manipulators of infant spines - and they are GRUESOME spinal manipulators - senselessly closing birth canals up to 30% - sometimes pulling so hard they rip spinal nerves out of tiny spinal cords. MD-obstetricians may be causing strokes/cerebral palsy in some babies with their gruesome spinal mainpulation. See the two Open Letters below. Todd Dr. Gastaldo OPEN LETTER #1 Emergency room physician Carlos A. Camargo, Jr., MD/Kim et al.^^^ write: "Given the growing evidence of benefits and hazards from popular CAM...therapies [e.g. chiropractic], [emergency department/ED] staff should consider raising this health issue with their patients." [Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Apr;12(4):377-80. PubMed abstract] ^^^Kim S, Hohrmann JL, Clark S, Munoz KN, Braun JE, Doshi A, Radeos MS, Camargo CA Jr. OPEN LETTER (archived for global access at http://groups.google.com) Carlos A. Camargo, Jr., MD Massachusetts General Hospital 326 Cambridge Street Suite 410, Boston, MA 02114 Carlos, I suspect by your mention hazards of chiropractic that you are alluding to hazards of spinal manipulation. Emergency department/ED staffs may not be aware that CAM spinal manipulation injuries happen FAR more frequently in hospitals. Hospital-based CAM spinal manipulators (MD-obstetricians) are closing birth canals up to 30%, keeping birth canals closed the "extra" up to 30% when babies get stuck - and pulling with hands forceps and vacuum extractors. Sometimes hospital-based CAM practitioners (MD-obstetricians) pull so hard they rip spinal nerves out of tiny spinal cords. Some babies die - some babies get paralyzed - most "only" suffer gruesome spinal manipulation. ALL spinal manipulation is gruesome with the birth canal senselessly closed the "extra" up to 30%. (Remember: OBs are KEEPING birth canals closed the "extra" up to 30% when babies get stuck - as they pull with hands, forceps and vacuums.. See OB Lie #4 below.) Emergency department/ED staffs may not be aware that hospital-based CAM practitioners (MD-obstetricians) are slicing vaginas/abdomens en masse (episiotomy/c-section) - surgically/fraudulently inferring they are doing/have done everything possible to open birth canals even as they CLOSE birth canals the "extra" up to 30%. Emergency department/ED staffs should immediately stop hospital-based CAM practitioners (MD-obstetricians) from closing birth canals the "extra" up to 30%. It's an emergency. Sincerely, Todd Dr. Gastaldo PS1 I suspect hospital-based CAM practitioners (MD-obstetricians) are committing child abuse - so I have been reporting it... See Women can sue: UCLA OBs slicing vaginas illegally: It's sexual assault http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3404 PS2 THE FOUR OB LIES OB LIE #1. After MASSIVE change in the AP pelvic outlet diameter was clinically demonstrated in 1911 and radiographically demonstrated in 1957, the authors of Williams Obstetrics began erroneously claiming that pelvic diamaters DON'T CHANGE at delivery. OB LIE #2. After Ohlsen pointed out in 1973 that pelvic diameters DO change - the authors of Williams Obstetrics began erroneously claiming that their most frequent delivery position - dorsal - widens the outlet. OB LIE #3. After I pointed out in 1992 that dorsal CLOSES - and so does semisitting - the authors of Williams Obstetrics - put the correct biomechanics in their 1993 edition - but kept in their text (in the same paragraph!) - the dorsal widens bald lie that first called my attention to their text... OB LIE #4. OBs are actually KEEPING birth canals closed when babies get stuck - and claiming they are doing everything to allow the birth canal open maximally. (ACOG Shoulder Dystocia video - also forceps and vacuum births are performed with the mother in lithotomy.) See Make birth better: Dan Rather, before you leave CBS... http://health.groups.yahoo.com*/grou...t/message/2983 I noted some of the OB lies in an Open Letter to the FTC years ago... http://home1.gte.net/gastaldo/*part2ftc.html RELEVANT AMA PRINCIPLES OF MEDICAL ETHICS.... "[AMA physician[s] shall...strive to expose those physicians...who engage in fraud or deception." "[AMA p]hysician[s] shall...seek changes in those requirements which are contrary to the best interests of the patient." "[AMA p]hysician[s] shall...make relevant information available to patients, colleagues, and the public..." http://www.psych.org/psych_pra*ct/et...ions53101*.cfm AMA physicians are ignoring their own stated ethics - babies be damned. EMERGENCY. PREGNANT WOMEN: By using semisitting and dorsal delivery, OBs are closing birth canals up to 30%. Also, when babies get stuck, OBs KEEP women semisitting and dorsal - they KEEP the birth canal closed the "extra" up to 30% as they pull with hands, forceps and vacuums. THE SOLUTION: To allow your birth canal to OPEN the "extra" up to 30%, simply roll onto your side as you push your baby out - BUT BEWARE - some OBs will let pregnant women "try" alternative delivery positions - but will roll them back to semisitting/dorsal - close their birth canals the "extra" up to 30% for the actual delivery. Talk to your OB. OPEN LETTER #2 UCSF: COULD OBs BE CAUSING STROKES IN BABIES? See below. STROKES IN BABIES --- CEREBRAL PALSY "[The rate of p]erinatal arterial ischemic stroke (PAS)...a common cause of hemiplegic cerebral palsy...increased dramatically when multiple risk factors were present." --Janet Lee, MS et al.^^^ JAMA. 2005 Feb 9;293(6):723-9. PubMed abstract http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/293/6/723 ^^^Janet Lee, MS; Lisa A. Croen, PhD; Kendall H. Backstrand, BA; Cathleen K. Yoshida, MS; Louis H. Henning, BA; Camilla Lindan, MD; Donna M. Ferriero, MD; Heather J. Fullerton, MD; A. J. Barkovich, MD; Yvonne W. Wu, MD, MPH OPEN LETTER (archived for global access at http://groups.google.com) Janet Lee, MS et al. via: Lisa A. Croen, PhD Division of Research Kaiser Foundation Research Institute Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, Calif. 94612, USA. Yvonne W. Wu, MD, MPH Department of Neurology University of California, San Francisco 94143-0136, USA Janet Lee, MS et al., I recently reported to UCLA Police Chief Karl T. Ross that UCLA MD-obstetricians may be causing stroke in some infants because they routinely close birth canals up to 30% and keep birth canals closed the "extra" up to 30% when babies get stuck. See Strokes in babies (also: Chiro with headache and slurred speech) http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3429 I am interested in your professional opinions. Could the fact that MD-obstetricians routinely close birth canals up to 30% and keep birth canals closed the "extra" up to 30% when babies get stuck have anything to do with the rate of perinatal arterial ischemic stroke/PAS? I ask because you wrote that the rate of perinatal arterial ischemic stroke (PAS) increased dramatically when multiple risk factors were present... Some of the risk factors you listed are quite relevant to the grisly spectacle of OBs routinely closing birth canals up to 30% and routinely keeping birth canals closed when babies get stuck, as in, FETAL HEART RATE ABNORMALITY: Over three times as many stroke infants vs. control infants. (46% vs 14%, P.001) PROLONGED SECOND STAGE: Over five times as many stroke infants vs. control infants. (25% vs 4%, P.001) EMERGENCY CESAREAN DELIVERY: Over twice as many stroke infants vs. control infants.(35% vs 13%, P = .002) (OR) VACUUM EXTRACTION: Over twice as many stroke infants vs. control infants (24% vs 11%, P = .04), Of course, regardless whether MD-obstetricians are causing strokes in babies... MD-obstetricians have no business closing birth canals up to 30% or keeping birth canals closed the "extra" up to 30% when babies get stuck - or lying to cover-up. See the Four OB Lies below. It's mass child abuse - which is why I reported it to UCLA Chief of Police Karl T. Ross, mentioned above. The MDs among you are mandatory suspected child abuse reporters. If you suspect child abuse - please immediately report - it's the law. BTW, I am in favor of pardons in advance for MDs. As medical students, MDs are TRAINED to perform child abuse. More mass child abuse - perhaps also (perhaps) relevant to strokes in infants... MD-obstetricians at UCLA are "usually" clamping umbilical cords "within 15 to 20 seconds" - which means they are routinely robbing babies of massive amounts of blood volume - which may have some bearing on the infant stroke rate. See Strokes in babies (also: Chiro with headache and slurred speech) http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3429 Thanks for reading. Sincerely, Todd Dr. Gastaldo Born and raised in LA County Graduated UCLA (Biochem 1975) Graduated Los Angeles College of Chiropractic (DC, 1979) Living in Hillsboro, Oregon (503) 640-0456 PS THE FOUR OB LIES OB LIE #1. After MASSIVE change in the AP pelvic outlet diameter was clinically demonstrated in 1911 and radiographically demonstrated in 1957, the authors of Williams Obstetrics began erroneously claiming that pelvic diamaters DON'T CHANGE at delivery. OB LIE #2. After Ohlsen pointed out in 1973 that pelvic diameters DO change - the authors of Williams Obstetrics began erroneously claiming that their most frequent delivery position - dorsal - widens the outlet. OB LIE #3. After I pointed out in 1992 that dorsal CLOSES - and so does semisitting - the authors of Williams Obstetrics - put the correct biomechanics in their 1993 edition - but kept in their text (in the same paragraph!) - the dorsal widens bald lie that first called my attention to their text... OB LIE #4. OBs are actually KEEPING birth canals closed when babies get stuck - and claiming they are doing everything to allow the birth canal open maximally. (ACOG Shoulder Dystocia video - also forceps and vacuum births are performed with the mother in lithotomy.) See Make birth better: Dan Rather, before you leave CBS... http://health.groups.yahoo.com*/grou...t/message/2983 I noted some of the OB lies in an Open Letter to the FTC years ago... http://home1.gte.net/gastaldo/*part2ftc.html RELEVANT AMA PRINCIPLES OF MEDICAL ETHICS.... "[AMA physician[s] shall...strive to expose those physicians...who engage in fraud or deception." "[AMA p]hysician[s] shall...seek changes in those requirements which are contrary to the best interests of the patient." "[AMA p]hysician[s] shall...make relevant information available to patients, colleagues, and the public..." http://www.psych.org/psych_pra*ct/et...ions53101*.cfm AMA physicians are ignoring their own stated ethics - babies be damned. EMERGENCY. PREGNANT WOMEN: By using semisitting and dorsal delivery, OBs are closing birth canals up to 30%. Also, when babies get stuck, OBs KEEP women semisitting and dorsal - they KEEP the birth canal closed the "extra" up to 30% as they pull with hands, forceps and vacuums. THE SOLUTION: To allow your birth canal to OPEN the "extra" up to 30%, simply roll onto your side as you push your baby out - or use other "alternative" delivery positions. JUST BEWARE - some OBs will let pregnant women "try" alternative delivery positions - but will roll them back to semisitting/dorsal - close their birth canals the "extra" up to 30% for the actual delivery. Talk to your OB. Copied to: UCLA Police Chief Karl T. Ross via . END the Open Letters Dr. Gastaldo sends to Dr. Brand The MD-obstetrician spinal manipulation crime is so obvious - the silence of chiropractors so deafening - it would not surprise me to learn that MDs (Brand et al. and Kim et al., see above) are doing studies to KEEP chiropractors cowed into silence out of fear that THEIR (the chiropractors') spinal manipulation practices will be adversely effected if they speak out to stop MD-obstetricians from closing birth canals up to 30% and gruesomely - sometimes fatally - manipulating most babies' spines. As a doctor of chiropractic myself, it was very difficult to put on my subject line Brand et al.'s indication of apnea in babies being caused by MDs and others who manipulate the spines of babies... But there it was right smack in the medical literature... "...22% of infants showed short episodes of apnoea during manual therapy of the spine, and...one case has been described in which such apnoea resulted in death...Given the absence of evidence of beneficial effects of spinal manipulation in infants and in view of its potential risks, manual therapy, chiropractic and osteopathy should not be used in infants with the [kinetic imbalance due to subocciptal strain/KISS-syndrome]..." ^^^Brand PL, Engelbert RH, Helders PJ, Offringa M. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2005 Mar 26;149(13):703-7. PubMed abstract I am reassessing my own recommendation that mothers take their babies to doctors of chiropractic - or any other practitioners who manipulate babies' spines. Some (most?) doctors of chiropractic are SO gentle - but until I know what Brand et. al. meant by "manual therapy" well....22% is a big number...I don't think babies should be made to suffer apnea during spinal manipulation... MDs and others who treat KISS (or vertebral subluxation) with spinal manipulation must be made aware of the report of Brand et al. Pregnant women must also be made aware of Brand et al.'s report. Hence this post to the usenet newsgroup misc.kids.pregnancy. To Dr. Brand I say again... Since you are opposed to MDs and others TREATING the kinetic imbalance due to suboccipital strain/KISS-syndrome with spinal manipulation... Surely you can muster some opposition to MD-obstetricians CAUSING kinetic imbalance due to suboccipital strain/KISS-syndrome with spinal manipulation. MD-obstetricians are the most prolific spinal manipulators of infant spines - and they are GRUESOME spinal manipulators - senselessly closing birth canals up to 30% - sometimes pulling so hard they rip spinal nerves out of tiny spinal cords. MD-obstetricians may be causing strokes/cerebral palsy in some babies with their gruesome spinal mainpulation. See the two Open Letters [above]. Thanks for reading everyone. Sincerely, Todd Dr. Gastaldo EMERGENCY. PREGNANT WOMEN: By using semisitting and dorsal delivery, OBs are closing birth canals up to 30%. Also, when babies get stuck, OBs KEEP women semisitting and dorsal - they KEEP the birth canal closed the "extra" up to 30% as they pull with hands, forceps and vacuums. THE SOLUTION: To allow your birth canal to OPEN the "extra" up to 30%, simply roll onto your side as you push your baby out - or use other "alternative" delivery positions. JUST BEWARE - some OBs will let pregnant women "try" alternative delivery positions - but will roll them back to semisitting/dorsal - close their birth canals the "extra" up to 30% for the actual delivery. Talk to your OB. This Open Letter to Paul L.P. Brand, MD will be archived for global access in the Google usenet archive. Search http://groups.google.com for "Chiropractic causes apnea in babies?" |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Joel M. Eichen" wrote in message ... Todd, one chiropractor around here who was opening birth canals got in huge trouble for it. Joel, You are probably referring to rape/sexual assault, as in, "Sexual assault includes genital...penetration by part of the accused's body or by an object...It may result from...the victim's inability to give appropriate consent."^^^ ^^^In DeCherney AH, Nathan L (eds). Current Obstetric & Gynecologic Diagnosis & Treatment. NY: Lange Medical Books/McGraw-Hill. Ninth Edition. 2003:1089 MDs commit rape/sexual assault all the time - it's their most frequent surgical behavior toward females. As I recently noted for UCLA CHIEF OF POLICE KARL T. ROSS ): American medicine's most frequent surgical behavior toward females ("routine episiotomy") involves SLICING of the vagina - not just penetration. Pregnant women can't give appropriate consent for vagina slicing ("routine episiotomy") because UCLA obstetricians aren't telling pregnant women that they are closing birth canals up to 30% then slicing vaginas fraudulently (to be seen as doing everything to open birth canals). See Women can sue: UCLA OBs slicing vaginas illegally: It's sexual assault http://health.groups.yahoo.com*/grou...t/message/3404 Todd joel "Joel M. Eichen" wrote in message ... "Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message ink.net... PREGNANT WOMEN: OBs are routinely closing birth canals up to 30% and routinely keeping birth canals closed when babies get stuck. REPLY Todd, This is news to everybody. Can you please post at least once or twice per month more? Joel It's easy to allow your birth canal to OPEN the "extra" up to 30%. See THE SOLUTION at the very end of this post. *CHIROPRACTIC* CAUSES APNEA IN BABIES? What exactly do Paul L.P. Brand, MD et al. [2005] mean by "manual therapy"? And why the deafening silence about the gruesome spinal manipulation of MD-obstetricians the most prolific spinal manipulators? (More on this below.) Here's the apnea in babies/"manual therapy" quote... Brand et al.^^^ write: "...22% of infants showed short episodes of apnoea during manual therapy of the spine, and...one case has been described in which such apnoea resulted in death...Given the absence of evidence of beneficial effects of spinal manipulation in infants and in view of its potential risks, manual therapy, chiropractic and osteopathy should not be used in infants with the [kinetic imbalance due to subocciptal strain/KISS-syndrome]..." ^^^Brand PL, Engelbert RH, Helders PJ, Offringa M. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2005 Mar 26;149(13):703-7. PubMed abstract OPEN LETTER (archived for global access at http://groups.google.com) Paul L.P. Brand, MD Isala Klinieken Amalia kinderafdeling Postbus 10.500 8000 GM Zwolle THE NETHERLANDS Paul, Since you are opposed to MDs and others TREATING the kinetic imbalance due to suboccipital strain/KISS-syndrome with spinal manipulation... Surely you can muster some opposition to MD-obstetricians CAUSING kinetic imbalance due to suboccipital strain/KISS-syndrome with spinal manipulation. MD-obstetricians are the most prolific spinal manipulators of infant spines - and they are GRUESOME spinal manipulators - senselessly closing birth canals up to 30% - sometimes pulling so hard they rip spinal nerves out of tiny spinal cords. MD-obstetricians may be causing strokes/cerebral palsy in some babies with their gruesome spinal mainpulation. See the two Open Letters below. Todd Dr. Gastaldo OPEN LETTER #1 Emergency room physician Carlos A. Camargo, Jr., MD/Kim et al.^^^ write: "Given the growing evidence of benefits and hazards from popular CAM...therapies [e.g. chiropractic], [emergency department/ED] staff should consider raising this health issue with their patients." [Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Apr;12(4):377-80. PubMed abstract] ^^^Kim S, Hohrmann JL, Clark S, Munoz KN, Braun JE, Doshi A, Radeos MS, Camargo CA Jr. OPEN LETTER (archived for global access at http://groups.google.com) Carlos A. Camargo, Jr., MD Massachusetts General Hospital 326 Cambridge Street Suite 410, Boston, MA 02114 Carlos, I suspect by your mention hazards of chiropractic that you are alluding to hazards of spinal manipulation. Emergency department/ED staffs may not be aware that CAM spinal manipulation injuries happen FAR more frequently in hospitals. Hospital-based CAM spinal manipulators (MD-obstetricians) are closing birth canals up to 30%, keeping birth canals closed the "extra" up to 30% when babies get stuck - and pulling with hands forceps and vacuum extractors. Sometimes hospital-based CAM practitioners (MD-obstetricians) pull so hard they rip spinal nerves out of tiny spinal cords. Some babies die - some babies get paralyzed - most "only" suffer gruesome spinal manipulation. ALL spinal manipulation is gruesome with the birth canal senselessly closed the "extra" up to 30%. (Remember: OBs are KEEPING birth canals closed the "extra" up to 30% when babies get stuck - as they pull with hands, forceps and vacuums.. See OB Lie #4 below.) Emergency department/ED staffs may not be aware that hospital-based CAM practitioners (MD-obstetricians) are slicing vaginas/abdomens en masse (episiotomy/c-section) - surgically/fraudulently inferring they are doing/have done everything possible to open birth canals even as they CLOSE birth canals the "extra" up to 30%. Emergency department/ED staffs should immediately stop hospital-based CAM practitioners (MD-obstetricians) from closing birth canals the "extra" up to 30%. It's an emergency. Sincerely, Todd Dr. Gastaldo PS1 I suspect hospital-based CAM practitioners (MD-obstetricians) are committing child abuse - so I have been reporting it... See Women can sue: UCLA OBs slicing vaginas illegally: It's sexual assault http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3404 PS2 THE FOUR OB LIES OB LIE #1. After MASSIVE change in the AP pelvic outlet diameter was clinically demonstrated in 1911 and radiographically demonstrated in 1957, the authors of Williams Obstetrics began erroneously claiming that pelvic diamaters DON'T CHANGE at delivery. OB LIE #2. After Ohlsen pointed out in 1973 that pelvic diameters DO change - the authors of Williams Obstetrics began erroneously claiming that their most frequent delivery position - dorsal - widens the outlet. OB LIE #3. After I pointed out in 1992 that dorsal CLOSES - and so does semisitting - the authors of Williams Obstetrics - put the correct biomechanics in their 1993 edition - but kept in their text (in the same paragraph!) - the dorsal widens bald lie that first called my attention to their text... OB LIE #4. OBs are actually KEEPING birth canals closed when babies get stuck - and claiming they are doing everything to allow the birth canal open maximally. (ACOG Shoulder Dystocia video - also forceps and vacuum births are performed with the mother in lithotomy.) See Make birth better: Dan Rather, before you leave CBS... http://health.groups.yahoo.com*/grou...t/message/2983 I noted some of the OB lies in an Open Letter to the FTC years ago... http://home1.gte.net/gastaldo/*part2ftc.html RELEVANT AMA PRINCIPLES OF MEDICAL ETHICS.... "[AMA physician[s] shall...strive to expose those physicians...who engage in fraud or deception." "[AMA p]hysician[s] shall...seek changes in those requirements which are contrary to the best interests of the patient." "[AMA p]hysician[s] shall...make relevant information available to patients, colleagues, and the public..." http://www.psych.org/psych_pra*ct/et...ions53101*.cfm AMA physicians are ignoring their own stated ethics - babies be damned. EMERGENCY. PREGNANT WOMEN: By using semisitting and dorsal delivery, OBs are closing birth canals up to 30%. Also, when babies get stuck, OBs KEEP women semisitting and dorsal - they KEEP the birth canal closed the "extra" up to 30% as they pull with hands, forceps and vacuums. THE SOLUTION: To allow your birth canal to OPEN the "extra" up to 30%, simply roll onto your side as you push your baby out - BUT BEWARE - some OBs will let pregnant women "try" alternative delivery positions - but will roll them back to semisitting/dorsal - close their birth canals the "extra" up to 30% for the actual delivery. Talk to your OB. OPEN LETTER #2 UCSF: COULD OBs BE CAUSING STROKES IN BABIES? See below. STROKES IN BABIES --- CEREBRAL PALSY "[The rate of p]erinatal arterial ischemic stroke (PAS)...a common cause of hemiplegic cerebral palsy...increased dramatically when multiple risk factors were present." --Janet Lee, MS et al.^^^ JAMA. 2005 Feb 9;293(6):723-9. PubMed abstract http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/293/6/723 ^^^Janet Lee, MS; Lisa A. Croen, PhD; Kendall H. Backstrand, BA; Cathleen K. Yoshida, MS; Louis H. Henning, BA; Camilla Lindan, MD; Donna M. Ferriero, MD; Heather J. Fullerton, MD; A. J. Barkovich, MD; Yvonne W. Wu, MD, MPH OPEN LETTER (archived for global access at http://groups.google.com) Janet Lee, MS et al. via: Lisa A. Croen, PhD Division of Research Kaiser Foundation Research Institute Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, Calif. 94612, USA. Yvonne W. Wu, MD, MPH Department of Neurology University of California, San Francisco 94143-0136, USA Janet Lee, MS et al., I recently reported to UCLA Police Chief Karl T. Ross that UCLA MD-obstetricians may be causing stroke in some infants because they routinely close birth canals up to 30% and keep birth canals closed the "extra" up to 30% when babies get stuck. See Strokes in babies (also: Chiro with headache and slurred speech) http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3429 I am interested in your professional opinions. Could the fact that MD-obstetricians routinely close birth canals up to 30% and keep birth canals closed the "extra" up to 30% when babies get stuck have anything to do with the rate of perinatal arterial ischemic stroke/PAS? I ask because you wrote that the rate of perinatal arterial ischemic stroke (PAS) increased dramatically when multiple risk factors were present... Some of the risk factors you listed are quite relevant to the grisly spectacle of OBs routinely closing birth canals up to 30% and routinely keeping birth canals closed when babies get stuck, as in, FETAL HEART RATE ABNORMALITY: Over three times as many stroke infants vs. control infants. (46% vs 14%, P.001) PROLONGED SECOND STAGE: Over five times as many stroke infants vs. control infants. (25% vs 4%, P.001) EMERGENCY CESAREAN DELIVERY: Over twice as many stroke infants vs. control infants.(35% vs 13%, P = .002) (OR) VACUUM EXTRACTION: Over twice as many stroke infants vs. control infants (24% vs 11%, P = .04), Of course, regardless whether MD-obstetricians are causing strokes in babies... MD-obstetricians have no business closing birth canals up to 30% or keeping birth canals closed the "extra" up to 30% when babies get stuck - or lying to cover-up. See the Four OB Lies below. It's mass child abuse - which is why I reported it to UCLA Chief of Police Karl T. Ross, mentioned above. The MDs among you are mandatory suspected child abuse reporters. If you suspect child abuse - please immediately report - it's the law. BTW, I am in favor of pardons in advance for MDs. As medical students, MDs are TRAINED to perform child abuse. More mass child abuse - perhaps also (perhaps) relevant to strokes in infants... MD-obstetricians at UCLA are "usually" clamping umbilical cords "within 15 to 20 seconds" - which means they are routinely robbing babies of massive amounts of blood volume - which may have some bearing on the infant stroke rate. See Strokes in babies (also: Chiro with headache and slurred speech) http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3429 Thanks for reading. Sincerely, Todd Dr. Gastaldo Born and raised in LA County Graduated UCLA (Biochem 1975) Graduated Los Angeles College of Chiropractic (DC, 1979) Living in Hillsboro, Oregon (503) 640-0456 PS THE FOUR OB LIES OB LIE #1. After MASSIVE change in the AP pelvic outlet diameter was clinically demonstrated in 1911 and radiographically demonstrated in 1957, the authors of Williams Obstetrics began erroneously claiming that pelvic diamaters DON'T CHANGE at delivery. OB LIE #2. After Ohlsen pointed out in 1973 that pelvic diameters DO change - the authors of Williams Obstetrics began erroneously claiming that their most frequent delivery position - dorsal - widens the outlet. OB LIE #3. After I pointed out in 1992 that dorsal CLOSES - and so does semisitting - the authors of Williams Obstetrics - put the correct biomechanics in their 1993 edition - but kept in their text (in the same paragraph!) - the dorsal widens bald lie that first called my attention to their text... OB LIE #4. OBs are actually KEEPING birth canals closed when babies get stuck - and claiming they are doing everything to allow the birth canal open maximally. (ACOG Shoulder Dystocia video - also forceps and vacuum births are performed with the mother in lithotomy.) See Make birth better: Dan Rather, before you leave CBS... http://health.groups.yahoo.com*/grou...t/message/2983 I noted some of the OB lies in an Open Letter to the FTC years ago... http://home1.gte.net/gastaldo/*part2ftc.html RELEVANT AMA PRINCIPLES OF MEDICAL ETHICS.... "[AMA physician[s] shall...strive to expose those physicians...who engage in fraud or deception." "[AMA p]hysician[s] shall...seek changes in those requirements which are contrary to the best interests of the patient." "[AMA p]hysician[s] shall...make relevant information available to patients, colleagues, and the public..." http://www.psych.org/psych_pra*ct/et...ions53101*.cfm AMA physicians are ignoring their own stated ethics - babies be damned. EMERGENCY. PREGNANT WOMEN: By using semisitting and dorsal delivery, OBs are closing birth canals up to 30%. Also, when babies get stuck, OBs KEEP women semisitting and dorsal - they KEEP the birth canal closed the "extra" up to 30% as they pull with hands, forceps and vacuums. THE SOLUTION: To allow your birth canal to OPEN the "extra" up to 30%, simply roll onto your side as you push your baby out - or use other "alternative" delivery positions. JUST BEWARE - some OBs will let pregnant women "try" alternative delivery positions - but will roll them back to semisitting/dorsal - close their birth canals the "extra" up to 30% for the actual delivery. Talk to your OB. Copied to: UCLA Police Chief Karl T. Ross via . END the Open Letters Dr. Gastaldo sends to Dr. Brand The MD-obstetrician spinal manipulation crime is so obvious - the silence of chiropractors so deafening - it would not surprise me to learn that MDs (Brand et al. and Kim et al., see above) are doing studies to KEEP chiropractors cowed into silence out of fear that THEIR (the chiropractors') spinal manipulation practices will be adversely effected if they speak out to stop MD-obstetricians from closing birth canals up to 30% and gruesomely - sometimes fatally - manipulating most babies' spines. As a doctor of chiropractic myself, it was very difficult to put on my subject line Brand et al.'s indication of apnea in babies being caused by MDs and others who manipulate the spines of babies... But there it was right smack in the medical literature... "...22% of infants showed short episodes of apnoea during manual therapy of the spine, and...one case has been described in which such apnoea resulted in death...Given the absence of evidence of beneficial effects of spinal manipulation in infants and in view of its potential risks, manual therapy, chiropractic and osteopathy should not be used in infants with the [kinetic imbalance due to subocciptal strain/KISS-syndrome]..." ^^^Brand PL, Engelbert RH, Helders PJ, Offringa M. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2005 Mar 26;149(13):703-7. PubMed abstract I am reassessing my own recommendation that mothers take their babies to doctors of chiropractic - or any other practitioners who manipulate babies' spines. Some (most?) doctors of chiropractic are SO gentle - but until I know what Brand et. al. meant by "manual therapy" well....22% is a big number...I don't think babies should be made to suffer apnea during spinal manipulation... MDs and others who treat KISS (or vertebral subluxation) with spinal manipulation must be made aware of the report of Brand et al. Pregnant women must also be made aware of Brand et al.'s report. Hence this post to the usenet newsgroup misc.kids.pregnancy. To Dr. Brand I say again... Since you are opposed to MDs and others TREATING the kinetic imbalance due to suboccipital strain/KISS-syndrome with spinal manipulation... Surely you can muster some opposition to MD-obstetricians CAUSING kinetic imbalance due to suboccipital strain/KISS-syndrome with spinal manipulation. MD-obstetricians are the most prolific spinal manipulators of infant spines - and they are GRUESOME spinal manipulators - senselessly closing birth canals up to 30% - sometimes pulling so hard they rip spinal nerves out of tiny spinal cords. MD-obstetricians may be causing strokes/cerebral palsy in some babies with their gruesome spinal mainpulation. See the two Open Letters [above]. Thanks for reading everyone. Sincerely, Todd Dr. Gastaldo EMERGENCY. PREGNANT WOMEN: By using semisitting and dorsal delivery, OBs are closing birth canals up to 30%. Also, when babies get stuck, OBs KEEP women semisitting and dorsal - they KEEP the birth canal closed the "extra" up to 30% as they pull with hands, forceps and vacuums. THE SOLUTION: To allow your birth canal to OPEN the "extra" up to 30%, simply roll onto your side as you push your baby out - or use other "alternative" delivery positions. JUST BEWARE - some OBs will let pregnant women "try" alternative delivery positions - but will roll them back to semisitting/dorsal - close their birth canals the "extra" up to 30% for the actual delivery. Talk to your OB. This Open Letter to Paul L.P. Brand, MD will be archived for global access in the Google usenet archive. Search http://groups.google.com for "Chiropractic causes apnea in babies?" |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Todd I must hand it to you ........ you change your message
ever so slightly each time so I am forced to read it one more time! Joel If ever there was a good spammer, its you. "Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message ink.net... "Joel M. Eichen" wrote in message ... "Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message ink.net... PREGNANT WOMEN: OBs are routinely closing birth canals up to 30% and routinely keeping birth canals closed when babies get stuck. REPLY Todd, This is news to everybody. Can you please post at least once or twice per month more? I will try. : ) Seriously though Joel... The grisly spectacle of OBs closing birth canasl up to 30% is news to thousands of babies per day up-close-and-personal. The grisly OB crime is also news to many (most?) new PREGNANT LURKERS - which is why I post this news daily. This is a NEWSgroup after all. Todd Joel It's easy to allow your birth canal to OPEN the "extra" up to 30%. See THE SOLUTION at the very end of this post. *CHIROPRACTIC* CAUSES APNEA IN BABIES? What exactly do Paul L.P. Brand, MD et al. [2005] mean by "manual therapy"? And why the deafening silence about the gruesome spinal manipulation of MD-obstetricians the most prolific spinal manipulators? (More on this below.) Here's the apnea in babies/"manual therapy" quote... Brand et al.^^^ write: "...22% of infants showed short episodes of apnoea during manual therapy of the spine, and...one case has been described in which such apnoea resulted in death...Given the absence of evidence of beneficial effects of spinal manipulation in infants and in view of its potential risks, manual therapy, chiropractic and osteopathy should not be used in infants with the [kinetic imbalance due to subocciptal strain/KISS-syndrome]..." ^^^Brand PL, Engelbert RH, Helders PJ, Offringa M. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2005 Mar 26;149(13):703-7. PubMed abstract OPEN LETTER (archived for global access at http://groups.google.com) Paul L.P. Brand, MD Isala Klinieken Amalia kinderafdeling Postbus 10.500 8000 GM Zwolle THE NETHERLANDS Paul, Since you are opposed to MDs and others TREATING the kinetic imbalance due to suboccipital strain/KISS-syndrome with spinal manipulation... Surely you can muster some opposition to MD-obstetricians CAUSING kinetic imbalance due to suboccipital strain/KISS-syndrome with spinal manipulation. MD-obstetricians are the most prolific spinal manipulators of infant spines - and they are GRUESOME spinal manipulators - senselessly closing birth canals up to 30% - sometimes pulling so hard they rip spinal nerves out of tiny spinal cords. MD-obstetricians may be causing strokes/cerebral palsy in some babies with their gruesome spinal mainpulation. See the two Open Letters below. Todd Dr. Gastaldo OPEN LETTER #1 Emergency room physician Carlos A. Camargo, Jr., MD/Kim et al.^^^ write: "Given the growing evidence of benefits and hazards from popular CAM...therapies [e.g. chiropractic], [emergency department/ED] staff should consider raising this health issue with their patients." [Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Apr;12(4):377-80. PubMed abstract] ^^^Kim S, Hohrmann JL, Clark S, Munoz KN, Braun JE, Doshi A, Radeos MS, Camargo CA Jr. OPEN LETTER (archived for global access at http://groups.google.com) Carlos A. Camargo, Jr., MD Massachusetts General Hospital 326 Cambridge Street Suite 410, Boston, MA 02114 Carlos, I suspect by your mention hazards of chiropractic that you are alluding to hazards of spinal manipulation. Emergency department/ED staffs may not be aware that CAM spinal manipulation injuries happen FAR more frequently in hospitals. Hospital-based CAM spinal manipulators (MD-obstetricians) are closing birth canals up to 30%, keeping birth canals closed the "extra" up to 30% when babies get stuck - and pulling with hands forceps and vacuum extractors. Sometimes hospital-based CAM practitioners (MD-obstetricians) pull so hard they rip spinal nerves out of tiny spinal cords. Some babies die - some babies get paralyzed - most "only" suffer gruesome spinal manipulation. ALL spinal manipulation is gruesome with the birth canal senselessly closed the "extra" up to 30%. (Remember: OBs are KEEPING birth canals closed the "extra" up to 30% when babies get stuck - as they pull with hands, forceps and vacuums.. See OB Lie #4 below.) Emergency department/ED staffs may not be aware that hospital-based CAM practitioners (MD-obstetricians) are slicing vaginas/abdomens en masse (episiotomy/c-section) - surgically/fraudulently inferring they are doing/have done everything possible to open birth canals even as they CLOSE birth canals the "extra" up to 30%. Emergency department/ED staffs should immediately stop hospital-based CAM practitioners (MD-obstetricians) from closing birth canals the "extra" up to 30%. It's an emergency. Sincerely, Todd Dr. Gastaldo PS1 I suspect hospital-based CAM practitioners (MD-obstetricians) are committing child abuse - so I have been reporting it... See Women can sue: UCLA OBs slicing vaginas illegally: It's sexual assault http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3404 PS2 THE FOUR OB LIES OB LIE #1. After MASSIVE change in the AP pelvic outlet diameter was clinically demonstrated in 1911 and radiographically demonstrated in 1957, the authors of Williams Obstetrics began erroneously claiming that pelvic diamaters DON'T CHANGE at delivery. OB LIE #2. After Ohlsen pointed out in 1973 that pelvic diameters DO change - the authors of Williams Obstetrics began erroneously claiming that their most frequent delivery position - dorsal - widens the outlet. OB LIE #3. After I pointed out in 1992 that dorsal CLOSES - and so does semisitting - the authors of Williams Obstetrics - put the correct biomechanics in their 1993 edition - but kept in their text (in the same paragraph!) - the dorsal widens bald lie that first called my attention to their text... OB LIE #4. OBs are actually KEEPING birth canals closed when babies get stuck - and claiming they are doing everything to allow the birth canal open maximally. (ACOG Shoulder Dystocia video - also forceps and vacuum births are performed with the mother in lithotomy.) See Make birth better: Dan Rather, before you leave CBS... http://health.groups.yahoo.com*/grou...t/message/2983 I noted some of the OB lies in an Open Letter to the FTC years ago... http://home1.gte.net/gastaldo/*part2ftc.html RELEVANT AMA PRINCIPLES OF MEDICAL ETHICS.... "[AMA physician[s] shall...strive to expose those physicians...who engage in fraud or deception." "[AMA p]hysician[s] shall...seek changes in those requirements which are contrary to the best interests of the patient." "[AMA p]hysician[s] shall...make relevant information available to patients, colleagues, and the public..." http://www.psych.org/psych_pra*ct/et...ions53101*.cfm AMA physicians are ignoring their own stated ethics - babies be damned. EMERGENCY. PREGNANT WOMEN: By using semisitting and dorsal delivery, OBs are closing birth canals up to 30%. Also, when babies get stuck, OBs KEEP women semisitting and dorsal - they KEEP the birth canal closed the "extra" up to 30% as they pull with hands, forceps and vacuums. THE SOLUTION: To allow your birth canal to OPEN the "extra" up to 30%, simply roll onto your side as you push your baby out - BUT BEWARE - some OBs will let pregnant women "try" alternative delivery positions - but will roll them back to semisitting/dorsal - close their birth canals the "extra" up to 30% for the actual delivery. Talk to your OB. OPEN LETTER #2 UCSF: COULD OBs BE CAUSING STROKES IN BABIES? See below. STROKES IN BABIES --- CEREBRAL PALSY "[The rate of p]erinatal arterial ischemic stroke (PAS)...a common cause of hemiplegic cerebral palsy...increased dramatically when multiple risk factors were present." --Janet Lee, MS et al.^^^ JAMA. 2005 Feb 9;293(6):723-9. PubMed abstract http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/293/6/723 ^^^Janet Lee, MS; Lisa A. Croen, PhD; Kendall H. Backstrand, BA; Cathleen K. Yoshida, MS; Louis H. Henning, BA; Camilla Lindan, MD; Donna M. Ferriero, MD; Heather J. Fullerton, MD; A. J. Barkovich, MD; Yvonne W. Wu, MD, MPH OPEN LETTER (archived for global access at http://groups.google.com) Janet Lee, MS et al. via: Lisa A. Croen, PhD Division of Research Kaiser Foundation Research Institute Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, Calif. 94612, USA. Yvonne W. Wu, MD, MPH Department of Neurology University of California, San Francisco 94143-0136, USA Janet Lee, MS et al., I recently reported to UCLA Police Chief Karl T. Ross that UCLA MD-obstetricians may be causing stroke in some infants because they routinely close birth canals up to 30% and keep birth canals closed the "extra" up to 30% when babies get stuck. See Strokes in babies (also: Chiro with headache and slurred speech) http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3429 I am interested in your professional opinions. Could the fact that MD-obstetricians routinely close birth canals up to 30% and keep birth canals closed the "extra" up to 30% when babies get stuck have anything to do with the rate of perinatal arterial ischemic stroke/PAS? I ask because you wrote that the rate of perinatal arterial ischemic stroke (PAS) increased dramatically when multiple risk factors were present... Some of the risk factors you listed are quite relevant to the grisly spectacle of OBs routinely closing birth canals up to 30% and routinely keeping birth canals closed when babies get stuck, as in, FETAL HEART RATE ABNORMALITY: Over three times as many stroke infants vs. control infants. (46% vs 14%, P.001) PROLONGED SECOND STAGE: Over five times as many stroke infants vs. control infants. (25% vs 4%, P.001) EMERGENCY CESAREAN DELIVERY: Over twice as many stroke infants vs. control infants.(35% vs 13%, P = .002) (OR) VACUUM EXTRACTION: Over twice as many stroke infants vs. control infants (24% vs 11%, P = .04), Of course, regardless whether MD-obstetricians are causing strokes in babies... MD-obstetricians have no business closing birth canals up to 30% or keeping birth canals closed the "extra" up to 30% when babies get stuck - or lying to cover-up. See the Four OB Lies below. It's mass child abuse - which is why I reported it to UCLA Chief of Police Karl T. Ross, mentioned above. The MDs among you are mandatory suspected child abuse reporters. If you suspect child abuse - please immediately report - it's the law. BTW, I am in favor of pardons in advance for MDs. As medical students, MDs are TRAINED to perform child abuse. More mass child abuse - perhaps also (perhaps) relevant to strokes in infants... MD-obstetricians at UCLA are "usually" clamping umbilical cords "within 15 to 20 seconds" - which means they are routinely robbing babies of massive amounts of blood volume - which may have some bearing on the infant stroke rate. See Strokes in babies (also: Chiro with headache and slurred speech) http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3429 Thanks for reading. Sincerely, Todd Dr. Gastaldo Born and raised in LA County Graduated UCLA (Biochem 1975) Graduated Los Angeles College of Chiropractic (DC, 1979) Living in Hillsboro, Oregon (503) 640-0456 PS THE FOUR OB LIES OB LIE #1. After MASSIVE change in the AP pelvic outlet diameter was clinically demonstrated in 1911 and radiographically demonstrated in 1957, the authors of Williams Obstetrics began erroneously claiming that pelvic diamaters DON'T CHANGE at delivery. OB LIE #2. After Ohlsen pointed out in 1973 that pelvic diameters DO change - the authors of Williams Obstetrics began erroneously claiming that their most frequent delivery position - dorsal - widens the outlet. OB LIE #3. After I pointed out in 1992 that dorsal CLOSES - and so does semisitting - the authors of Williams Obstetrics - put the correct biomechanics in their 1993 edition - but kept in their text (in the same paragraph!) - the dorsal widens bald lie that first called my attention to their text... OB LIE #4. OBs are actually KEEPING birth canals closed when babies get stuck - and claiming they are doing everything to allow the birth canal open maximally. (ACOG Shoulder Dystocia video - also forceps and vacuum births are performed with the mother in lithotomy.) See Make birth better: Dan Rather, before you leave CBS... http://health.groups.yahoo.com*/grou...t/message/2983 I noted some of the OB lies in an Open Letter to the FTC years ago... http://home1.gte.net/gastaldo/*part2ftc.html RELEVANT AMA PRINCIPLES OF MEDICAL ETHICS.... "[AMA physician[s] shall...strive to expose those physicians...who engage in fraud or deception." "[AMA p]hysician[s] shall...seek changes in those requirements which are contrary to the best interests of the patient." "[AMA p]hysician[s] shall...make relevant information available to patients, colleagues, and the public..." http://www.psych.org/psych_pra*ct/et...ions53101*.cfm AMA physicians are ignoring their own stated ethics - babies be damned. EMERGENCY. PREGNANT WOMEN: By using semisitting and dorsal delivery, OBs are closing birth canals up to 30%. Also, when babies get stuck, OBs KEEP women semisitting and dorsal - they KEEP the birth canal closed the "extra" up to 30% as they pull with hands, forceps and vacuums. THE SOLUTION: To allow your birth canal to OPEN the "extra" up to 30%, simply roll onto your side as you push your baby out - or use other "alternative" delivery positions. JUST BEWARE - some OBs will let pregnant women "try" alternative delivery positions - but will roll them back to semisitting/dorsal - close their birth canals the "extra" up to 30% for the actual delivery. Talk to your OB. Copied to: UCLA Police Chief Karl T. Ross via . END the Open Letters Dr. Gastaldo sends to Dr. Brand The MD-obstetrician spinal manipulation crime is so obvious - the silence of chiropractors so deafening - it would not surprise me to learn that MDs (Brand et al. and Kim et al., see above) are doing studies to KEEP chiropractors cowed into silence out of fear that THEIR (the chiropractors') spinal manipulation practices will be adversely effected if they speak out to stop MD-obstetricians from closing birth canals up to 30% and gruesomely - sometimes fatally - manipulating most babies' spines. As a doctor of chiropractic myself, it was very difficult to put on my subject line Brand et al.'s indication of apnea in babies being caused by MDs and others who manipulate the spines of babies... But there it was right smack in the medical literature... "...22% of infants showed short episodes of apnoea during manual therapy of the spine, and...one case has been described in which such apnoea resulted in death...Given the absence of evidence of beneficial effects of spinal manipulation in infants and in view of its potential risks, manual therapy, chiropractic and osteopathy should not be used in infants with the [kinetic imbalance due to subocciptal strain/KISS-syndrome]..." ^^^Brand PL, Engelbert RH, Helders PJ, Offringa M. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2005 Mar 26;149(13):703-7. PubMed abstract I am reassessing my own recommendation that mothers take their babies to doctors of chiropractic - or any other practitioners who manipulate babies' spines. Some (most?) doctors of chiropractic are SO gentle - but until I know what Brand et. al. meant by "manual therapy" well....22% is a big number...I don't think babies should be made to suffer apnea during spinal manipulation... MDs and others who treat KISS (or vertebral subluxation) with spinal manipulation must be made aware of the report of Brand et al. Pregnant women must also be made aware of Brand et al.'s report. Hence this post to the usenet newsgroup misc.kids.pregnancy. To Dr. Brand I say again... Since you are opposed to MDs and others TREATING the kinetic imbalance due to suboccipital strain/KISS-syndrome with spinal manipulation... Surely you can muster some opposition to MD-obstetricians CAUSING kinetic imbalance due to suboccipital strain/KISS-syndrome with spinal manipulation. MD-obstetricians are the most prolific spinal manipulators of infant spines - and they are GRUESOME spinal manipulators - senselessly closing birth canals up to 30% - sometimes pulling so hard they rip spinal nerves out of tiny spinal cords. MD-obstetricians may be causing strokes/cerebral palsy in some babies with their gruesome spinal mainpulation. See the two Open Letters [above]. Thanks for reading everyone. Sincerely, Todd Dr. Gastaldo EMERGENCY. PREGNANT WOMEN: By using semisitting and dorsal delivery, OBs are closing birth canals up to 30%. Also, when babies get stuck, OBs KEEP women semisitting and dorsal - they KEEP the birth canal closed the "extra" up to 30% as they pull with hands, forceps and vacuums. THE SOLUTION: To allow your birth canal to OPEN the "extra" up to 30%, simply roll onto your side as you push your baby out - or use other "alternative" delivery positions. JUST BEWARE - some OBs will let pregnant women "try" alternative delivery positions - but will roll them back to semisitting/dorsal - close their birth canals the "extra" up to 30% for the actual delivery. Talk to your OB. This Open Letter to Paul L.P. Brand, MD will be archived for global access in the Google usenet archive. Search http://groups.google.com for "Chiropractic causes apnea in babies?" |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"Joel M. Eichen" wrote in message ... Todd I must hand it to you ........ you change your message ever so slightly each time so I am forced to read it one more time! Joel If ever there was a good spammer, its you. Joel, Thanks - I guess. I forgot to mention: OBs are also routinely robbing babies of up to 50% of their blood volume.^^^ Sorry. : ) Todd ^^^UCSF: Could OBs be causing strokes in babies? (Cerebral palsy) http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3437 |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
It was meant as a compliment!
Joel "Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message ink.net... "Joel M. Eichen" wrote in message ... Todd I must hand it to you ........ you change your message ever so slightly each time so I am forced to read it one more time! Joel If ever there was a good spammer, its you. Joel, Thanks - I guess. I forgot to mention: OBs are also routinely robbing babies of up to 50% of their blood volume.^^^ Sorry. : ) Todd ^^^UCSF: Could OBs be causing strokes in babies? (Cerebral palsy) http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3437 |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Gastaldo is a well know idiot. You will soon find that all your exchanges
with him were a huge waste of time. He starts off okay, then gets psychotic. Just wait. "Joel M. Eichen" wrote in message ... Todd I must hand it to you ........ you change your message ever so slightly each time so I am forced to read it one more time! Joel If ever there was a good spammer, its you. "Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message ink.net... "Joel M. Eichen" wrote in message ... "Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message ink.net... PREGNANT WOMEN: OBs are routinely closing birth canals up to 30% and routinely keeping birth canals closed when babies get stuck. REPLY Todd, This is news to everybody. Can you please post at least once or twice per month more? I will try. : ) Seriously though Joel... The grisly spectacle of OBs closing birth canasl up to 30% is news to thousands of babies per day up-close-and-personal. The grisly OB crime is also news to many (most?) new PREGNANT LURKERS - which is why I post this news daily. This is a NEWSgroup after all. Todd Joel It's easy to allow your birth canal to OPEN the "extra" up to 30%. See THE SOLUTION at the very end of this post. *CHIROPRACTIC* CAUSES APNEA IN BABIES? What exactly do Paul L.P. Brand, MD et al. [2005] mean by "manual therapy"? And why the deafening silence about the gruesome spinal manipulation of MD-obstetricians the most prolific spinal manipulators? (More on this below.) Here's the apnea in babies/"manual therapy" quote... Brand et al.^^^ write: "...22% of infants showed short episodes of apnoea during manual therapy of the spine, and...one case has been described in which such apnoea resulted in death...Given the absence of evidence of beneficial effects of spinal manipulation in infants and in view of its potential risks, manual therapy, chiropractic and osteopathy should not be used in infants with the [kinetic imbalance due to subocciptal strain/KISS-syndrome]..." ^^^Brand PL, Engelbert RH, Helders PJ, Offringa M. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2005 Mar 26;149(13):703-7. PubMed abstract OPEN LETTER (archived for global access at http://groups.google.com) Paul L.P. Brand, MD Isala Klinieken Amalia kinderafdeling Postbus 10.500 8000 GM Zwolle THE NETHERLANDS Paul, Since you are opposed to MDs and others TREATING the kinetic imbalance due to suboccipital strain/KISS-syndrome with spinal manipulation... Surely you can muster some opposition to MD-obstetricians CAUSING kinetic imbalance due to suboccipital strain/KISS-syndrome with spinal manipulation. MD-obstetricians are the most prolific spinal manipulators of infant spines - and they are GRUESOME spinal manipulators - senselessly closing birth canals up to 30% - sometimes pulling so hard they rip spinal nerves out of tiny spinal cords. MD-obstetricians may be causing strokes/cerebral palsy in some babies with their gruesome spinal mainpulation. See the two Open Letters below. Todd Dr. Gastaldo OPEN LETTER #1 Emergency room physician Carlos A. Camargo, Jr., MD/Kim et al.^^^ write: "Given the growing evidence of benefits and hazards from popular CAM...therapies [e.g. chiropractic], [emergency department/ED] staff should consider raising this health issue with their patients." [Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Apr;12(4):377-80. PubMed abstract] ^^^Kim S, Hohrmann JL, Clark S, Munoz KN, Braun JE, Doshi A, Radeos MS, Camargo CA Jr. OPEN LETTER (archived for global access at http://groups.google.com) Carlos A. Camargo, Jr., MD Massachusetts General Hospital 326 Cambridge Street Suite 410, Boston, MA 02114 Carlos, I suspect by your mention hazards of chiropractic that you are alluding to hazards of spinal manipulation. Emergency department/ED staffs may not be aware that CAM spinal manipulation injuries happen FAR more frequently in hospitals. Hospital-based CAM spinal manipulators (MD-obstetricians) are closing birth canals up to 30%, keeping birth canals closed the "extra" up to 30% when babies get stuck - and pulling with hands forceps and vacuum extractors. Sometimes hospital-based CAM practitioners (MD-obstetricians) pull so hard they rip spinal nerves out of tiny spinal cords. Some babies die - some babies get paralyzed - most "only" suffer gruesome spinal manipulation. ALL spinal manipulation is gruesome with the birth canal senselessly closed the "extra" up to 30%. (Remember: OBs are KEEPING birth canals closed the "extra" up to 30% when babies get stuck - as they pull with hands, forceps and vacuums.. See OB Lie #4 below.) Emergency department/ED staffs may not be aware that hospital-based CAM practitioners (MD-obstetricians) are slicing vaginas/abdomens en masse (episiotomy/c-section) - surgically/fraudulently inferring they are doing/have done everything possible to open birth canals even as they CLOSE birth canals the "extra" up to 30%. Emergency department/ED staffs should immediately stop hospital-based CAM practitioners (MD-obstetricians) from closing birth canals the "extra" up to 30%. It's an emergency. Sincerely, Todd Dr. Gastaldo PS1 I suspect hospital-based CAM practitioners (MD-obstetricians) are committing child abuse - so I have been reporting it... See Women can sue: UCLA OBs slicing vaginas illegally: It's sexual assault http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3404 PS2 THE FOUR OB LIES OB LIE #1. After MASSIVE change in the AP pelvic outlet diameter was clinically demonstrated in 1911 and radiographically demonstrated in 1957, the authors of Williams Obstetrics began erroneously claiming that pelvic diamaters DON'T CHANGE at delivery. OB LIE #2. After Ohlsen pointed out in 1973 that pelvic diameters DO change - the authors of Williams Obstetrics began erroneously claiming that their most frequent delivery position - dorsal - widens the outlet. OB LIE #3. After I pointed out in 1992 that dorsal CLOSES - and so does semisitting - the authors of Williams Obstetrics - put the correct biomechanics in their 1993 edition - but kept in their text (in the same paragraph!) - the dorsal widens bald lie that first called my attention to their text... OB LIE #4. OBs are actually KEEPING birth canals closed when babies get stuck - and claiming they are doing everything to allow the birth canal open maximally. (ACOG Shoulder Dystocia video - also forceps and vacuum births are performed with the mother in lithotomy.) See Make birth better: Dan Rather, before you leave CBS... http://health.groups.yahoo.com*/grou...t/message/2983 I noted some of the OB lies in an Open Letter to the FTC years ago... http://home1.gte.net/gastaldo/*part2ftc.html RELEVANT AMA PRINCIPLES OF MEDICAL ETHICS.... "[AMA physician[s] shall...strive to expose those physicians...who engage in fraud or deception." "[AMA p]hysician[s] shall...seek changes in those requirements which are contrary to the best interests of the patient." "[AMA p]hysician[s] shall...make relevant information available to patients, colleagues, and the public..." http://www.psych.org/psych_pra*ct/et...ions53101*.cfm AMA physicians are ignoring their own stated ethics - babies be damned. EMERGENCY. PREGNANT WOMEN: By using semisitting and dorsal delivery, OBs are closing birth canals up to 30%. Also, when babies get stuck, OBs KEEP women semisitting and dorsal - they KEEP the birth canal closed the "extra" up to 30% as they pull with hands, forceps and vacuums. THE SOLUTION: To allow your birth canal to OPEN the "extra" up to 30%, simply roll onto your side as you push your baby out - BUT BEWARE - some OBs will let pregnant women "try" alternative delivery positions - but will roll them back to semisitting/dorsal - close their birth canals the "extra" up to 30% for the actual delivery. Talk to your OB. OPEN LETTER #2 UCSF: COULD OBs BE CAUSING STROKES IN BABIES? See below. STROKES IN BABIES --- CEREBRAL PALSY "[The rate of p]erinatal arterial ischemic stroke (PAS)...a common cause of hemiplegic cerebral palsy...increased dramatically when multiple risk factors were present." --Janet Lee, MS et al.^^^ JAMA. 2005 Feb 9;293(6):723-9. PubMed abstract http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/293/6/723 ^^^Janet Lee, MS; Lisa A. Croen, PhD; Kendall H. Backstrand, BA; Cathleen K. Yoshida, MS; Louis H. Henning, BA; Camilla Lindan, MD; Donna M. Ferriero, MD; Heather J. Fullerton, MD; A. J. Barkovich, MD; Yvonne W. Wu, MD, MPH OPEN LETTER (archived for global access at http://groups.google.com) Janet Lee, MS et al. via: Lisa A. Croen, PhD Division of Research Kaiser Foundation Research Institute Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, Calif. 94612, USA. Yvonne W. Wu, MD, MPH Department of Neurology University of California, San Francisco 94143-0136, USA Janet Lee, MS et al., I recently reported to UCLA Police Chief Karl T. Ross that UCLA MD-obstetricians may be causing stroke in some infants because they routinely close birth canals up to 30% and keep birth canals closed the "extra" up to 30% when babies get stuck. See Strokes in babies (also: Chiro with headache and slurred speech) http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3429 I am interested in your professional opinions. Could the fact that MD-obstetricians routinely close birth canals up to 30% and keep birth canals closed the "extra" up to 30% when babies get stuck have anything to do with the rate of perinatal arterial ischemic stroke/PAS? I ask because you wrote that the rate of perinatal arterial ischemic stroke (PAS) increased dramatically when multiple risk factors were present... Some of the risk factors you listed are quite relevant to the grisly spectacle of OBs routinely closing birth canals up to 30% and routinely keeping birth canals closed when babies get stuck, as in, FETAL HEART RATE ABNORMALITY: Over three times as many stroke infants vs. control infants. (46% vs 14%, P.001) PROLONGED SECOND STAGE: Over five times as many stroke infants vs. control infants. (25% vs 4%, P.001) EMERGENCY CESAREAN DELIVERY: Over twice as many stroke infants vs. control infants.(35% vs 13%, P = .002) (OR) VACUUM EXTRACTION: Over twice as many stroke infants vs. control infants (24% vs 11%, P = .04), Of course, regardless whether MD-obstetricians are causing strokes in babies... MD-obstetricians have no business closing birth canals up to 30% or keeping birth canals closed the "extra" up to 30% when babies get stuck - or lying to cover-up. See the Four OB Lies below. It's mass child abuse - which is why I reported it to UCLA Chief of Police Karl T. Ross, mentioned above. The MDs among you are mandatory suspected child abuse reporters. If you suspect child abuse - please immediately report - it's the law. BTW, I am in favor of pardons in advance for MDs. As medical students, MDs are TRAINED to perform child abuse. More mass child abuse - perhaps also (perhaps) relevant to strokes in infants... MD-obstetricians at UCLA are "usually" clamping umbilical cords "within 15 to 20 seconds" - which means they are routinely robbing babies of massive amounts of blood volume - which may have some bearing on the infant stroke rate. See Strokes in babies (also: Chiro with headache and slurred speech) http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3429 Thanks for reading. Sincerely, Todd Dr. Gastaldo Born and raised in LA County Graduated UCLA (Biochem 1975) Graduated Los Angeles College of Chiropractic (DC, 1979) Living in Hillsboro, Oregon (503) 640-0456 PS THE FOUR OB LIES OB LIE #1. After MASSIVE change in the AP pelvic outlet diameter was clinically demonstrated in 1911 and radiographically demonstrated in 1957, the authors of Williams Obstetrics began erroneously claiming that pelvic diamaters DON'T CHANGE at delivery. OB LIE #2. After Ohlsen pointed out in 1973 that pelvic diameters DO change - the authors of Williams Obstetrics began erroneously claiming that their most frequent delivery position - dorsal - widens the outlet. OB LIE #3. After I pointed out in 1992 that dorsal CLOSES - and so does semisitting - the authors of Williams Obstetrics - put the correct biomechanics in their 1993 edition - but kept in their text (in the same paragraph!) - the dorsal widens bald lie that first called my attention to their text... OB LIE #4. OBs are actually KEEPING birth canals closed when babies get stuck - and claiming they are doing everything to allow the birth canal open maximally. (ACOG Shoulder Dystocia video - also forceps and vacuum births are performed with the mother in lithotomy.) See Make birth better: Dan Rather, before you leave CBS... http://health.groups.yahoo.com*/grou...t/message/2983 I noted some of the OB lies in an Open Letter to the FTC years ago... http://home1.gte.net/gastaldo/*part2ftc.html RELEVANT AMA PRINCIPLES OF MEDICAL ETHICS.... "[AMA physician[s] shall...strive to expose those physicians...who engage in fraud or deception." "[AMA p]hysician[s] shall...seek changes in those requirements which are contrary to the best interests of the patient." "[AMA p]hysician[s] shall...make relevant information available to patients, colleagues, and the public..." http://www.psych.org/psych_pra*ct/et...ions53101*.cfm AMA physicians are ignoring their own stated ethics - babies be damned. EMERGENCY. PREGNANT WOMEN: By using semisitting and dorsal delivery, OBs are closing birth canals up to 30%. Also, when babies get stuck, OBs KEEP women semisitting and dorsal - they KEEP the birth canal closed the "extra" up to 30% as they pull with hands, forceps and vacuums. THE SOLUTION: To allow your birth canal to OPEN the "extra" up to 30%, simply roll onto your side as you push your baby out - or use other "alternative" delivery positions. JUST BEWARE - some OBs will let pregnant women "try" alternative delivery positions - but will roll them back to semisitting/dorsal - close their birth canals the "extra" up to 30% for the actual delivery. Talk to your OB. Copied to: UCLA Police Chief Karl T. Ross via . END the Open Letters Dr. Gastaldo sends to Dr. Brand The MD-obstetrician spinal manipulation crime is so obvious - the silence of chiropractors so deafening - it would not surprise me to learn that MDs (Brand et al. and Kim et al., see above) are doing studies to KEEP chiropractors cowed into silence out of fear that THEIR (the chiropractors') spinal manipulation practices will be adversely effected if they speak out to stop MD-obstetricians from closing birth canals up to 30% and gruesomely - sometimes fatally - manipulating most babies' spines. As a doctor of chiropractic myself, it was very difficult to put on my subject line Brand et al.'s indication of apnea in babies being caused by MDs and others who manipulate the spines of babies... But there it was right smack in the medical literature... "...22% of infants showed short episodes of apnoea during manual therapy of the spine, and...one case has been described in which such apnoea resulted in death...Given the absence of evidence of beneficial effects of spinal manipulation in infants and in view of its potential risks, manual therapy, chiropractic and osteopathy should not be used in infants with the [kinetic imbalance due to subocciptal strain/KISS-syndrome]..." ^^^Brand PL, Engelbert RH, Helders PJ, Offringa M. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2005 Mar 26;149(13):703-7. PubMed abstract I am reassessing my own recommendation that mothers take their babies to doctors of chiropractic - or any other practitioners who manipulate babies' spines. Some (most?) doctors of chiropractic are SO gentle - but until I know what Brand et. al. meant by "manual therapy" well....22% is a big number...I don't think babies should be made to suffer apnea during spinal manipulation... MDs and others who treat KISS (or vertebral subluxation) with spinal manipulation must be made aware of the report of Brand et al. Pregnant women must also be made aware of Brand et al.'s report. Hence this post to the usenet newsgroup misc.kids.pregnancy. To Dr. Brand I say again... Since you are opposed to MDs and others TREATING the kinetic imbalance due to suboccipital strain/KISS-syndrome with spinal manipulation... Surely you can muster some opposition to MD-obstetricians CAUSING kinetic imbalance due to suboccipital strain/KISS-syndrome with spinal manipulation. MD-obstetricians are the most prolific spinal manipulators of infant spines - and they are GRUESOME spinal manipulators - senselessly closing birth canals up to 30% - sometimes pulling so hard they rip spinal nerves out of tiny spinal cords. MD-obstetricians may be causing strokes/cerebral palsy in some babies with their gruesome spinal mainpulation. See the two Open Letters [above]. Thanks for reading everyone. Sincerely, Todd Dr. Gastaldo EMERGENCY. PREGNANT WOMEN: By using semisitting and dorsal delivery, OBs are closing birth canals up to 30%. Also, when babies get stuck, OBs KEEP women semisitting and dorsal - they KEEP the birth canal closed the "extra" up to 30% as they pull with hands, forceps and vacuums. THE SOLUTION: To allow your birth canal to OPEN the "extra" up to 30%, simply roll onto your side as you push your baby out - or use other "alternative" delivery positions. JUST BEWARE - some OBs will let pregnant women "try" alternative delivery positions - but will roll them back to semisitting/dorsal - close their birth canals the "extra" up to 30% for the actual delivery. Talk to your OB. This Open Letter to Paul L.P. Brand, MD will be archived for global access in the Google usenet archive. Search http://groups.google.com for "Chiropractic causes apnea in babies?" |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"Joel M. Eichen" wrote in message
... Todd, This is news to everybody. Can you please post at least once or twice per month more? Joel Well, at the very least, 30% more, ought to do it. :-) -- Jacqueline #1 Due late Jul/early Aug |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Homebirth (also: AMA: Is it illegal for OBs to lie?) | Todd Gastaldo | Pregnancy | 1 | March 6th 05 09:18 PM |
Is Gastaldo hurting chiropractic? | Todd Gastaldo | Pregnancy | 3 | October 18th 04 08:03 PM |
Chiro care of baby penises (also: Dr. Poland never sued Dr. Gastaldo) | Todd Gastaldo | Pregnancy | 6 | April 7th 04 04:58 PM |
Strokes in babies! (also: WFC Pres. Paul F. Carey, DC) | Todd Gastaldo | Pregnancy | 0 | January 25th 04 09:00 PM |
Three WFC Council members to help babies? | Todd Gastaldo | Pregnancy | 0 | January 25th 04 12:25 AM |