If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#251
|
|||
|
|||
WHAT IS CHILD SUPPORT FOR
"JD Hoeye" wrote in message ... PapaPolarbear stated non-coprehension: I don't see how CS, the financial or parental responsibilities, have anything to do with marriage. Papa whether they do or not depends on ones position at to whether: genital sexual contact, fathering/mothering, parenting and supporting a child are activities properly reserved to, the product of, a marrage; wherein the marrage is pre-requisite thereto. if so, then they have everything to do with marrage. if not, then they have nothing specificly connecting them with marrage. to be specific however, financial/parental responsibilities have everything to do with marrage so long as the marrage exists as a functioning entity... and nothing to do with it once the functionality of a marrage ceases since at that point the marrage no longer exists no matter any legal state of existence applies or not. therefore, CS, financial or parental responsibilities do exist apart and independent of the existance of a marrage... a contradiction which appears to exist in spite of, and in the face of, all natural laws of nature and the almighty to the contrary because the civilized, modern, culture, of man presumes and has seen fit to superceed thier's with our own laws. IMHO, that is. Um, ya... Ok.. Child Support should not be factored based on the existance or non-existance of a marriage to the CP. The laws around CS should be severed and separate from this intracacies of a divorce. I don't think you're disagreeing with this. but whatever you just said was neither an argument or clarifying statement. Papa |
#252
|
|||
|
|||
WHAT IS CHILD SUPPORT FOR
"JD Hoeye" wrote in message ... PapaPolarbear stated non-coprehension: I don't see how CS, the financial or parental responsibilities, have anything to do with marriage. Papa whether they do or not depends on ones position at to whether: genital sexual contact, fathering/mothering, parenting and supporting a child are activities properly reserved to, the product of, a marrage; wherein the marrage is pre-requisite thereto. if so, then they have everything to do with marrage. if not, then they have nothing specificly connecting them with marrage. to be specific however, financial/parental responsibilities have everything to do with marrage so long as the marrage exists as a functioning entity... and nothing to do with it once the functionality of a marrage ceases since at that point the marrage no longer exists no matter any legal state of existence applies or not. therefore, CS, financial or parental responsibilities do exist apart and independent of the existance of a marrage... a contradiction which appears to exist in spite of, and in the face of, all natural laws of nature and the almighty to the contrary because the civilized, modern, culture, of man presumes and has seen fit to superceed thier's with our own laws. IMHO, that is. Um, ya... Ok.. Child Support should not be factored based on the existance or non-existance of a marriage to the CP. The laws around CS should be severed and separate from this intracacies of a divorce. I don't think you're disagreeing with this. but whatever you just said was neither an argument or clarifying statement. Papa |
#253
|
|||
|
|||
WHAT IS CHILD SUPPORT FOR
"JD Hoeye" wrote in message ... PapaPolarbear stated non-coprehension: I don't see how CS, the financial or parental responsibilities, have anything to do with marriage. Papa whether they do or not depends on ones position at to whether: genital sexual contact, fathering/mothering, parenting and supporting a child are activities properly reserved to, the product of, a marrage; wherein the marrage is pre-requisite thereto. if so, then they have everything to do with marrage. if not, then they have nothing specificly connecting them with marrage. to be specific however, financial/parental responsibilities have everything to do with marrage so long as the marrage exists as a functioning entity... and nothing to do with it once the functionality of a marrage ceases since at that point the marrage no longer exists no matter any legal state of existence applies or not. therefore, CS, financial or parental responsibilities do exist apart and independent of the existance of a marrage... a contradiction which appears to exist in spite of, and in the face of, all natural laws of nature and the almighty to the contrary because the civilized, modern, culture, of man presumes and has seen fit to superceed thier's with our own laws. IMHO, that is. Um, ya... Ok.. Child Support should not be factored based on the existance or non-existance of a marriage to the CP. The laws around CS should be severed and separate from this intracacies of a divorce. I don't think you're disagreeing with this. but whatever you just said was neither an argument or clarifying statement. Papa |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How Children REALLY React To Control | Chris | General | 444 | July 20th 04 07:14 PM |
Various MD crimes (obvious ones) | Todd Gastaldo | Pregnancy | 0 | May 17th 04 04:48 PM |
Dennis was U.N. rules Canada should ban spanking | Kane | Spanking | 63 | November 17th 03 10:12 PM |
| Ex Giants player sentenced-DYFS wrkr no harm noticed | Kane | Foster Parents | 10 | September 16th 03 11:59 AM |