If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
New "Generation Rx" Documentary Exposes Mass Betrayal of Childrenby FDA, Big Pharma
On Mar 8, 10:19*am, "Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A."
wrote: Ann; I have tried to reason with you, but to no avail. We sure have come afar from the original post, and that's a shame. But our side, the side of honest research, will not be bullied, intimidated or demoralized by the actions of Ann or the other members of her cult. *We will try to reason with them, but so far, that has been a very challenging proposition! Dear Readers, notice how the kooky Cult never addresses the well- documented facts that Jan, Ilena and myself document. *And their little game of accusing us of not stating the evidence. *This is why they are on the rampage of trying to censor us. *This is a direct attack on all people who cherish freedom, liberty, peace and truth. They must not prevail or else ALL MANKIND will perish! Okay - a partial, point by point analysis of J/F/Wh/Fr's pseudo- manic style and veiled manipulation of readers' impression of him that he is some poor, rapid-cycling victim who thus mustn't be contradicted aggressively, lest the respondant be received as insensitive, bulllying, "cultish", mean, or desirous of silencing those who, albeit very carefully ineptly, would present views that differ from some imagined "big pharma" mainstream populace and their even more outlandishly alleged motives be they financial, or - and this is just too cleverly quasi-psychotic on Frag's part - **SINISTER**!! (ie "drugging of children", or perhaps the furthering of some (again, quasi-irrational) deteriorating social mores visavis "victim-, or prozac-, nation" et al): Item 1A: "kooky Cult " Deliberate use of the literary device known as alliteration. Fine for poetry. But a little nuts and a tad self- effacing in the context of a so-called argument. Frag knows it has this effect. He wants to appear almost unhinged and inept. It is a ploy, a ruse. Yes - he is a nutjob, but for his pathetic pass-time of being a troll, not for what he wants folks to think are legitimately held beliefs that are out there, but authentic. They are not authentic. It is all flame-bait and self-amusement. Item 2A: " But our side," Worded deliberately to give the impression of instability or weak thinking. Frag is saying one thing, but his intent is to give the ironic appearance. He know he sounds "out there" with this phaseology - and that is what he wants. Item 2B: "will not be bullied" Different phrase, same motive. The use of "(we) will not be" is delibererately strident and borderline grandiose. Again, it is deliberate - he wants folks to think he's off his nut - a "victim" who should just be left alone on a.s.a-d. Item 2C: "the side of honest research" More of the same. Deliberately simplistically "black versus white", "hero versus villian" mentality. The effect is one of a possible two: that readers see him as endearingly feeble-minded and worthy of pity, not confrontation, or that said readers get the impression of some schizo off of his own lithium who "cannot help himself" and thus shouldn't be "set off" or treated harshly. DELIBERATE, folks. Item 2D: "This is why they are on the rampage of trying to censor us. This is a direct attack on all people who cherish freedom, liberty, peace and truth. They must not prevail or else ALL MANKIND will perish!" Okay - I think you get the point. This last example is one last flourish to finish off a deliberately unhinged presentation, all designed to continue the ruse of a poor pathetic whackjob who should just be left alone to rant on. The near classic (read: *cliche! *) use of "liberty, truth, justice" - and the American way!! - all presented to make him sound like a kook whose views are, although woefully weak in logic and reason, nonetheless authentic. The views are not authentic, and neither is Frag. No "fringe of society" victim is he. Just some pathetic, probably unwillingly single, perhaps unemployed shmo in a garden level studio who cannot afford to go out and acquire the life experiences which might actually contribute to the attainment of the slightest bit of culture, wisdom or class. -stan |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
The "GAME" (was, in part, " New 'Generation Rx' Documentary"...)
But our side, the side of honest research, will not be bullied, intimidated or demoralized by the actions of Ann or the other members of her cult. *We will try to reason with them, but so far, that has been a very challenging proposition! Dear Readers, notice how the kooky Cult never addresses the well- documented facts that Jan, Ilena and myself document. *And their little game of accusing us of not stating the evidence. *This is why they are on the rampage of trying to censor us. *This is a direct attack on all people who cherish freedom, liberty, peace and truth. They must not prevail or else ALL MANKIND will perish! Okay - a partial, point by point analysis of J/F/Wh/Fr's pseudo- manic style and veiled manipulation of readers' impression of him that he is some poor, rapid-cycling victim who thus mustn't be contradicted aggressively, lest the respondant be received as insensitive, bulllying, "cultish", mean, or desirous of silencing those who, albeit very carefully ineptly, would present views that differ from some imagined "big pharma" mainstream populace and their even more outlandishly alleged motives be they financial, or - and this is just too cleverly quasi-psychotic on Frag's part - **SINISTER**!! (ie "drugging of children", or perhaps the furthering of some (again, quasi-irrational) deteriorating social mores visavis "victim-, or prozac-, nation" et al): Item 1A: "kooky Cult " Deliberate use of the literary device known as alliteration. Fine for poetry. But a little nuts and a tad self- effacing in the context of a so-called argument. Frag knows it has this effect. He wants to appear almost unhinged and inept. It is a ploy, a ruse. Yes - he is a nutjob, but for his pathetic pass-time of being a troll, not for what he wants folks to think are legitimately held beliefs that are out there, but authentic. They are not authentic. It is all flame-bait and self-amusement. Item 2A: " But our side," Worded deliberately to give the impression of instability or weak thinking. Frag is saying one thing, but his intent is to give the ironic appearance. He know he sounds "out there" with this phaseology - and that is what he wants. Item 2B: "will not be bullied" Different phrase, same motive. The use of "(we) will not be" is delibererately strident and borderline grandiose. Again, it is deliberate - he wants folks to think he's off his nut - a "victim" who should just be left alone on a.s.a-d. Item 2C: "the side of honest research" More of the same. Deliberately simplistically "black versus white", "hero versus villian" mentality. The effect is one of a possible two: that readers see him as endearingly feeble-minded and worthy of pity, not confrontation, or that said readers get the impression of some schizophrenic (or victim of some other psychotic break) off of his own lithium who "cannot help himself" and thus shouldn't be "set off" or treated harshly. DELIBERATE, folks. Item 2D: "This is why they are on the rampage of trying to censor us. This is a direct attack on all people who cherish freedom, liberty, peace and truth. They must not prevail or else ALL MANKIND will perish!" Okay - I think you get the point. This last example is one last flourish to finish off a deliberately unhinged presentation, all designed to continue the ruse of some hapless victim or poor pathetic whackjob who should just be left alone to rant on - and to deny the reality of a lonely loser who cannot find another way to amuse himself. The near classic (read: *cliche! *) use of "liberty, truth, justice" - and the American way!! - all presented to make him sound like a kook whose views are, although woefully weak in logic and reason, nonetheless authentic. The views are not authentic, and neither is Frag. No "fringe of society" victim is he. Just some pathetic, probably unwillingly single, perhaps unemployed shmo in a garden level studio who cannot afford to dig himself out from under the pizza boxes, ramen noodle wrappers, beer cans and slap mags and actually *go out* and acquire the life experiences which might actually contribute to the attainment of the slightest bit of culture, wisdom or class. -stan |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
New "Generation Rx" Documentary Exposes Mass Betrayal of Children by FDA, Big Pharma
"Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A." expounded:
Ann; I have tried to reason with you, but to no avail. You know no reason. But our side, the side of honest research, will not be bullied, There is no honest research on your side. intimidated or demoralized by the actions of Ann or the other members of her cult. We will try to reason with them, but so far, that has been a very challenging proposition! See above. Dear Readers, notice how the kooky Cult never addresses the well- documented facts that Jan, Ilena and myself document. You have never, ever, once documented anything, never mind facts. And their little game of accusing us of not stating the evidence. There's no game, because you don't state any evidence. This is why they are on the rampage of trying to censor us. No rampage, just letting everyone who doesn't know already (there are still a few) that you're a known liar, deceiver, forger and plagarist. This is a direct attack on all people who cherish freedom, liberty, peace and truth. They must not prevail or else ALL MANKIND will perish! You are such an overblown buffoon it'd be funny if it wasn't so old. -- Proud member WWWSC #2 Formerly known as Ann |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
The "GAME" (was, in part, " New 'Generation Rx'Documentary"...)
Stan, I wish I had the time and inclination to cross-examine your
hair-brain analysis, but that would feed into your delusional sickness, and that would be wrong!! But I will strongly urge you to use you diagnostic skills at something more fruitful, like the over- diagnosis of certain phony spin-dromes. You may find your work much more meaningful and fulfilling if you would chose that course of action. I would love to say it is nice to have you back, but it isn’t. We need people who have a strong moral and ethical code that can help those who are being victimized by Big Pharma and Big Medicine. In fact, we have taken a principled stand to do just that. If we don’t help these victims today, we all may end up in the Gulag tomorrow. These are words to ponder. I do find your very amateurish psychoanalysis amusing to say the least. It is nice to see that at least one member of your Bloc has a sense of humour. Ha-ha! stanw wrote: But our side, the side of honest research, will not be bullied, intimidated or demoralized by the actions of Ann or the other members of her cult. �We will try to reason with them, but so far, that has been a very challenging proposition! Dear Readers, notice how the kooky Cult never addresses the well- documented facts that Jan, Ilena and myself document. �And their little game of accusing us of not stating the evidence. �This is why they are on the rampage of trying to censor us. �This is a direct attack on all people who cherish freedom, liberty, peace and truth. They must not prevail or else ALL MANKIND will perish! Okay - a partial, point by point analysis of J/F/Wh/Fr's pseudo- manic style and veiled manipulation of readers' impression of him that he is some poor, rapid-cycling victim who thus mustn't be contradicted aggressively, lest the respondant be received as insensitive, bulllying, "cultish", mean, or desirous of silencing those who, albeit very carefully ineptly, would present views that differ from some imagined "big pharma" mainstream populace and their even more outlandishly alleged motives be they financial, or - and this is just too cleverly quasi-psychotic on Frag's part - **SINISTER**!! (ie "drugging of children", or perhaps the furthering of some (again, quasi-irrational) deteriorating social mores visavis "victim-, or prozac-, nation" et al): Item 1A: "kooky Cult " Deliberate use of the literary device known as alliteration. Fine for poetry. But a little nuts and a tad self- effacing in the context of a so-called argument. Frag knows it has this effect. He wants to appear almost unhinged and inept. It is a ploy, a ruse. Yes - he is a nutjob, but for his pathetic pass-time of being a troll, not for what he wants folks to think are legitimately held beliefs that are out there, but authentic. They are not authentic. It is all flame-bait and self-amusement. Item 2A: " But our side," Worded deliberately to give the impression of instability or weak thinking. Frag is saying one thing, but his intent is to give the ironic appearance. He know he sounds "out there" with this phaseology - and that is what he wants. Item 2B: "will not be bullied" Different phrase, same motive. The use of "(we) will not be" is delibererately strident and borderline grandiose. Again, it is deliberate - he wants folks to think he's off his nut - a "victim" who should just be left alone on a.s.a-d. Item 2C: "the side of honest research" More of the same. Deliberately simplistically "black versus white", "hero versus villian" mentality. The effect is one of a possible two: that readers see him as endearingly feeble-minded and worthy of pity, not confrontation, or that said readers get the impression of some schizophrenic (or victim of some other psychotic break) off of his own lithium who "cannot help himself" and thus shouldn't be "set off" or treated harshly. DELIBERATE, folks. Item 2D: "This is why they are on the rampage of trying to censor us. This is a direct attack on all people who cherish freedom, liberty, peace and truth. They must not prevail or else ALL MANKIND will perish!" Okay - I think you get the point. This last example is one last flourish to finish off a deliberately unhinged presentation, all designed to continue the ruse of some hapless victim or poor pathetic whackjob who should just be left alone to rant on - and to deny the reality of a lonely loser who cannot find another way to amuse himself. The near classic (read: *cliche! *) use of "liberty, truth, justice" - and the American way!! - all presented to make him sound like a kook whose views are, although woefully weak in logic and reason, nonetheless authentic. The views are not authentic, and neither is Frag. No "fringe of society" victim is he. Just some pathetic, probably unwillingly single, perhaps unemployed shmo in a garden level studio who cannot afford to dig himself out from under the pizza boxes, ramen noodle wrappers, beer cans and slap mags and actually *go out* and acquire the life experiences which might actually contribute to the attainment of the slightest bit of culture, wisdom or class. -stan |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
New "Generation Rx" Documentary Exposes Mass Betrayal of Childrenby FDA, Big Pharma
Ann; I feel your pain, but alas, you have been duped by a one Mr.
Proby. He is very skilled at the Hitlerian-Nixonian tactic of the Big Lie. Your unruly Mob is coming apart at the seams, just as I predicted it would. But these are medical support and information groups, and I have always kept my postings on topics and only very rarely directly accuse anybody of misinformation. But your posts are nothing but that. I will kindly ask you once again to moderate yourself. We cannot afford to scare people off of these newsgroups because you go off half-crazy with phony accusations because your Controller tells you to!! If you knew 1/1000 of what Jan knows or even 1/10000 of what Ilena knows, you would have something to say. But they do real research and they are to be commended for their excellent job and sacrifice to get information out to the public. I hope and pray that deep down you fell the same way. Sir ARtiØ WWWSC #2 wrote: "Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A." expounded: Ann; I have tried to reason with you, but to no avail. You know no reason. But our side, the side of honest research, will not be bullied, There is no honest research on your side. intimidated or demoralized by the actions of Ann or the other members of her cult. We will try to reason with them, but so far, that has been a very challenging proposition! See above. Dear Readers, notice how the kooky Cult never addresses the well- documented facts that Jan, Ilena and myself document. You have never, ever, once documented anything, never mind facts. And their little game of accusing us of not stating the evidence. There's no game, because you don't state any evidence. This is why they are on the rampage of trying to censor us. No rampage, just letting everyone who doesn't know already (there are still a few) that you're a known liar, deceiver, forger and plagarist. This is a direct attack on all people who cherish freedom, liberty, peace and truth. They must not prevail or else ALL MANKIND will perish! You are such an overblown buffoon it'd be funny if it wasn't so old. -- Proud member WWWSC #2 Formerly known as Ann |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
New "Generation Rx" Documentary Exposes Mass Betrayal of Children by FDA, Big Pharma
"Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A." expounded:
Ann; I feel your pain, I am in no pain, fArty. Hold your arms out straight from your body, fArty, it'll make it harder to get the net over you. -- Proud member WWWSC #2 Formerly known as Ann |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
New "Generation Rx" Documentary Exposes Mass Betrayal of Children by FDA, Big Pharma
"stanw" expounded: [ ] |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
New "Generation Rx" Documentary Exposes Mass Betrayal of Children by FDA, Big Pharma
"stanw" wrote [ ] |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
New "Generation Rx" Documentary Exposes Mass Betrayal of Childrenby FDA, Big Pharma
On Mar 9, 8:54*pm, "Jan Drew" wrote:
"stanw" expounded: * [ * *] Your smartest and most eloquent post yet. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
New "Generation Rx" Documentary Exposes Mass Betrayal of Children by FDA, Big Pharma
"stanw" wrote in message ... On Mar 9, 8:54 pm, "Jan Drew" wrote: "stanw" expounded: [ ] Your smartest and most eloquent post yet. No, this one was: "Jan Drew" wrote in message t... " wrote in message ... On Mar 5, 10:08 pm, terrym2442 wrote: Hi, Just checking in- I see Mark is still here (hi) but is Nancy? I guess there's still the old feuding going on here? : ( Terry www.addconsults.comwww.myADDstore.com You rang? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative From: "M,a,r,k P,r,o,b,e,r,t-September 7, 2004" M,a,r,k P,r,o,b,e,r,t Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative From: "M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-July 10, 2004" M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t From: M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-April 30, 2004 ) What say about that stan?? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|